Cited by 432Multi-Criteria Decision MakingBIM and Construction IntegrationSustainable Building Design and Assessment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Application of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in multi-criteria analysis of the selection of intelligent building systems

Wong, Johnny K.W., Li, Heng·2008·Building and Environment

DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.11.019

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.11.019

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory With the Analytic Hierarchy Process
Saaty, T. L. (2000) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,649
Application of the AHP in project management
Al‐Harbi, K. M. A. (2001) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/s0263-7863(99)00038-1 · Cited by 1,141
Feature deduction and ensemble design of intrusion detection systems
Chebrolu, S., Abraham, A., & Thomas, J. P. (2004) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2004.09.008 · Cited by 608
Intelligent building research: a review
Wong, J. K. W., Li, H., & Wang, S. (2004) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2004.06.001 · Cited by 412
Self-citation
Final contractor selection using the analytical hierarchy process
Fong, P. S. W., & Choi, S. K.-Y. (2000) · Construction Management and Economics · doi:10.1080/014461900407356 · Cited by 335
Construction Partnering Process and Associated Critical Success Factors: Quantitative Investigation
Cheng, E. W. L., & Li, H. (2002) · Journal of Management in Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)0742-597x(2002)18:4(194 · Cited by 319
Self-citation
Evaluation of Advanced Construction Technology with AHP Method
Skibniewski, M. J., & Chao, L. (1992) · Journal of Construction Engineering and Management · doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9364(1992)118:3(577 · Cited by 244
An application of quality function deployment to improve the quality of teaching
Lam, K., & Zhao, X. (1998) · International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management · doi:10.1108/02656719810196351 · Cited by 238
An analytical hierarchy process based procurement selection method
Cheung, S. O., Lam, T.-I., Leung, M., & Wan, Y.-W. (2001) · Construction Management and Economics · doi:10.1080/014461901300132401 · Cited by 166
Industry-centric benchmarking of information technology benefits, costs and risks for small-to-medium sized enterprises in construction
Love, P. E. D., Irani, Z., & Edwards, D. J. (2004) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2004.02.002 · Cited by 145

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 38 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

Smith S. The use of quality functional deployment in the design of the office of the future. In: Proceedings of the second international conference on construction management, Sydney; 1999. p. 146–55.
Trankler HR, Kanoun O. Sensor systems in intelligent buildings. In: Gassmann O, Meixner H, editors. Hesse J., Gardner JW, Gopel W, series editors. Sensor application, vol. 2: Sensors in Intelligent Buildings; 2001.
Sobchak, 2003, Upping a building's IQ, Building, 53, 52

Sorted by citations

Multiple criteria decision-making techniques and their applications – a review of the literature from 2000 to 2014
Mardani, A., Jusoh, A., Nor, K. M., Khalifah, Z., Zakwan, N. M., & Valipour, A. (2015) · Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja · doi:10.1080/1331677x.2015.1075139 · Cited by 1,223
The analytic hierarchy process and analytic network process: an overview of applications
Sipahi, S., & Timor, M. (2010) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/00251741011043920 · Cited by 602
Multi-criteria evaluation model for the selection of sustainable materials for building projects
Akadiri, P. O., Olomolaiye, P. O., & Chinyio, E. (2012) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2012.10.004 · Cited by 389
Key performance indicators (KPIs) and priority setting in using the multi-attribute approach for assessing sustainable intelligent buildings
AlWaer, H., & Clements-Croome, D. J. (2009) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.08.019 · Cited by 359
Urban sustainability assessment framework development: The ranking and weighting of sustainability indicators using analytic hierarchy process
Ameen, R. F. M., & Mourshed, M. M. (2018) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2018.10.020 · Cited by 278
Green decoration materials selection under interior environment characteristics: A grey-correlation based hybrid MCDM method
Tian, G., Zhang, H., Feng, Y., Wang, D., Peng, Y. L., & Jia, H. (2017) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.08.050 · Cited by 267
Greening smart cities: An investigation of the integration of urban natural resources and smart city technologies for promoting environmental sustainability
Hui, C. X., Dan, G., Alamri, S., & Toghraie, D. S. (2023) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2023.104985 · Cited by 288
Estimation and Minimization of Embodied Carbon of Buildings: A Review
Akbarnezhad, A., & Xiao, J. (2017) · Buildings · doi:10.3390/buildings7010005 · Cited by 284
Rank of green building material criteria based on the three pillars of sustainability using the hybrid multi criteria decision making method
Khoshnava, S. M., Rostami, R., Valipour, A., Ismail, M., & Rahmat, A. R. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.066 · Cited by 202
Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis in building performance simulation for decision support and design optimization
Hopfe, C. J. (2009) · TU/e Research Portal · doi:10.6100/ir643321 · Cited by 206
Development of sustainable assessment criteria for building materials selection
Akadiri, P. O., & Olomolaiye, P. O. (2012) · Engineering Construction & Architectural Management · doi:10.1108/09699981211277568 · Cited by 182
Cognitive Dissonance in Technology Adoption: A Study of Smart Home Users
Marikyan, D., Papagiannidis, S., & Alamanos, E. (2020) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-020-10042-3 · Cited by 189
MAINTENANCE STRATEGY SELECTION USING AHP AND COPRAS UNDER FUZZY ENVIRONMENT / PRIEŽIŪROS STRATEGIJOS PARINKIMAS TAIKANT AHP IR COPRAS METODUS NEAPIBRĖŽTOSE SITUACIJOSE
Fouladgar, M. M., Yazdani–Chamzini, A., Lashgari, A., Zavadskas, E. K., & Turskis, Z. (2012) · International Journal of Strategic Property Management · doi:10.3846/1648715x.2012.666657 · Cited by 170
A knowledge-based risk management tool for construction projects using case-based reasoning
Okudan, O., Budayan, C., & Dikmen, İ. (2021) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2021.114776 · Cited by 162
Decision support methodologies on the energy efficiency and energy management in buildings
Kolokotsa, D. D., Diakaki, C., Grigoroudis, E., Stavrakakis, G. M., & Kalaitzakis, K. C. (2009) · Advances in Building Energy Research · doi:10.3763/aber.2009.0305 · Cited by 160
Multi-criteria decision making under uncertainty in building performance assessment
Hopfe, C. J., Augenbroe, G., & Hensen, J. J. (2013) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.07.019 · Cited by 157
Machine learning modelling for predicting non-domestic buildings energy performance: A model to support deep energy retrofit decision-making
Seyedzadeh, S., Rahimian, F. P., Oliver, S., Rodríguez, S., & Glesk, I. (2020) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115908 · Cited by 163
Analysing Stakeholder Consensus for a Sustainable Transport Development Decision by the Fuzzy AHP and Interval AHP
Moslem, S., Ghorbanzadeh, O., Blaschke, T., & Duleba, S. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11123271 · Cited by 152
Designing predictive maintenance systems using decision tree-based machine learning techniques
Kaparthi, S., & Bumblauskas, D. (2020) · International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management · doi:10.1108/ijqrm-04-2019-0131 · Cited by 158
The essence of future smart houses: From embedding ICT to adapting to sustainability principles
Ghaffarianhoseini, A., Dahlan, N. D., Berardi, U., GhaffarianHoseini, A., & Makaremi, N. (2013) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.02.032 · Cited by 143
A multi-criteria decision-making framework for selecting a suitable maintenance strategy for public buildings using sustainability criteria
Ighravwe, D. E., & Oke, S. A. (2019) · Journal of Building Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100753 · Cited by 143
Development of a multi-criteria approach for the selection of sustainable materials for building projects
Akadiri, P. O. (2011) · OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique) · Cited by 142
Assessment of priority alternatives for preservation of historic buildings using model based on ARAS and AHP methods
Kutut, V., Zavadskas, E. K., & Lazauskas, M. (2013) · Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.acme.2013.10.007 · Cited by 137
Factors Affecting Entrepreneurship and Business Sustainability
Porcar, A. M. T., Roig‐Tierno, N., & Mestre, A. L. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10020452 · Cited by 137
Developing weighting system for refurbishment building assessment scheme in Malaysia through analytic hierarchy process (AHP) approach
Kamaruzzaman, S. N., Lou, E. C. W., Wong, P. F., Wood, F. R., & Ani, A. I. C. (2017) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2017.10.023 · Cited by 130
Fuzzy AHP based prioritization and taxonomy of software process improvement success factors in global software development
Khan, A. A., Shameem, M., Kumar, R. R., Hussain, S., & Yan, X. (2019) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105648 · Cited by 126
A decision-making model for selecting the most appropriate natural fiber – Polypropylene-based composites for automotive applications
AL-Oqla, F. M., Sapuan, S. M., Ishak, M. R., & Nuraini, A. A. (2015) · Journal of Composite Materials · doi:10.1177/0021998315577233 · Cited by 123
Multi-criteria evaluation for the optimal adoption of distributed residential energy systems in Japan
Ren, H., Gao, W., Zhou, W., & Nakagami, K. (2009) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.08.014 · Cited by 123
Predicting the potential of agro waste fibers for sustainable automotive industry using a decision making model
AL-Oqla, F. M., Sapuan, S. M., Ishak, M. R., & Nuraini, A. A. (2015) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2015.01.011 · Cited by 117
Bidding strategy to support decision-making by integrating fuzzy AHP and regression-based simulation
Chou, J., Pham, A., & Wang, H. (2013) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2013.06.007 · Cited by 113
A multi-criteria approach toward discovering killer IoT application in Korea
Kim, S., & Kim, S. (2015) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2015.05.007 · Cited by 108
Eco-environmental quality assessment based on pressure-state-response framework by remote sensing and GIS
Boori, M. S., Choudhary, K., Александрович, П. Р., & Kupriyanov, A. V. (2021) · Remote Sensing Applications Society and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rsase.2021.100530 · Cited by 106
Consensus-based decision support for multicriteria group decision making
Wibowo, S., & Deng, H. (2013) · Computers & Industrial Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cie.2013.09.015 · Cited by 104
A method to assess lighting quality in educational rooms using analytic hierarchy process
Leccese, F., Salvadori, G., Rocca, M., Buratti, C., & Belloni, E. (2019) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106501 · Cited by 104
Optimal site selection for a solar power plant in Iran via the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)
Ahadi, P., Fakhrabadi, F., Pourshaghaghy, A., & Kowsary, F. (2023) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2023.118944 · Cited by 99
Commuters’ Perception towards Transfer Facility Attributes in and Around Metro Stations: Experience in Kolkata
Sadhukhan, S., Banerjee, U. K., & Maitra, B. (2014) · Journal of Urban Planning and Development · doi:10.1061/(asce)up.1943-5444.0000243 · Cited by 94
Integrated sustainability assessment method applied to structural concrete columns
Pons, O., & de la Fuente, A. (2013) · Construction and Building Materials · doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.09.009 · Cited by 92
Developing a decision support system for sustainable cage aquaculture
Halide, H., Stigebrandt, A., Rehbein, M., & McKinnon, A. D. (2008) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2008.10.013 · Cited by 91
A state-of-the-art review on artificial intelligence for Smart Buildings
Panchalingam, R., & Chan, K. C. (2019) · Intelligent Buildings International · doi:10.1080/17508975.2019.1613219 · Cited by 90
Agile trends in Chinese global software development industry: Fuzzy AHP based conceptual mapping
Khan, A. A., Shameem, M., Nadeem, M., & Akbar, M. A. (2021) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107090 · Cited by 89
Prioritizing the factors for coordinated supply chain using analytic hierarchy process (AHP)
Singh, R. K. (2013) · Measuring Business Excellence · doi:10.1108/13683041311311383 · Cited by 88
Stakeholders' perspectives on green building rating: A case study in Indonesia
Berawi, M. A., Miraj, P., Windrayani, R., & Berawi, A. R. B. (2019) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01328 · Cited by 82
BIM-enabled sustainability assessment of material supply decisions
Fini, A. A. F., Rashidi, T. H., Akbarnezhad, A., & Waller, S. T. (2017) · Engineering Construction & Architectural Management · doi:10.1108/ecam-12-2015-0193 · Cited by 82
A decision model for evaluating third-party logistics providers using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process
Soh, S. (2010) · Global Journal of Business Management · doi:10.5897/ajbm.9000012 · Cited by 81
Priority Assessment of Investment in Development of Nanotechnology in Upstream Petroleum Industry
Pourafshary, P., Azimpour, S. S., Motamedi, P., Samet, M., Taheri, S. A., Bargozin, H., & Hendi, S. S. (2009) · SPE Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Annual Technical Symposium and Exhibition · doi:10.2118/126101-ms · Cited by 80
Offshore wind power plant site selection using Analytical Hierarchy Process for Northwest Turkey
Caceoğlu, E., Yıldız, H. K., Oğuz, E., Huvaj, N., & Guerrero, J. M. (2022) · Ocean Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111178 · Cited by 78
Use of the AHP methodology in system dynamics: Modelling and simulation for health technology assessments to determine the correct prosthesis choice for hernia diseases
Improta, G., Russo, M. A., Triassi, M., Converso, G., Murino, T., & Santillo, L. C. (2018) · Mathematical Biosciences · doi:10.1016/j.mbs.2018.03.004 · Cited by 80
Evaluation of Delay Causes for BOT Projects Based on Perceptions of Different Stakeholders in Turkey
Budayan, C. (2018) · Journal of Management in Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000668 · Cited by 75
Taxonomical classification of barriers for scaling agile methods in global software development environment using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process
Shameem, M., Kumar, R. R., Nadeem, M., & Khan, A. A. (2020) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106122 · Cited by 75
A Fuzzy-AHP based prioritization of trust criteria in fog computing services
Ogundoyin, S. O., & Kamil, I. A. (2020) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106789 · Cited by 73
Comparison of passive house construction types using analytic hierarchy process
Kuzman, M. K., Grošelj, P., Ayrılmış, N., & Zbašnik-Senegačnik, M. (2013) · Energy and Buildings · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.05.020 · Cited by 73
Identification and prioritization of barriers to total quality management implementation in service industry
Talib, F., & Rahman, Z. (2015) · The TQM Journal · doi:10.1108/tqm-11-2013-0122 · Cited by 73
A Simplified Method for Evaluating Building Sustainability in the Early Design Phase for Architects
Markelj, J., Kuzman, M. K., Grošelj, P., & Zbašnik-Senegačnik, M. (2014) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su6128775 · Cited by 71
A method for evaluating the performance of green buildings with a focus on user experience
Kim, M. J., Oh, M. W., & Kim, J. T. (2013) · Energy and Buildings · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.07.049 · Cited by 71
Polymer Selection Approach for Commonly and Uncommonly Used Natural Fibers Under Uncertainty Environments
AL-Oqla, F. M., & Sapuan, S. M. (2015) · JOM · doi:10.1007/s11837-015-1548-8 · Cited by 69
A hybrid IT framework for identifying high-quality physicians using big data analytics
Ye, Y., Zhao, Y., Shang, J. S., & Zhang, L. (2019) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.005 · Cited by 65
A novel fuzzy integrated MCDM model for optimal selection of waste-to-energy-based-distributed generation under uncertainty: A case of the City of Cape Town, South Africa
Alao, M. A., Popoola, O., & Ayodele, T. R. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130824 · Cited by 64
A COMPARISON OF FUZZY MULTICRITERIA DECISION MAKING METHODS FOR INTELLIGENT BUILDING ASSESSMENT
Kaya, İ., & Kahraman, C. (2014) · Journal of Civil Engineering and Management · doi:10.3846/13923730.2013.801906 · Cited by 63
A trust management system for fog computing services
Ogundoyin, S. O., & Kamil, I. A. (2021) · Internet of Things · doi:10.1016/j.iot.2021.100382 · Cited by 62
The Analytical Hierarchy Process for contaminated land management
Bello-Dambatta, A., Farmani, R., Javadi, A. A., & Evans, B. M. (2009) · Advanced Engineering Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.aei.2009.06.006 · Cited by 62
Identification and selection of building façade's smart materials according to sustainable development goals
Balali, A., & Valipour, A. (2020) · Sustainable materials and technologies · doi:10.1016/j.susmat.2020.e00213 · Cited by 61
Prioritization of manufacturing sectors in Serbia for energy management improvement – AHP method
Jovanović, B., Filipović, J., & Bakić, V. V. (2015) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2015.03.107 · Cited by 59
Product-cost modelling approach for the development of a decision support system for optimal roofing material selection
Rahman, S. M., Odeyinka, H. A., Perera, S., & Bi, Y. (2012) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2012.01.010 · Cited by 57
Optimized AHP to Overcome Limits in Weight Calculation: Building Performance Application
Sangiorgio, V., Uva, G., & Fatiguso, F. (2017) · Journal of Construction Engineering and Management · doi:10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001418 · Cited by 57
Scientometric mapping of smart building research: Towards a framework of human-cyber-physical system (HCPS)
Li, P., Lu, Y., Yan, D., Xiao, J., & Wu, H. (2021) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103776 · Cited by 56
A decision-making model for supporting selection of green building materials
Al-Atesh, E. A. A., Rahmawati, Y., Zawawi, N. A. W. A., & Utomo, C. (2021) · International Journal of Construction Management · doi:10.1080/15623599.2021.1944548 · Cited by 56
Analysing the factors affecting the selection of ERP package: a fuzzy AHP approach
Bhatt, N., Guru, S., Thanki, S. J., & Sood, G. (2021) · Information Systems and e-Business Management · doi:10.1007/s10257-021-00521-8 · Cited by 55
Augmented reality based - decision making (AR-DM) to support multi-criteria analysis in constructions
Sangiorgio, V., Martiradonna, S., Fatiguso, F., & Lombillo, I. (2021) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103567 · Cited by 55
Multicriteria decision‐making taxonomy for DevOps challenging factors using analytical hierarchy process
Khan, A. A., & Shameem, M. (2020) · Journal of Software Evolution and Process · doi:10.1002/smr.2263 · Cited by 56
Proposal of an indicator-based sustainability assessment framework for the mining sector of APEC economies
Bui, N. T., Kawamura, A., Kim, K., Prathumratana, L., Kim, T.-H., Yoon, S.-H., Jang, M., AMAGUCHI, H., Bui, D. D., & Truong, N. T. (2017) · Resources Policy · doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2017.05.005 · Cited by 54
Modeling the environmental sustainability of timber structures: A case study
Zubizarreta, M., Cuadrado, J., Orbe, A., & García, H. (2019) · Environmental Impact Assessment Review · doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2019.106286 · Cited by 54
Analytic hierarchy process application in selecting the mode of transport for a logistics company
Kumru, M., & Yıldız, P. (2013) · Journal of Advanced Transportation · doi:10.1002/atr.1240 · Cited by 52
Prioritization based taxonomy of DevOps security challenges using PROMETHEE
Rafi, S., Yu, W., Akbar, M. A., Alsanad, A., & Gumaei, A. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2998819 · Cited by 50
Multi‐criteria decision analysis in building maintainability using analytical hierarchy process
Das, S., Chew, M. Y. L., & Poh, K. L. (2010) · Construction Management and Economics · doi:10.1080/01446193.2010.501806 · Cited by 51
Sustainability assessment framework for low rise commercial buildings: life cycle impact index-based approach
AL-Nassar, F., Ruparathna, R., Chhipi‐Shrestha, G., Haider, H., Hewage, K., & Sadiq, R. (2016) · Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy · doi:10.1007/s10098-016-1168-1 · Cited by 51
Stakeholder participation in prioritizing sustainability issues at regional level using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) technique: A case study of Goa, India
Kwatra, S., Kumar, A., Sharma, S., & Sharma, P. (2021) · Environmental and Sustainability Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.indic.2021.100116 · Cited by 51
Gap theory based post-occupancy evaluation (GTbPOE) of dormitory building performance: A case study and a comparative analysis
Hou, H. C., Lai, J. H. K., & Edwards, D. J. (2020) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107312 · Cited by 50
Ventilation impacts on infection risk mitigation, improvement of environmental quality and energy efficiency for subway carriages
Ren, C., Chen, H., Wang, J., Feng, Z., & Cao, S. (2022) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109358 · Cited by 48
Multi-criteria assessment of combined cooling, heating and power systems located in different regions in Japan
Wu, Q., Ren, H., Gao, W., & Ren, J. (2014) · Applied Thermal Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2014.08.020 · Cited by 48
The use of a mathematical multicriteria decision-making model for selecting the fire origin room
Tavares, R. M., Tavares, J. M. L., & Parry-Jones, S. L. (2007) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2007.12.010 · Cited by 48
Modelling of linguistic variables in multicriteria energy policy support
Doukas, H. (2012) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2012.11.026 · Cited by 48
An investigation of indicators for measuring sustainable manufacturing
Fan, C., Carrell, J., & Zhang, H. (2010) · IEEE International Symposium on Sustainable Systems and Technology · doi:10.1109/issst.2010.5507764 · Cited by 47
Sun, sea and shrines: Application of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to assess the attractiveness of six cultural heritage sites in Phuket: Thailand
Božić, S., Vujičić, M. D., Kennell, J. S., Besermenji, S., & Solarević, M. (2018) · Geographica Pannonica · doi:10.5937/22-16983 · Cited by 47
An Efficient Design Support System based on Automatic Rule Checking and Case-based Reasoning
Lee, P., Lo, T., Tian, M.-Y., & Long, D. (2019) · KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12205-019-1750-2 · Cited by 47
Prioritizing key attributes influencing electric two-wheeler usage: A multi criteria decision making (MCDM) approach – A case study of Hyderabad, India
Patil, M., & Majumdar, B. B. (2021) · Case Studies on Transport Policy · doi:10.1016/j.cstp.2021.04.011 · Cited by 46
Smart retrofitting for existing buildings: State of the art and future research directions
Peiris, S., Lai, J. H. K., Kumaraswamy, M. M., & Hou, H. C. (2023) · Journal of Building Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107354 · Cited by 46
Implementation of Adjusted Fuzzy AHP Method in the Assessment for Reuse of Industrial Buildings
Milošević, D. M., Milošević, M. R., & Simjanovic, D. (2020) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math8101697 · Cited by 46
Sustainability Assessment of Modern High-Rise Timber Buildings
Tūpėnaitė, L., Žilėnaitė, V., Kanapeckienė, L., Gečys, T., & Geipele, I. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13168719 · Cited by 46
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Identification and prioritization of DevOps success factors using fuzzy-AHP approach
Akbar, M. A., Mahmood, S., Shafiq, M., Alsanad, A., Alsanad, A. A., & Gumaei, A. (2020) · Soft Computing · doi:10.1007/s00500-020-05150-w · Cited by 46
Retracted
Factors influencing the adoption of passive exoskeletons in the construction industry: Industry perspectives
Gonsalves, N. J., Akanmu, A. A., Shojaei, A., & Agee, P. R. (2024) · International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2024.103549 · Cited by 45
Selection of ERP suppliers using AHP tools in the clothing industry
Ünal, C., & Güner, M. (2009) · International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology · doi:10.1108/09556220910959990 · Cited by 45
Sustainable Decision-Making in Road Development: Analysis of Road Preservation Policies
Ruiz, A., & Guevara, J. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12030872 · Cited by 45
The development of sustainable assessment method for Saudi Arabia built environment: weighting system
Alyami, S. H., Rezgui, Y., & Kwan, A. S. K. (2014) · Sustainability Science · doi:10.1007/s11625-014-0252-x · Cited by 44
Requirement change management challenges in GSD: An analytical hierarchy process approach
Akbar, M. A., Khan, A. A., Khan, A. W., & Mahmood, S. (2020) · Journal of Software Evolution and Process · doi:10.1002/smr.2246 · Cited by 44
An expert-based model for selecting the most suitable substrate material type for antenna circuits
AL-Oqla, F. M., & Omar, A. A. (2014) · International Journal of Electronics · doi:10.1080/00207217.2014.961041 · Cited by 43
Prioritizing Metro Service Quality Attributes to Enhance Commuter Experience: TOPSIS Ranking and Importance Satisfaction Analysis Methods
Majumdar, B. B., Dissanayake, D. A., Rajput, A. S., Saw, Y. Q., & Sahu, P. K. (2020) · Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board · doi:10.1177/0361198120917972 · Cited by 43
A cost-benefit analysis of applying urban agriculture in sustainable park design
Hosseinpour, N., Kazemi, F., & Mahdizadeh, H. (2021) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105834 · Cited by 43
A Fuzzy AHP-based approach for prioritization of cost overhead factors in agile software development
Saeed, S. A., Khan, S. U. R., & Mashkoor, A. (2022) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2022.109977 · Cited by 42
Identification of factors influencing bicycling in small sized cities: A case study of Kharagpur, India
Majumdar, B. B., & Mitra, S. (2014) · Case Studies on Transport Policy · doi:10.1016/j.cstp.2014.09.002 · Cited by 42
Oleaginous feedstocks for hydro-processed esters and fatty acids (HEFA) biojet production in southeastern Brazil: A multi-criteria decision analysis
de Souza, L. M., Mendes, P. A. S., & Aranda, D. A. G. (2019) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2019.10.125 · Cited by 43

Authors: Wong, J. K. W., & Li, H.
Affiliations: Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
Corresponding author: Wong, Johnny K.W.
ORCID: Wong, Johnny K.W.
Li, Heng
Venue: Building and Environment
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Published: 2008-01
Volume: 43
Issue: 1
Pages: 108-125
ISSN: 0360-1323 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.11.019
OpenAlex: W2016714167
Cited by: 432
References: 38
Citations by year: 2026: 10 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 13
FWCI: 18.65
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations: Building and Environment (publishedVersion)
PolyU Institutional Research Archive (Hong Kong Polytechnic University) (submittedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › BIM and Construction Integration
Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
Keywords: smart buildings, selection criteria, analytic hierarchy process, multi-criteria decision making, criteria weighting, work efficiency, user comfort, cost-effectiveness, reliability, operation and maintenance costs, expert survey

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Application of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in multi-criteria analysis of the selection of intelligent building systems

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks