Cited by 28Building Energy and Comfort OptimizationUrban Heat Island MitigationThermoregulation and physiological responses

Development of thermal discernment among visitors: Results from a field study in the Hermitage Amsterdam

Open access
Mishra, A.K., Kramer, R.P., Loomans, M.G.L.C., Schellen, H.L.·2016·Building and Environment

Abstract

Building energy and occupant health concerns have increased the desire for variable, dynamic indoors and hence the interest in comfort of non-uniform and/or transient thermal conditions. An extended thermal comfort field study in the Hermitage Amsterdam museum afforded a unique opportunity to analyse evolving subjective perception of occupants, upon their moving indoors, over the time they spent in the museum. Visitors’ responses were grouped depending on how long they had been inside when they filled up the survey. The mean thermal sensation vote of each time group bore a strong correlation with their average time duration. For visitors who had been inside for 20 min or less, the thermal sensation vote had a significant relation with the outdoor temperature but not the indoor temperature. As visitors spent longer indoors, percentage of them feeling warm decreased and percentage of neutral or cool feeling increased. In tandem, the percentage of visitors preferring to be warmer also increased with time. Gender based differences in thermal sensation and preference also had a gradual and logical evolution with time. In an evidence of alliesthesial response, all the visitors inside for 20 min or less, accepted their thermal environment. The overall evidence suggests that visitor’s subjective perception of the thermal environment undergoes a distinct evolution during their first hour indoors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.05.026

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • After entering the museum, most people felt warm due to the warm outdoor conditions and perceived the cool indoor conditions as comfortable, but as visitors were longer in the museum, they gradually started feeling cooler and more uncomfortable.

    “After entering the museum, most people felt warm due to the warm outdoor conditions and perceived the cool indoor conditions as comfortable, but as visitors were longer in the museum, they gradually started feeling cooler and more uncomfortable.”
  • For visitors who had been inside a museum conditioned at approximately 21°C for 20 min or less, the thermal sensation vote had a significant relation with the outdoor temperature but not the indoor temperature.

    “For visitors who had been inside for 20 min or less, the thermal sensation vote had a significant relation with the outdoor temperature but not the indoor temperature.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 38 · Cited by 28

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. A. Potvin, Assessing the microclimate of urban transitional spaces, Proc. Pas- sive Low. Energy Archit. (2000) 581e586.
  2. A.G. Kwok, Thermal comfort in tropical classrooms, ASHRAE Trans. 104 (1) (1998) 1031e1050.

Authors
Mishra, A. K., Kramer, R. P., Loomans, M. G. L. C., & Schellen, H. L.
Affiliations
Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
Corresponding author
Mishra, A.K.
Venue
Building and Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-08
Volume
105
Pages
40-49
ISSN
0360-1323 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2397658770
Cited by
28
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3
FWCI
4.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Building and Environment (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Dutch Technology Foundation (11854)
  • Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research
  • Ministry of Economic Affairs
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Heat Island Mitigation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Thermoregulation and physiological responses
Keywords
thermal comfort, thermal sensation, thermal preference, museum visitors, thermal transients, outdoor temperature, gender differences, occupant thermal perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review