Cited by 88Social Robot Interaction and HRIArtificial Intelligence in EducationIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning

Artificial intelligence-based robots in education: A systematic review of selected SSCI publications

Open access
Chu, Shih-Ting, Hwang, Gwo-Jen, Tu, Yun-Fang·2022·Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

With the rapid development of artificial intelligence, the application of AI robots (Artificial Intelligence-based robots) for instruction has become an attractive research topic. Numerous studies have shown that AI robots may provide new opportunities for learning designs in school settings or professional training. However, there is no review examining the role and research foci of AI-Robots in Education (AIRE) research. This study therefore explored the research trends of AIRE by conducting a systematic review of SSCI (Social Sciences Citation Index) journal articles published in the Web of Science (WoS). The study analyzed the participants, duration of the studies, learning environments, application domains, data analysis, evaluations of learners' performance, learning strategies, roles of AI-robots, and research issues. The research findings are concluded as follows: (1) The countries of Canada, Chile, and South Korea invested in AIRE research early, and focused on students' learning performance and learning behavior. (2) Most AIRE research focuses on research targets under the age of 13 and completed experiments within 4 weeks in a physical environment. Most AIRE research has been applied in the disciplines of Language and Science, and problem-solving related strategies and mixed strategies are the most commonly used strategies. (3) AI-robots are often applied and regarded as tutees or tutors. Regardless of what the AI-robot's role is, learning performance is the most widely focused variable in AIRE research. Furthermore, attitudes, opinions of learners or learning perceptions and learning behavior are other frequently discussed themes. To sum up, this study makes several recommendations for AIRE research for educators, researchers, and policy makers in higher education settings as a reference based on the results.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100091

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The existing body of research predominantly focuses on adult learners in higher education, leaving a significant gap in understanding AI's impact on younger learners in K-12 settings, particularly in the EFL context.

    “However, the existing body of research predominantly focuses on adult learners in higher education, leaving a significant gap in understanding AI's impact on younger learners in K-12 settings, particularly in the English as a Foreign Language (EFL) context.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chu, S.-T., Hwang, G.-J., & Tu, Y.-F.
Affiliations
  • National Taiwan University of Science and Technology (TW)
  • Fu Jen Catholic University (TW)
Corresponding author
Tu, Yun-Fang
Venue
Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022
Volume
3
Pages
100091
ISSN
2666-920X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4286511253
Cited by
88
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 18
FWCI
2.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST-108-2511-H-011-005-MY3, MOST-109-2511-H-011-002-MY3)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Keywords
educational robotics, research trends, learning performance, learning strategies, problem-solving strategies, AI tutors, student attitudes, learning behavior, research foci

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review