Cited by 35Online Learning and AnalyticsIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningEducational Technology and E-Learning

Learning pattern classification using moodle logs and the visualization of browsing processes by time-series cross-section

Open access
Dobashi, Konomu, Ho, Curtis P., Fulford, Catherine P., Grace Lin, Meng-Fen, Higa, Christina·2022·Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

In recent years, distance learning using learning management and e-book systems has been actively conducted in higher education institutions and various other organizations. It is possible to collect and analyze learning logs even in classes with many learners, including clickstreams and quiz scores in detail for each individual. This research proposes using Moodle's learning logs to classify learning patterns and outliers in order to identify struggling learners. The proposed method uses the descriptive statistics between the learner's teaching material clickstream and the final test score accumulated in Moodle, and students can be classified into four learning patterns. The frequency of each learning pattern was correlated with the appearance of outliers in the final test score and the teaching material clickstream. Most learners moved through four learning patterns during the weekly lessons, however, some learners scoring at the top and bottom of the weekly quiz scores repeated the same learning patterns. There was a tendency to correspond to an outlier due to the repetition of the same learning pattern. The time-series learning analytics of the teaching material clickstream revealed that learners with low final test scores and abnormal values tended to fall under a learning pattern with a smaller teaching material clickstream and a smaller access outside class hours.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100105

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies that integrated LMS data with surveys and interviews uncovered deeper patterns and underlying causes of student behaviours.

    “For instance, studies that integrated LMS data with surveys and interviews uncovered deeper patterns and underlying causes of student behaviours (Dobashi et al., 2022;Ouyang et al., 2023).”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 94 · Cited by 35

Authors
Dobashi, K., Ho, C. P., Fulford, C. P., Grace Lin, M.-F., & Higa, C.
Affiliations
  • Aichi University (JP)
  • University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
Corresponding author
Dobashi, Konomu
Venue
Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022
Volume
3
Pages
100105
ISSN
2666-920X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4307851609
Cited by
35
References
94
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6
FWCI
5.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Purdue University
  • University of Michigan
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (18K11588, 21K12183)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and E-Learning
Keywords
clickstream data, outlier detection, learning analytics, distance education, quiz scores

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review