The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 5 are not checked yet.
Perceptions and usage of AI chatbots among students in higher education across genders, academic levels and fields of study
Open accessAbstract
AI chatbots have ignited discussions and controversies about their impact on teaching and learning practices in higher education. This study explores students' adoption and perceptions of ChatGPT and other AI chatbots in higher education. Based on survey data from a large sample (n = 5894) across Swedish universities, the study employs descriptive statistical methods to analyze usage, attitudes, and concerns, and inferential statistics to identify relations between attitudes and usage and background variables (gender, academic level, and field of study). The results reveal broad awareness and use of ChatGPT among students, but not of other AI chatbots. More than half of the students expressed positive attitudes towards the use of chatbots in education, but almost as many expressed concerns about future use. Statistically significant differences were found across all examined grouping variables, particularly between genders and fields of study. Female students and students from the humanities and medicine consistently expressed more negative attitudes and concerns about AI's role in learning and assessment, while males and technology and engineering students showed higher usage and optimism. These findings not only validate the continued relevance of student backgrounds as a determinant of technology adoption but also expose several challenges and considerations surrounding AI and chatbot usage in education. The study supports the development of local solutions to AI in education tailored to student attributes and needs, and it provides insights for developers, educators, and policymakers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Despite this, over one-third of students surveyed utilize ChatGPT for educational purposes, and the use of other chatbot technologies was minimal (Stohr et al., 2024).”
From Effects of Generative AI on Engagement and Performance Within Asynchronous Online Courses (2026) · cites this paper as Stohr et al., 2024
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Stohr et al. (2024) found that male students in technology and engineering degree programs had more positive views of AI chatbots than their female counterparts in medical or humanities degree programs.”
From Effects of Generative AI on Engagement and Performance Within Asynchronous Online Courses (2026) · cites this paper as Stohr et al., 2024
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Male students tend to report greater familiarity with AI tools and more optimism about their benefits for learning, whereas female students are generally more cautious and sceptical about their impact on assessment and academic integrity (Jospeh et al. 2024;Stöhr, Ou, and Malmström 2024).”
From Widely used but barely trusted: understanding student perceptions on the use of generative AI in higher education (2025) · cites this paper as Stöhr, Ou, and Malmström 2024
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Large-scale surveys such as Jospeh et al. (2024) in Nigeria (n = 5, 554) and Stöhr, Ou, and Malmström (2024) in Sweden (n = 5, 894) point to positive attitudes towards GAI as usage increases.”
From Widely used but barely trusted: understanding student perceptions on the use of generative AI in higher education (2025) · cites this paper as Stöhr, Ou, and Malmström (2024)
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“While many students value GAI as a complement to their learning, a substantial proportion consider its use in exams to constitute cheating (Stöhr, Ou, and Malmström 2024).”
From Widely used but barely trusted: understanding student perceptions on the use of generative AI in higher education (2025) · cites this paper as Stöhr, Ou, and Malmström 2024
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Disciplinary background appears to moderate these differences, as students in engineering and technology tend to embrace GAI tools more enthusiastically, while students in humanities and medicine have displayed more scepticism (Freeman 2025;Mercader and Gairín 2020;Stöhr, Ou, and Malmström 2024).”
From Widely used but barely trusted: understanding student perceptions on the use of generative AI in higher education (2025) · cites this paper as Stöhr, Ou, and Malmström 2024
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Despite this, over one-third of students surveyed utilize ChatGPT for educational purposes, and the use of other chatbot technologies was minimal (Stohr et al., 2024).”
From Effects of Generative AI on Engagement and Performance Within Asynchronous Online Courses (2026) · cites this paper as Stohr et al., 2024
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036540 · Cited by 45,035
Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches
Caldas, M. (2003) · Revista de Administração Contemporânea · doi:10.1590/s1415-65552003000100015 · Cited by 18,688
ChatGPT for Good? On Opportunities and Challenges of Large Language Models for Education
Kasneci, E., Seßler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., et al. (2023) · doi:10.35542/osf.io/5er8f · Cited by 7,552
ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., et al. (2023) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274 · Cited by 7,326 · cited 4×
“…answering questions (Chen et al., 2023), facilitating group discussions, and resolving problems instantaneously (Rahman & Watanobe, 2023), thereby enriching students ’ learning experiences, offering personalized support, and potentially boosting academic performance (Kasneci et al., 2023).”
BackgroundInfluentialZawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0 · Cited by 7,242
Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Review
Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2988510 · Cited by 4,133 · cited 2×
“Concomitantly, AI in education (AIED) has emerged as a vibrant academic field, extending the capability of AI not just to learners but also to educators and institutions alike (Chen et al., 2020; Hwang et al., 2020; Nemorin et al., 2023).”
BackgroundWhat is AI Literacy? Competencies and Design Considerations
Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3313831.3376727 · Cited by 3,241 · cited 1×
“Students ’ AI literacy development enabling them to critically evaluate, communicate with, and use AI technologies (Long & Magerko, 2020) are likely to be significantly shaped by the ways in which teachers insert and discuss AI technologies in their teaching practices.”
BackgroundThe Predictive Validity of Multiple-Item versus Single-Item Measures of the Same Constructs
Bergkvist, L., & Rossiter, J. R. (2007) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.44.2.175 · Cited by 3,107
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Lobet, 2023, Use of ChatGPT by students: Artificial intelligence is all the rage!
- Nisar, 2023, Is ChatGPT a good tool for T&CM students in studying pharmacology?, SSRN Scholarly Paper (4324310)
- Welding, 2023, Half of college students say using AI on schoolwork is cheating or plagiarism, BestColleges
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 323
From inquiry to insight: Cultivating local conversations on GenAI
Rohrbacher, C., Cicchino, A., Dewees, A. A. D., & Caulkins, J. (2025) · To improve the academy · doi:10.3998/tia.7361
Leveraging Chatbots in Management Education
DALAL, A., & BHATTACHARYA, S. (2025) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781394411283.ch7
Merino, M., & Duarte, S. R. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-7574-8.ch004
AI in legal studies: navigating the prospects and hurdles for law faculty in higher education
Vélez, J. A. A. (2025) · Revista Científica Multidisciplinaria SAPIENTIAE · doi:10.56124/sapientiae.v8i17.031 · Cited by 1
A Meta-Model Analysis of Students’ Autonomous Interaction With General-Purpose LLMs
Cloux, M., Monticolo, D., & Bary, R. (2025) · International Generative AI and Computational Language Modelling Conference (GACLM) · doi:10.1109/gaclm67198.2025.11232237
Chatbots as Intelligent Advisors
Nai, S., Moudden, T. E., Rifai, A., & Sadiq, A. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-8011-7.ch005
Impact of Generative AI Characteristics on Continuous Use Intention: Mediating Role of Utilization
Ko, Y.-J. (2025) · Journal of Digital Contents Society · doi:10.9728/dcs.2025.26.10.2961
GNITS-NaviGlow: College Navigation Chatbot
Nittala, S., Bagade, N., Konkala, S., Dharani, P., & Sasidhar, B. (2025) · Lecture notes in electrical engineering · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-0269-1_102
Lorenzo, M. D. C. R., Delgado-Parada, J., Ricoy, S. F., & Murias, T. F. (2025) · Algorithms · doi:10.3390/a18110726 · Cited by 1
Alzahrani, L. (2025) · International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE) · doi:10.35940/ijrte.a1130.14041125
Gedrimiene, E., Çelik, İ., Silvola, A., & Muukkonen, H. (2025) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.70033
Mao, P., Cai, Z., Luo, X., Zhang, Y., Liu, J., & Sun, X. (2025) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2025.2589406
The Impact of AI on Student Productivity in Multitasking Environments: An IPO Framework Analysis
Li, Z., & Zhang, X. (2025) · International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence for Education (ISAIE) · doi:10.1145/3775073.3775233
Stoyanov, A., & Nedelcheva, A. (2025) · Sci · doi:10.3390/sci7040183
Nalluri, V., Manideep, A. S., Agrawal, S., Sinha, P., & Mazharunnisa (2025) · Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1108/jarhe-04-2025-0256
Ninaquispe, J. C. M., Tocto, R. I. M., Jiménez, F. A. A., Rázuri-Rubio, H. H., Huatay, K. C. V., & Rivera, L. G. A. (2025) · Lecture notes in educational technology · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-4689-3_17
Zhou, P., Lau, P. W. C., Lü, N., & Ma, M. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-1788-0_59-1 · Cited by 1
Dennis, B., Muliawan, F., Soehaidi, K., & Aryuni, M. (2025) · International Conference on Informatics, Multimedia, Cyber and Information System (ICIMCIS) · doi:10.1109/icimcis68501.2025.11327056 · Cited by 1
Skořepová, P., & Marešová, P. (2026) · Inproforum ... · doi:10.32725/978-80-7694-143-4.26
Paul, A., Fakiyesi, V. O., Tahsin, M. U., Arinze, L., Moyaki, D., & Dunmoye, I. D. (2026) · Learning and analytics in intelligent systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-09058-4_5
Unpacking Higher Education Students’ Relationship with AI
Ferreira, E., Valente, B., Antunes, A. C., Gama, A. C. C., Silva, M. J., & Xavier, P. (2025) · International Symposium on Computers in Education · doi:10.1109/siie68580.2025.11368416
Isidro, S. N., Fernández-Queiruga, J.-M., & Calle, H. R. (2025) · International Symposium on Computers in Education · doi:10.1109/siie68580.2025.11368412
Student Perceptions of an AI-Based Assistant for Formative Feedback in Higher Education
Sotaminga-Cinilin, M. J., & Uribe-Laverde, M. Á. (2026) · EAI/Springer Innovations in Communication and Computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-10310-9_15
Guevarra, K. H. V., Tutor, B. O. D., Gara, G. C., Camangeg, J. P., & Jesus, L. L. D. D. (2025) · International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Education (WAIE) · doi:10.1109/waie67422.2025.11381282
Influencing Factors on AI Use Intention of Undergraduates in Can Tho City
Truong, T.-K. H. V., & Le, D. (2025) · 2025 International Conference on Applied Artificial Intelligence, Data Engineering and Sciences (ICAIDES) · doi:10.1109/icaides67265.2025.11404034
Truong, T.-K. H. V., & Le, D. V. G. (2025) · International Conference on Applied Artificial Intelligence, Data Engineering and Sciences (ICAIDES) · doi:10.1109/icaides67265.2025.11404019
Erat, L., & DEMİRER, M. C. (2026) · Kent Akademisi · doi:10.35674/kent.1759678
TutorBotz: A GenAI Tool for Teachers to Program Social Robots as Teacher Assistants
Botzer, B. H., Gordon, G., & Gordon-Kiwkowitz, M. (2026) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/3776734.3794386
Gilardoni, F., Malla, M. I. M., Pertuz, D. O., & Gamarra, S. R. M. (2026) · Revista Innova Educación · doi:10.35622/j.rie.2026.01.006
Kaba, A., Shimray, S. R., Zaitoun, E. A., & Refae, G. A. E. (2026) · Open Information Science · doi:10.1515/opis-2025-0038
Sebopelo, P., & Chukwuma, N. N. (2026) · Review of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.37497/rev.artif.intell.educ.v7ii.78
Allen, B. H., Figueras, H., Therrien, M. C. S., & Wood, C. L. (2026) · Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups · doi:10.1044/2026_persp-25-00197
How to teach programming in the age of AI
Juavinett, A. (2026) · The Transmitter · doi:10.53053/ixoz2506
Gunathilake, N., Gamage, A., Rajapakshe, D. D. S., Jayasooriya, M. N. N. J., Wisenthige, K., & Yapa, C. G. (2026) · International Conference on Advanced Research in Computing (ICARC) · doi:10.1109/icarc68737.2026.11453820
Harfe, B. D., & Thomas, A. (2026) · TechTrends · doi:10.1007/s11528-026-01182-5 · Cited by 1
Köse, N. (2026) · Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi · doi:10.37217/tebd.1782832 · Cited by 1
Gender perspectives: Artificial intelligence in academic practice
Slijepčević, M., Šević, N. P., & Šević, A. (2026) · Research in Pedagogy · doi:10.5937/istrped2601099s
Duan, X., & Guo, Y. Q. (2026) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2026.2655876
Erümit, S. F. (2026) · European Journal of Education · doi:10.1111/ejed.70616
Lu, H.-C. C. (2026) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3772363.3798858
“Bespoke Bots”: Diverse Instructor Needs for Customizing Generative AI Classroom Chatbots
Hou, I., Xiong, Z., Guo, P. J., & Wang, A. Y. (2026) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772318.3791491 · Cited by 3
Lam, M. H., Low, M. P., & Chan, K. Y. (2026) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Computer, Data Sciences and Applications (ACDSA) · doi:10.1109/acdsa67686.2026.11468141
The Role of Habit in Promoting Generative AI Adoption Among Social Science Students and Researchers
Spilbergs, A. (2026) · International Journal of Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.46300/9109.2026.20.8
Zhang, C., Lingaiah, J., & Krishnan, I. A. (2026) · International Journal of Education Psychology and Counseling · doi:10.35631/ijepc.1162051
Mangubat, M. R., Mangubat, J. C., Gantalao, L. C., Calzada, J. G. D., Lumantas, B. C., Capuyan, D. L., Acut, D. P., & Garcia, M. B. (2026) · International Journal of Technology and Design Education · doi:10.1007/s10798-026-10101-x
Cooke, E. M., Kopf, S., Grace, M. M., & Keen, J. (2026) · Journal of Criminal Justice Education · doi:10.1080/10511253.2026.2667841
Women Worry, Men Adopt: How Gendered Perceptions Shape the Use of Generative AIPreprint
Stephany, F., & Duszynski, J. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-9304693/v1
Tikhonova, E. A., & Raitskaya, L. (2026) · Journal of language and Education · doi:10.17323/jle.2026.33523
Guillén‐Gámez, F. D., Habibi, A., Cevallos, M. B. M., & Piris, N. P. (2026) · IJERI International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation · doi:10.46661/ijeri.13165 · Cited by 2
Exploring Online Proctoring Solutions
Swaby-Frazer, R., & Noel, E. O. (2026) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-8800-7.ch011
Najjar, F., & Ahmed, A. A. (2026) · Journal of Philology and Educational Sciences · doi:10.53898/jpes2026514
Analyzing the Effectiveness of AI-Based Learning Tools on Indonesian Students Using the TAM Model
Unviana, M., Wijaya, M. D., Yovalim, C., & Santy (2026) · International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Automation for Sustainable Solutions (ICASS) · doi:10.1109/icass69550.2026.11547454
Use of a Chatbot to Learn Thermodynamics in the First-Year of University
Tejeda, S., Ortiz, M., Regueiro, J. M. P., Hidalgo‐Reyes, J. I., López-Mariño, M. A., & Heredia, A. S. (2026) · IEEE World Engineering Education Conference (EDUNINE) · doi:10.1109/edunine62390.2026.11546726
Generative Artificial Intelligence and Chatbots: Profiles and Uses in Chilean Distance Education
González, E. A., Machado, R. P., Alario‐Hoyos, C., & Hormazábal, P. Á. (2026) · IEEE World Engineering Education Conference (EDUNINE) · doi:10.1109/edunine62390.2026.11546855
BanglaRAG: Building a Low-Cost Multilingual Knowledge Backbone for an Agentic LMS Assistant
Khandaker, S., Hasan, M. M., Roy, S. K., Pranto, F. S., Mamun, A. A., & Haque, A. (2026) · IEEE International Conference on Quantum Photonics, Artificial Intelligence & Networking (QPAIN) · doi:10.1109/qpain69676.2026.11545902 · Cited by 1
Monetizing Cyberliterature through AI‐Enhanced Networks in English Education System
Muthmainnah, M., Cardoso, L., Yakin, A. M. A., Khristianto, K., Nirmalawati, W., & Wahyuningsih, T. (2026) · doi:10.1002/9781394347315.ch4
Feeney, C., & Fhloinn, E. N. (2026) · Teaching Mathematics and its Applications An International Journal of the IMA · doi:10.1093/teamat/hrag013
Guerra-Guerrero, C. O., Tass-Herrera, B., Reyes, G. V., & Cocón, F. (2026) · Media Literacy and Academic Research · doi:10.34135/mlar-26-01-02
Yu, L., Ding, X. Z., Ding, Y., & Li, J. (2026) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-026-14050-9
Prasad, K., Singh, S., Vaidya, R., Pathak, A., & Srinivas, V. (2026) · Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1155/hbe2/6611806 · Cited by 1
Benchmarking generative AI on fermentation knowledge
Caccavale, F., Krühne, U., Gernaey, K. V., & Gargalo, C. L. (2026) · Systems and Control Transactions · doi:10.69997/sct.137474
Кабакова, С. А., Батурин, Н. Н., Биляк, В. С., Кузеванов, М. А., & Черноусов, А. С. (2026) · Pedagogical Education · doi:10.62257/2712-9950-2026-7-6-34-41
Assessing the AI Literacy in Higher Education: A Comparative Study
Alangan, H. G., Saludo, J. D., & Cagas, R. L. D. (2026) · Dibon Journal of Education · doi:10.64169/dje.213
Cheng, Y., Yang, L., & Guile, D. (2026) · IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) · doi:10.1109/educon67543.2026.11574423
Mestiraihi, M. A., Labda, W., & Bennecer, A. (2026) · IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) · doi:10.1109/educon67543.2026.11574491
Patel, P., Hassan, B., Yasin, A., Wasiq, M. F., Rani, M., Niaz, S., & Naveed, K. (2026) · IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) · doi:10.1109/educon67543.2026.11574348
Ali, S., Ali, I., & Warraich, N. F. (2026) · Information Discovery and Delivery · doi:10.1108/idd-09-2025-0230
AlHajri, H. M., Kasim, J. M., & Lawati, H. A. (2026) · Informatics · doi:10.3390/informatics13070104
An Ecological Systems Analysis of University Students' ChatGPT Use in Higher Education
Nazır, T. (2026) · Systems Research and Behavioral Science · doi:10.1002/sres.70108
Swaby-Frazer, R., Noel, E. O., Bowen, A., & Irving-Scott, W. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-30784-2_9
Artificial Intelligence, Human Prejudice
Twardawa, S. L., Schrade, F., & Weber, S. (2026) · Annual Symposium on Human-Computer Interaction for Work (CHIWORK) · doi:10.1145/3805029.3818287
UNDERSTANDING THE ROLE OF GENERATIVE AI IN GENERATION Z’S LIFE: A PLS-SEM AND FSQCA STUDY
Neha, & Khurana, A. (2024) · ShodhKosh Journal of Visual and Performing Arts · doi:10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i2.2024.8869
Zhou, P., Lau, P. W. C., Lu, N., & Ma, M. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-2175-3_59
Lee, D., & Tang, L. (2026) · The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education · doi:10.32431/kace.2026.29.6.010
Vziatysheva, V. (2026) · Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1155/hbe2/1733863
Vernmark, K., Carlbring, P., & Andersson, G. (2026) · doi:10.2196/preprints.107511
What Drives Learners to Keep Using Chatbots? An Extended TCT Modeling in Higher Education
Kavitha, K., & Joshith, V. P. (2026) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/07356331261469358
Ratul, M. A. I., Haque, F., Saha, P., Noor, J., & Haque, S. M. T. (2026) · ACM SIGCAS/SIGCHI Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies (COMPASS) · doi:10.1145/3811242.3819097
Psychological drivers of generative AI adoption in a Saudi Arabian EMI setting
Yüksel, D., El‐Dakhs, D. A. S., & Yüksel, B. (2026) · Language Culture and Curriculum · doi:10.1080/07908318.2026.2711074
Romero‐Martínez, Á. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-10599376/v1
Kim, S.-J. (2026) · Journal of Digital Contents Society · doi:10.9728/dcs.2026.27.7.1939
Dimensional Structure of Student Perceptions in AI-Supported Avatar Learning Environments
Moosa, R. (2026) · 2018 International Conference on Multidisciplinary Research · doi:10.26803/myres.2026.21
Moryossef, I. G., & Nathan, D. (2026) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2026.2712013
Global perspectives in generative AI integration in higher education
Wen, Y. (2026) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-026-01736-9
Fernandez, J. L., Encarnado, K. A. J., Eduarte, J. V. T., Chavez, J. X. S., Moreno, D. E. L., & Chu, L. M. (2026) · International Conference on e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning · doi:10.1109/ic4e69618.2026.11631609
Bowman, S., Huang, G., Ichenihi, A. M., Bowman, E., & Qiu, L. (2026) · The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher · doi:10.1007/s40299-026-01136-8
Students' Voice in the Era of AI
Omar, L. A., Alvarado, H. A. L., Sehaban, R. E., Iralan, S. A., & Jackaria, P. M. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-5586-3.ch011
Larza, L. A., Piqueras, R. F., ALBERO, A. R. M., & Marco-Ahulló, A. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1905299
Ursavaş, Ö. F., Durak, H. Y., Reisoğlu, İ., Akbulut, Y., & McIlroy, D. (2026) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-026-09959-w
Li, Z., Han, J., Wu, L., & Xiaogang, W. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1731653
From AI Literacy to Epistemic Agency
Schnatz, N. I., & Bieri, A. (2026) · MedienPädagogik Zeitschrift für Theorie und Praxis der Medienbildung · doi:10.21240/mpaed/71/2026.08.20.x
Nagy, T. M. G., Kun, P. A., & Kálmán, A. (2026) · Iskolakultúra · doi:10.14232/iskkult.2026.7.3
Bartz, A., Glaser, N., Bayer, O., Hallsson, L. R., Jaeger, V. K., Krumkamp, R., Minnerup, H., Pickford, R., Olsen, K. S., Wülk, N., et al. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-10974790/v1
Pandey, P., & Upadhyay, T. (2026) · Springer Proceedings in Humanities and Social Sciences · doi:10.1007/978-981-92-0411-3_38
Wu, Y., & Lu, X. (2026) · Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice · doi:10.1080/0969594x.2026.2736632 · Cited by 1
Formative and summative use of automatic conversational assessment in higher education
Shingjergji, K., Bauer, J., Härmä, A., Verstegen, D. M. L., Arts, J., & Brinke, D. J.-T. (2026) · Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice · doi:10.1080/0969594x.2026.2736624
Mitkus, T., & Nedzinskaitė-Mitkė, V. (2026) · Creativity Studies · doi:10.3846/cs.2026.23866
Fang, L., Li, Z., Xiong, B., & Lu, Z. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1832451
Yurtçu, A. (2026) · International Journal Of Eurasia Social Sciences · doi:10.70736/ijoess.2512
Metadata
- Authors
- Stöhr, C., Ou, A. W., & Malmström, H.
- Affiliations
- Chalmers University of Technology (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Stöhr, Christian
- Venue
- Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-12
- Volume
- 7
- Pages
- 100259
- ISSN
- 2666-920X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4399948582
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 145 · 2025: 155 · 2024: 19
- FWCI
- 119.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Karlstads universitet
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › AI in Service Interactions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Keywords
- AI chatbots, ChatGPT, student perceptions, technology adoption, gender differences, academic level, field of study, student attitudes, assessment, higher education, humanities students, medical students
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
