The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Integration of convolutional neural network and conventional machine learning classifiers for landslide susceptibility mapping
Abstract
Abstract Landslides are regarded as one of the most common geological hazards in a wide range of geo-environment. The aim of this study is to assess landslide susceptibility by integrating convolutional neural network (CNN) with three conventional machine learning classifiers of support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF) and logistic regression (LR) in the case of Yongxin Country, China. To this end, 16 predisposing factors were first selected for landslide modelling. Then, a total of 364 landslide historical locations were randomly divided into training (70%; 255) and verification (30%; 109) sets for modelling process and assessment. Next, the training set was used for building three hybrid methods of CNN-SVM, CNN-RF and CNN-LR. In the following, the trained models were used for landslide susceptibility mapping. Finally, several objective measures were employed to compare and validate the performance of these methods. The experimental results demonstrated that the performance of the machine learning classifiers previously mentioned can be effectively improved by integrating the CNN technique. Therefore, the proposed hybrid methods can be recommended for landslide spatial modelling in other prone areas with similar geo-environmental conditions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00994018 · Cited by 59,421
Girshick, R. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.169 · Cited by 28,105
Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
(1993) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.1993 · Cited by 17,667
(2016) · Cited by 11,679
(2010) · Cited by 8,261
Large-Scale Machine Learning with Stochastic Gradient Descent
Bottou, L. (2010) · Proceedings of COMPSTAT'2010 · doi:10.1007/978-3-7908-2604-3_16 · Cited by 5,795
An overview of gradient descent optimization algorithms
Ruder, S. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1609.04747 · Cited by 4,962
Cited by
Deep learning-based landslide susceptibility mapping
Azarafza, M., Azarafza, M., Akgün, H., Atkinson, P. M., & Derakhshani, R. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-03585-1 · Cited by 412
Metadata
- Authors
- Fang, Z., Wang, Y., Peng, L., & Hong, H.
- Venue
- Computers & Geosciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-06
- Volume
- 139
- Pages
- 104470
- ISSN
- 0098-3004 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3009636339
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 54
- FWCI
- 53.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Integration of convolutional neural network and conventional machine learning classifiers for landslide susceptibility mapping. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cageo.2020.104470
- The paper
- Fang, Z., Wang, Y., Peng, L., & Hong, H. (2020). Integration of convolutional neural network and conventional machine learning classifiers for landslide susceptibility mapping. Computers & Geosciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2020.104470
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.