The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deep learning-based landslide susceptibility mapping
Open accessAbstract
Landslides are considered as one of the most devastating natural hazards in Iran, causing extensive damage and loss of life. Landslide susceptibility maps for landslide prone areas can be used to plan for and mitigate the consequences of catastrophic landsliding events. Here, we developed a deep convolutional neural network (CNN–DNN) for mapping landslide susceptibility, and evaluated it on the Isfahan province, Iran, which has not previously been assessed on such a scale. The proposed model was trained and validated using training (80%) and testing (20%) datasets, each containing relevant data on historical landslides, field records and remote sensing images, and a range of geomorphological, geological, environmental and human activity factors as covariates. The CNN–DNN model prediction accuracy was tested using a wide range of statistics from the confusion matrix and error indices from the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The CNN–DNN model was evaluated comprehensively by comparing it to several state-of-the-art benchmark machine learning techniques including the support vector machine (SVM), logistic regression (LR), Gaussian naïve Bayes (GNB), multilayer perceptron (MLP), Bernoulli Naïve Bayes (BNB) and decision tree (DT) classifiers. The CNN–DNN model for landslide susceptibility mapping was found to predict more accurately than the benchmark algorithms, with an AUC = 90.9%, IRs = 84.8%, MSE = 0.17, RMSE = 0.40, and MAPE = 0.42. The map provided by the CNN–DNN clearly revealed a high-susceptibility area in the west and southwest, related to the main Zagros trend in the province. These findings can be of great utility for landslide risk management and land use planning in the Isfahan province.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
A review of statistically-based landslide susceptibility models
Reichenbach, P., Rossi, M., Malamud, B. D., Mihir, M., & Guzzetti, F. (2018) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.03.001 · Cited by 2,347
Ayalew, L., & Yamagishi, H. (2005) · Geomorphology · doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.06.010 · Cited by 1,913
Cichy, R. M., Khosla, A., Pantazis, D., Torralba, A., & Oliva, A. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep27755 · Cited by 716
Yao, X., Tham, L. G., & Dai, F. C. (2008) · Geomorphology · doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2008.02.011 · Cited by 600
Aditian, A., Kubota, T., & Shinohara, Y. (2018) · Geomorphology · doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.06.006 · Cited by 534
Wang, Y., Fang, Z., & Hong, H. (2019) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.263 · Cited by 525
Sun, D., Wen, H., Wang, D., & Xu, J. (2020) · Geomorphology · doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2020.107201 · Cited by 480
Bui, D. T., Tsangaratos, P., Nguyen, V.-T., Liem, N. V., & Trinh, P. T. (2020) · CATENA · doi:10.1016/j.catena.2019.104426 · Cited by 467
Huang, F., Zhang, J., Zhou, C., Wang, Y., Huang, J., & Zhu, L. (2020) · Landslides · doi:10.1007/s10346-019-01274-9 · Cited by 444
Metadata
- Authors
- Azarafza, M., Azarafza, M., Akgün, H., Atkinson, P. M., & Derakhshani, R.
- Venue
- Scientific Reports
- Published
- 2021-12-16
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 24112-24112
- ISSN
- 2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4200108305
- Cited by
- 412
- References
- 32
- FWCI
- 58.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deep learning-based landslide susceptibility mapping. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41598-021-03585-1
- The paper
- Azarafza, M., Azarafza, M., Akgün, H., Atkinson, P. M., & Derakhshani, R. (2021). Deep learning-based landslide susceptibility mapping. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03585-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.