Cited by 21Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionGraphene research and applicationsCatalytic Processes in Materials Science

Surface activation of graphene nanoribbons for oxygen reduction reaction by nitrogen doping and defect engineering: An ab initio study

Ekspong, Joakim, Boulanger, Nicolas, Gracia-Espino, Eduardo·2018·Carbon

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.05.050

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ekspong, J., Boulanger, N., & Gracia-Espino, E.
Affiliations
Umeå University (SE)
Venue
Carbon
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-10
Volume
137
Pages
349-357
ISSN
0008-6223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2803847407
Cited by
20
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Carbon (publishedVersion)
Funders
Stiftelsen Åforsk (15-391)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Graphene research and applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
Keywords
graphene nanoribbons, oxygen reduction reaction, nitrogen doping, defect engineering, metal-free electrocatalysts, current-voltage characteristics, electrical conductivity, adsorption energy, reaction intermediates, surface activation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review