Cited by 56Food composition and propertiesPolysaccharides Composition and ApplicationsGlycogen Storage Diseases and Myoclonus

Physicochemical properties of amylose-free and high-amylose starches from transgenic sweetpotatoes modified by RNA interference

Kitahara, Kanefumi, Hamasuna, Keigo, Nozuma, Kumiko, Otani, Motoyasu, Hamada, Tatsuro, Shimada, Takiko, Fujita, Kiyotaka, Suganuma, Toshihiko·2007·Carbohydrate Polymers

Abstract

The transgenic sweetpotatoes having amylose-free and moderately high-amylose starches have been obtained by RNA interferences of granule-bound starch synthase I (GBSSI) and starch branching enzyme II [SBEII (class A)] genes, respectively. In this study, the physicochemical properties of such sweetpotato starches were investigated. From the amylose-free starches, structural changes in the starch molecules were found by suppressing GBSSI expression: lack of amylose, lack of long chains with more than DP 100 in amylopectin, and a slight decrease in chains with DP 6 and 7 in amylopectin. These results suggest that GBSSI participates in not only the synthesis of amylose molecules, but also the characterization of amylopectin molecules. In the case of the high-amylose starches, complicated structural changes were found by suppressing SBEII expression: increase in amylose, increase in phosphate content, alteration of crystalline structure, decrease in long chains with more than DP 100 in amylopectin, decrease in chains around DP 6-11, and increase in chains around DP 12-15 and DP 24-33 in amylopectin. As the results of the structural changes, the amylose-free sweetpotato starches showed a very slow retrogradation and high digestibility by pancreatin, whereas the high-amylose sweetpotato starches showed a higher pasting viscosity, more rapid retrogradation and lower digestibility compared to normal starch.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.carbpol.2006.09.025

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 56

Authors
Kitahara, K., Hamasuna, K., Nozuma, K., Otani, M., Hamada, T., Shimada, T., Fujita, K., & Suganuma, T.
Affiliations
  • Kagoshima University (JP)
  • Ishikawa Prefectural University (JP)
Corresponding author
Kitahara, Kanefumi
Venue
Carbohydrate Polymers
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-06
Volume
69
Issue
2
Pages
233-240
ISSN
0144-8617 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2074722966
Cited by
56
References
31
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Carbohydrate Polymers (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Polysaccharides Composition and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Glycogen Storage Diseases and Myoclonus
Keywords
amylose-free starch, high-amylose starch, granule-bound starch synthase I, RNA interference, amylopectin chain length distribution, starch crystalline structure, starch retrogradation, starch digestibility, pasting viscosity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review