The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of annealing on the molecular structure and physicochemical properties of starches from different botanical origins – A review
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hydrothermal Modifications of Granular Starch, with Retention of the Granular Structure: A Review
Jacobs, H., & Delcour, J. A. (1998) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf980169k · Cited by 589
Cited by
Functionality of Porous Starch Obtained by Amylase or Amyloglucosidase Treatments
Dura, A., Błaszczak, W., & Rosell, C. M. (2014) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.10.013 · Cited by 256
Ultrasound-induced changes in the structure and functionality of starch and protein
Zhu, M., Xiong, W., Devkota, L., & Dhital, S. (2026) · Food Hydrocolloids · doi:10.1016/j.foodhyd.2025.112111 · Cited by 40
Ultrasound-assisted hydration offers a novel approach to anneal in-situ pinto bean starch
Kumar, G., Hooper, J. F., Li, E., Devkota, L., & Dhital, S. (2025) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2025.123602 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Jayakody, L., & Hoover, R.
- Venue
- Carbohydrate Polymers
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-11
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 691-703
- ISSN
- 0144-8617 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2006578022
- Cited by
- 314
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
