Functionality of Porous Starch Obtained by Amylase or Amyloglucosidase Treatments
Abstract
Porous starch is attracting very much attention for its absorption and shielding ability in many food applications. The effect of two different enzymes, fungal α-amylase (AM) or amyloglucosidase (AMG), on corn starch at sub-gelatinization temperature was studied as an alternative to obtain porous starch. Biochemical features, thermal and structural analyses of treated starches were studied. Microscopic analysis of the granules confirmed the enzymatic modification of the starches obtaining porous structures with more agglomerates in the case of AMG treated starches. Several changes in thermal properties and hydrolysis kinetics were observed in enzymatically modified starches. Hydration properties were significantly affected by enzymatic modification being greater influenced by AMG activity, and the opposite trend was observed in the pasting properties. Overall, results showed that enzymatic modification at sub-gelatinization temperatures really offer an attractive alternative for obtaining porous starch granules to be used in a variety of foods applications.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Amyloglucosidase has an optimal temperature of 20-70 • C and an optimal pH of 3.50-5.50 and is applicable to microalgae.
“Amyloglucosidase | 20-70 • C | 3.50-5.50 | Microalgae | [217]”
From A Review of Algae-Based Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (Algae-Based CCUS) (2024) · cites this paper as [217]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 45 · Cited by 256
- Authors
- Dura, A., Błaszczak, W., & Rosell, C. M.
- Affiliations
- InLife Institute of Animal Reproduction and Food Research, Polish Academy of Sciences (PL)
- Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Rosell, C.M.
- Venue
- Carbohydrate Polymers
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-01
- Volume
- 101
- Pages
- 837-845
- ISSN
- 0144-8617 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2093759419
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 7.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Carbohydrate Polymers (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness
- European Regional Development Fund (FEDER)
- Generalitat Valenciana
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Polysaccharides Composition and Applications
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Proteins in Food Systems
- Keywords
- porous starch, enzymatic starch modification, alpha-amylase, glucoamylase, corn starch, starch granule structure, starch hydration, pasting properties, hydrolysis kinetics, thermal properties
- MeSH terms
- Amylases, Zea mays, Glucan 1,4-alpha-Glucosidase, Hydrolysis, Kinetics, Starch, Temperature, Porosity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review