Cited by 97Heart Failure Treatment and ManagementCardiovascular Function and Risk FactorsCardiac Health and Mental Health

Improvement in health-related quality of life after hospitalization predicts event-free survival in patients with advanced heart failure

Open access
Moser, Debra K., Yamokoski, Laura, Sun, Jie Lena, Conway, Ginger A., Hartman, Karen A., Graziano, Judith A., Binanay, Cynthia, Stevenson, Lynne W.·2009·Journal of Cardiac Failure

Abstract

Background Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is a major clinical outcome for heart failure (HF) patients. We aimed to determine the frequency, durability, and prognostic significance of improved HRQOL after hospitalization for decompensated HF.Methods and results We analyzed HRQOL, measured serially using the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ), for 425 patients who survived to discharge in a multicenter randomized clinical trial of pulmonary artery catheter versus clinical assessment to guide therapy for patients with advanced HF. All patients enrolled had 1 or more prior HF hospitalizations or chronic high diuretic doses and 1 or more symptom and 1 sign of fluid overload at admission. Improvement, defined as a decrease of more than 5 points in MLHFQ total score, occurred in 68% of patients by 1 month and stabilized. The degree of 1-month improvement differed (P < .0001 group x time interaction) between 6-month survivors and non-survivors. In a Cox regression model, after adjustment for traditional risk factors for HF morbidity and mortality, improvement in HRQOL by 1 month compared to worsening at 1 month or no change predicted time to subsequent event-free survival (P=.013).Conclusions In patients hospitalized with severe HF decompensation, HRQOL is seriously impaired but improves substantially within 1 month for most patients and remains improved for 6 months. Patients for whom HRQOL does not improve by 1 month after hospital admission merit specific attention both to improve HRQOL and to address high risk for poor event-free survival.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cardfail.2009.05.003

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The MLHFQ is frequently used in CHF due to its ease and familiarity, and it predicts event-free survival following CHF decompensation with utility in identifying changes in the patient's quality of life and outcomes.

    “It is frequently used in CHF due to its ease and familiarity, 111 and it predicts event‐free survival following CHF decompensation with utility in identifying changes in the patient's QoL and outcomes. 112”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moser, D. K., Yamokoski, L., Sun, J. L., Conway, G. A., Hartman, K. A., Graziano, J. A., Binanay, C., & Stevenson, L. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Kentucky (US)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
  • University of Cincinnati (US)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Moser, Debra K.
Venue
Journal of Cardiac Failure
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-11
Volume
15
Issue
9
Pages
763-769
ISSN
1071-9164 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2001709913
Cited by
96
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 10
FWCI
3.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cardiac Failure (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (n01hv098177-001)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (N01 HV098177)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Keywords
health-related quality of life, advanced heart failure, acute decompensated heart failure, event-free survival, prognostic factors, Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire, pulmonary artery catheter, fluid overload, hospitalization outcomes
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Health Status, Heart Failure, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Quality of Life, Risk Factors, Cohort Studies, Survival Rate, Disease-Free Survival

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review