The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A review on dry reforming of methane in aspect of catalytic properties
Abstract
Abstract Because the whole world is under threat from climate change, 195 countries decided to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by adopting the “Paris Agreement”. The mitigation and utilization of GHG have become the most significant challenges in the area of green energy research. One feasible solution is the reforming of methane with carbon dioxide (called dry reforming of methane, DRM) that converts the two main GHGs (CO2 and CH4) into synthesis gas (H2 and CO), which is a resource for the manufacture of useful value-added products. The main issue that needs to be addressed for DRM is the deactivation of catalysts by sintering and carbon formation. Design of a viable catalyst that exhibits high catalytic activity and stability, as well as resistance against deactivation, could be accomplished by making appropriate choices of active metal, support, promoter, structure and methods for preparation and activation. Numerous studies and reviews have dealt with various aspects of DRM. This review focuses on the physicochemical properties of the pertinent catalysts and their role in the catalytic performance needed for DRM. Specifically, the interaction between components, dispersion, particle size, basicity, oxygen storage capacity, reducibility, porosity and surface area are discussed. This study provides the understanding of catalytic properties and their correlation with catalytic performance needed for the rational design of catalysts and suitable for DRM.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2 °C
Rogelj, J., den Elzen, M., Höhne, N., Fransen, T., Fekete, H., Winkler, H., Schaeffer, R., Sha, F., Riahi, K., & Meinshausen, M. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature18307 · Cited by 3,637
Energy Technology Perspectives 2017: Catalysing Energy Technology Transformations
International Energy Agency (2017) · Energy Technology Perspectives · doi:10.1787/energy_tech-2017-en · Cited by 375
Cited by
Direct air capture: process technology, techno-economic and socio-political challenges
Erans, M., Sanz-Pérez, E. S., Hanak, D. P., Clulow, Z., Reiner, D. M., & Mutch, G. A. (2022) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d1ee03523a · Cited by 688
C–H bond activation in light alkanes: a theoretical perspective
Wang, Y., Hu, P., Yang, J., Zhu, Y.-A., & Chen, D. (2021) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs01262a · Cited by 375
Industrial hydrogen production technology and development status in China: A review
Chai, S., Zhang, G., Li, G., & Zhang, Y. (2021) · Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy · doi:10.1007/s10098-021-02089-w · Cited by 133
Apolinar-Hernández, J. E., Bertoli, S. L., Riella, H. G., Soares, C., & Padoin, N. (2024) · Energy & Fuels · doi:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.3c02287 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Jang, W.-J., Shim, J.-O., Kim, H.-M., Yoo, S.-Y., & Roh, H.-S.
- Venue
- Catalysis Today
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-03
- Volume
- 324
- Pages
- 15-26
- ISSN
- 0920-5861 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2883533494
- Cited by
- 693
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review on dry reforming of methane in aspect of catalytic properties. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cattod.2018.07.032
- The paper
- Jang, W.-J., Shim, J.-O., Kim, H.-M., Yoo, S.-Y., & Roh, H.-S. (2019). A review on dry reforming of methane in aspect of catalytic properties. Catalysis Today. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2018.07.032
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.