Cited by 48Seaweed-derived Bioactive CompoundsDrug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and ProtectionMedicinal plant effects and applications

Stabilization of mitochondrial and microsomal function by polysaccharide of Ulva lactuca on d-galactosamine induced hepatitis in rats

Devaki, Thiruvengadam, Sathivel, Arumugam, BalajiRaghavendran, Hanumantha Rao·2009·Chemico-Biological Interactions

Abstract

In this study we used liver mitochondrial and microsomal fraction from rats pretreated with seaweed Ulva lactuca polysaccharide extract (ULP - 200mg/kg body weight, daily for 21 days, oral gavage) on D-Galactosamine (500mg/kg body weight, intraperitoneally) challenge. Effectiveness of ULP was determined based on functional status of trichloro acetic acid (TCA), urea cycle, and microsomal enzymes. The composition of sulfate polysaccharide content such as total sugars, sulfate and uronic acid were examined. In addition the fine ultra structural changes were examined using electron microscopy (EM). We observed significant (p<0.001) mitochondrial and microsomal abnormalities during liver damage by D-Galactosamine, consequently altering enzymes of energy metabolism. Electron microscopy of D-Galactosamine intoxicated rat liver tissue revealed the swelling and loss of mitochondrial cristae. Conversely the rats pretreated with ULP against D-Galactosamine challenge prevented (p<0.05) the significant abnormality of TCA, microsomal enzymes and severity of mitochondria as observed in EM study in rats injected with D-Galactosamine alone. However no effective prevention was observed in urea cycle enzymes among D-Galactosamine and treatment group rats. These results showed the effectiveness of ULP in stabilizing the functional status of mitochondrial and microsomal membrane which might be due to the presence of sulfated polysaccharide that could prevented the oxidative stress induced by D-Galactosamine intoxication.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cbi.2008.09.036

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 40 · Cited by 48

Authors
Devaki, T., Sathivel, A., & BalajiRaghavendran, H. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Madras (IN)
  • Saveetha University (IN)
Venue
Chemico-Biological Interactions
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-01
Volume
177
Issue
2
Pages
83-88
ISSN
0009-2797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2073328758
Cited by
48
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Chemico-Biological Interactions (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Seaweed-derived Bioactive Compounds
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Medicinal plant effects and applications
Keywords
Ulva lactuca, seaweed polysaccharides, microsomal enzymes, TCA cycle, urea cycle, oxidative stress, sulfated polysaccharides, hepatoprotection, liver ultrastructure
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Galactosamine, Injections, Intraperitoneal, Male, Microsomes, Liver, Mitochondria, Liver, Plant Extracts, Polysaccharides, Trichloroacetic Acid, Urea, Rats, Wistar, Hepatocytes, Ulva, Mitochondrial Membranes, Rats, Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review