Cited by 235Mass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsProtein Structure and DynamicsAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications

Collision induced unfolding of isolated proteins in the gas phase: past, present, and future

Open access
Dixit, Sugyan M, Polasky, Daniel A, Ruotolo, Brandon T·2018·Current Opinion in Chemical Biology

Abstract

Rapidly characterizing the three-dimensional structures of proteins and the multimeric machines they form remains one of the great challenges facing modern biological and medical sciences. Ion mobility-mass spectrometry based techniques are playing an expanding role in characterizing these functional complexes, especially in drug discovery and development workflows. Despite this expansion, ion mobility-mass spectrometry faces many challenges, especially in the context of detecting small differences in protein tertiary structure that bear functional consequences. Collision induced unfolding is an ion mobility-mass spectrometry method that enables the rapid differentiation of subtly-different protein isoforms based on their unfolding patterns and stabilities. In this review, we summarize the modern implementation of such gas-phase unfolding experiments and provide an overview of recent developments in both methods and applications.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cbpa.2017.11.010

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dixit, S. M., Polasky, D. A., & Ruotolo, B. T.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Ruotolo, Brandon T
Venue
Current Opinion in Chemical Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-02
Volume
42
Pages
93-100
ISSN
1367-5931 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2772936471
Cited by
235
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 10 · 2015: 1
FWCI
2.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Chemical Biology (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1253384)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • NIGMS (R01 GM095832)
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Agilent Technologies
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
Keywords
collision-induced unfolding, ion mobility mass spectrometry, protein tertiary structure, protein isoforms, protein stability, protein complexes, drug discovery
MeSH terms
Ion Mobility Spectrometry, Biological Products, Gases, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Mass Spectrometry, Protein Structure, Secondary, Protein Isoforms, Drug Discovery, High-Throughput Screening Assays, Protein Unfolding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review