Cited by 54Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyComparative Animal Anatomy Studies

Intake, ingesta retention, particle size distribution and digestibility in the Hippopotamidae

Open access
Clauss, M., Schwarm, A., Ortmann, S., Alber, D., Flach, E.J., Kühne, R., Hummel, J., Streich, W.J. +1 more·2004·Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology

Abstract

Although several aspects of the digestive physiology of the hippopotamidae-non-ruminating foregut fermenters-have been described, ingesta kinetics and passage characteristics of these species are not well understood. The most outstanding feature of the hippo digestive physiology reported so far is the very long mean ingesta retention times (MRTs) measured by Foose [Foose, T., 1982. Trophic strategies of ruminant versus nonruminant ungulates. PhD dissertation, University of Chicago, Chicago.]. Since those data had been investigated with animals without water access, we intended to measure MRT in hippos which were allowed to enter water pools during the night. MRT parameters as well as dry matter (DM) digestibility were determined in four common (Hippopotamus amphibius) and four pygmy hippos (Hexaprotodon liberiensis) on two different diets each using cobalt ethylendiamintetraacetate (Co-EDTA) as a fluid, chromium (Cr)-mordanted fibre (<2 mm) as a particle and acid detergent lignin (ADL) as an internal digestibility marker. Four of the animals additionally received cerium (Ce)-mordanted fibres (2-10 mm) as particle markers. Total MRTs for fluids and particles ranged between 20-35 and 48-106 h in the common and between 13-39 and 32-107 h in the pygmy hippos. The difference between fluid and particle retention was greater than usually reported in ruminants. Excretion patterns of the markers differed from those usually observed in ruminants but resembled those reported for macropo…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cbpb.2004.10.002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hippopotamids have comparatively low energy requirements and basal metabolic rates than similarly sized ruminants.

    “Hippopotamids have comparatively low energy requirements and basal metabolic rates than similarly sized ruminants (Clauss et al. 2004), so even a small excess in energy intake can lead to weight gain.”

    From Choeropsis liberiensis (Artiodactyla: Hippopotamidae) (2019) · cites this paper as Clauss et al. 2004

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clauss, M., Schwarm, A., Ortmann, S., Alber, D., Flach, E. J., Kühne, R., Hummel, J., Streich, W. J., & Hofer, H.
Affiliations
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
  • Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research (DE)
  • Berlin Zoological Garden (DE)
Corresponding author
Clauss, M.
Venue
Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-12
Volume
139
Issue
4
Pages
449-459
ISSN
1095-6433 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1976618275
Cited by
54
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A Molecular & Integrative Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
Keywords
hippopotamus, dry matter digestibility, particle size distribution, forestomach, tubular reactor
MeSH terms
Animals, Body Weight, Digestion, Feces, Feeding Behavior, Female, Fermentation, Male, Mammals, Particle Size, Gastrointestinal Tract

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review