The Bull's-Eye Values Survey: A Psychometric Evaluation
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Bull's Eye Values Survey part 1 is a validated measure of values-driven behavior that is sensitive to ACT treatment effects.
“The Bull’s Eye Values Survey part 1 [96] is a validated measure of values-driven behavior that is sensitive to ACT treatment effects.”
Bull's Eye has good temporal stability and many properties supporting its construct validity.
“It has shown good temporal stability and has many properties supporting its construct validity [59]”
Higher perceived value-action discrepancy is positively correlated with measures of psychological distress using the DASS-21.
“A correlation analysis shows that higher perceived value-action discrepancy is positively correlated with measures of psychological distress, using the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21; [Lundgren et al., 2012]),”
From Development and initial evaluation of a smartphone application based on acceptance and commitment therapy (2012) · cites this paper as Lundgren et al., 2012
The degree to which a person lives up to his or her values directly affects that person's sense of quality of life.
“It is suggested that the degree to which a person lives up to his or her values will directly affect that person’s sense of quality of life ([Lundgren et al., 2012]).”
From Development and initial evaluation of a smartphone application based on acceptance and commitment therapy (2012) · cites this paper as Lundgren et al., 2012
Higher value action discrepancy is associated with lowered psychological flexibility as measured by the AAQ-II and lower levels of subjective well-being as measured by the SWLS.
“Furthermore, higher value action discrepancy is associated with lowered psychological flexibility, as measured by the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire II (AAQ-II), and lower levels of subjective well being, as measured by the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS; [Lundgren et al., 2012]).”
From Development and initial evaluation of a smartphone application based on acceptance and commitment therapy (2012) · cites this paper as Lundgren et al., 2012
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 25 · Cited by 172
- Authors
- Lundgren, T., Luoma, J. B., Dahl, J., Strosahl, K., & Melin, L.
- Affiliations
- Stockholm University (SE)
- Uppsala University (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Lundgren, Tobias
- Venue
- Cognitive and Behavioral Practice
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-11
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 518-526
- ISSN
- 1077-7229 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2015267354
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 10.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Cognitive and Behavioral Practice (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Keywords
- personal values, values-based intervention, psychological flexibility, depression, anxiety, stress, temporal stability, internal consistency, content validity, epilepsy patients, university students
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review