Cited by 5Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyPsychiatric care and mental health services

Implementing and adapting the SAFETY treatment for suicidal youth: The incubator model, telehealth, and the Covid-19 pandemic

Hughes, Jennifer L., Asarnow, Joan R.·2022·Cognitive and Behavioral Practice

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cbpra.2021.06.009

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hughes, J. L., & Asarnow, J. R.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Asarnow, Joan R.
Venue
Cognitive and Behavioral Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-02
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
198-213
ISSN
1077-7229 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3192998060
Cited by
5
References
19
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2
FWCI
0.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cognitive and Behavioral Practice (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health
  • Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
  • American Foundation for Suicide Prevention
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
adolescent suicide prevention, self-harm, telemedicine, COVID-19 pandemic, treatment adaptation, social systems, treatment implementation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review