Cited by 46Metabolism and Genetic DisordersLysosomal Storage Disorders ResearchMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies

Improved analysis of C26:0-lysophosphatidylcholine in dried-blood spots via negative ion mode HPLC-ESI-MS/MS for X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy newborn screening

Haynes, Christopher A., De Jesús, Víctor R.·2012·Clinica Chimica Acta

Abstract

Background X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy (X-ALD) is the most common human peroxisomal disorder, and is caused by mutations in the peroxisomal transmembrane ALD protein (ALDP, ABCD1). The biochemical defect associated with X-ALD is an accumulation of very long-chain fatty acids (VLCFA, e.g. C24:0 and C26:0), which has been shown to result in the accumulation of C26:0-lysophosphatidylcholine (C26:0-LPC). Methods We describe the analysis of C26:0-LPC in dried-blood spots (DBS) using a rapid (30 min) and simple extraction procedure, isocratic HPLC resolution of LPC, and structure-specific analysis via negative ion mode tandem mass spectrometry. Results In putative normal DBS specimens from newborns (N=223) C26:0-LPC was 0.09±0.03 μmol/l whole blood, while in peroxisomal biogenesis disorder (including X-ALD) patients (N=28) C26:0-LPC was 1.13±0.67 μmol/l whole blood. Both multiple reaction monitoring and a neutral loss scan (225.1 Da) analysis of DBS were used to analyze LPC. Conclusions Compared to a previous report of C26:0-LPC analysis in DBS, the method described here is simpler, faster, and more structure-specific for LPC with C26:0 acyl chains.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cca.2012.03.026

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Determination of C26:0 lysophosphatidylcholine (C26:0-LPC) from dried blood spots has turned out to be most promising for high-throughput biochemical screening for X-ALD and other metabolic disorders.

    “Determination of C26:0 lysophosphatidylcholine (C26:0-LPC) from dried blood spots has turned out to be most promising and slightly different methods based on tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) were reported by different laboratories.68–71”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haynes, C. A., & De Jesús, V. R.
Affiliations
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Corresponding author
Haynes, Christopher A.
Venue
Clinica Chimica Acta
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-08
Volume
413
Issue
15-16
Pages
1217-1221
ISSN
0009-8981 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2043030037
Cited by
46
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinica Chimica Acta (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Metabolism and Genetic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
Keywords
X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy, dried blood spots, newborn screening, peroxisomal disorders, very long chain fatty acids, ABCD1, peroxisome biogenesis disorders, neutral loss scan, multiple reaction monitoring
MeSH terms
Adrenoleukodystrophy, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Lysophosphatidylcholines, Reference Values, Neonatal Screening, Peroxisomal Disorders, Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization, Tandem Mass Spectrometry, Dried Blood Spot Testing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review