Cited by 832Microtubule and mitosis dynamicsCell death mechanisms and regulationCancer-related Molecular Pathways

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Cancer Cells Display Profound Intra- and Interline Variation following Prolonged Exposure to Antimitotic Drugs

Open access

Abstract

Drugs targeting the mitotic spindle are used extensively during chemotherapy, but surprisingly, little is known about how they kill tumor cells. This is largely because many of the population-based approaches are indirect and lead to vague and confusing interpretations. Here, we use a high-throughput automated time-lapse light microscopy approach to systematically analyze over 10,000 single cells from 15 cell lines in response to three different classes of antimitotic drug. We show that the variation in cell behavior is far greater than previously recognized, with cells within any given line exhibiting multiple fates. We present data supporting a model wherein cell fate is dictated by two competing networks, one involving caspase activation, the other protecting cyclin B1 from degradation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ccr.2008.07.002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fate of cells undergoing mitotic catastrophe is dictated at least in part by time under mitotic arrest and ability to slip out of aberrant mitoses.

    “Of note, the ultimate fate of cells undergoing mitotic catastrophe seems to be dictated (at least in part) by the time spent under mitotic arrest and their capability to slip out of aberrant mitoses [993].”

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 47 · Cited by 832

Metadata

Authors
Gascoigne, K. E., & Taylor, S. S.
Affiliations
University of Manchester (GB)
Corresponding author
Taylor, Stephen S.
Venue
Cancer Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-08
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
111-122
ISSN
1535-6108 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2154603906
Cited by
832
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 59 · 2015: 53 · 2014: 57 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 48
FWCI
26.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • AstraZeneca
  • Cancer Research UK
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Cell death mechanisms and regulation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
Keywords
antimitotic agents, mitotic spindle, mitotic cell death, single-cell heterogeneity, caspase activation, cyclin B1 degradation, cell cycle, chemotherapy response, cell lines
MeSH terms
Chromosomes, Human, Humans, Microscopy, Mitosis, Spindle Apparatus, Models, Biological, Neoplasms, Time Factors, Cell Death, Cell Lineage, Caspases, Chromosomal Instability, Cell Line, Tumor, Antimitotic Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review