Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 320

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 125 of the 125 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Proton-conductive metal-organic frameworks: Recent advances and perspectives

Li, Ai-Lin, Gao, Qiang, Xu, Jian, Bu, Xian-He·2017·Coordination Chemistry Reviews

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ccr.2017.03.027

Cites

125 of 125 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 125 references

Cited by

See all 320

Metadata

Authors
Li, A.-L., Gao, Q., Xu, J., & Bu, X.-H.
Venue
Coordination Chemistry Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-08
Volume
344
Pages
54-82
ISSN
0010-8545 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2604147365
Cited by
320
References
125
FWCI
13.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Proton-conductive metal-organic frameworks: Recent advances and perspectives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ccr.2017.03.027
The paper
Li, A.-L., Gao, Q., Xu, J., & Bu, X.-H. (2017). Proton-conductive metal-organic frameworks: Recent advances and perspectives. Coordination Chemistry Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2017.03.027

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.