The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Amide-functionalized metal–organic frameworks: Syntheses, structures and improved gas storage and separation properties
Abstract
Abstract Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), emerging as a new type of solid state porous material, have received intensive attention in academia and industry over the last two decades. MOF materials demonstrate not only intriguing structures/topologies, but also a variety of functionalities/applications, i.e., mediating the currentdemanding energy crisis and environmental pollution. We are interested in the design and self-assembly of functional MOF materials to improve carbon dioxide, hydrogen, methane and acetylene storage capabilities, as well as the separation efficiencies toward flue gas and nature gas. Therefore, significant efforts have been devoted to construct a subclass of amide-functionalized metal–organic frameworks (AFMOFs) in the last decade in our research group to target the above-mentioned applications. Due to the intrinsic nature, i.e., flexibility and polarizability of amide groups, the resultant AFMOFs unveil a myriad of graceful structures/topologies in combination with enhanced gas storage and separation properties. Depending on where the amide groups are implanted into the organic backbones, two types of AFMOFs were essentially afforded in our research group. In this review, we first pay some attention to the synthesis and structures of dynamic AFMOFs, in which the amide groups are built between carboxymethyl and phenyl rings, then we discuss the designs, syntheses and constructions of robust AFMOFs by means of several intriguingly topological platforms, i.e., pcu-, agw-, nbo-, rht-, pbz- and txt-MOFs, where the amide groups are built between two phenyl rings. Later, several outstanding AFMOFs are chosen to elucidate their applications for energy gas storage and carbon capture, as well as acetylene safe handling.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Millward, A. R., & Yaghi, O. M. (2005) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja0570032 · Cited by 2,876
Large-scale screening of hypothetical metal–organic frameworks
Wilmer, C. E., Leaf, M., Lee, C. Y., Farha, O. K., Hauser, B. G., Hupp, J. T., & Snurr, R. Q. (2012) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/nchem.1192 · Cited by 1,439
Cited by
Liu, W., Yin, R., Xu, X., Zhang, L., Shi, W., & Cao, X. (2019) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.201802373 · Cited by 304
Polyoxometalate@Metal–Organic Framework Composites as Effective Photocatalysts
Liu, Y., Tang, C., Cheng, M., Chen, M., Chen, S., Lei, L., Chen, Y., Yi, H., Fu, Y., & Li, L. (2021) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.1c03866 · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- Xue, D.-X., Wang, Q., & Bai, J.
- Venue
- Coordination Chemistry Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-01
- Volume
- 378
- Pages
- 2-16
- ISSN
- 0010-8545 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2768220817
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Amide-functionalized metal–organic frameworks: Syntheses, structures and improved gas storage and separation properties. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ccr.2017.10.026
- The paper
- Xue, D.-X., Wang, Q., & Bai, J. (2019). Amide-functionalized metal–organic frameworks: Syntheses, structures and improved gas storage and separation properties. Coordination Chemistry Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2017.10.026
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.