The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measuring treatment impact: a review of patient-reported outcomes and other efficacy endpoints in approved product labels
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1992) · PubMed · Cited by 33,716
The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual Framework and Item Selection
Ware, J. E., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002 · Cited by 30,033
A New Method for Measuring Daytime Sleepiness: The Epworth Sleepiness Scale
Johns, M. W. (1991) · Sleep · doi:10.1093/sleep/14.6.540 · Cited by 17,364
Rosen, R. C., Riley, A., Wagner, G., Osterloh, I. H., Kirkpatrick, J., & Mishra, A. (1997) · Urology · doi:10.1016/s0090-4295(97)00238-0 · Cited by 5,849
The Sickness Impact Profile: Development and Final Revision of a Health Status Measure
Bergner, M., Bobbitt, R. A., Carter, W. B., & Gilson, B. S. (1981) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-198108000-00001 · Cited by 4,619
Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis
Fries, J. F., Spitz, P., Kraines, R. G., & Holman, H. R. (1980) · Arthritis & Rheumatism · doi:10.1002/art.1780230202 · Cited by 4,382
The American Urological Association Symptom Index for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
Barry, M. J., Fowler, F. J., O’Leary, M. P., Bruskewitz, R. C., Holtgrewe, H. L., Mebust, W. K., Cockett, A. T. K., & The Measurement Committee of the American Urological Association (1992) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(17)36966-5 · Cited by 3,436
Wilson, I. B. (1995) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03520250075037 · Cited by 3,027 · cited 1×
“In addition to evaluating recent industry and regulatory practices with respect to reporting the results of clinical studies in product labels, this summary creates a baseline for monitoring regulatory and harmonization initiatives regarding PRO endpoints in drug development and contributes to ongoing discussions abou…”
BackgroundArky, R. A. (1994) · Cited by 2,632
A Critical Appraisal of the Quality of Quality-of-Life Measurements
Gill, T. M. (1994) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1994.03520080061045 · Cited by 2,208
Cited by
Revicki, D., Hays, R. D., Cella, D., & Sloan, J. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.03.012 · Cited by 2,362
Varni, J. W., Limbers, C. A., & Burwinkle, T. M. (2007) · Health and Quality of Life Outcomes · doi:10.1186/1477-7525-5-1 · Cited by 1,075
Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes: A User’s Guide
(2020) · doi:10.23970/ahrqepcregistries4 · Cited by 960
Varni, J. W., Limbers, C. A., & Burwinkle, T. M. (2007) · Health and Quality of Life Outcomes · doi:10.1186/1477-7525-5-43 · Cited by 890
Gwaltney, C. J., Shields, A. L., & Shiffman, S. (2008) · Value in Health · doi:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00231.x · Cited by 623
Metadata
- Authors
- Willke, R. J., Burke, L. B., & Erickson, P.
- Venue
- Controlled Clinical Trials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-12
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 535-552
- ISSN
- 0197-2456 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2111869225
- Cited by
- 305
- References
- 49
- FWCI
- 33.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measuring treatment impact: a review of patient-reported outcomes and other efficacy endpoints in approved product labels. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cct.2004.09.003
- The paper
- Willke, R. J., Burke, L. B., & Erickson, P. (2004). Measuring treatment impact: a review of patient-reported outcomes and other efficacy endpoints in approved product labels. Controlled Clinical Trials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2004.09.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
