The DOI matches its Crossref record; 478 of the 478 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes: A User’s Guide
Open accessAbstract
The fourth edition of the AHRQ publication, "Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes: A User's Guide," is a reference handbook that provides best practices to guide design, operation, analysis, and evaluation of patient registries. First published in 2007, the User's Guide was expanded and revised in 2010 and 2014 to address new issues in registry methodology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Charlson, M. E., Pompei, P., Ales, K. L., & MacKenzie, C. R. (1987) · Journal of Chronic Diseases · doi:10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8 · Cited by 49,742
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
Martin Bland, J., & Altman, D. (1986) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90837-8 · Cited by 47,965
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions: Cochrane Book Series
(2008) · doi:10.1002/9780470712184 · Cited by 25,048
Home visits: a strategy to improve newborn survival - Authors' reply
(2008) · Americanae (AECID Library) · doi:10.1016/s0140 · Cited by 22,524
Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys
Rubin, D. B. (1987) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9780470316696 · Cited by 20,701
Statistical Analysis With Missing Data
Lahiff, M., Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2289883 · Cited by 17,265
Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes
Drummond, M. E., Sculpher, M. J., Torrance, G. W., O’Brien, B. J., & Stoddart, G. L. (2005) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198529446.001.0001 · Cited by 13,648
Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness
(2008) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.46-0977 · Cited by 11,572
Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century
Baker, A. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7322.1192 · Cited by 10,736
To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System
Hendee, W. R. (2001) · Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology · doi:10.1016/s1051-0443(01)70072-3 · Cited by 10,103
Cited by
Validation of a common data model for active safety surveillance research
Overhage, J. M., Ryan, P. B., Reich, C. G., Hartzema, A. G., & Stang, P. E. (2012) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000376 · Cited by 548
Cammarota, G., Ianiro, G., Kelly, C. R., Mullish, B. H., Allegretti, J. R., Kassam, Z., Putignani, L., Fischer, M., Keller, J. J., Costello, S. P., et al. (2019) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319548 · Cited by 506
Establishing Patient Registries for Rare Diseases: Rationale and Challenges
Boulanger, V., Schlemmer, M., Rossov, S., Seebald, A., & Gavin, P. (2020) · Pharmaceutical Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40290-020-00332-1 · Cited by 124
Kimball, A. B., Leonardi, C., Stahle, M., Gulliver, W., Chevrier, M., Fakharzadeh, S., Goyal, K., Calabro, S., Langholff, W., Menter, A., et al. (2014) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/bjd.13013 · Cited by 117
Al‐Rubeaan, K., Abu El‐Asrar, A. M., Youssef, A. M., Subhani, S. N., Ahmad, N. A., Al‐Sharqawi, A. H., Alguwaihes, A., Alotaibi, M. S., Al‐Ghamdi, A., & Ibrahim, H. M. (2015) · Acta Ophthalmologica · doi:10.1111/aos.12532 · Cited by 108
Metadata
- Published
- 2020-09-21
- OpenAlex
- W2400968868
- Cited by
- 960
- References
- 478
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes: A User’s Guide. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.23970/ahrqepcregistries4
- The paper
- Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes: A User’s Guide. (2020). https://doi.org/10.23970/ahrqepcregistries4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
