Cited by 28Ovarian function and disordersEthics in Clinical ResearchMethodologies in Health Research and Practice

Local recruitment experience in a study comparing the effectiveness of a low glycaemic index diet with a low calorie healthy eating approach at achieving weight loss and reducing the risk of endometrial cancer in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS)

Atiomo, William, Read, Anna, Golding, Mary, Silcocks, Paul, Razali, Nuguelis, Sarkar, Sabitabrata, Hardiman, Paul, Thornton, Jim·2009·Contemporary Clinical Trials

Abstract

Objective Feasibility of a clinical-trial comparing a low-glycaemic diet with a low-calorie healthy eating approach at achieving weight loss and reducing the risk of endometrial cancer in women with PCOS.Design A pilot Randomised-Controlled-Trial using different recruitment strategies.Setting A University Hospital in the United Kingdom.Patients Women seen at specialist gynaecology clinics over a 12 month period in one University Hospital, and women self identified through a website and posters.Interventions Potential recruits were assessed for eligibility, gave informed consent, randomised, treated and assessed as in the definitive trial.Main outcome measures Eligibility and recruitment rates, compliance with the allocated diet for 6 months and with clinical assessments, blood tests, pelvic ultrasound scans and endometrial biopsies.Results 1433 new and 2598 follow up patients were seen in 153 gynaecology clinics for over 12 months. 441 (11%) potentially eligible women were identified, 19 (0.4%) of whom met the trial entry criteria. Eleven consented to take part, of which 8 (73%) completed the study.Conclusions Planned future trials on over-weight women with PCOS should be multicentre and should incorporate primary care. This data will help other researchers plan and calculate the sample size and potential recruitment rates in future clinical trials in PCOS. The results will also be useful for inclusion in future meta-analyses.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cct.2009.05.001

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Atiomo, W., Read, A., Golding, M., Silcocks, P., Razali, N., Sarkar, S., Hardiman, P., & Thornton, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
  • University of Malaya (MY)
  • Royal Derby Hospital (GB)
  • The Royal Free Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Atiomo, William
Venue
Contemporary Clinical Trials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-09
Volume
30
Issue
5
Pages
451-456
ISSN
1551-7144 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2064496465
Cited by
28
References
13
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Contemporary Clinical Trials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Cancer Research UK (C20654/A7380)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Methodologies in Health Research and Practice
Keywords
polycystic ovary syndrome, trial recruitment, local recruitment, low glycemic index diet, hypocaloric diet, weight loss, endometrial cancer risk, trial feasibility, overweight women, dietary adherence
MeSH terms
Adult, Diet, Reducing, Feasibility Studies, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Risk Factors, Weight Loss, Body Mass Index, Endometrial Neoplasms, Risk Assessment, Patient Selection, Glycemic Index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review