Cited by 58Research Data Management PracticesElectronic Health Records SystemsBiomedical Text Mining and Ontologies

NIH/NCATS/GRDR® Common Data Elements: A leading force for standardized data collection

Open access
Rubinstein, Yaffa R., McInnes, Pamela·2015·Contemporary Clinical Trials

Abstract

The main goal of the NIH/NCATS GRDR® program is to serve as a central web-based global data repository to integrate de-identified patient clinical data from rare disease registries, and other data sources, in a standardized manner, to be available to researchers for conducting various biomedical studies, including clinical trials and to support analyses within and across diseases. The aim of the program is to advance research for many rare diseases. One of the first tasks toward achieving this goal was the development of a set of Common Data Elements (CDEs), which are controlled terminologies that represent collected data. A list of 75 CDEs was developed by a national committee and was validated and implemented during a period of 2 year proof of concept. Access to GRDR CDEs is freely available at: https://grdr.ncats.nih.gov/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=3&Itemid=5. The GRDR CDEs have been the cornerstone of the GRDR repository, as well as of several other national and international patient registries. The establishment of the GRDR program has elevated the issue of data standardization and interoperability for rare disease patient registries, to international attention, resulting in a global dialog and significant change in the mindset of registry developers, patient advocacy groups, and other national and international organizations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cct.2015.03.003

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [4]Jenders RA McDonald C Rubinstein YR Groft S Applying Standards to Public Health: An Information Model for a Global Rare-Diseases Registry I 1819 American Medical Informatics Association symposium Proc. 2011
  2. [11]AHRQ Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes A User’s Guide: 3rd Edition Research Report - Final – Apr. 30, 2014

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rubinstein, Y. R., & McInnes, P.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Rubinstein, Yaffa R.
Venue
Contemporary Clinical Trials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-05
Volume
42
Pages
78-80
ISSN
1551-7144 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2009470317
Cited by
58
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
15.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Contemporary Clinical Trials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (Z99 TR999999)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
Keywords
common data elements, rare disease registry, data standardization, interoperability, de-identified patient data, controlled vocabulary, patient advocacy
MeSH terms
Data Collection, Humans, Databases, Factual, Rare Diseases, Biomedical Research, Common Data Elements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review