The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Integrating trust and personal values into the Technology Acceptance Model: The case of e-government services adoption
Open accessAbstract
The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) is considered one of the best frameworks to understand technology-related adoptions that can be extended and adapted to the different features of many diverse situations. This work analyzes the adoption of e-government services and proposes that trust and personal values contribute to better understand such adoption. Specifically, this study proposes an integration of trust into the TAM, due to the online context characteristics (i.e., uncertainty). In addition, since these services are provided to the whole citizenry, two personal values very much related to e-government advantages (citizens’ time consciousness and environmental concern) are proposed as moderators of the aforementioned relationships. Results reveal the mediating role of trust into the TAM framework which is confirmed by a rival models analysis. Besides, citizens’ personal values moderate the influence of some antecedents of the intention to use e-government services, which suggests some interesting implications for public administration strategic marketing. El Modelo de Aceptación Tecnológica (TAM) es conocido por ser uno de los mejores marcos conceptuales que puede adaptarse a las características de diferentes escenarios de adopción tecnológica. Este trabajo analiza la adopción de servicios de administración electrónica y propone que la confianza y los valores personales contribuyen a entender mejor este proceso. Concretamente, dada las características del entorno online y la variedad de usuarios potenciales, se propone una integración de la confianza en el TAM y se analiza como dos valores personales de los ciudadanos (la conciencia de tiempo y la conciencia medioambiental) moderan las relaciones anteriores en este contexto. Los resultados revelan que la confianza desempeña un papel mediador en el modelo TAM, lo que se confirma con el análisis de modelos rivales. Asimismo, los valores personales moderan la influencia de las variables TAM sobre la intención de uso, sugiriendo algunas implicaciones de interés para el marketing estratégico de las Administraciones Públicas.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
An integrative model of organizational trust
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258792 · Cited by 10,736
Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.6.2.144 · Cited by 8,815
Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model1
Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036519 · Cited by 8,635
An Examination of the Nature of Trust in Buyer-Seller Relationships
Doney, P. M., & Cannon, J. P. (1997) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1251829 · Cited by 6,822
(2003) · International Journal of Electronic Commerce · doi:10.1080/10864415.2003.11044275 · Cited by 5,715
What trust means in e-commerce customer relationships: an interdisciplinary conceptual typology
McKnight, D. H., & Chervany, N. L. (2001) · International Journal of Electronic Commerce · doi:10.1080/10864415.2001.11044235 · Cited by 2,282
A trust model for consumer Internet shopping
Lee, M. K. O., & Turban, E. (2001) · International Journal of Electronic Commerce · doi:10.1080/10864415.2001.11044227 · Cited by 2,012
The Relative Importance of Perceived Ease of Use in IS Adoption: A Study of E-Commerce Adoption
Drexel University, Gefen, D., Straub, D., & Georgia State University (2000) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00008 · Cited by 1,833
Cited by
Consumer attitude and intention to adopt mobile wallet in India – An empirical study
Chawla, D., & Joshi, H. (2019) · International Journal of Bank Marketing · doi:10.1108/ijbm-09-2018-0256 · Cited by 518
The role of utilitarian and hedonic aspects in the continuance intention to use social mobile apps
Akdim, K., Casaló, L. V., & Flavián, C. (2022) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102888 · Cited by 365
Self-citationHamid, A. A., Razak, F. Z. A., Bakar, A. A., & Abdullah, W. S. W. (2016) · Procedia Economics and Finance · doi:10.1016/s2212-5671(16)00079-4 · Cited by 334
Improving IoT Technology Adoption through Improving Consumer Trust
AlHogail, A. (2018) · Technologies · doi:10.3390/technologies6030064 · Cited by 180
Predictors for e-government adoption: integrating TAM, TPB, trust and perceived risk.
Xie, Q., Song, W., Peng, X., & Shabbir, M. (2017) · The Electronic Library · doi:10.1108/el-08-2015-0141 · Cited by 167
Metadata
- Authors
- Belanche, D., Casaló, L. V., & Flavián, C.
- Venue
- Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-10
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 192-204
- ISSN
- 1138-5758 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1963796759
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 22
- FWCI
- 4.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Integrating trust and personal values into the Technology Acceptance Model: The case of e-government services adoption. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cede.2012.04.004
- The paper
- Belanche, D., Casaló, L. V., & Flavián, C. (2012). Integrating trust and personal values into the Technology Acceptance Model: The case of e-government services adoption. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cede.2012.04.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.