Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 213

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Integrating trust and personal values into the Technology Acceptance Model: The case of e-government services adoption

Open access
Belanche, Daniel, Casaló, Luis V., Flavián, Carlos·2012·Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa

Abstract

The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) is considered one of the best frameworks to understand technology-related adoptions that can be extended and adapted to the different features of many diverse situations. This work analyzes the adoption of e-government services and proposes that trust and personal values contribute to better understand such adoption. Specifically, this study proposes an integration of trust into the TAM, due to the online context characteristics (i.e., uncertainty). In addition, since these services are provided to the whole citizenry, two personal values very much related to e-government advantages (citizens’ time consciousness and environmental concern) are proposed as moderators of the aforementioned relationships. Results reveal the mediating role of trust into the TAM framework which is confirmed by a rival models analysis. Besides, citizens’ personal values moderate the influence of some antecedents of the intention to use e-government services, which suggests some interesting implications for public administration strategic marketing. El Modelo de Aceptación Tecnológica (TAM) es conocido por ser uno de los mejores marcos conceptuales que puede adaptarse a las características de diferentes escenarios de adopción tecnológica. Este trabajo analiza la adopción de servicios de administración electrónica y propone que la confianza y los valores personales contribuyen a entender mejor este proceso. Concretamente, dada las características del entorno online y la variedad de usuarios potenciales, se propone una integración de la confianza en el TAM y se analiza como dos valores personales de los ciudadanos (la conciencia de tiempo y la conciencia medioambiental) moderan las relaciones anteriores en este contexto. Los resultados revelan que la confianza desempeña un papel mediador en el modelo TAM, lo que se confirma con el análisis de modelos rivales. Asimismo, los valores personales moderan la influencia de las variables TAM sobre la intención de uso, sugiriendo algunas implicaciones de interés para el marketing estratégico de las Administraciones Públicas.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cede.2012.04.004

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Cited by

See all 213

Metadata

Authors
Belanche, D., Casaló, L. V., & Flavián, C.
Venue
Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-10
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
192-204
ISSN
1138-5758 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1963796759
Cited by
213
References
22
FWCI
4.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Integrating trust and personal values into the Technology Acceptance Model: The case of e-government services adoption. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cede.2012.04.004
The paper
Belanche, D., Casaló, L. V., & Flavián, C. (2012). Integrating trust and personal values into the Technology Acceptance Model: The case of e-government services adoption. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cede.2012.04.004

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.