Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The student engagement questionnaire was found to be valid and reliable in Pearson's correlation analysis and in terms of Cronbach's alpha (α = 0.912).
“The questionnaire was found to be valid and reliable in Pearson's correlation analysis and in terms of Cronbach's alpha (α = 0.912).”
From Incorporating Computational Thinking Into Virtual Laboratories to Enhance Learning Motivation, Engagement, and Higher‐Order Thinking Skills (2025) · cites this paper as Reeve and Tseng (2011)
The questionnaires used had acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.936 for learning motivation, 0.912 for student engagement, and 0.874 for HOTS).
“| Learning motivation | 0.936 | Pintrich (1991) |”
From Incorporating Computational Thinking Into Virtual Laboratories to Enhance Learning Motivation, Engagement, and Higher‐Order Thinking Skills (2025) · cites this paper as Reeve and Tseng (2011)
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 75 · Cited by 1,618
- Authors
- Reeve, J., & Tseng, C.-M.
- Affiliations
- Korea University (KR)
- University of Iowa (US)
- Corresponding author
- Reeve, Johnmarshall
- ORCID
- Reeve, Johnmarshall
- Venue
- Contemporary Educational Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-10
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 257-267
- ISSN
- 0361-476X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2018176383
- Cited by
- 1,618
- References
- 75
- Citations by year
- 2026: 247 · 2025: 216 · 2024: 188 · 2023: 232 · 2022: 163 · 2021: 132 · 2020: 105 · 2019: 93 · 2018: 63 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 22.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Contemporary Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministry of Education, Science and Technology
- Korea Science and Engineering Foundation (R32-2008-000-20023-0)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
- Keywords
- agentic engagement, student engagement, behavioral engagement, emotional engagement, cognitive engagement, academic performance, high school students, classroom motivation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
