An attributional theory of motivation
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Expectancy and value are explicit in expectancy-value theory, attribution theory, control-value theory, and Dweck's integrative theory.
“These two sides, expectancy and value, are explicit in expectancy-value theory (Eccles & Wigfield, 2002, 2020), attribution theory (Graham, 2020;Weiner, 2010), controlvalue theory (Pekrun, 2006;Pekrun et al., 2017), and Dweck's integrative theory (Dweck, 2017).”
From Motivation-Achievement Cycles in Learning: a Literature Review and Research Agenda (2022) · cites this paper as Graham, 2020
Perceived achievement is subject to interpretative, comparison, and attributional processes.
“Perceived achievement is also subject to interpretative, comparison, and attributional processes (described in attribution theories, Graham, 2020;Weiner, 2010).”
From Motivation-Achievement Cycles in Learning: a Literature Review and Research Agenda (2022) · cites this paper as Graham, 2020
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 111 · Cited by 341
- Authors
- Graham, S.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Corresponding author
- Graham, Sandra
- ORCID
- Graham, Sandra
- Venue
- Contemporary Educational Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-04
- Volume
- 61
- Pages
- 101861
- ISSN
- 0361-476X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3015082896
- Cited by
- 341
- References
- 111
- Citations by year
- 2026: 32 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 129 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 14 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 48.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Contemporary Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Keywords
- attribution theory, motivation, perceived causality, locus of causality, controllability, self-perception, interpersonal attributions, race and ethnicity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
