Motivation-Achievement Cycles in Learning: a Literature Review and Research Agenda
Open accessAbstract
The question of how learners’ motivation influences their academic achievement and vice versa has been the subject of intensive research due to its theoretical relevance and important implications for the field of education. Here, we present our understanding of how influential theories of academic motivation have conceptualized reciprocal interactions between motivation and achievement and the kinds of evidence that support this reciprocity. While the reciprocal nature of the relationship between motivation and academic achievement has been established in the literature, further insights into several features of this relationship are still lacking. We therefore present a research agenda where we identify theoretical and methodological challenges that could inspire further understanding of the reciprocal relationship between motivation and achievement as well as inform future interventions. Specifically, the research agenda includes the recommendation that future research considers (1) multiple motivation constructs, (2) behavioral mediators, (3) a network approach, (4) alignment of intervals of measurement and the short vs. long time scales of motivation constructs, (5) designs that meet the criteria for making causal, reciprocal inferences, (6) appropriate statistical models, (7) alternatives to self-reports, (8) different ways of measuring achievement, and (9) generalizability of the reciprocal relations to various developmental, ethnic, and sociocultural groups.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review synthesizes theories and evidence on reciprocal motivation–achievement relations and proposes a research agenda. It concludes that reciprocity is established but that causal mechanisms, behavioral mediators, time scales, and generalizability remain poorly understood.
Key findings
- Reciprocal relations are supported across theories and longitudinal/meta-analytic evidence, but effects are small and direction varies: Scharmer (2020) reported pooled achievement→motivation β = .12 versus motivation→achievement β = .06; Valentine and DuBois (2005) reported β = 0.08 and β = 0.15; Huang (2011) reported β = 0.19–0.25 and β = 0.20–0.27.
- Motivation interventions usually improve achievement, with Lazowski and Hulleman (2016) reporting an average Cohen’s d of 0.49, but the reverse causal path (achievement→motivation) is rarely experimentally manipulated, and few studies combine manipulation with longitudinal reciprocal modeling.
- Empirical work heavily focuses on academic self-concept (ASC): 24 of 41 studies in Scharmer (2020) used ASC, even though ASC items overlap with achievement reports and ASC may be less malleable than other motivation constructs.
- Generalizability is limited: Scharmer (2020) found 90% of samples were from WEIRD countries; Valentine et al. (2004) had only four non-Western samples out of 60; Chiu and Klassen (2010), using PISA data (N = 88,590; 34 countries), found the math self-concept–achievement link was moderated by cultural orientations.
Methods
- Narrative literature review and conceptual synthesis of prominent academic motivation theories, explicitly not an exhaustive review or meta-analysis.
- Draws on prior cross-sectional, longitudinal, meta-analytic, and intervention studies to evaluate evidence for reciprocal motivation–achievement relations; presents a summary model (Fig. 1) and three study designs for reciprocity/causality (Fig. 2).
- Proposes a nine-point research agenda covering multiple motivation constructs, behavioral mediators, network approaches, time scales, causal designs, statistical models, alternatives to self-reports, achievement measurement, and generalizability.
Limitations
- The paper states that an exhaustive review is beyond its scope and that it is a conceptual synthesis rather than a systematic review or new empirical study.
- The paper states that most evidence remains correlational; to its knowledge, no studies satisfy the third causality precondition of manipulating one variable and then repeatedly measuring alternating motivation and achievement, and manipulating achievement independently of motivation is difficult.
- The paper states sampling bias toward WEIRD, ethnically and culturally homogeneous samples, plus self-report caveats and unresolved measurement/time-scale issues; evident from the text, the proposed agenda is not itself empirically tested here.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 232 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Premisecitation
Achievement can affect motivation through experiences of success or failure.
“Yet the reverse relation is also often found, as achievement can affect motivation through experiences of success or failure (Garon-Carrier et al., 2016;Guay et al., 2003;Jansen et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
The influence of motivation on achievement is well-documented.
“The influence of motivation on achievement is well-documented (Burnette et al., 2013;Gottfried et al., 2013;Greene & Azevedo, 2007;Valentine et al., 2004).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
Higher motivation leads to higher quality academic behaviors, such as adopting effective learning strategies, adaptive metacognitive strategies, spaced practice, elaboration, retrieval practice, interleaving, and dual coding.
“As a second route, higher levels of motivation could also be associated with higher quality of academic behaviors; for example, by adopting effective learning strategies, adaptive meta-cognitive strategies, spaced practice, elaboration, retrieval practice, interleaving, dual coding, and so on.Several theories of academic motivation support the idea that higher motivation leads to higher quality”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Many theories posit that beliefs about the self, including self-concept, self-esteem, and mindset, are important causes of human behavior and learning.
“It is worth noting that many theories posit that beliefs about the self (including self-concept and self-esteem and mindset/implicit theory of self attributes) are important causes of human behavior and learning (Bandura, 1997;Carver & White, 1994;Deci & Ryan, 2000;Molden & Dweck, 2006).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisenone given
In self-determination theory, the feeling of competence is a basic need that increases the intrinsic value of learning.
“For example, in self-determination theory, the feeling of competence (strengthened by positive perceived achievement) is a basic need that increases the intrinsic value of learning.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Premisecitation
An appraisal of values and expectancies leads to the decision to engage.
“An appraisal of values and expectancies leads to the decision to engage (Cleary & Zimmerman, 2012;Kuhl, 1984;Schunk & DiBenedetto, 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Cleary & Zimmerman, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kuhl, 1984
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Schunk & DiBenedetto, 2020 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The appraisal of values and expectancies can trigger academic emotions such as pride in achievement, hope, boredom, and enjoyment.
“The appraisal of values and expectancies can also trigger academic emotions, such as pride in achievement, hope, boredom, and enjoyment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Much empirical research on motivation-achievement interactions operationalizes motivation as academic self-concept in a certain academic domain, most often in mathematics and verbal subjects such as language and reading.
“Much empirical research on motivation-achievement interactions operationalizes motivation as ASC in a certain academic domain, most often in mathematics and verbal subjects such as language and reading (Guay et al., 2003;Seaton et al., 2014); for meta-analyses and reviews, see Burnette et al. (2013), Eccles and Wigfield (2002), Marsh and Craven (2006), Marsh and Martin (2011), and Robbins et al. (”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
Many theories explicitly suggest that past achievement leads a learner to experience feelings of self-efficacy and perception of control.
“Many theories, such as self-efficacy theory (Bandura, 1997), expectancy-value theory (Eccles & Wigfield, 2002), control theories (Skinner, 1995), and attribution theory (Weiner, 2010) explicitly suggest that past achievement leads a learner to experience feelings of self-efficacy and perception of control.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Bandura, 1997
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Eccles & Wigfield, 2002 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Skinner, 1995
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Individual differences in academic achievement are partly the result of differences in motivation for learning.
“Individual differences in academic achievement are partly the result of differences in motivation for learning (Arens et al., 2017;Burnette et al., 2013;Eccles & Wigfield, 2002;Guay et al., 2003;Huang, 2011;Marsh & Craven, 2006;Marsh & Martin, 2011;Robbins et al., 2004;Seaton et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
Expectancy and value are explicit in expectancy-value theory, attribution theory, control-value theory, and Dweck's integrative theory.
“These two sides, expectancy and value, are explicit in expectancy-value theory (Eccles & Wigfield, 2002, 2020), attribution theory (Graham, 2020;Weiner, 2010), controlvalue theory (Pekrun, 2006;Pekrun et al., 2017), and Dweck's integrative theory (Dweck, 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning
It is plausible and parsimonious that the same kinds of appraisal lie at the basis of both motivation and academic emotions.
“While it is not certain that the same kinds of appraisal lie at the basis of both motivation and academic emotions, it would seem plausible and parsimonious.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Control-value theory describes how academic emotions codetermine achievement behaviors.
“Control-value theory (Pekrun, 2006;Pekrun et al., 2017) describes how such emotions codetermine what are termed achievement behaviors-behaviors that are conducive to the achievement of academic goals.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
A recent study of more than 30,000 college students found that need for competence, relative to need for autonomy and relatedness, is the strongest predictor of perceived learning gains.
“A recent study of more than 30,000 college students found that need for competence (relative to need for autonomy and relatedness) is the strongest predictor of perceived learning gains (Yu & Levesque-Bristol, 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Yu & Levesque-Bristol, 2020 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Literature showing that emotions and academic achievement also form reciprocal relationships over time has recently emerged.
“Literature showing that emotions and academic achievement also form reciprocal relationships over time has recently emerged (Putwain et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Putwain et al., 2018 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In many theories, motivation results from an appraisal combining the value attached to the behavior and its outcomes and the expectancy of the likelihood of certain outcomes of the behavior.
“In that appraisal, two elements are combined (Eccles & Wigfield, 2002): the value attached to the behavior and its outcomes, and the expectancy of the likelihood of certain outcomes of the behavior.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Eccles & Wigfield, 2002 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The earliest support for the relationship between motivation, focusing specifically on self-concepts and other self beliefs, and academic achievement comes from cross-sectional and correlational studies reviewed by Hansford and Hattie (1982).
“The earliest support for the relationship between motivation (focusing specifically on selfconcepts and other self beliefs) and academic achievement comes from cross-sectional and correlational studies, reviewed by Hansford and Hattie (1982).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hansford and Hattie, 1982 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Valentine and DuBois (2005)'s findings were more similar to Scharmer's (2020) in terms of the size of the effects: achievement on self-belief β = 0.08; self-belief on achievement β = 0.15.
“Valentine and DuBois (2005)'s findings were also more similar to Scharmer's (2020) in terms of the size of the effects (achievement on self-belief: β = 0.08; self-belief on achievement: β = 0.15).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Valentine and DuBois, 2005
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Scharmer, 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Research into the Big-Fish-Little-Pond phenomenon suggests that domain-specific academic self-concept, more so than general academic self-concept, is influenced by social comparison.
“Research into the Big-Fish-Little-Pond phenomenon (i.e., students in high-achieving classes having lower ASC than those with comparable aptitude in regular classes) suggests that domain-specific ASC (more so than general ASC) is influenced by social comparison (Fang et al., 2018;Marsh et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
The self-regulatory account of motivation is most explicit that the pathway between self-regulation and achievement is a cyclical feedback loop.
“Most explicit in this regard is the self-regulatory account of motivation (Cleary & Zimmerman, 2012) where the pathway between self-regulation and achievement is a cyclical feedback loop.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cleary & Zimmerman, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
To date, the majority of evidence for the reciprocal relationship between self-concept and achievement has come from time-series or cross-sectional data collected at schools, to which various structural equation models have been fitted.
“To date, the majority of evidence for the reciprocal relationship between self-concept and achievement has come from such time-series or cross-sectional data collected at schools, to which various SEMs have been fitted (see Marsh & Craven, 2006 for a narrative review and Huang, 2011 for a meta-analysis of such studies).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisereasoning
Theories of academic achievement imply a reciprocal relationship between motivation and achievement.
“Figure 1 shows that theories of academic achievement imply a reciprocal relationship between motivation and achievement.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
In an intervention study by Betz and Schifano (2000), ensuring students of successful completion of a task followed by affirmation of accomplishments with applause and verbal praise resulted in an increase in self-efficacy.
“One example is an intervention study by Betz and Schifano (2000) where students were ensured of successful completion of a task followed by affirmation of their accomplishments with applause and verbal praise.This resulted in an increase in selfefficacy (a motivation construct highly related to ASC, Bong & Skaalvik, 2003).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
Supporting autonomy and creating relatedness are ways external actors can increase the value attached to learning, increasing motivation and achievement.
“Supporting autonomy and creating relatedness are other ways in which external actors can increase the value attached to learning, increasing motivation and achievement (Deci & Ryan, 2000).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Deci & Ryan, 2000 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
More recent studies use large sample sizes and longitudinal data of up to six waves, allowing changes in motivation and achievement of students to be tracked across their school career.
“More recent studies showcase impressive efforts of researchers to use large sample sizes and longitudinal data of up to six waves, allowing changes in motivation and achievement of students to be tracked across their school career (e.g., Marsh et al., 2018;Murayama et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
Valentine and DuBois (2005) found that academic achievement had a stronger effect on self-belief than vice versa.
“These findings are in line with Valentine and DuBois (2005) who found that academic achievement had a stronger effect on self-belief than vice versa.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Valentine and DuBois, 2005
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
To date, a large amount of empirical research on reciprocal motivation-achievement interactions has mainly studied academic self-concept.
“However, to date, a large amount of empirical research on reciprocal motivation-achievement interactions has mainly studied ASC (Arens et al., 2019;Brunner et al., 2010;Chen et al., 2013;Dicke et al., 2018;Gottfried et al., 2013;Grygiel et al., 2017;Guay et al., 2003;Guo et al., 2015;Möller et al., 2011;Niepel et al., 2014aNiepel et al., , 2014b;;Retelsdorf et al., 2014;Viljaranta et al., 2014;W”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
A meta-analysis investigating mean-level changes of a number of important motivation constructs concluded that the decline in motivation shows non-trivial differences across these constructs.
“Second, a meta-analysis investigating mean-level changes of a number of important motivation constructs concluded that the decline in motivation shows non-trivial differences across these constructs (Scherrer & Preckel, 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Scherrer & Preckel, 2019 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Empirical evidence for reciprocal relations between motivation and achievement exists.
“The overview given above suggests that empirical evidence for reciprocal relations between motivation and achievement exists.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Academic self-concept and achievement are highly intertwined, as items in academic self-concept questionnaires usually ask students to report on their achievement.
“First and foremost, ASC and achievement are highly intertwined, as items in ASC questionnaires usually ask students to report on their achievement”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Marsh & O'Neill, 1984
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Academic self-concept might be less malleable than other motivation constructs since general self-concept is relatively stable, especially for those at lower levels.
“Third, ASC might also be less malleable than other motivation constructs since general selfconcept is relatively stable-especially for those at lower levels (Scherbaum et al., 2006).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Scherbaum et al., 2006 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Perceived achievement is subject to interpretative, comparison, and attributional processes.
“Perceived achievement is also subject to interpretative, comparison, and attributional processes (described in attribution theories, Graham, 2020;Weiner, 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisenone given
Many motivation theories have implicitly or explicitly conceptualized the relationship between a plethora of motivation constructs and achievement as reciprocal.
“First, as we presented above, many motivation theories have implicitly or explicitly conceptualized the relationship between a plethora of motivation constructs and achievement as reciprocal.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Few studies have combined experimental manipulation and longitudinal design to investigate reciprocal motivation-achievement relations.
“Nevertheless, to the best of our knowledge, few studies have done both: combining experimental manipulation and longitudinal design to investigate reciprocal motivation-achievement relations (an exception that we are aware of is Bejjani et al., 2019 which will be discussed later).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bejjani et al., 2019 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
Experimental studies that look at the reverse causal path, manipulating achievement or the perception of achievement to affect motivation, are scarce.
“However, experimental studies that look at the reverse causal path, manipulating achievement (or the perception of achievement) to affect motivation, are scarce.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Cultural norms, social learning, and verbal persuasion by others can alter learners' expectations, values, and attributional processes, and therefore keep a motivation-achievement cycle going that would otherwise falter or not start up.
“Cultural norms (described in control theories and control-value theory, Pekrun, 2006;Skinner, 1995), social learning, and verbal persuasion by others (social cognitive theory, Bandura, 1997) can alter the expectations, values, and attributional processes of learners (expectancy-value theory, attribution theories, Eccles & Wigfield, 2020;Graham, 2020), and therefore keep a motivation-achievement”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Pekrun, 2006 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Skinner, 1995
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Bandura, 1997
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning
Achievement can increase in the absence of stronger motivation because of better support for learning.
“Thus, achievement can increase in the absence of stronger motivation, because of better support for learning.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Extrinsic rewards and requirements tied to achievement may change the value attributed to academic behavior and so change motivation.
“Extrinsic rewards and requirements tied to achievement, e.g., schools or parents, may change the value attributed to academic behavior, and so change motivation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Deci & Ryan, 2000 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Hidi & Harackiewicz, 2001
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning
Outside requirements can lead to achievement in the absence of strong motivation.
“Such outside requirements can lead to achievement in the absence of strong motivation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Interventions and randomized controlled field studies have manipulated self-concept or other motivation constructs, allowing for causal inferences.
“There have also been interventions and randomized controlled field studies in which either self-concept or other motivation constructs were manipulated (e.g., Savi et al., 2018;Vansteenkiste et al., 2004), thereby allowing for causal inferences.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
Studies investigating reciprocal relations are still missing at a state (or task) level.
“While it has been suggested that reciprocal relations play a more central role on the trait level-e.g., explaining the stronger relations between emotion antecedents and emotions (Bieg et al., 2013), studies investigating reciprocal relations are still missing at a state (or task) level.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bieg et al., 2013 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In non-longitudinal studies, the evidence on behavioral mediators shows differentiation related to how effort is measured.
“In non-longitudinal studies looking at the relations between academic motivation and achievement, the evidence on behavioral mediators also shows differentiation related to how effort is measured.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
In recent investigations of the reciprocal relationship between motivation and achievement, motivation constructs other than academic self-concept have started to be included.
“In recent investigations of the reciprocal relationship between motivation and achievement, motivation constructs other than ASC have started to be included (e.g., self-efficacy in Grigg et al., 2018;Schöber et al., 2018;achievement goals in Scherrer et al., 2020; intrinsic motivation in Hebbecker et al., 2019;and interest in Höft & Bernholt, 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
In Sachisthal et al. (2019), correlations between students' value of science, science engagement, and achievement were modeled as a network, within which clusters of variables emerged.
“This study included measures of students' value of science, their science engagement, and achievement.The correlations between these measures were modeled as a network, within which clusters of variables emerged.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sachisthal et al., 2019 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning
Self-regulatory processes theoretically mediate the link between beliefs and accomplishment of the task.
“Thus, self-regulatory processes theoretically mediate the link between beliefs and accomplishment of the task.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
When studies found reciprocal relations between academic self-concept and other motivation constructs and achievement, they left unanswered which pathways mediate the link between such beliefs and achievement.
“Usually, when studies found reciprocal relations between ASC and other motivation constructs and achievement, they left unanswered which pathways mediate the link between such beliefs and achievement (Marsh & Martin, 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Marsh & Martin, 2011 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Recent accounts of motivation are situated ones, which call attention to fine-grained, moment-to-moment fluctuations during learning engagement.
“Recent accounts of motivation are situated ones, which also call attention to finegrained, moment-to-moment fluctuations that occur during learning engagement (Schunk & DiBenedetto, 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schunk & DiBenedetto, 2020 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premiseown data
Studies including motivation constructs other than academic self-concept in reciprocal motivation-achievement research are still small in number.
“Yet, these studies are still small in number.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Students might perceive that having to try hard, that is, expending a great deal of effort, is indicative of a lack of academic ability.
“Students might perceive that having to try hard (i.e., expending a great deal of effort) is indicative of a lack of academic ability (Baars et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Baars et al., 2020 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Initial attempts to study mediating processes in longitudinal designs yielded mixed findings with regards to the role of effort in the relationship between academic self-concept and academic achievement.
“To our knowledge, initial attempts to study mediating processes in longitudinal designs (Marsh et al., 2016;Pinxten et al., 2014;Trautwein et al., 2009) yielded mixed findings with regards to the role of effort in the relationship between ASC and academic achievement.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
Twenty-four out of 41 studies included in the meta-analysis of Scharmer (2020) still used academic self-concept as the main motivation construct of interest.
“Twenty-four out of 41 studies included in the meta-analysis of Scharmer (2020) still used ASC as the main motivation construct of interest.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Scharmer, 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning
Subjective effort, as opposed to objective effort, might have a very different relation to motivation and achievement.
“Subjective effort, as opposed to objective effort, might therefore have a very different relation to motivation and achievement.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Much research on the reciprocity between motivation and achievement has been done with data collected at large time intervals, reflecting changes over months or years.
“Another gap in the literature that we identified is that much research on the reciprocity between motivation and achievement has been done with data collected at large time intervals, which reflect changes that happen over months or years (e.g., Harackiewicz et al., 2008;Marsh et al., 2005Marsh et al., , 2016;;Nuutila et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
When effort is measured as quality of learning, there is some evidence for a positive link between academic achievement and effort.
“When effort is measured as quality of learning (e.g., selecting adaptive goals, adopting higher-quality learning strategies, etc.), there is some evidence for a positive link between academic achievement and effort (Trigwell et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Trigwell et al., 2013 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In research on interest and achievement emotions, a stable trait level is often distinguished from a shorter, task-dependent state level.
“In research focusing on interest and achievement emotions, for instance, a stable, so-called trait level (e.g., individual interest) is often distinguished from a shorter, taskdependent state level (e.g., situational interest) (see Hidi & Renninger, 2006;Renninger & Hidi, 2011 for interest; Pekrun, 2006 for achievement emotions).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationcitation
The difference between slow and fast change is more salient for certain constructs than for others.
“Furthermore, the difference between slow and fast change is also more salient for certain constructs than for others.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Intensive longitudinal designs can help uncover potential real-time causal variance attributable to a construct that would be missed when it is measured at relatively lengthy intervals such as one academic semester or year.
“Intensive longitudinal designs can help uncover potential”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites McNeish & Hamaker, 2019 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
There are other well-studied motivation constructs such as achievement goals, self-efficacy, interest, and intrinsic motivation.
“Given that there are other well-studied motivation constructs such as achievement goals, self-efficacy, interest, and intrinsic motivation (Scherrer et al., 2020;Scherrer & Preckel, 2019), further research with multiple non-ASC motivation constructs included as concomitant predictors of academic achievement is therefore much needed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
Marsh et al. (2016) and Pinxten et al. (2014) measured subjective effort, in which students were asked to rate their own effort expenditure.
“Specifically, Marsh et al. (2016) and Pinxten et al. (2014) measured subjective effort-i.e., students were asked to rate their own effort expenditure.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning
When studies do not consider fast vs. long cycles of constructs, the effects of a faster changing variable on a slowly changing variable can be missed.
“This suggests that when studies do not consider fast vs. long cycles of constructs, the effects of a faster changing variable on a slowly changing variable can be missed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
Theories of academic motivation imply several pathways through which motivation influences achievement and vice versa.
“As mentioned above, theories of academic motivation imply several pathways through which motivation influences achievement and vice versa (see Fig. 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Cross-lagged paths show the reciprocity between variables but not necessarily causality in these relations.
“Such cross-lagged paths show the reciprocity between the variables but not necessarily causality in these relations (Usami et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Usami et al., 2019 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
To our knowledge, no studies of the mutual relations between motivation and achievement also satisfy the third precondition of causality, that is the manipulation of x has an effect on y at a later time point, followed by repeated measure(s) of x (and y).
“Importantly, to our knowledge, no studies of the mutual relations between motivation and achievement also satisfy the third precondition of causality, that is the manipulation of x has an effect on y at a later time point, followed by (a) repeated measure(s) of x (and y) (Antonakis et al., 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Antonakis et al., 2010 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Most recent discussions of motivation-achievement interactions emphasize the need for alternative methods to self-report questionnaires.
“Most recent discussions of motivation-achievement interactions emphasize the need for alternative methods to self-report questionnaires.These alternatives include experience sampling, daily diaries, think-aloud protocols, observations, and structured interviews (Eccles & Wigfield, 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Eccles & Wigfield, 2020 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
When extant research finds relationships between motivation and achievement, the interpretation with regards to causal relations remains difficult due to the lack of experimental manipulation.
“When extant research finds the relationships between motivation and achievement, the interpretation with regards to causal relations remains difficult due to the lack of experimental manipulation (Granger, 1980;Holland, 1986;Marsh et al., 2018;Mega et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
In longitudinal studies, it is often difficult to assess whether performance at different moments in time truly reflects the same skill.
“Moreover, in longitudinal studies, it is often difficult to assess whether performance at different moments in time truly reflects the same skill.For example, studies of reading skill may assess basic letter decoding skills in a first wave, and complex reading comprehension in the last (Sewasew & Schroeders, 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sewasew & Schroeders, 2019 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Several alternative methods are available to observe and measure motivation or engagement 'online' during learning, for example by using frequent choices of learners or video observations.
“Several alternative methods are available to observe and measure motivation or engagement”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Järvenoja et al., 2018 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Scherrer et al. (2020) found reciprocal effects only in later time points and not in earlier time points after transition into secondary school.
“Some support for such a pattern is provided in Scherrer et al. (2020) who found the reciprocal effects only in later time points and not in earlier time points after transition into secondary school.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Scherrer et al., 2020 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In almost every study investigating reciprocal motivation and achievement relations, the need for experimental designs in which either motivation or achievement is manipulated is raised as a suggestion for future research.
“In almost every study investigating reciprocal motivation and achievement relations, the need for experimental designs in which either motivation or achievement is manipulated is raised as a suggestion for future research (Marsh et al., 2016(Marsh et al., , 2018;;Mega et al., 2014;Pinxten et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
Achievement is nearly always bound to a specific domain, for example mathematics or reading skill.
“First, achievement is nearly always bound to a specific domain, for example mathematics (Arens et al., 2017) or reading skill (Ehm et al., 2019;Sewasew & Koester, 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning
It is hard to manipulate achievement independently from motivation.
“However, it is hard to manipulate achievement independently from motivation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premiseown data
We encountered two studies that contained both an experimental manipulation of a motivation construct and subsequent multiple, alternate measurements of motivation and performance.
“We encountered two studies that contained both an experimental manipulation of a motivation construct and subsequent multiple, alternate measurements of motivation and performance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
None of these process-oriented measures has currently been established as reliable enough to replace verbal reports.
“It should be noted that none of these process-oriented measures has currently been established as reliable enough to replace verbal reports.A standard conclusion is that”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Holzman & Bridgett, 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Establishing causality of reciprocal effects requires the experimental manipulation of at least one of the two variables.
“Establishing causality of reciprocal effects requires the experimental manipulation of at least one of the two variables.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The choice of sophisticated statistical models to investigate reciprocal relationships can have implications for the conclusion drawn.
“Such studies most importantly also point out that the choice of sophisticated statistical models to investigate such relationships can have implications for the conclusion drawn (e.g., Burns et al., 2020;Ehm et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationcitation
Substantial knowledge about confounders will help researchers select the correct statistical model.
“Substantial knowledge about such confounders will help researchers select the correct statistical model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Usami et al. (2019) demonstrated that it is important to identify the existence of third time-varying or time-invariant variables that can have a causal effect on the longitudinal relationship but are yet accounted for in a model.
“In addition, as Usami et al. (2019)-in their comprehensive unified framework of longitudinal models-demonstrated, it is important to identify the existence of third time-varying or time invariant variables (such as stable traits) that can have a causal effect on the longitudinal relationship but are yet accounted for in a model.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Usami et al., 2019 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Self-reports (including questionnaires) of motivation suffer from many inherent caveats.
“Despite their evident psychometric benefits, self-reports (including questionnaires) of motivation suffer from many inherent caveats.Fulmer and Frijters (2009) list several that are relevant.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fulmer and Frijters, 2009 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Most studies investigating the reciprocal relationship between motivation and achievement have measured motivation through questionnaires probing ASC.
“Most studies investigating reciprocal relationship between motivation and achievement have measured motivation through questionnaires probing ASC (e.g., the Academic Self-Description Questionnaire by Marsh & O'Neill, 1984).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Marsh & O'Neill, 1984
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
Non-linear developmental trends cannot be captured by low-frequent measurements.
“This may also help when developmental trajectories are characterized by non-linear trends that cannot be captured by low-frequent measurements (McNeish & Hamaker, 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites McNeish & Hamaker, 2019 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
During adolescence, same-aged peers in school can motivate academic achievement to a larger extent.
“During adolescence, same-aged peers in school can motivate academic achievement to a larger extent”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Maehr & Zusho, 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In Valentine et al. (2004) meta-analysis, samples from non-Western countries tended to have larger effect sizes than those from Western countries.
“samples from non-Western countries tended to have larger effect sizes than those from Western countries”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Valentine et al., 2004 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Populations of different ages have distinct motivation factor structures.
“Populations of different ages have distinct motivation factor structures (Rao & Sachs, 1999)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rao & Sachs, 1999 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
The same motivation construct might contribute differently to achievement across groups.
“even the same motivation construct might contribute differently to achievement across groups.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The link between calibration of mathematics self-concept and mathematics achievement was significantly stronger in places where the prevailing culture was more egalitarian or more tolerant of uncertainty.
“this link was significantly stronger in places where the prevailing culture was more egalitarian or more tolerant of uncertainty.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chiu & Klassen, 2010 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Sachisthal et al. (2019) showed that across populations different motivation constructs are central in the network of constructs.
“Sachisthal et al. (2019) also showed that across populations different motivation constructs are central in the network of constructs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sachisthal et al., 2019 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
A stronger focus on performance rather than mastery goals is sometimes empirically observed during adolescence.
“a stronger focus on performance rather than mastery goals is sometimes empirically observed”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Maehr & Zusho, 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Chiu and Klassen (2010) found that calibration of mathematics self-concept was positively related to mathematics achievement.
“Chiu and Klassen (2010) found that calibration of mathematics selfconcept (i.e., the degree to which judgments of one's competence in a domain accurately reflect actual performance) was positively related to mathematics achievement.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chiu & Klassen, 2010 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
General self-concept is conceptualized differently across cultures.
“general self-concept is conceptualized differently across cultures (Becker et al., 2012;Taras et al., 2010;Vignoles et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning
The reciprocal relationship between motivation and achievement may take different shapes across contexts (ethnic, gender, socioeconomic, and cultural groups).
“The reciprocal relationship between motivation and achievement may also take different shapes across contexts, as students belong to different ethnic, gender, socioeconomic (SES), and cultural groups.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Social influences on learning and motivation within the family, peer, and school contexts play a significant role in the changes in motivation and achievement.
“Beyond the individual level, social influences on learning and motivation within the family, peer, and school contexts (see Fig. 1) also play a significant role in the changes in motivation and achievement (Nolen & Ward, 2008;Wigfield et al., 1998).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Nolen & Ward, 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Wigfield et al., 1998 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The lack of developmentally appropriate measures complicates comparisons across different stages.
“the lack of developmentally appropriate measures complicates comparisons across different stages (Fulmer & Frijters, 2009).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fulmer & Frijters, 2009 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Reciprocal motivation-achievement relations from one age group cannot be readily generalized to other ages.
“reciprocal motivationachievement relations from one age group cannot be readily generalized to other ages (Marsh & Martin, 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Marsh & Martin, 2011 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
For several other constructs, including self-esteem, academic self-efficacy, and performance-avoidance achievement goals, there was no consistent developmental trend across empirical studies.
“However, for several other constructs, including selfesteem, academic self-efficacy, and performance-avoidance achievement goals, there was no consistent developmental trend across empirical studies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
What is communicated to students tends to be performance relative to peers (e.g., rankings or grades, which tend to be age-normed either explicitly or implicitly).
“What is communicated to students, on the other hand, tends to be performance relative to peers (e.g., rankings or grades, which tend to be age-normed either explicitly or implicitly).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Perceived performance will be based on relative performance, and not on the absolute achievement that researchers tend to study.
“This implies that perceived performance (see Fig. 1) will be based on relative performance, and not on the absolute achievement that researchers tend to study.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Chen and Wong (2015) found that Chinese students assigned different meanings to performance-approach and performance-avoidance goals than Western populations.
“Chen and Wong (2015) also found that Chinese students assigned different meanings to performance-approach and performance-avoidance goals than what is usually found in Western populations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chen & Wong, 2015 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
It is premature to conclude that the reciprocal relationship between motivation and achievement is universal.
“it is premature to conclude that the reciprocal relationship between motivation and achievement is universal.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Marsh & Martin, 2011 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
Qualitative differences between sociocultural contexts threaten the generalizability of findings.
“This would threaten the generalizability of findings (Henrich et al., 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Henrich et al., 2010 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Differences between sociocultural contexts are not just gradual but also likely to be qualitative.
“differences between sociocultural contexts are not just gradual but also likely to be qualitative.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Different groups have diverging motivation constructs.
“it is not unlikely that different groups have diverging motivation constructs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
There might be culture-dependent or population-specific pathways connecting the relationship between motivation and achievement.
“there might be culture-dependent or population-specific pathways connecting the relationship between motivation and achievement.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
A meta-analysis by Scherrer and Preckel (2019) found a small but significant overall decrease in several motivation constructs including academic self-concept, intrinsic motivation, mastery, and performance-approach achievement goals over the course of elementary and secondary school.
“A meta-analysis by Scherrer and Preckel (2019) found a small but significant overall decrease in several motivation constructs including academic self-concept, intrinsic motivation, mastery, and performance-approach achievement goals over the course of elementary and secondary school.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Scherrer and Preckel, 2019 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning
It is unclear whether results can be generalized across developmental stages.
“It is therefore unclear whether results can be generalized across developmental stages.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Qualitative and quantitative differences in the reciprocal relationship between motivation and achievement across development seem plausible.
“Qualitative and quantitative differences in the reciprocal relationship between motivation and achievement thus seem plausible”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The extent to which academic self-concept contributes to a general sense of self likely differs across groups.
“the extent to which academic self-concept contributes to a general sense of self likely differs across groups (Hansford & Hattie, 1982).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hansford & Hattie, 1982 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In Valentine et al. (2004) meta-analysis, there were only four non-Western samples out of a total of 60 samples.
“there were only four non-Western samples out of a total of 60 samples.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Valentine et al., 2004 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Peer relationships show a stronger influence on academic self-concept for seventh graders compared to fifth graders.
“peer relationships show a stronger influence on academic self-concept for seventh graders, compared to fifth graders (Molloy et al., 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Molloy et al., 2011 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
The majority of current research on reciprocal relations between motivation and academic achievement has suffered from a sampling bias problem, conducted using homogenous samples in ethnicity and cultural background.
“the majority of current research on the reciprocal relations between motivation and academic achievement has suffered from what can be considered a sampling bias problem (Pollet & Saxton, 2019), i.e., conducted using homogenous samples in terms of ethnicity (Marsh & Martin, 2011) and cultural background (Henrich et al., 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
The majority of research in this area has been conducted in Western, educated, industrialized, rich, and democratic (WEIRD) societies.
“Furthermore, as in many subfields of psychology, the majority of research in this area has been conducted in Western, educated, industrialized, rich, and democratic (WEIRD) societies (Henrich et al., 2010), where, for example, rates of schooling are much higher than other places (e.g. the Global South).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Henrich et al., 2010 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Young children do not yet have the cognitive and memory capacity to process some motivation constructs and contextual references.
“young children do not yet have the cognitive and memory capacity to process some motivation constructs and contextual references (Fulmer & Frijters, 2009).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fulmer & Frijters, 2009 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The network approach is beneficial in the classroom context where many variables cannot be independently manipulated.
“The network approach is also beneficial in the classroom context where there are many variables to take into account which cannot be independently manipulated (Yeager & Walton, 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Yeager & Walton, 2011 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Most studies' underlying data remains correlational and susceptible to third-variable explanations.
“the underlying data remains correlational in nature and susceptible to explanations in terms of the presence of a (time-varying or time-invariant) third variable”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Empirical evidence for a cycle between motivation and achievement is far from complete.
“empirical evidence for a cycle is far from complete.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Motivation and performance can best be seen as a cycle of mutually reinforcing relations.
“They can best be seen as a cycle of mutually reinforcing relations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
There is a lack of studies that allow for firm causal inferences.
“One of the hardest problems to solve is the lack of studies that allow for firm causal inferences.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Such manipulation studies do not yet exist.
“Such studies do not yet exist to our knowledge.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
There is no way to conclusively rule out the presence of unobserved confounders.
“There seems to be no way to conclusively rule out the presence of such confounders.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The achievement → motivation pathway has not been studied extensively due to difficulties identifying manipulations affecting achievement but not motivation.
“The other pathway (i.e., achievement → motivation) has not been studied extensively, because of difficulties identifying manipulations that would directly affect achievement but not motivation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Motivation and performance are densely interlinked.
“how densely motivation and performance are interlinked”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 74
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 44
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn most countries, motivation for school declines throughout school time, with individual heterogeneity in changes depending on specific motivation constructs across academic domains.
“In most countries, motivation for school clearly declines throughout school time (Martin, 2009;OECD, 2016;Scherrer & Preckel, 2019) with individual heterogeneity in changes depending on specific motivation constructs across academic domains (Gaspard et al., 2020;Scherrer & Preckel, 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Martin, 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- cites OECD, 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Scherrer & Preckel, 2019
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBoth the motivation-to-achievement and achievement-to-motivation links exist, and motivation and achievement influence each other reciprocally over time.
“A common view is that both the “motivation → achievement” and “achievement → motivation” links exist and that motivation and achievement influence each other in a reciprocal manner over time (Huang, 2011;Marsh & Craven, 2006;Marsh & Martin, 2011;Möller et al., 2009).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Huang, 2011 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Marsh & Craven, 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Marsh & Martin, 2011
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPositive academic motivations have been suggested to facilitate creative learning strategies, and incremental implicit beliefs (growth mindset) to facilitate mastery-oriented strategies.
“Positive academic motivations have also been suggested to facilitate creative learning strategies (control-value theory, Pekrun, 2006), and incremental implicit beliefs (growth mindset) to facilitate mastery-oriented strategies (Burnette et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
PremisecitationEffects of achievement on motivation may take two routes: through perceived achievement and through flow.
“Effects of achievement on motivation may also take two routes.The first is through perceived achievement.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationEmotions are typically more temporary than motivation, but the distinction is fuzzy.
“Emotions will typically be more temporary than motivation, but this is a fuzzy distinction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Kleinginna & Kleinginna, 1981
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Berridge, 2018 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenFurther insights into the nature of the reciprocal relationship between motivation and achievement are currently lacking; direction of causality, behavioral mediating pathways, possible effect of time scale, and generalizations to different motivation constructs and population groups are not well understood.
“However, further insights into the nature of the relationship are currently lacking; features such as the direction of causality, behavioral mediating pathways, possible effect of the time scale, and generalizations to different motivation constructs and population groups are currently not well understood.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Motivation can be targeted by interventions.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAccording to the self-regulatory account of motivation, students first identify values and expectancy of learning activities, then engage in self-regulatory processes; following performance, students conduct self-evaluations, infer causal attributions, and make adaptive or maladaptive attributions of successes and failures.
“According to the selfregulatory account of motivation (Cleary & Zimmerman, 2012;Schunk & DiBenedetto, 2020), students first identify values and expectancy of learning activities, then engage in self-regulatory processes (self-instruction, attention focusing, task strategies, etc.).Following their performance, students conduct self-evaluations, infer causal attributions, and make adaptive or mal”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Cleary & Zimmerman, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Schunk & DiBenedetto, 2020
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTheoretically, two routes can be discerned for how motivation affects achievement: the quantity of academic behaviors and the quality of academic behaviors.
“Theoretically, two routes can be discerned (see Fig. 1).The first is the quantity (frequency and intensity) of academic behaviors aimed at achievement (such as effort, persistence, etc.) (Cury et al., 2008;Dettmers et al., 2009;Doumen et al., 2014;Marsh et al., 2016;Pinxten et al., 2014;Plant et al., 2005;Trautwein et al., 2009).As a second route, higher levels of motivation could also be assoc”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Cury et al., 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Dettmers et al., 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Doumen et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenMany other theories focus either on the value attached to behavior or on expectancies.
“Many other theories focus either on the value attached to behavior or on expectancies.Theories on the values side of the ledger (goal theories, flow theory, self-determination theory, individual differences theories, and interest theories) focus on interest, goals, needs for relatedness, competence, and autonomy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPekrun (2006) assumed that an appraisal of control of the learner and the value of learning activities lie at the basis of academic emotions.
“In line with dominant theories of emotion (e.g.Frijda, 1988;Lazarus, 1999), Pekrun (2006) assumed that an appraisal of control of the learner and the value of learning activities lie at the basis of academic emotions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pekrun, 2006 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAcademic self-concept is a component distinct from physical, social, and emotional self-concepts within the multidimensional, hierarchical model of self-concept.
“ASC is a component distinct from physical, social, and emotional self-concepts within the multidimensional, hierarchical model of self-concept (Marsh & Craven, 2006;Marsh & Martin, 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Marsh & Craven, 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Marsh & Martin, 2011
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFigure 1 suggests a positive feedback loop, with motivation feeding achievement and achievement feeding motivation, an idea alluded to in some theories.
“Figure 1 suggests a positive feedback loop, with motivation feeding achievement, and achievement feeding motivation-an idea that is alluded to in some theories (Cleary & Zimmerman, 2012;Eccles & Wigfield, 2002;Schunk & DiBenedetto, 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Cleary & Zimmerman, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Eccles & Wigfield, 2002 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Schunk & DiBenedetto, 2020
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone givenOne suggested pathway is that positive self-beliefs can lead to self-affirmative, self-regulatory academic behaviors such as exerting effort, demonstrating persistence, and selecting goals conducive to academic goals.
“One suggested pathway is that positive self-beliefs can lead to self-affirmative, self-regulatory, academic behaviors (or achievement behaviors, see below) such as exerting effort, demonstrating persistence, and selecting goals that are conducive to the achievement of academic goals.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationAlthough the idea that academic self-concept or other beliefs about the self affect achievement has been challenged, much empirical research supports it.
“Although the idea that ASC or other beliefs about the self affect achievement has been challenged (see the discussion in Marsh & Craven, 2006), there has also been much empirical research in support of it (Burnette et al., 2013;Gottfried et al., 2013;Greene & Azevedo, 2007; and the meta-analyses of Huang, 2011;Valentine et al., 2004).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn flow theory, an activity in which the learner is holistically immersed can generate a feeling of flow, which is rewarding in its own right and alters the value attached to academic behaviors.
“The second route from achievement to motivation is central to flow theory (Csikzentmihalyi, 1990).An activity in which the learner is holistically immersed can generate a feeling of flow, which is rewarding in its own right and alters the value attached to the academic behaviors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Csikzentmihalyi, 1990
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAccording to self-worth theory, students with positive beliefs about themselves assign high and positive values to academic activities; these activities are then viewed as important, intrinsically interesting, of high expected utility and low cost, which leads to high achievement.
“Another pathway for beliefs about the self to act as a causal agent on academic achievement, according to self-worth theory (Covington, 2000), is that students with positive beliefs about themselves assign high and positive values to academic activities.Academic activities are then viewed as important, intrinsically interesting, of high expected utility and of low cost, which leads to high achie”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Covington, 2000
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Valentine et al., 2004
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAcademic self-concept is multidimensional and usually measured by the Self Description Questionnaire; its academic subscales tap general academic self-concept, math self-concept, and verbal self-concept.
“ASC is itself also multidimensional and usually measured by the Self Description Questionnaire (Marsh et al., 1999;Marsh & O'Neill, 1984); its academic subscales tap into general academic self-concept, math self-concept, and verbal self-concept.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Marsh et al., 1999
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Marsh & O'Neill, 1984
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe self-regulatory account stresses the importance of metacognition, where students who can monitor their learning processes can maintain their engagement in the learning cycle.
“This account stresses the importance of metacognition, where students who can monitor their learning processes can then maintain their engagement in the learning cycle.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenIn self-determination theory, feelings of competence are a precursor of intrinsic motivation, leading to a higher value being assigned to academic activities if one feels competent, which leads to behaviors that support later achievement.
“Also, in self-determination theory, feelings of competence are a precursor of intrinsic motivation, again leading to a higher value being assigned to academic activities if one feels competent.This would then lead to behaviors that support later achievement.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningHigh perceived performance changes learners' expectancies and may also alter the value attached to learning activities.
“High perceived performance will thus change the expectancies of learners (i.e., make them trust that good outcomes are attainable), but it may also alter the value attached to learning activities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationBoth intrinsic motivation and interest have been linked to deeper learning.
“Both intrinsic motivation (self-determination theory, Deci & Ryan, 2000) and interest (interest theories, Alexander et al., 1994) have been linked to deeper learning (Alexander et al., 1994;Schiefele, 1999;Scott Rigby et al., 1992).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Deci & Ryan, 2000 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Alexander et al., 1994
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Schiefele, 1999
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA recent meta-analysis (Scharmer, 2020) showed that overall, the pooled effect of achievement on motivation was twice (β = .12) the pooled effect of motivation on achievement (β = .06), though both are conventionally considered small.
“A recent meta-analysis (Scharmer, 2020), which includes such studies that were published between 2011 and August 2020, showed that overall, the pooled effect of achievement on motivation was twice (β = .12)the pooled effect of motivation on achievement (β = .06),though both are what is conventionally considered a small effect.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Scharmer, 2020
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCross-sectional and correlational studies established a relationship between self-concepts and academic achievement, but no causal paths.
“These studies established a relationship between self-concepts and academic achievement, but no causal paths.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hansford and Hattie, 1982
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningQuality of learning is affected not only by motivation but also by the abilities of the learner and the quality of teaching, instructions, and study materials.
“Quality of learning is not only affected by motivation but also by the abilities of the learner and the quality of teaching, instructions, and study materials.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationBandura's social cognitive theory stresses the reciprocity of the interactions between behavioral, environmental, and personal factors.
“Bandura's social cognitive theory also stresses the reciprocity of the interactions between behavioral, environmental, and personal factors (Bandura, 1997).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bandura, 1997
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationFulmer and Frijters (2009) made the point that self-report measures confound the measurement of motivation with other variables, such as ability and attention.
“Fulmer and Frijters (2009, p. 228) in their critique of how motivation is measured in educational psychology also made the point that “self-report measures confound the measurement of motivation with other variables, such as ability and attention.””
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fulmer and Frijters, 2009
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningTrue high achievement can fail to support motivation, and low achievement can be viewed in such a way as not to be detrimental for motivation.
“This means that true high achievement can still fail to support motivation (e.g., when a sibling performs even better), or low achievement can be viewed in such a way so as to not be detrimental for motivation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSchunk and DiBenedetto (2020) suggest an iterative process between perceived progress, self-efficacy, and goal pursuit.
“Schunk and DiBenedetto (2020) suggest an iterative process between perceived progress, self-efficacy, and goal pursuit.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schunk & DiBenedetto, 2020
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSubsequent work set out to investigate the causal and temporal ordering of the effects using structural equation models and longitudinal data.
“Subsequent work set out to investigate the causal and temporal ordering of the effects using structural equation models (SEMs) and longitudinal data (e.g., Marsh et al., 1999).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Marsh et al., 1999
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationEffort is not only a result of the learner's motivation but also of outside requirements such as deadlines and exams set by the educational institution.
“Effort is not only a result of the learner's motivation but also of outside requirements (e.g., deadlines and exams set by the educational institution, Kerdijk et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kerdijk et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAlthough extrinsic rewards may detract from intrinsic motivation, they may also jolt a motivation-achievement cycle that would otherwise not start.
“Although this has been described in self-determination theory as potentially detracting from intrinsic motivation (Deci & Ryan, 2000), it may also jolt a motivation-achievement cycle that would otherwise not start (Hidi & Harackiewicz, 2001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Deci & Ryan, 2000 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Hidi & Harackiewicz, 2001
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationHuang (2011)'s meta-analysis found a slightly larger effect of self-concept on achievement than the other way around.
“In contrast, Huang (2011)'s meta-analysis found a slightly larger effect of self-concept on achievement than the other way around.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Huang, 2011 source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningSeveral features of the reciprocal relationship between motivation and achievement are still poorly understood.
“However, several features of such relationships are still poorly understood.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenSome doubts about the robustness of the effects of reciprocal motivation-achievement relations have recently surfaced.
“Also, some doubts about the robustness of the effects have recently surfaced (which we discuss in detail in section “Choice of appropriate statistical models” below).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationHuang (2011) found considerably larger ranges of effects overall: achievement on self-concept β = 0.19-0.25; self-concept on achievement β = 0.20-0.27.
“Huang (2011), however, found considerably larger ranges of effects overall (achievement on selfconcept: β = 0.19-0.25;self-concept on achievement: β = 0.20-0.27).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Huang, 2011 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe meta-analysis by Lazowski and Hulleman (2016) showed that interventions targeting motivation usually led to positive outcomes on achievement (medium effect size; average Cohen's d of 0.49), and it did not matter which theory was at the basis of the intervention.
“The meta-analysis of these studies by Lazowski and Hulleman (2016) showed that, while interventions targeting motivation usually led to positive outcomes on achievement (medium effect size; average Cohen's d of 0.49), it did not matter which theory was at the basis of the intervention-all theories of motivation performed about equally well.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lazowski and Hulleman, 2016
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningExternal factors are important for a complete causal understanding of motivation-achievement interactions and offer entry points for interventions that enhance motivation, achievement, or both.
“Such external factors are not only important for a complete causal understanding of motivation-achievement interactions (i.e., highly relevant for educational researchers) but also because they offer entry points for interventions that enhance motivation, achievement, or both (i.e., highly relevant for educators).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIt may be hard to manipulate academic self-concept in a randomized controlled trial, although it has been indirectly done by affirming general self-esteem and personal values.
“Nevertheless, it may be hard to manipulate ASC in a randomized controlled trial (although it has been indirectly done by affirming general selfesteem and personal values, Cohen et al., 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cohen et al., 2009 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe network approach does not assume an a priori structure of motivation factors; it uses bidirectional partial correlations between variables in empirical data, and clusters of variables that can be interpreted as constructs may emerge.
“The network approach is different; it does not assume an a priori structure of motivation factors.Instead, it uses the (bidirectional) partial correlations between variables in empirical data and in doing so clusters of variables which can be interpreted as constructs may emerge.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites van der Maas et al., 2006 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites van der Maas et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIt is not trivial to evaluate and conceptualize effort.
“Irrespective of what operationalization is chosen, it is important to note that it is not trivial to evaluate and conceptualize effort (see extensive discussions in Baars et al., 2020;Scheiter et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Baars et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Scheiter et al., 2020 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningMultiple motivation constructs are linked to academic achievement, and may also all be mutually related.
“The discussion above and Fig. 1 show that multiple motivation constructs are linked to academic achievement, which may also all be mutually related.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenTheories of motivation such as self-determination theory or expectancy-value theory are not formulated with an explicit time scale, and the interactions they describe seem framed in terms suggesting effects happen without delays (seconds).
“However, theories of motivation such as self-determination theory or expectancy-value theory are not formulated with an explicit time scale, and the interactions they describe seem framed in terms that suggest that the effects of motivation constructs happen without delays (i.e., on a time scale of seconds).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThere is a relative paucity of empirical research and especially longitudinal studies that include measures of regulatory processes.
“However, there is a relative paucity of empirical research and especially longitudinal studies that include measures of such regulatory processes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe volition theory of motivation posits that motivational beliefs only lead to the decision to act; once the individual engages in action, volitional processes determine whether the intention is fulfilled.
“In a similar vein, the volition theory of motivation (Eccles & Wigfield, 2002;Kuhl, 1984) posits that motivational beliefs only lead to the decision to act.Once the individual engages in action, volitional processes are required and determine whether the intention is fulfilled.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Eccles & Wigfield, 2002 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kuhl, 1984
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationCentral variables may be efficient intervention targets because interventions informed by network analyses have been shown to be highly effective, as these central variables were later shown to be predictive of subsequent behaviors.
“Central variables may be efficient intervention targets as interventions informed by network analyses have been shown to be highly effective as these central variables were later shown to be predictive of subsequent behaviors (e.g., Sachisthal et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sachisthal et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn Niemivirta & Tapola (2007), students' self-efficacy generally grew throughout the progress of a task, while interest did not.
“For example, in one rare study where the within-task changes in multiple motivation constructs was studied, researchers found that while students' self-efficacy generally grew throughout the progress of a task, interest did not (Niemivirta & Tapola, 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Niemivirta & Tapola, 2007
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningNetwork analyses found different central variables in different populations, showcasing how such an approach can flexibly capture interactions between motivation factors in real life.
“Moreover, the fact that network analyses found different central variables in different populations also showcases how such an approach can flexibly capture interactions between motivation factors in real life.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningOnly by measuring regulatory processes that mediate the motivation-to-achievement pathway can progress be made in understanding the underlying mechanism of mutual influences between motivation and achievement.
“Yet, only by measuring regulatory processes that mediate the motivation → achievement pathway, we can make progress in understanding the underlying mechanism of mutual influences between motivation and achievement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe mixed findings on effort may be due to multiple operationalizations and evaluations of the construct effort, which may have varying relations with academic achievement.
“This may be due to the fact that there are multiple operationalizations and evaluations of the construct effort (Massin, 2017), which may have varying relations with academic achievement.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Massin, 2017
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenAcademic self-concept is mainly self-reported and, despite well-constructed measures, suffers from all the caveats inherent to self-report measures.
“Last but not least, ASC is mainly self-reported and, despite the availability of well-constructed measures, it suffers from all the caveats inherent to self-report measures (see section “Alternatives to self-reports” below).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn the network of Dutch students, enjoyment emerged as the central node; in the network of Colombian students, engagement behaviors emerged as central.
“For example, enjoyment emerged as the central node in the network of Dutch students, whereas engagement behaviors emerged as central in the network of Colombian students and therefore different approaches for increasing science interest are advised for the two countries (Sachisthal et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sachisthal et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationWhen effort is measured as quantity of learning, the relationship with achievement seems weak or only significant after controlling for quality of learning, or even negative.
“However, when effort is measured as a quantity of learning (such as study time, practice time, time-on-task, persistence, etc.), this relationship seems either weak or only significant after controlling for quality of learning (Cury et al., 2008;Dettmers et al., 2009;Doumen et al., 2014;Plant et al., 2005) or even negative (the labour-in-vain effect, Koriat et al., 2006;Nelson & Leonesio, 1988;Und”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Cury et al., 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Dettmers et al., 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Doumen et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationcitationThe heavy focus on academic self-concept may reflect an emphasis on a cognitive, intrapsychological theoretical view of motivation while losing sight of social, contextual, historical, and environmental factors that arguably also play important roles.
“Furthermore, the heavy focus on ASC may reflect an emphasis on a cognitive, intrapsychological theoretical view of motivation while losing sight of social, contextual, historical, and environmental factors that arguably also play important roles”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThere is a huge overlap in terms and variables in the motivation and achievement literature; the same construct may have different names, or different constructs may go under the same name (Jingle-Jangle fallacies).
“Like many topics in psychology, there is a huge overlap in terms and variables in the literature on motivation and achievement; the same construct may have different names, or different constructs go under the same name (this is known as Jingle-Jangle fallacies; e.g., Marsh et al., 2003).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Marsh et al., 2003
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFor the motivation-to-achievement link, the rationale is that motivation leads to active and effortful commitment to learning, implying that motivation constructs that are beliefs about competence and efficacy influence achievement by inducing self-regulatory academic behaviors.
“For the motivation → achievement link, the rationale is that motivation leads to active and effortful commitment to learning (e.g., E. Skinner et al., 1990), implying that motivation constructs that are beliefs about competence and efficacy influence achievement by inducing self-regulatory, academic behaviors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites E. Skinner et al., 1990
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone givenThe general hypothesis in psychological network models is that correlations between observed behaviors are not due to unobserved common causes, but to a network of interacting psychological, social, and/or biological factors.
“The general hypothesis in psychological network models is that correlations between observed behaviors, such as cognitive functions, psychopathological symptoms, and attitudes (or, motivation constructs), are not due to unobserved common causes, but to a network of interacting psychological, social, and/or biological factors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningA mutualistic network approach can potentially solve the question of the mechanisms of the impact of motivation on achievement.
“Last but not least, at a more abstract level, a mutualistic network approach can potentially solve the question of the mechanisms of the impact of motivation on achievement (also raised in Hattie et al., 2020 as an important avenue for future research).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hattie et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe term 'effect' in many existing studies is used only in conventional statistical sense and standard path analytic terminology, as representing a relation that is not necessarily causal.
“The term”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Marsh et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAchievement measures tend to vary substantially in reliability and validity and yield different results (e.g., stronger reciprocity for school grades than for test scores).
“These tend to vary substantially in reliability and validity and yield different results (e.g., stronger reciprocity for school grades than for test scores; Marsh et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Marsh et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationOther promising process-oriented measures are eye-tracking and facial emotional expressions.
“Other promising process-oriented measures are eye-tracking and facial emotional expressions (D'Mello et al., 2008;Grafsgaard et al., 2014Grafsgaard et al., , 2011;;Nye et al., 2018;van Amelsvoort & Krahmer, 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites D'Mello et al., 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Grafsgaard et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Nye et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationStudies typically use raw test scores as a dependent measure to assess achievement, which reflect mastery of skills.
“Studies typically use raw test scores as a dependent measure to assess this (Huang, 2011;Scharmer, 2020), which reflect mastery of skills.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Huang, 2011 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Scharmer, 2020
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAlthough the existence of the reciprocal relationship between motivation and performance is generally agreed upon, there are also empirical works that fail to establish such a relationship or cast doubts on the robustness of the reciprocal effects.
“Although the existence of the reciprocal relationship between motivation and performance is generally agreed upon, there are also empirical works that fail to establish such a relationship (Fraine et al., 2007) or cast doubts on the robustness of the reciprocal effects (Burns et al., 2020;Ehm et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Fraine et al., 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Burns et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Ehm et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningManipulations of instruction, modeling, practice, and self-correction may all affect achievement, but they may do so partly by making the material more appealing, raising motivation at the same time or before achievement is raised.
“For example, manipulations of instruction, modeling, practice, and self-correction may all affect achievement, but they may do so partly by making the material more appealing, raising motivation at the same time or before achievement is raised.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationFor causal inferences, experiments would ideally include double-blinded random assignment, which is possible in the lab but poses important practical problems in the classroom.
“For causal inferences, experiments would ideally include (doubleblinded) random assignment, which is possible in the lab but poses important practical problems in the classroom (cf.Savi et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Savi et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThese alternatives have strengths, but some limitations remain, such as the subjective nature of these measures and a possible high demand on research participants' cognitive resources when a large number of measures are administered during a session.
“These alternatives have their strengths, but some limitations remain, such as the subjective nature of these measures and a possible high demand on research participants' cognitive resources when a large number of measures are administered during a session.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationTwo recent studies found motivation declines to be associated with particular academic stages; some constructs such as achievement goal orientation specifically dropped in the transition to secondary school.
“Two recent studies found motivation declines to be associated with particular academic stages, for example some constructs such as achievement goal orientation specifically dropped in the transition to secondary school (Scherrer et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Scherrer et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationEhm et al. (2019) found that although a cross-lagged panel model (CLPM) supported reciprocal motivation-achievement relations, other models did not, such as the random-intercept CLPM.
“Ehm et al. (2019) specifically found that although a cross-lagged panel model (CLPM) supported reciprocal motivationachievement relations, other models did not-such as the random-intercept CLPM, which Hamaker et al. (2015) showed to be more effective than CLPM in explicitly modeling withinand between-individual changes across time.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Ehm et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Hamaker et al., 2015 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenQuestionnaires are problematic from a developmental perspective because, across age groups, there might be varying factor structures in empirical data.
“Fourth, questionnaires are problematic from a developmental perspective because, across age groups, there might be varying factor structures in empirical data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningCorrelation between different variables, measured at different time points, is a necessary but not sufficient requirement of causality in mutual relations.
“Correlation between different variables, measured at different time points, is a necessary but not sufficient requirement of causality in mutual relations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningPhysiological measures are relatively new, and triangulation can help establish their reliability and validity.
“Given that physiological measures are relatively new, triangulation can help establish their reliability and validity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenWith the development of new technologies, it is now possible to collect such data longitudinally on a large scale.
“With the development of new technologies, it is now also possible to collect such data longitudinally on a large scale.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningQuestionnaires are subjective and rely on the assumption that motives are consciously accessible, declarative, and communicable to other people.
“First of all, questionnaires are subjective and rely on the assumption that motives are consciously accessible, declarative, and communicable to other people, while as discussed above, motivation arises from partially inaccessible and non-declarative cognition and emotions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningNeither Cohen et al. (2009) nor Yeager et al. (2019) modeled reciprocal effects between motivation and performance.
“Although the authors discuss the role of a recursive process Yeager & Walton, 2011), neither of these interventions modeled reciprocal effects between motivation and performance (Cohen et al., 2009;Yeager et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationSelf-reports are sensitive to demand characteristics and a tendency to give socially desirable answers.
“Finally, self-reports are sensitive to demand characteristics and a tendency to give socially desirable answers (e.g.students who are familiar with the implicit theory of intelligence might tend to report that they endorse a growth mindset, Lüftenegger & Chen, 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lüftenegger & Chen, 2017
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningChanges in tested skills are likely to lead to a lower stability of scores, and skew estimates of change over time.
“Such changes in tested skills are likely to lead to a lower stability of scores, and skew estimates of change over time.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenANS techniques can be used to measure arousal, which is defined as higher activation of the sympathetic relative to the parasympathetic system.
“ANS techniques can be used to measure arousal, which is defined as higher activation of the sympathetic relative to the parasympathetic system.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenAchievement can be construed as mastery of skills, which usually grows over time, or as performance relative to peers, which by definition cannot grow for all students.
“A third aspect of achievement which may be important is that achievement can be construed as mastery of skills, which usually grows over time, or as performance relative to peers, which by definition cannot grow for all students.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisereasoningIt is unclear whether findings generalize from one domain to others.
“It is unclear whether findings generalize from one domain to others.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationResearch that aims to establish causality in the reciprocal relationship between motivation and achievement would need to meet three preconditions: order, correlation, and manipulation.
“Research that aims to establish causality in the reciprocal relationship between motivation and achievement would need to meet three preconditions.The first precondition of causality is order, that is”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Antonakis et al., 2010 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMotivation is indexed by the frequency and length of voluntary, self-initiated practice, and can be linked to learning and performance.
“Motivation is indexed by the frequency and length of voluntary, self-initiated practice, and can be linked to learning and performance (Hofman et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hofman et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenIn practice, self-reports cannot be sampled with high frequency during learning.
“In practice, self-reports cannot be sampled with high frequency during learning (see process-oriented measures below).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningMotivated and effortful behavior is accompanied by increased arousal, and thus ANS techniques can provide an index of motivation.
“Motivated and effortful behavior is accompanied by increased arousal, and thus ANS techniques can provide an index of motivation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningHeterogeneity in developmental patterns of various motivation constructs suggests that the reciprocal interactions with achievement may also follow different trajectories across development and still need to be investigated.
“Overall, this heterogeneity in developmental patterns of various motivation constructs suggests that the reciprocal interactions with achievement may also follow different trajectories across development and still need to be investigated.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationAdolescence is especially characterized by heightened social influences on motivation; social interactions become increasingly important and peer affiliation motivation peaks.
“Adolescence is especially characterized by heightened social influences on motivation (Casey, 2015): social interactions become increasingly important and peer affiliation motivation peaks (Brown & Larson, 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Casey, 2015 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Brown & Larson, 2009
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationChildhood and adolescent development is characterized by rather different trajectories for academic achievement (general improvement with age) than for academic motivation (general decrease during adolescence, as well as diversification in sources of motivation).
“Childhood and adolescent development is characterized by rather different trajectories for academic achievement (with a general pattern of improvement with age) than for academic motivation (with a general pattern of decrease during adolescence, as well as diversification in sources of motivation) (Scherrer et al., 2020;Scherrer & Preckel, 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Scherrer et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Scherrer & Preckel, 2019
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCulture is likely to have a strong influence on attributional processes and implicit theory of intelligence.
“culture is likely to have a strong influence on attributional processes (see extensive theoretical discussion in Graham, 2020;empirical data in Chiu & Klassen, 2010) and implicit theory of intelligence (W.W. Chen & Wong, 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Graham, 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Chiu & Klassen, 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Chen & Wong, 2015
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAs children transition into middle school, there is increased competition for grades and typically a larger pool of peers that serve as a reference group.
“As children transition into middle school, there is increased competition for grades and typically a larger pool of peers that serve as a reference group (Molloy et al., 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Molloy et al., 2011 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenMany of the empirical studies cited in this section are non-longitudinal.
“many of the empirical studies cited in this section are non-longitudinal.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationChiu and Klassen (2010) found a positive link between mathematics self-concept and mathematics achievement, moderated by cross-country differences in cultural orientations.
“Chiu and Klassen (2010), using PISA data and a very large and diverse sample (N participant = 88,590, N country = 34), found a positive link between mathematics self-concept and mathematics achievement, but this relationship was moderated by cross-country differences in cultural orientations”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chiu & Klassen, 2010
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBroadly speaking, motivation for academic activities decreases between childhood and adolescence, and motivation reorients toward social and novel situations.
“Broadly speaking, motivation for academic activities decreases between childhood and adolescence, and motivation reorients toward social and novel situations (Crone & Dahl, 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Crone & Dahl, 2012 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAccording to the stage-environment fit account, the decline in academic motivation in adolescents is driven by a mismatch between their newly developed needs and their social settings.
“According to the stage-environment fit account, the decline in academic motivation in adolescents is driven by a mismatch between their newly developed needs and their social settings (Scherrer et al., 2020;Scherrer & Preckel, 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Scherrer et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Scherrer & Preckel, 2019
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenStudies investigating motivation-achievement interactions have often studied the development of these processes separately during childhood, adolescence, and early adulthood.
“Studies investigating motivation-achievement interactions have often studied the development of these processes separately during childhood, adolescence, and early adulthood.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn Scharmer (2020) meta-analysis, 90% of samples were collected in WEIRD countries, with half using German samples.
“90% of samples were collected in WEIRD countries (Australia, USA, and Western Europe, with fully half using German samples).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Scharmer, 2020
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThe transition to middle and high schools is usually accompanied by changes in peer relationships, friendship, and teacher-student relationships, an increase in normative and performance-focused evaluation, and a decrease in perceived autonomy.
“Specifically, the transition to middle and high schools is usually accompanied by changes in peer relationships, friendship, and teacher-student relationships, an increase in normative and performance-focused evaluation and a decrease in perceived autonomy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationMeta-analytic findings point to declines in both mastery and performance goals.
“meta-analytic findings point to declines in both mastery and performance goals”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Scherrer et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Scherrer & Preckel, 2019
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningA network approach can be used to study the motivation-achievement relationship.
“An innovative method to study the motivationachievement relationship can be a network approach”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningManipulations of motivation may directly or indirectly influence achievement and vice versa.
“manipulations of motivation may directly or indirectly influence achievement and vice versa.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningTheories of motivation share a common denominator of reciprocal positive influences of motivation on achievement and vice versa, supported by previous research.
“The common denominator between theories suggested reciprocal positive influences of motivation on achievement and vice versa, which has been supported by much previous research.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningReciprocal relationships between motivation and achievement may look different from what we currently know when representative samples are included.
“Reciprocal relationships between motivation and achievement may look different from what we currently know when representative samples are included.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningMany studies show effects of manipulations affecting motivation on achievement, but have not looked at longitudinal interactions.
“Many studies do show effects of manipulations affecting motivation thereby having an effect on achievement, but these studies have not looked at longitudinal interactions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationAutonomy support and training in helpful attributions are well-researched practical interventions.
“Some of these are wellresearched practical interventions, such as autonomy support and training in helpful attributions (Hulleman et al., 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hulleman et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenTo estimate causal relations, one variable can be manipulated at a time, and its effects on other variables can be observed.
“to estimate causal relations, one variable can be manipulated at a time, and its effects on other variables can be observed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationResearch has shown how to provide negative feedback without lowering motivation, how peer comparison can be harnessed for motivation, and how feedback can be given without revealing errors.
“Research has shown how to provide negative feedback in a way that does not lower a learner's motivation (Fong et al., 2019), how peer comparison can be harnessed for motivation (Mumm & Mutlu, 2011), or how feedback can be given without giving away that errors have been made (Narciss & Huth, 2006).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Fong et al., 2019 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Mumm & Mutlu, 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Narciss & Huth, 2006
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationBejjani et al. (2019) used a feedback manipulation to study its effect on subsequent motivation and learning.
“Bejjani et al. (2019) where they used a feedback manipulation (a competence-threatening IQ score) to study its effect on subsequent motivation and learning.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bejjani et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThe strongest support for causal claims on motivation-achievement relations would be studies manipulating either motivation or achievement at one time point and studying effects on interactions across subsequent time points.
“the strongest support for causal claims on motivation-achievement relations would be studies manipulating either motivation or achievement at one time point and studying the effects on motivation-achievement interactions across subsequent time points.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenMotivation can best be seen as a constellation of highly related, multidimensional constructs.
“motivation can best be seen as a constellation of highly related, multidimensional constructs”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationcitationThe trickiest assumption for causality inferences is no unobserved confounders.
“In our view, the trickiest is the third assumption”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Motivation can be targeted by interventions.
“Given this undesirable decline and the fact that motivation can be targeted by interventions, motivation has long been a central focus of educational psychology.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The impact of motivation on achievement is low early in a new environment (e.g., a school transition) where learners experience considerable uncertainty regarding their competence and academic standing; when the learning environment is stable, the impact of achievement on subsequent motivation might be more substantial.
“Theoretically, one could assume that the impact of motivation on achievement is low early in a new environment (e.g., a school transition) where learners experience considerable uncertainty regarding their competence and academic standing (Eccles et al., 1993;Valentine et al., 2004).When the learning environment is stable, the impact of achievement on subsequent motivation might be more sub”
The paper relies on this without support.
Academic motivation typically drops considerably in adolescence and may be lower for some groups.
“As academic motivation typically drops considerably in adolescence and may be lower for some groups (e.g., through the effects of SES, stereotype threat, and the likes)”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cluster-level randomisation preserves ecological validity and reduces risk of cross-condition interference compared to individual-level randomisation.
“By implementing a cluster-level randomisation (i.e., randomising entire classes), we preserve ecological validity – each class follows a uniform teaching approach – and reduce risk of cross-condition interference [19].”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Valentine and DuBois effect direction is reversed
MajorThe paper says Valentine and DuBois found a stronger effect of achievement on self-belief, but the effect sizes it later attributes to them show the opposite: 0.08 for achievement on self-belief versus 0.15 for self-belief on achievement.
“These findings are in line with Valentine and DuBois (2005) who found that academic achievement had a stronger effect on self-belief than vice versa.”
“Valentine and DuBois (2005)'s findings were also more similar to Scharmer's (2020) in terms of the size of the effects (achievement on self-belief: β = 0.08; self-belief on achievement: β = 0.15).”
Cites
The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1104_01 · Cited by 34,210 · see citing works
Flow: the psychology of optimal experience
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-0597 · Cited by 12,652 · see citing works
The weirdest people in the world?
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x0999152x · Cited by 12,641 · see citing works
Motivational beliefs, values, and goals
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153 · Cited by 7,587 · see citing works
Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.319 · Cited by 7,306 · see citing works
(1999) · Cited by 6,308 · see citing works
Pekrun, R. (2006) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9 · Cited by 5,566 · cited 7× · see citing works
“& Cultural norms (described in control theories and control-value theory, Pekrun, 2006; Skinner, 1995), social learning, and verbal persuasion by others (social cognitive theory, Bandura, 1997) can alter the expectations, values, and attributional processes of learners (expectancy-value theory,…”
BackgroundInfluentialStatistics and Causal Inference
Holland, P. W. (1986) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1986.10478354 · Cited by 5,293 · see citing works
The four-phase model of interest development
Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4 · Cited by 4,702 · see citing works
WEIRD languages have misled us, too
Majid, A., & Levinson, S. C. (2010) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x1000018x · Cited by 4,169 · see citing works
Self-concept: validation of construct interpretations.
Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J. J., & Stanton, G. C. (1976) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543046003407 · Cited by 4,164 · see citing works
A critique of the cross-lagged panel model
Hamaker, E. L., Kuiper, R. M., & Grasman, R. P. P. P. (2015) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/a0038889 · Cited by 4,005 · see citing works
A network theory of mental disorders
Borsboom, D. (2017) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.20375 · Cited by 3,482 · see citing works
Alpha-band oscillations, attention, and controlled access to stored information
Klimesch, W. (2012) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.10.007 · Cited by 3,310 · see citing works
Frontal theta as a mechanism for cognitive control
Cavanagh, J. F., & Frank, M. J. (2014) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2014.04.012 · Cited by 2,726 · see citing works
Frijda, N. H. (1988) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.43.5.349 · Cited by 2,611 · see citing works
Understanding adolescence as a period of social–affective engagement and goal flexibility
Crone, E. A., & Dahl, R. E. (2012) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3313 · Cited by 2,507 · see citing works
Do Psychosocial and Study Skill Factors Predict College Outcomes? A Meta-Analysis.
Robbins, S. B., Lauver, K., Le, H., Davis, D., Langley, R., & Carlstrom, A. (2004) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.2.261 · Cited by 2,479 · see citing works
On making causal claims: A review and recommendations
Antonakis, J., Bendahan, S., Jacquart, P., & Lalive, R. (2010) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.010 · Cited by 2,441 · see citing works
Motivation and social cognitive theory
Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101832 · Cited by 2,416 · see citing works
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2020) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101859 · Cited by 2,368 · see citing works
Academic Self-Concept and Self-Efficacy: How Different Are They Really?
Bong, M., & Skaalvik, E. M. (2003) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1023/a:1021302408382 · Cited by 1,994 · see citing works
Jacobs, J. E., Lanza, S. T., Osgood, D. W., Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00421 · Cited by 1,800 · see citing works
Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Lens, W., Sheldon, K. M., & Deci, E. L. (2004) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.246 · Cited by 1,762 · see citing works
Granger, C. W. J. (1980) · Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control · doi:10.1016/0165-1889(80)90069-x · Cited by 1,746 · see citing works
Motivating the Academically Unmotivated: A Critical Issue for the 21st Century
Hidi, S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2000) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543070002151 · Cited by 1,689 · see citing works
A national experiment reveals where a growth mindset improves achievement
Yeager, D. S., Hanselman, P., Walton, G. M., Murray, J. S., Crosnoe, R., Muller, C., Tipton, E., Schneider, B., Hulleman, C. S., Hinojosa, C. P., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1466-y · Cited by 1,513 · see citing works
Marsh, H. W., & Craven, R. G. (2006) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00010.x · Cited by 1,368 · see citing works
Mind-sets matter: A meta-analytic review of implicit theories and self-regulation.
Burnette, J. L., O'Boyle, E. H., VanEpps, E. M., Pollack, J. M., & Finkel, E. J. (2013) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0029531 · Cited by 1,367 · see citing works
Social-Psychological Interventions in Education: They’re Not Magic
Yeager, D. S., & Walton, G. M. (2011) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654311405999 · Cited by 1,345 · see citing works
Goal theory, motivation, and school achievement: an integrative review.
Covington, M. V. (2000) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.171 · Cited by 1,316 · see citing works
The Relation Between Self-Beliefs and Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analytic Review
Valentine, J. C., DuBois, D. L., & Cooper, H. (2004) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3902_3 · Cited by 1,315 · see citing works
Hulleman, C. S., Schrager, S. M., Bodmann, S. M., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2010) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0018947 · Cited by 1,307 · see citing works
Brehm, J. W., & Self, E. A. (1989) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.40.020189.000545 · Cited by 1,292 · see citing works
A categorized list of emotion definitions, with suggestions for a consensual definition
Kleinginna, P. R., & Kleinginna, A. M. (1981) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1007/bf00992553 · Cited by 1,229 · see citing works
Peer Relationships in Adolescence
Brown, B. B., & Larson, J. (2009) · Handbook of Adolescent Psychology · doi:10.1002/9780470479193.adlpsy002004 · Cited by 1,208 · see citing works
Marsh, H. W., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Köller, O., & Baumert, J. (2005) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00853.x · Cited by 1,198 · see citing works
Taras, V., Kirkman, B. L., & Steel, P. (2010) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0018938 · Cited by 1,160 · see citing works
Fredricks, J. A., & Eccles, J. S. (2002) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.38.4.519 · Cited by 1,050 · see citing works
Sisk, V. F., Burgoyne, A. P., Sun, J., Butler, J. L., & Macnamara, B. N. (2018) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797617739704 · Cited by 1,040 · see citing works
Mega, C., Ronconi, L., & De Beni, R. (2014) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0033546 · Cited by 1,007 · see citing works
A dynamical model of general intelligence: The positive manifold of intelligence by mutualism.
Van Der Maas, H. L. J., Dolan, C. V., Grasman, R. P. P. P., Wicherts, J. M., Huizenga, H. M., & Raijmakers, M. E. J. (2006) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.113.4.842 · Cited by 1,006 · see citing works
Self-citationReview: Electrodermal Responses: What Happens in the Brain
Critchley, H. D. (2002) · The Neuroscientist · doi:10.1177/107385840200800209 · Cited by 997 · see citing works
Academic self‐concept and academic achievement: Relations and causal ordering
Marsh, H. W., & Martin, A. J. (2011) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1348/000709910x503501 · Cited by 975 · see citing works
Skinner, E. A., Wellborn, J. G., & Connell, J. P. (1990) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.22 · Cited by 891 · see citing works
Academic self-concept and academic achievement: Developmental perspectives on their causal ordering.
Guay, F., Marsh, H. W., & Boivin, M. (2003) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-0663.95.1.124 · Cited by 884 · see citing works
The Development of an Attribution-Based Theory of Motivation: A History of Ideas
WEINER, B. (2010) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520903433596 · Cited by 868 · see citing works
Molden, D. C., & Dweck, C. S. (2006) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.61.3.192 · Cited by 861 · see citing works
Robinaugh, D. J., Hoekstra, R. H. A., Toner, E. R., & Borsboom, D. (2020) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291719003404 · Cited by 861 · see citing works
Recursive Processes in Self-Affirmation: Intervening to Close the Minority Achievement Gap
Cohen, G. L., Garcia, J., Purdie-Vaughns, V., Apfel, N., & Brzustoski, P. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1170769 · Cited by 800 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Nevertheless, it may be hard to manipulate ASC in a randomized controlled trial (although it has been indirectly done by affirming general selfesteem and personal values, Cohen et al., 2009).”
BackgroundInfluentialRevisiting the Conceptualization, Measurement, and Generation of Interest
RENNINGER, K. A., & HIDI, S. (2011) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2011.587723 · Cited by 786 · see citing works
Harackiewicz, J. M., Durik, A. M., Barron, K. E., Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., & Tauer, J. M. (2008) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.105 · Cited by 756 · see citing works
Testing for Causality: A Personal Viewpoint
Granger, C. W. J. (2010) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511753978.003 · Cited by 747 · see citing works
Beyond simple models of self-control to circuit-based accounts of adolescent behavior
Casey, B. J. (2015) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015156 · Cited by 742 · see citing works
The Relationship Between Self and Achievement/Performance Measures
Hansford, B. C., & Hattie, J. A. (1982) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543052001123 · Cited by 741 · see citing works
Marsh, H. W., & O'neill, R. (1984) · Journal of Educational Measurement · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1984.tb00227.x · Cited by 686 · see citing works
Dweck, C. S. (2017) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000082 · Cited by 683 · see citing works
Negative Effects of Traditional Middle Schools on Students' Motivation
Eccles, J. S., Wigfield, A., Midgley, C., Reuman, D. A., Iver, D. M., & Feldlaufer, H. (1993) · The Elementary School Journal · doi:10.1086/461740 · Cited by 636 · see citing works
Academic self-concept and academic achievement: Developmental perspectives on their causal ordering.
Guay, F., Marsh, H. W., & Boivin, M. (2003) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.124 · Cited by 633 · see citing works
Kuhl, J. (1984) · Progress in Experimental Personality Research · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-541413-5.50007-3 · Cited by 630 · see citing works
Motivation Interventions in Education: A Meta-Analytic Review
Lazowski, R. A., & Hulleman, C. S. (2016) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654315617832 · Cited by 607 · see citing works
A primer on two-level dynamic structural equation models for intensive longitudinal data in Mplus.
McNeish, D., & Hamaker, E. L. (2019) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/met0000250 · Cited by 603 · see citing works
Beyond the ‘east–west’ dichotomy: Global variation in cultural models of selfhood.
Vignoles, V. L., Owe, E., Becker, M., Smith, P. B., Easterbrook, M. J., Brown, R., González, R., Didier, N., Carrasco, D., Cadena, M. P., et al. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/xge0000175 · Cited by 601 · see citing works
Self-concept and academic achievement: A meta-analysis of longitudinal relations
Huang, C. (2011) · Journal of School Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2011.07.001 · Cited by 558 · see citing works
Watt, H. M. G. (2004) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00757.x · Cited by 540 · see citing works
Beauchaine, T. P. (2015) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.01.017 · Cited by 529 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…can be measured as reduction in high frequency heart rate variability, has been associated with effortful control (Spangler & Friedman, 2015) and emotion regulation (Beauchaine, 2015), but a recent meta-analysis supports a more general role in top-down self-regulation (Holzman & Bridgett, 2017).”
BackgroundInterest and Learning From Text
Schiefele, U. (1999) · Scientific Studies of Reading · doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr0303_4 · Cited by 497 · see citing works
Kühl, J. (1984) · PubMed · Cited by 491 · see citing works
Greene, J. A., & Azevedo, R. (2007) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/003465430303953 · Cited by 486 · see citing works
Hope: An Emotion and a Vital Coping Resource Against Despair
Lazarus, R. S. (1999) · Social Research: An International Quarterly · Cited by 484 · see citing works
Perceived Control, Motivation, & Coping
Skinner, E. A. (1995) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781483327198 · Cited by 480 · see citing works
Holzman, J. B., & Bridgett, D. J. (2017) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.12.032 · Cited by 449 · see citing works
A unified framework of longitudinal models to examine reciprocal relations.
Usami, S., Murayama, K., & Hamaker, E. L. (2019) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/met0000210 · Cited by 437 · cited 5× · see citing works
“Such cross-lagged paths show the reciprocity between the variables but not necessarily causality in these relations (Usami et al., 2019).”
BackgroundInfluentialMøller, J., Pohlmann, B., Köller, O., & Marsh, H. W. (2009) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654309337522 · Cited by 426 · see citing works
Koriat, A., Ma’ayan, H., & Nussinson, R. (2006) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.135.1.36 · Cited by 424 · see citing works
Estimating workload using EEG spectral power and ERPs in the n-back task
Brouwer, A.-M., Hogervorst, M. A., van Erp, J. B. F., Heffelaar, T., Zimmerman, P. H., & Oostenveld, R. (2012) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2560/9/4/045008 · Cited by 407 · see citing works
Yeager, D. S., Purdie-Vaughns, V. J., Garcia, J., Apfel, N. H., Brzustoski, P., Master, A., Hessert, W. T., Williams, M. E., & Cohen, G. L. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/a0033906 · Cited by 403 · see citing works
Chapter 3: The Development of Children’s Motivation in School Contexts
Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., & Rodriguez, D. (1998) · Review of Research in Education · doi:10.3102/0091732x023001073 · Cited by 402 · see citing works
Plant, E. A., Ericsson, K. A., Hill, L., & Asberg, K. (2005) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.06.001 · Cited by 400 · see citing works
Measuring General Self-Efficacy: A Comparison of Three Measures Using Item Response Theory
Scherbaum, C. A., Cohen-Charash, Y., & Kern, M. J. (2006) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164406288171 · Cited by 393 · see citing works
Toward a formalized account of attitudes: The Causal Attitude Network (CAN) model.
Dalege, J., Borsboom, D., van Harreveld, F., van den Berg, H., Conner, M. T., & van der Maas, H. L. J. (2015) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0039802 · Cited by 376 · see citing works
Murayama, K., Pekrun, R., Lichtenfeld, S., & vom Hofe, R. (2013) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.12036 · Cited by 374 · see citing works
Measuring emotions during epistemic activities: the Epistemically-Related Emotion Scales
Pekrun, R., Vogl, E., Muis, K. R., & Sinatra, G. M. (2017) · Cognition and Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699931.2016.1204989 · Cited by 373 · see citing works
Interindividual differences in intraindividual change.
Nesselroade, J. R. (1991) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/10099-006 · Cited by 358 · see citing works
The Development of Children's Motivation in School Contexts
Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., & Rodriguez, D. (1998) · Review of Research in Education · doi:10.2307/1167288 · Cited by 349 · see citing works
Causal ordering of academic self-concept and achievement: Reanalysis of a pioneering study and...
Marsh, H. W., Byrne, B. M., & Yeung, A. S. (1999) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3403_2 · Cited by 343 · see citing works
An attributional theory of motivation
Graham, S. (2020) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101861 · Cited by 341 · see citing works
Allocation of self-paced study time and the "labor-in-vain effect."
Nelson, T. O., & Leonesio, R. J. (1988) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037//0278-7393.14.4.676 · Cited by 332 · see citing works
The Role of Subject-Matter Knowledge and Interest in the Processing of Linear and Nonlinear Texts
Alexander, P., Kulikowich, J., & Jetton, T. (1994) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543064002201 · Cited by 329 · see citing works
Beyond the intrinsic-extrinsic dichotomy: Self-determination in motivation and learning
Rigby, C. S., Deci, E. L., Patrick, B. C., & Ryan, R. M. (1992) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1007/bf00991650 · Cited by 326 · see citing works
Automatic detection of learner’s affect from conversational cues
D’Mello, S. K., Craig, S. D., Witherspoon, A. M., McDaniel, B., & Graesser, A. C. (2007) · User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction · doi:10.1007/s11257-007-9037-6 · Cited by 317 · see citing works
Motivation and Engagement Across the Academic Life Span
Martin, A. J. (2009) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164409332214 · Cited by 316 · see citing works
Marsh, H. W., Pekrun, R., Murayama, K., Arens, A. K., Parker, P. D., Guo, J., & Dicke, T. (2018) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/dev0000393 · Cited by 306 · see citing works
Achievement motivation theory: Balancing precision and utility
Anderman, E. M. (2020) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101864 · Cited by 303 · see citing works
A Meta-Analysis of Negative Feedback on Intrinsic Motivation
Fong, C. J., Patall, E. A., Vasquez, A. C., & Stautberg, S. (2019) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-018-9446-6 · Cited by 299 · see citing works
Kool, W., & Botvinick, M. (2018) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-018-0401-9 · Cited by 288 · see citing works
Theories of motivation: Integration and ways forward
Hattie, J., Hodis, F. A., & Kang, S. H. K. (2020) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101865 · Cited by 283 · see citing works
Negotiating the Transition to Middle School: The Role of Self-Regulatory Processes
Rudolph, K. D., Lambert, S. F., Clark, A. G., & Kurlakowsky, K. D. (2001) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00325 · Cited by 282 · see citing works
Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation
Berridge, K. C. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01647 · Cited by 273 · see citing works
A Cyclical Self-Regulatory Account of Student Engagement: Theoretical Foundations and Applications
Cleary, T. J., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_11 · Cited by 262 · see citing works
Pinxten, M., Marsh, H. W., De Fraine, B., Van Den Noortgate, W., & Van Damme, J. (2014) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjep.12028 · Cited by 260 · see citing works
Scherrer, V., & Preckel, F. (2019) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654318819127 · Cited by 251 · cited 11× · see citing works
“Social cognitive accounts often postulate that the development of more sophisticated cognitive capacities with age allows adolescents to improve performance but also to be more aware of their own abilities and those of their peers (Dweck, 2000, Scherrer and Preckel, 2019).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAchievement Goal Th eory: Th e Past, Present, and Future
Maehr, M. L., & Zusho, A. (2009) · doi:10.4324/9780203879498-11 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
Reciprocal relations between students’ academic enjoyment, boredom, and achievement over time
Putwain, D. W., Becker, S., Symes, W., & Pekrun, R. (2018) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.08.004 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
A Review of Self-Report and Alternative Approaches in the Measurement of Student Motivation
Fulmer, S. M., & Frijters, J. C. (2009) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-009-9107-x · Cited by 227 · see citing works
Effort Mobilization when the Self is Involved: Some Lessons from the Cardiovascular System
Gendolla, G., & Richter, M. (2010) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0019742 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Allocation of self-paced study time and the "labor-in-vain effect."
Nelson, T. O., & Leonesio, R. J. (1988) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.14.4.676 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
Evaluation of an Intervention to Increase Realistic Self-Efficacy and Interests in College Women
Betz, N. E., & Schifano, R. S. (2000) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1006/jvbe.1999.1690 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
The Reciprocal Internal/External Frame of Reference Model
Möller, J., Retelsdorf, J., Köller, O., & Marsh, H. (2011) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/0002831211419649 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Koenka, A. C. (2020) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101831 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Marsh, H. W., Craven, R. G., Hinkley, J. W., & Debus, R. L. (2003) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3802_3 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Chiu, M. M., & Klassen, R. M. (2010) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.11.002 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Jansen, B. R. J., Louwerse, J., Straatemeier, M., Van der Ven, S. H. G., Klinkenberg, S., & Van der Maas, H. L. J. (2013) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2012.12.014 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Self-citationWigfield, A., & Koenka, A. C. (2020) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101872 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
The structure of academic self-concepts revisited: The nested Marsh/Shavelson model.
Brunner, M., Keller, U., Dierendonck, C., Reichert, M., Ugen, S., Fischbach, A., & Martin, R. (2010) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0019644 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
The Influence of Reading on Vocabulary Growth: A Case for a Matthew Effect
Duff, D., Tomblin, J. B., & Catts, H. W. (2015) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2015_jslhr-l-13-0310 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Grigg, S., Perera, H. N., McIlveen, P., & Svetleff, Z. (2018) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.01.007 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Lumley, M. A., Gustavson, B. J., Partridge, R., & Labouvie‐Vief, G. (2005) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/1528-3542.5.3.329 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Garon-Carrier, G., Boivin, M., Guay, F., Kovas, Y., Dionne, G., Lemelin, J.-P., Séguin, J. R., Vitaro, F., & Tremblay, R. E. (2016) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.12458 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Kelley, N. J., Hortensius, R., Schutter, D. J. L. G., & Harmon‐Jones, E. (2017) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2017.03.001 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
EEG alpha band dissociation with increasing task demands
Fink, A., Grabner, R. H., Neuper, C., & Neubauer, A. C. (2005) · Cognitive Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.02.002 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Marsh, H. W., & Nagy, G. (2009) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0016306 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Seaton, M., Parker, P., Marsh, H. W., Craven, R. G., & Yeung, A. S. (2014) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410.2013.825232 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Reading achievement and reading self-concept – Testing the reciprocal effects model
Retelsdorf, J., Köller, O., & Møller, J. (2013) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.07.004 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Narciss, S., & Huth, K. (2006) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.07.003 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Directionality of the Associations of High School Expectancy-Value, Aspirations, and Attainment
Guo, J., Marsh, H. W., Morin, A. J. S., Parker, P. D., & Kaur, G. (2015) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/0002831214565786 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Fraine, B. D., Damme, J. V., & Onghena, P. (2006) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.10.005 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Network Models for Cognitive Development and Intelligence
van der Maas, H. L. J., Kan, K., Marsman, M., & Stevenson, C. E. (2017) · Journal of Intelligence · doi:10.3390/jintelligence5020016 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Becker, M., Vignoles, V. L., Owe, E., Brown, R., Smith, P. B., Easterbrook, M., Herman, G., de Sauvage, I., Bourguignon, D., Torres, A., et al. (2012) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0026853 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
The relationship between academic self-concept and achievement: A multicohort–multioccasion study
Chen, S.-K., Yeh, Y.-C., Hwang, F.-M., & Lin, S. S. J. (2013) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2012.07.021 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Collie, R. J., Martin, A. J., Malmberg, L., Hall, J., & Ginns, P. (2015) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjep.12066 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Arens, A. K., Marsh, H. W., Pekrun, R., Lichtenfeld, S., Murayama, K., & vom Hofe, R. (2017) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000163 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Reciprocal effects between self-efficacy and achievement in mathematics and reading
Schöber, C., Schütte, K., Köller, O., McElvany, N., & Gebauer, M. M. (2018) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2018.01.008 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Harnessing Values to Promote Motivation in Education
Harackiewicz, J. M., Tibbetts, Y., Canning, E., & Hyde, J. S. (2014) · Motivational Interventions · doi:10.1108/s0749-742320140000018002 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Implicit theories and IQ test performance: A sequential mediational analysis
Cury, F., Fonséca, D. D., Zahn, I., & Elliot, A. J. (2007) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2007.07.003 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Niepel, C., Brunner, M., & Preckel, F. (2014) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0036307 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Marsh, H. W., Pekrun, R., Lichtenfeld, S., Guo, J., Arens, A. K., & Murayama, K. (2016) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/dev0000146 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Reciprocal Effects between Reading Achievement and Intrinsic and Extrinsic Reading Motivation
Hebbecker, K., Förster, N., & Souvignier, E. (2019) · Scientific Studies of Reading · doi:10.1080/10888438.2019.1598413 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Mumm, J., & Mutlu, B. (2011) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.02.002 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Evoked prior learning experience and approach to learning as predictors of academic achievement
Trigwell, K., Ashwin, P., & Millan, E. S. (2013) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.2012.02066.x · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Dettmers, S., Trautwein, U., & Lüdtke, O. (2009) · School Effectiveness and School Improvement · doi:10.1080/09243450902904601 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Bieg, M., Goetz, T., & Hubbard, K. (2013) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2013.09.006 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
The Developmental Dynamics between Interest, Self-concept of Ability, and Academic Performance
Viljaranta, J., Tolvanen, A. J., Aunola, K., & Nurmi, J. (2014) · Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00313831.2014.904419 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Scherrer, V., Preckel, F., Schmidt, I., & Elliot, A. J. (2020) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/dev0000898 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Chen, W.-W., & Wong, Y.-L. (2015) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410.2014.893559 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Molloy, L. E., Gest, S. D., & Rulison, K. L. (2011) · The Journal of Early Adolescence · doi:10.1177/0272431610384487 · Cited by 116 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Indeed, peer relationships show a stronger influence on academic self-concept for seventh graders, compared to fifth graders (Molloy et al., 2011).”
BackgroundRao, N., & Sachs, J. (1999) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/00131649921970206 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
The Big-Fish-Little-Pond Effect on Academic Self-Concept: A Meta-Analysis
Fang, J., Huang, X., Zhang, M., Huang, F., Li, Z., & Yuan, Q. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01569 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Chamorro‐Premuzic, T., Harlaar, N., Greven, C. U., & Plomin, R. J. (2010) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2010.05.002 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Burns, R. A., Crisp, D. A., & Burns, R. B. (2020) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjep.12265 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
The Relation Between Students’ Effort and Monitoring Judgments During Learning: A Meta-analysis
Baars, M., Wijnia, L., de Bruin, A., & Paas, F. (2020) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-020-09569-3 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
OECD (2016) · Reviews of National Policies for Education/Reviews of national policies for education · doi:10.1787/9789264257658-en · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Conceptual Issues and Assessment of Implicit Theories
Lüftenegger, M., & Chen, J. (2017) · Zeitschrift für Psychologie · doi:10.1027/2151-2604/a000286 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Arens, A. K., Schmidt, I., & Preckel, F. (2019) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000313 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Wigfield, A., Cambria, J., & Eccles, J. S. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195399820.013.0026 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Gottfried, A. E., Marcoulides, G. A., Gottfried, A. W., & Oliver, P. H. (2013) · Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness · doi:10.1080/19345747.2012.698376 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Pollet, T. V., & Saxton, T. K. (2019) · Evolutionary Psychological Science · doi:10.1007/s40806-019-00192-2 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Applying an attitude network approach to consumer behaviour towards plastic
Zwicker, M. V., Nohlen, H. U., Dalege, J., Gruter, G. M., & van Harreveld, F. (2020) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101433 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Brouwer, A.-M., Hogervorst, M. A. J., Holewijn, M., & van Erp, J. B. F. (2014) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2014.05.004 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Adolescent Development of Value-Guided Goal Pursuit
Davidow, J. Y., Insel, C., & Somerville, L. H. (2018) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2018.05.003 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Niepel, C., Brunner, M., & Preckel, F. (2014) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.07.002 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Capturing motivation and emotion regulation during a learning process
Järvenoja, H., Järvelä, S., Törmänen, T., Näykki, P., Malmberg, J., Kurki, K., Mykkänen, A., & Isohätälä, J. (2018) · frontline Learning Research · doi:10.14786/flr.v6i3.369 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Dicke, T., Marsh, H. W., Parker, P. D., Pekrun, R. H., Guo, J., & Televantou, I. (2018) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000259 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Sewasew, D., & Schroeders, U. (2019) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.03.009 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Sociocultural and situative approaches to studying motivation
Nolen, S. B., & Ward, C. J. (2008) · Advances in Motivation and Achievement · doi:10.1016/s0749-7423(08)15013-0 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Self-Efficacy, Interest, and Task Performance
Niemivirta, M., & Tapola, A. (2007) · Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie · doi:10.1024/1010-0652.21.3.241 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Gaspard, H., Lauermann, F., Rose, N., Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. (2019) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.13343 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Miyamoto, A., Pfost, M., & Artelt, C. (2017) · Journal of Research in Reading · doi:10.1111/1467-9817.12113 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Systolic Time Intervals and New Measurement Methods
Tavakolian, K. (2016) · Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology · doi:10.1007/s13239-016-0262-1 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Bossaert, G., Doumen, S., Buyse, E., & Verschueren, K. (2011) · Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2010.12.002 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Nuutila, K., Tuominen, H., Tapola, A., Vainikainen, M.-P., & Niemivirta, M. (2018) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.04.003 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Walgermo, B. R., Foldnes, N., Uppstad, P. H., & Solheim, O. J. (2018) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-018-9843-8 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Ehm, J.-H., Hasselhorn, M., & Schmiedek, F. (2019) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/dev0000796 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Looking at Mental Effort Appraisals through a Metacognitive Lens: Are they Biased?
Scheiter, K., Ackerman, R., & Hoogerheide, V. (2020) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-020-09555-9 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Towards a Definition of Efforts
Massin, O. (2017) · Motivation Science · doi:10.1037/mot0000066 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Yu, S., & Levesque-Bristol, C. (2020) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101857 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
de Kraker-Pauw, E., van Wesel, F., A, L. K. M., & van Atteveldt, N. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01594 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Predicting Learning and Affect from Multimodal Data Streams in Task-Oriented Tutorial Dialogue.
Grafsgaard, J. F., Wiggins, J. B., Boyer, K. E., Wiebe, E., & Lester, J. C. (2014) · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Ladd, G. W., Herald‐Brown, S. L., & Kochel, K. P. (2009) · Cited by 51 · see citing works
The puzzle of study time allocation for the most challenging items
Undorf, M., & Ackerman, R. (2017) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-017-1261-4 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
The role of self-study time in freshmen’s achievement
Doumen, S., Broeckmans, J., & Masui, C. (2013) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410.2013.785063 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Höft, L., & Bernholt, S. (2019) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2019.1571650 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Sewasew, D., & Koester, L. S. (2019) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2019.05.010 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Cumulative versus end‐of‐course assessment: effects on self‐study time and test performance
Kerdijk, W., Cohen‐Schotanus, J., Mulder, B. F., Muntinghe, F. L. H., & Tio, R. A. (2015) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.12756 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Introducing a science interest network model to reveal country differences.
Sachisthal, M. S. M., Jansen, B. R. J., Peetsma, T. T. D., Dalege, J., van der Maas, H. L. J., & Raijmakers, M. E. J. (2019) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000327 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Self-citationGrygiel, P., Modzelewski, M., & Pisarek, J. (2016) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-016-0300-2 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Savi, A. O., Ruijs, N. M., Maris, G. K. J., & van der Maas, H. L. J. (2018) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.12.008 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Vu, T., Finkenauer, C., Huizinga, M., Novin, S., & A, L. K. M. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0183011 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Self-citationLanfranchi, P. A., Pépin, J., & Somers, V. K. (2016) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-24288-2.00014-3 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Modeling Confusion: Facial Expression, Task, and Discourse in Task-Oriented Tutorial Dialogue
Grafsgaard, J. F., Boyer, K., Phillips, R., & Lester, J. C. (2011) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-21869-9_15 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Effortful control and resiliency exhibit different patterns of cardiac autonomic control
Spangler, D. P., & Friedman, B. H. (2015) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.03.002 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Intelligence mindset shapes neural learning signals and memory
Bejjani, C., DePasque, S., & Tricomi, E. (2019) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2019.06.003 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
A Solution to the Measurement Problem in the Idiographic Approach Using Computer Adaptive Practicing
Hofman, A. D., Jansen, B. R. J., de Mooij, S. M. M., Stevenson, C. E., & van der Maas, H. L. J. (2018) · Journal of Intelligence · doi:10.3390/jintelligence6010014 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Self-citationA Primer on Two-Level Dynamic Structural Equation Models for Intensive Longitudinal Data
McNeish, D. (2018) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/j56bm · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Sachisthal, M. S. M., Jansen, B. R. J., Dalege, J., & Raijmakers, M. E. J. (2020) · Australian Journal of Education · doi:10.1177/0004944120957477 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Self-citationNye, B. D., Karumbaiah, S., Tokel, S. T., Core, M. G., Stratou, G., Auerbach, D., & Georgila, K. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-93843-1_26 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Wigfield, A., Turci, L., Cambria, J., & Eccles, J. S. (2019) · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190666453.013.24 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Mendes, W. B. (2015) · Emotion Review · doi:10.1177/1754073914565521 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Mindset about Intelligence and Connections to Student Effort: Opportunities for Learning and Action
Haynes, C. L., Thompson, J. R., Licklider, B. L., Hendrich, S., Thompson, K., & Wiersema, J. A. (2016) · Natural sciences education · doi:10.4195/nse2016.0004 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Appraisal of children's facial expressions while performing mathematics problems
Krahmer, E., & van Amelsvoort, M. (2009) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Beck, R. C. (1990). Motivation. Prentice Hall.
- Maehr, M. L., & Zusho, A. (2009). Achievement goal theory: The past, present, and future. In K. R. Wenzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 77–104). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
- Scharmer, A. L. (2020). The Reciprocal relation of motivation and academic achievement in typically developing elementary and high-school students: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies [Master thesis].[masked for double blind review].
- Valentine, J. C., & Dubois, D. L. (2005). Effects of self-beliefs on academic achievement and vice versa. In H. W. Marsh, R. G. Craven, & D. M. McInerney (Eds.), International advances in self research: New frontiers for self research (2nd ed., pp. 53–78). Information Age.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Theories of motivation: A comprehensive analysis of human behavior drivers
Bandhu, D., Mohan, M. M., Nittala, N. A. P., Jadhav, P., Bhadauria, A., & Saxena, K. K. (2024) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104177 · Cited by 293 · see citing works
Meinlschmidt, G., Koc, S., Boerner, E., Tegethoff, M., Simacek, T., Schirmer, L., & Schneider, M. (2025) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-025-07307-3 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
When LLMs Hallucinate: Examining the Effects of Erroneous Feedback in Math Tutoring Systems
Steinbach, M., Bhandari, S., Meyer, J., & Pardos, Z. A. (2025) · Proceedings of the Twelfth ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale · doi:10.1145/3698205.3729555 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
- Authors
- Vu, T., Magis-Weinberg, L., Jansen, B. R. J., van Atteveldt, N., Janssen, T. W. P., Lee, N. C., van der Maas, H. L. J., Raijmakers, M. E. J., Sachisthal, M. S. M., & Meeter, M.
- Affiliations
- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
- University of Amsterdam (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Vu, TuongVan
- Jansen, Brenda R. J.
- Janssen, Tieme W. P.
- Lee, Nikki C.
- Raijmakers, Maartje E. J.
- Sachisthal, Maien S. M.
- Meeter, Martijn
- ORCID
- Venue
- Educational Psychology Review
- Published
- 2021-05-05
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 39-71
- ISSN
- 1040-726X (ISSN-L)
- 1573-336X
- OpenAlex
- W3159788096
- Semantic Scholar
- 299fd0664e741697d4a70fa676514954d061502c
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 200
- Citations by year
- 2026: 42 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 4 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 28.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Educational Psychology Review (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- VU Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
- Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- VU Research Portal (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Jacobs Foundation (2019 1329 00)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Keywords
- academic motivation, academic performance, bidirectional relationship, network analysis, causal inference, measurement interval, achievement measurement, motivational interventions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-08.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-08.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review