CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 11Reading and Literacy DevelopmentEarly Childhood Education and DevelopmentLiteracy and Educational Practices

Examining the effects of quality talk discussions on 4th- and 5th-grade students’ high-level comprehension of text

Open access
Karen Murphy, P., Greene, Jeffrey A., Firetto, Carla M., M. V. Croninger, Rachel, Duke, Rebekah F., Li, Mengyi, Lobczowski, Nikki G.·2022·Contemporary Educational Psychology
DOI 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2022.102099
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2022.102099

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Students' ability to 'examine the credibility of the source or the veracity of the claims, reasoning, or evidence presented in a given text' is best understood as an aspect of epistemic cognition.

    “In the current study, students' shifts in stances towards texts are supported by Murphy et al.'s (2022) study that demonstrated students' ability to 'examine the credibility of the source or the veracity of the claims, reasoning, or evidence presented in a given text' (2), best understood as an aspect of epistemic cognition.”

    From The Impact of a Dialogic Intervention on a Chinese Rural Teacher and Students' Stances Towards Texts (2025) · cites this paper as Murphy et al. (2022)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Karen Murphy, P., Greene, J. A., Firetto, C. M., M. V. Croninger, R., Duke, R. F., Li, M., & Lobczowski, N. G.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
ORCID
Venue
Contemporary Educational Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-10
Volume
71
Pages
102099
ISSN
0361-476X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.cedpsych.2022.102099
OpenAlex
W4290829701
Cited by
11
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3
FWCI
1.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Contemporary Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • ScholarSphere (Penn State Libraries) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Institute of Education Sciences (R305A130031)
  • Pennsylvania State University
  • U.S. Department of Education
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Literacy and Educational Practices
Keywords
small group discussion, literacy intervention, argumentative essay writing, elementary school students, argumentative writing, reading comprehension

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review