Planning promotes studying – The higher the plan quality the better: A micro-randomized trial
Open accessAbstract
• Self-regulated learning is crucial for vocabulary study outside the classroom. • Our mobile intervention aimed at helping children plan when and where to study. • Mobile prompts encouraged children to create if-then plans for studying the next day. • The effectiveness of the self-created plans crucially depended on their quality. • We highlight important criteria to consider when rating the quality of self-created if-then plans. Young learners often cram before exams instead of spacing out their study sessions. In this study, we investigated whether implementation intentions could help students develop beneficial study routines by planning when and where to study vocabulary. We conducted a 42-day micro-randomized trial to examine the effectiveness of a mobile intervention aimed at increasing children’s engagement with a vocabulary learning app. German-speaking fifth and sixth graders ( N = 357; 53.78 % female, M age = 11.63 years) received planning prompts on their smartphones on randomized evenings, asking them to formulate appropriate implementation intentions for the next day, that is, if-then plans specifying when and where they would like to study vocabulary. Using a micro-randomized trial allowed us to test the within-person effect of the intervention over time, as well as potential time-varying moderators. We used logistic mixed-effects models to examine whether receiving a planning prompt in the evening significantly increased the likelihood of studying with the vocabulary learning app the next day. Our results suggest that the effectiveness of the intervention was strongly dependent on the quality of the self-created plans. Using a categorical rubric to rate plan quality based on whether the cue of the plan was specific, salient, and appropriate in the given context, we show that the higher the plan quality, the more likely children were to study the next day. These findings suggest that if-then plans can be a useful metacognitive strategy for planning study sessions. Researchers and teachers should carefully scaffold the creation of high-quality plans by providing examples and feedback.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The lack of variation in cue type likely reflects a shared understanding in the literature that cues should be concrete and salient.
“This lack of variation likely reflects a shared understanding in the literature—grounded in theoretical work by Gollwitzer (1999)—that cues should be concrete and salient (see also Schaaf et al., 2025).”
From The effectiveness of implementation intentions in children: A systematic review and meta‐analysis (2026) · cites this paper as Schaaf et al., 2025
Cites
Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002) · Theory Into Practice · doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2 · Cited by 7,305 · see citing works
Implementation intentions and goal achievement: a meta-analysis of effects and processes
Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran, P. (2006) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(06)38002-1 · Cited by 3,236 · see citing works
Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100612453266 · Cited by 3,138 · see citing works
Dignath, C., & Büttner, G. (2008) · Metacognition and Learning · doi:10.1007/s11409-008-9029-x · Cited by 1,085 · see citing works
How can primary school students learn self-regulated learning strategies most effectively?
Dignath, C., Buettner, G., & Langfeldt, H.-P. (2008) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2008.02.003 · Cited by 903 · see citing works
Theobald, M. (2021) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2021.101976 · Cited by 478 · see citing works
Implementation Intentions Facilitate Response Inhibition in Children with ADHD
Gawrilow, C., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2008) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/s10608-007-9150-1 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Greene, J. A., Hutchison, L. A., Costa, L.-J., & Crompton, H. (2012) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2012.02.002 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The effectiveness of implementation intentions in children: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Breitwieser, J., & Reinelt, T. (2026) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.70065 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Schaaf, M., Brod, G., & Breitwieser, J.
- Affiliations
- Individual Development and Adaptive Education (DE)
- Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
- Venue
- Contemporary Educational Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2025-12
- Volume
- 83
- Pages
- 102422
- ISSN
- 0361-476X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4415531844
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- FWCI
- 1.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Contemporary Educational Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Publication Server of Goethe University Frankfurt am Main (Goethe University Frankfurt) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Pedocs (German Institute for International Educational Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Open Science Framework
- peDOCS (cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Mobile Learning in Education
- Keywords
- implementation intentions, if-then planning, student self-regulation, vocabulary acquisition, learning planning, metacognitive strategies, spaced practice, cramming, study routines, children, plan quality, metacognitive scaffolding
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review