Cited by 1Innovative Teaching and Learning MethodsBehavioral Health and InterventionsMobile Learning in Education

Planning promotes studying – The higher the plan quality the better: A micro-randomized trial

Open access
Schaaf, Mirijam, Brod, Garvin, Breitwieser, Jasmin·2025·Contemporary Educational Psychology

Abstract

• Self-regulated learning is crucial for vocabulary study outside the classroom. • Our mobile intervention aimed at helping children plan when and where to study. • Mobile prompts encouraged children to create if-then plans for studying the next day. • The effectiveness of the self-created plans crucially depended on their quality. • We highlight important criteria to consider when rating the quality of self-created if-then plans. Young learners often cram before exams instead of spacing out their study sessions. In this study, we investigated whether implementation intentions could help students develop beneficial study routines by planning when and where to study vocabulary. We conducted a 42-day micro-randomized trial to examine the effectiveness of a mobile intervention aimed at increasing children’s engagement with a vocabulary learning app. German-speaking fifth and sixth graders ( N = 357; 53.78 % female, M age = 11.63 years) received planning prompts on their smartphones on randomized evenings, asking them to formulate appropriate implementation intentions for the next day, that is, if-then plans specifying when and where they would like to study vocabulary. Using a micro-randomized trial allowed us to test the within-person effect of the intervention over time, as well as potential time-varying moderators. We used logistic mixed-effects models to examine whether receiving a planning prompt in the evening significantly increased the likelihood of studying with the vocabulary learning app the next day. Our results suggest that the effectiveness of the intervention was strongly dependent on the quality of the self-created plans. Using a categorical rubric to rate plan quality based on whether the cue of the plan was specific, salient, and appropriate in the given context, we show that the higher the plan quality, the more likely children were to study the next day. These findings suggest that if-then plans can be a useful metacognitive strategy for planning study sessions. Researchers and teachers should carefully scaffold the creation of high-quality plans by providing examples and feedback.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2025.102422

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The lack of variation in cue type likely reflects a shared understanding in the literature that cues should be concrete and salient.

    “This lack of variation likely reflects a shared understanding in the literature—grounded in theoretical work by Gollwitzer (1999)—that cues should be concrete and salient (see also Schaaf et al., 2025).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schaaf, M., Brod, G., & Breitwieser, J.
Affiliations
  • Individual Development and Adaptive Education (DE)
  • Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
Venue
Contemporary Educational Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-12
Volume
83
Pages
102422
ISSN
0361-476X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4415531844
Cited by
1
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
1.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Contemporary Educational Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Publication Server of Goethe University Frankfurt am Main (Goethe University Frankfurt) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Pedocs (German Institute for International Educational Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Open Science Framework
  • peDOCS (cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Mobile Learning in Education
Keywords
implementation intentions, if-then planning, student self-regulation, vocabulary acquisition, learning planning, metacognitive strategies, spaced practice, cramming, study routines, children, plan quality, metacognitive scaffolding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review