Cited by 74Innovative Teaching and Learning MethodsEducational Strategies and EpistemologiesVisual and Cognitive Learning Processes

Investigating how college students’ task definitions and plans relate to self-regulated learning processing and understanding of a complex science topic

Greene, Jeffrey A., Hutchison, Leigh Anna, Costa, Lara-Jeane, Crompton, Helen·2012·Contemporary Educational Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2012.02.002

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 71 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Greene, J. A., Hutchison, L. A., Costa, L.-J., & Crompton, H.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Greene, Jeffrey A.
Venue
Contemporary Educational Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-10
Volume
37
Issue
4
Pages
307-320
ISSN
0361-476X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1993594096
Cited by
74
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1
FWCI
9.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Contemporary Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
Keywords
student self-regulation, task definition, learning plans, hypermedia learning environments, university students, conceptual understanding, academic performance, science learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review