Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 236

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Kinetics of CO2 adsorption on cherry stone-based carbons in CO2/CH4 separations

Open access
Álvarez-Gutiérrez, N., Gil, M.V., Rubiera, F., Pevida, C.·2017·Chemical Engineering Journal

Abstract

Abstract Most practical applications of solids in industry involve porous materials and adsorption processes. A correct assessment of the equilibrium and kinetics of adsorption is extremely important for the design and operation of adsorption based processes. In our previous studies we focused on the evaluation of the equilibrium of CO2/CH4 adsorption on cherry stone-based carbons. In the present paper the kinetics of adsorption of CO2 on two cherry stone-based activated carbons (CS-H2O and CS-CO2), previously prepared in our laboratory, has been evaluated by means of transient breakthrough experiments at different CO2/CH4 feed concentrations, at atmospheric pressure and 30 °C. A commercial activated carbon, Calgon BPL, has also been evaluated for reference purposes. Three models have been applied to estimate the rate parameters during the adsorption of CO2 on these carbons, pseudo-first, pseudo-second and Avrami’s fractional order kinetic models. Avrami’s model accurately predicted the dynamic CO2 adsorption performance of the carbons for the different feed gas compositions. To further investigate the mechanism of CO2 adsorption on CS-H2O, CS-CO2 and Calgon BPL, intra-particle diffusion and Boyd’s film-diffusion models were also evaluated. It was established that mass transfer during the adsorption of CO2 from CO2/CH4 is a diffusion-based process and that the main diffusion mechanisms involved are intra-particle and film diffusion. At the initial stages of adsorption, film diffusion resistance governed the adsorption rate, whereas intra-particle diffusion resistance was the predominant factor in the following stages of adsorption.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cej.2016.08.077

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 236

Metadata

Authors
Álvarez-Gutiérrez, N., Gil, M. V., Rubiera, F., & Pevida, C.
Venue
Chemical Engineering Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-01
Volume
307
Pages
249-257
ISSN
1385-8947 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2513497197
Cited by
236
References
5
FWCI
15.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Kinetics of CO2 adsorption on cherry stone-based carbons in CO2/CH4 separations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cej.2016.08.077
The paper
Álvarez-Gutiérrez, N., Gil, M. V., Rubiera, F., & Pevida, C. (2017). Kinetics of CO2 adsorption on cherry stone-based carbons in CO2/CH4 separations. Chemical Engineering Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.08.077

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.