Cited by 209Carbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesIndustrial Gas Emission ControlCO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions

Kinetic study and breakthrough analysis of the hybrid physical/chemical CO2 adsorption/desorption behavior of a magnetite-based sorbent

Raganati, Federica, Alfe, Michela, Gargiulo, Valentina, Chirone, Riccardo, Ammendola, Paola·2019·Chemical Engineering Journal

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cej.2019.04.165

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Raganati, F., Alfe, M., Gargiulo, V., Chirone, R., & Ammendola, P.
Affiliations
Institute for Research on Combustion (IT)
Corresponding author
Raganati, Federica
Venue
Chemical Engineering Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-09
Volume
372
Pages
526-535
ISSN
1385-8947 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2941588210
Cited by
209
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 7
FWCI
11.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Chemical Engineering Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Industrial Gas Emission Control
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
Keywords
CO2 adsorption, CO2 desorption, carbon black, post-combustion CO2 capture, adsorption kinetics, pseudo-first-order kinetics, pseudo-second-order kinetics, Avrami equation, mass transfer resistance, intraparticle diffusion, sorbent deactivation, breakthrough curves

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review