Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 307

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Efficient degradation of sulfamethoxazole by the CuO@Al2O3 (EPC) coupled PMS system: Optimization, degradation pathways and toxicity evaluation

Yan, Jianfei, Li, Jun, Peng, Jiali, Zhang, Heng, Zhang, Yunhong, Lai, Bo·2019·Chemical Engineering Journal

Abstract

Abstract The CuO@Al2O3 (EPC) (prepared by an electroless plating and calcining method) was used to activate peroxymonosulfate (PMS) for advanced oxidation of sulfamethoxazole (SMX) in deionized water, and effects of three key parameters of its all parameters (i.e., CuO@Al2O3 (EPC) dosage, PMS dosage, and initial solution pH) on the CuO@Al2O3 (EPC)/PMS system were studied. Under the optimal conditions (i.e., [catalyst]0 = 0.5 g/L, [PMS]0 = 0.4 mM and initial solution pH of 6.2), the SMX removal efficiency obtained by the CuO@Al2O3 (EPC)/PMS process was 99%, while the SMX removal efficiency were 76% and 72% in CuO@Al2O3 (IC) (prepared by an impregnation-calcination method)/PMS and CuO/PMS system respectively. Adding H2PO4− into CuO@Al2O3 (EPC)/PMS system decreased the SMX removal efficiency, while the degradation efficiency was improved when Cl− was introduced the oxidation system. Furthermore, five possible degradation pathways of SMX were proposed according to the analysis results of intermediates detected by UPLC-QTOF-MS/MS. The biological toxicities of the degraded SMX solution were evaluated by activated sludge inhibition experiments. What is more, it was found that three radicals (i.e. SO4 −, OH and O2 −) made contributions to SMX degradation in the CuO@Al2O3 (EPC)/PMS system according to radicals scavenging experiments. Residual PMS, and generated SO4 − and OH radicals were quantified in CuO@Al2O3 (EPC)/PMS system, and the electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) was used to detect the generation of radicals. Finally, the mechanism of the CuO@Al2O3 (EPC)/PMS system was proposed according to analysis data of XPS and radical scavenging experiments.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cej.2018.11.074

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Metadata

Authors
Yan, J., Li, J., Peng, J., Zhang, H., Zhang, Y., & Lai, B.
Venue
Chemical Engineering Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-03
Volume
359
Pages
1097-1110
ISSN
1385-8947 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2901370525
Cited by
307
References
3
FWCI
11.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficient degradation of sulfamethoxazole by the CuO@Al2O3 (EPC) coupled PMS system: Optimization, degradation pathways and toxicity evaluation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cej.2018.11.074
The paper
Yan, J., Li, J., Peng, J., Zhang, H., Zhang, Y., & Lai, B. (2019). Efficient degradation of sulfamethoxazole by the CuO@Al2O3 (EPC) coupled PMS system: Optimization, degradation pathways and toxicity evaluation. Chemical Engineering Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.11.074

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.