Cited by 173Force Microscopy Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced Fluorescence Microscopy TechniquesRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms

Revisiting the central dogma one molecule at a time

Open access
Bustamante, Carlos, Cheng, Wei, Mejia, Yara X.·2011·Cell

Abstract

The faithful relay and timely expression of genetic information depend on specialized molecular machines, many of which function as nucleic acid translocases. The emergence over the last decade of single-molecule fluorescence detection and manipulation techniques with nm and Å resolution and their application to the study of nucleic acid translocases are painting an increasingly sharp picture of the inner workings of these machines, the dynamics and coordination of their moving parts, their thermodynamic efficiency, and the nature of their transient intermediates. Here we present an overview of the main results arrived at by the application of single-molecule methods to the study of the main machines of the central dogma.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2011.01.033

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The central dogma of molecular biology outlines the process of genetic information being transferred from DNA to mRNA to protein, representing a fundamental mechanism for biological information processing.

    “The central dogma of molecular biology outlines the process of genetic information being transferred from DNA to mRNA to protein, representing a fundamental mechanism for biological information processing [109].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bustamante, C., Cheng, W., & Mejia, Y. X.
Affiliations
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry (DE)
Corresponding author
Bustamante, Carlos
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-02
Volume
144
Issue
4
Pages
480-497
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2007349694
Cited by
173
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 20
FWCI
1.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Keywords
central dogma, single-molecule fluorescence, molecular machines, DNA replication, transcription, RNA processing, thermodynamic efficiency, transient intermediates, molecular dynamics
MeSH terms
Chromosomes, DNA Replication, DNA Helicases, Enzymes, Nucleic Acids, Thermodynamics, Transcription, Genetic, Protein Biosynthesis, Virus Assembly

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review