Cited by 84Fungal Infections and StudiesFungal and yeast genetics researchAntifungal resistance and susceptibility

Unraveling the Biology of a Fungal Meningitis Pathogen Using Chemical Genetics

Open access
Brown, Jessica C.S., Nelson, Justin, VanderSluis, Benjamin, Deshpande, Raamesh, Butts, Arielle, Kagan, Sarah, Polacheck, Itzhack, Krysan, Damian J. +2 more·2014·Cell

Abstract

The fungal meningitis pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans is a central driver of mortality in HIV/AIDS. We report a genome-scale chemical genetic data map for this pathogen that quantifies the impact of 439 small-molecule challenges on 1,448 gene knockouts. We identified chemical phenotypes for 83% of mutants screened and at least one genetic response for each compound. C. neoformans chemical-genetic responses are largely distinct from orthologous published profiles of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, demonstrating the importance of pathogen-centered studies. We used the chemical-genetic matrix to predict novel pathogenicity genes, infer compound mode of action, and to develop an algorithm, O2M, that predicts antifungal synergies. These predictions were experimentally validated, thereby identifying virulence genes, a molecule that triggers G2/M arrest and inhibits the Cdc25 phosphatase, and many compounds that synergize with the antifungal drug fluconazole. Our work establishes a chemical-genetic foundation for approaching an infection responsible for greater than one-third of AIDS-related deaths.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2014.10.044

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A high-throughput approach, termed the overlap2 method, has been developed to predict synergistic and antagonistic drug pairs using at least one known synergistic drug pair and chemical-genetic data sets.

    “A high-throughput approach has been developed to predict synergistic and antagonistic drug pairs using at least one known synergistic drug pair and chemical–genetic data sets118,119.”
  • The overlap2 method applied to a compound library enriched for FDA-approved compounds against C. neoformans predicted that the anticholinergic drug dicyclomine HCl with fluconazole would serve as a potent anti-cryptococcal combination therapy.

    “For example, the overlap2 method was applied to a compound library enriched for FDA-approved compounds against C. neoformans116–119 and successfully predicted that the anticholinergic drug dicyclomine HCl with fluconazole would serve as a potent anti-cryptococcal combination therapy.”
  • Pathogen-specific analyses revealed that many compounds display species-specific chemical-genetic interactions.

    “Chemical–genetic mapping of synergistic compound pairs has been explored in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, but pathogen-specific analyses have revealed that many compounds display species-specific chemical–genetic interactions118.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 66 · Cited by 84

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. WHO 2011 Rapid Advice: diagnosis, prevention and management of cryptococcal disease in HIV-infected adults, adolescents, and children W.H.O. Library Geneva, Switzerland WHO Press 26110194

Authors
Brown, J. C. S., Nelson, J., VanderSluis, B., Deshpande, R., Butts, A., Kagan, S., Polacheck, I., Krysan, D. J., Myers, C. L., & Madhani, H. D.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • University of Rochester Medicine (US)
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
Corresponding author
  • Myers, Chad L.
  • Madhani, Hiten D.
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-11
Volume
159
Issue
5
Pages
1168-1187
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2149579582
Cited by
84
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 6
FWCI
7.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Canadian Institute for Advanced Research
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (R01HG005084)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM104975, 1R01GM04975)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI096869, R01AI099206, R01AI091422, R01AI100272, T32AI060537)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
Keywords
Cryptococcus neoformans, fungal meningitis, chemical genetics, gene knockout, virulence genes, fluconazole, Cdc25 phosphatase, G2/M cell cycle arrest, HIV mortality, Saccharomyces cerevisiae comparison
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Animals, Antifungal Agents, Cryptococcus neoformans, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections, Virulence Factors, Gene Knockout Techniques, Drug Discovery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review