The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Constant Size Extension Drives Bacterial Cell Size Homeostasis
Open accessAbstract
Cell size control is an intrinsic feature of the cell cycle. In bacteria, cell growth and division are thought to be coupled through a cell size threshold. Here, we provide direct experimental evidence disproving the critical size paradigm. Instead, we show through single-cell microscopy and modeling that the evolutionarily distant bacteria Escherichia coli and Caulobacter crescentus achieve cell size homeostasis by growing on average the same amount between divisions, irrespective of cell length at birth. This simple mechanism provides a remarkably robust cell size control without the need of being precise, abating size deviations exponentially within a few generations. This size homeostasis mechanism is broadly applicable for symmetric and asymmetric divisions as well as for different growth rates. Furthermore, our data suggest that constant size extension is implemented at or close to division. Altogether, our findings provide fundamentally distinct governing principles for cell size and cell cycle control in bacteria.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coordination of growth with cell division in the yeast
JOHNSTON, G., PRINGLE, J., & HARTWELL, L. (1977) · Experimental Cell Research · doi:10.1016/0014-4827(77)90154-9 · Cited by 827
An inducible DNA replication–cell division coupling mechanism in E. coli
Huisman, O., & D'Ari, R. (1981) · Nature · doi:10.1038/290797a0 · Cited by 451
Single-cell dynamics of the chromosome replication and cell division cycles in mycobacteria
Santi, I., Dhar, N., Bousbaine, D., Wakamoto, Y., & McKinney, J. D. (2013) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms3470 · Cited by 170
Cited by
Van Valen, D. A., Kudo, T., Lane, K. M., Macklin, D. N., Quach, N. T., DeFelice, M. M., Maayan, I., Tanouchi, Y., Ashley, E. A., & Covert, M. W. (2016) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005177 · Cited by 557
The Synchronization of Replication and Division Cycles in Individual E. coli Cells
Wallden, M., Fange, D., Lundius, E. G., Baltekin, Ö., & Elf, J. (2016) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.06.052 · Cited by 331
Mechanistic Origin of Cell-Size Control and Homeostasis in Bacteria
Si, F., Le Treut, G., Sauls, J. T., Vadia, S., Levin, P. A., & Jun, S. (2019) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2019.04.062 · Cited by 268
Deletion of a mycobacterial divisome factor collapses single-cell phenotypic heterogeneity
Rego, E. H., Audette, R. E., & Rubin, E. J. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature22361 · Cited by 186
Simultaneous cross-evaluation of heterogeneous E. coli datasets via mechanistic simulation
Macklin, D. N., Ahn-Horst, T. A., Choi, H., Ruggero, N. A., Carrera, J., Mason, J. C., Sun, G., Agmon, E., DeFelice, M. M., Maayan, I., et al. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aav3751 · Cited by 151
Metadata
- Authors
- Campos, M., Surovtsev, I. V., Kato, S., Paintdakhi, A., Beltran, B., Ebmeier, S. E., & Jacobs-Wagner, C.
- Venue
- Cell
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-12
- Volume
- 159
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1433-1446
- ISSN
- 0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2098145231
- Cited by
- 472
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 24.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Constant Size Extension Drives Bacterial Cell Size Homeostasis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.022
- The paper
- Campos, M., Surovtsev, I. V., Kato, S., Paintdakhi, A., Beltran, B., Ebmeier, S. E., & Jacobs-Wagner, C. (2014). A Constant Size Extension Drives Bacterial Cell Size Homeostasis. Cell. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.022
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.