Cited by 274Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy TechniquesAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsCell Image Analysis Techniques

Yeast Proteome Dynamics from Single Cell Imaging and Automated Analysis

Open access
Chong, Yolanda T., Koh, Judice L.Y., Friesen, Helena, Kaluarachchi Duffy, Supipi, Cox, Michael J., Moses, Alan, Moffat, Jason, Boone, Charles +1 more·2015·Cell

Abstract

Proteomics has proved invaluable in generating large-scale quantitative data; however, the development of systems approaches for examining the proteome in vivo has lagged behind. To evaluate protein abundance and localization on a proteome scale, we exploited the yeast GFP-fusion collection in a pipeline combining automated genetics, high-throughput microscopy, and computational feature analysis. We developed an ensemble of binary classifiers to generate localization data from single-cell measurements and constructed maps of ∼3,000 proteins connected to 16 localization classes. To survey proteome dynamics in response to different chemical and genetic stimuli, we measure proteome-wide abundance and localization and identified changes over time. We analyzed >20 million cells to identify dynamic proteins that redistribute among multiple localizations in hydroxyurea, rapamycin, and in an rpd3Δ background. Because our localization and abundance data are quantitative, they provide the opportunity for many types of comparative studies, single cell analyses, modeling, and prediction. VIDEO ABSTRACT.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2015.04.051

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chong, Y. T., Koh, J. L. Y., Friesen, H., Kaluarachchi Duffy, S., Cox, M. J., Moses, A., Moffat, J., Boone, C., & Andrews, B. J.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Andrews, Brenda J.
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-06
Volume
161
Issue
6
Pages
1413-1424
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2132744522
Cited by
274
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 13
FWCI
22.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2015-07-02)
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP97939)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
Keywords
protein localization, protein abundance, GFP fusion protein, single-cell imaging, automated image analysis, binary classifier ensembles, hydroxyurea, rapamycin, Saccharomyces cerevisiae
MeSH terms
Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Proteome, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Single-Cell Analysis, Support Vector Machine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review