A global genetic interaction network maps a wiring diagram of cellular function
Open accessAbstract
INTRODUCTION: Genetic interactions occur when mutations in two or more genes combine to generate an unexpected phenotype. An extreme negative or synthetic lethal genetic interaction occurs when two mutations, neither lethal individually, combine to cause cell death. Conversely, positive genetic interactions occur when two mutations produce a phenotype that is less severe than expected. Genetic interactions identify functional relationships between genes and can be harnessed for biological discovery and therapeutic target identification. They may also explain a considerable component of the undiscovered genetics associated with human diseases. Here, we describe construction and analysis of a comprehensive genetic interaction network for a eukaryotic cell. RATIONALE: Genome sequencing projects are providing an unprecedented view of genetic variation. However, our ability to interpret genetic information to predict inherited phenotypes remains limited, in large part due to the extensive buffering of genomes, making most individual eukaryotic genes dispensable for life. To explore the extent to which genetic interactions reveal cellular function and contribute to complex phenotypes, and to discover the general principles of genetic networks, we used automated yeast genetics to construct a global genetic interaction network. RESULTS: We tested most of the ~6000 genes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae for all possible pairwise genetic interactions, identifying nearly 1 million interactions, including ~550,000 negative and ~350,000 positive interactions, spanning ~90% of all yeast genes. Essential genes were network hubs, displaying five times as many interactions as nonessential genes. The set of genetic interactions or the genetic interaction profile for a gene provides a quantitative measure of function, and a global network based on genetic interaction profile similarity revealed a hierarchy of modules reflecting the functional architecture of a cell. Negative interactions connected functionally related genes, mapped core bioprocesses, and identified pleiotropic genes, whereas positive interactions often mapped general regulatory connections associated with defects in cell cycle progression or cellular proteostasis. Importantly, the global network illustrates how coherent sets of negative or positive genetic interactions connect protein complex and pathways to map a functional wiring diagram of the cell. CONCLUSION: A global genetic interaction network highlights the functional organization of a cell and provides a resource for predicting gene and pathway function. This network emphasizes the prevalence of genetic interactions and their potential to compound phenotypes associated with single mutations. Negative genetic interactions tend to connect functionally related genes and thus may be predicted using alternative functional information. Although less functionally informative, positive interactions may provide insights into general mechanisms of genetic suppression or resiliency. We anticipate that the ordered topology of the global genetic network, in which genetic interactions connect coherently within and between protein complexes and pathways, may be exploited to decipher genotype-to-phenotype relationships. A global network of genetic interaction profile similarities.: ( Left ) Genes with similar genetic interaction profiles are connected in a global network, such that genes exhibiting more similar profiles are located closer to each other, whereas genes with less similar profiles are positioned farther apart. ( Right ) Spatial analysis of functional enrichment was used to identify and color network regions enriched for similar Gene Ontology bioprocess terms.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This paper reports a global genetic interaction network for *Saccharomyces cerevisiae*, built from over 23 million double mutants and comprising ~550,000 negative and ~350,000 positive interactions. The network organizes genes into a hierarchical functional map, with essential genes as densely connected hubs and negative interactions especially informative for pathway/complex relationships.
Key findings
- The combined NxN, ExN, and ExE network covered 5,416 genes and identified nearly 1 million genetic interactions: ~550,000 negative and ~350,000 positive, including ~120,000 interactions between essential gene pairs.
- Essential genes were major hubs: they participated in ~5-fold more negative and positive interactions than nonessential genes, and the essential similarity network was >25-fold more densely connected than the nonessential network at PCC ≥ 0.2 (3.12% vs. 0.12% of tested gene pairs).
- Genetic interaction profiles resolved a hierarchy of cell function: pathway/protein-complex modules combined into biological-process modules, which grouped into larger cellular-compartment modules. Negative interactions were enriched within functionally related gene sets, while positive interactions among essential genes often connected distant functions and reflected general regulatory mechanisms such as proteostasis or cell cycle delay.
- The network predicted new gene functions, including assigning YJR141W/IPA1 to mRNA 3′-end processing and polyadenylation, linking MTC pathway genes to aromatic amino acid homeostasis and telomere capping via NAD+, and naming YNL181w/PBR1 based on strong negative interactions with the ER membrane protein complex.
Methods
- Synthetic genetic array (SGA) analysis was used to construct and quantify double mutants in yeast, generating three maps: nonessential × nonessential (NxN), essential × nonessential (ExN), and essential × essential (ExE).
- Essential gene perturbations included 2,001 array and/or query strains carrying temperature-sensitive (TS) alleles for 868 unique essential genes, with ~600 genes represented by two or more TS alleles; DAmP alleles were also tested but excluded from most analyses because only 25% caused >5% fitness defect.
- Genetic interactions were scored at defined confidence thresholds, and analyses included profile similarity networks, SAFE enrichment with 4,373 GO biological process terms, unsupervised hierarchical clustering, pleiotropy scoring, and comparisons to protein complexes, protein-protein interactions, and chemical-genetic data.
Limitations
- The paper states that the network was mapped under a particular condition and in a specific genetic background, and that ~1,000 of the 5,400 examined genes showed relatively few interactions and remain sparsely connected; it anticipates that changing condition or background may reveal new interactions.
- The paper states that analyses described came from a representative subset (>80%) of the complete dataset, and that DAmP alleles were generally excluded unless noted.
- The paper notes that the work focuses on loss-of-function mutations in haploid cells and may miss higher-order interactions, gain-of-function alleles, diploid/polyploid contexts, other cell types, whole animals, or host–symbiont interactions; evident from the text, positive interactions among essential genes often lacked overlap with other functional standards, and TS alleles were screened at a semi-permissive temperature.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 74 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
The network identified ~550,000 negative genetic interactions.
“We generated a global genetic interaction network for Saccharomyces cerevisiae, constructing over 23 million double mutants, identifying ~550,000 negative and ~350,000 positive genetic interactions.”
- Also stated in: § A global and quantitative genetic network for yeast · plain
“In total, we identified nearly 1 million genetic interactions, corresponding to ~550,000 negative and ~350,000 positive genetic interactions, including ~120,000 interactions between pairs of essential genes (fig. S3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § A global and quantitative genetic network for yeast · plain
- Findingown data
The current global network involves ~90% of all yeast genes as query and/or array mutants.
“The current global network involves ~90% of all yeast genes as query and/or array mutants and is accessible from http://thecellmap.org/costanzo2016/.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The essential gene mutant collection consists of 2,001 array and/or query strains harboring TS alleles corresponding to 868 unique essential genes.
“Our essential gene mutant collection consists of 2,001 array and/or query strains harboring TS alleles corresponding to 868 unique essential genes, with ~600 of genes represented by two or more TS alleles, including strains for ~140 essential genes that were not represented in previous strain collections (11, 12).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The collection includes strains for about 140 essential genes not represented in previous strain collections.
“Our essential gene mutant collection consists of 2,001 array and/or query strains harboring TS alleles corresponding to 868 unique essential genes, with ~600 of genes represented by two or more TS alleles, including strains for ~140 essential genes that were not represented in previous strain collections (11, 12).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Essential genes are densely connected hubs in the network.
“This comprehensive network maps genetic interactions for essential gene pairs, highlighting essential genes as densely connected hubs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
Positive genetic interactions often mapped general regulatory connections among gene pairs, rather than shared functionality.
“Negative interactions connected functionally related genes, mapped core bioprocesses, and identified pleiotropic genes, whereas positive interactions often mapped general regulatory connections among gene pairs, rather than shared functionality.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The network includes ~120,000 interactions between pairs of essential genes.
“In total, we identified nearly 1 million genetic interactions, corresponding to ~550,000 negative and ~350,000 positive genetic interactions, including ~120,000 interactions between pairs of essential genes (fig. S3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
TS alleles mediated the majority of the essential gene genetic interactions in the network.
“Thus, TS alleles mediated the majority of the essential gene genetic interactions in our network and the analyses described exclude DAmP alleles, unless otherwise noted.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The network identified ~350,000 positive genetic interactions.
“We generated a global genetic interaction network for Saccharomyces cerevisiae, constructing over 23 million double mutants, identifying ~550,000 negative and ~350,000 positive genetic interactions.”
- Also stated in: § A global and quantitative genetic network for yeast · plain
“In total, we identified nearly 1 million genetic interactions, corresponding to ~550,000 negative and ~350,000 positive genetic interactions, including ~120,000 interactions between pairs of essential genes (fig. S3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § A global and quantitative genetic network for yeast · plain
- Findingown data
The global network was generated from analysis of ~23 million double mutants encompassing 5,416 different genes.
“A global genetic interaction network resulting from the combination of the NxN, ExN, and ExE networks was generated from analysis of ~23 million double mutants encompassing 5,416 different genes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
About 600 essential genes were represented by two or more TS alleles.
“Our essential gene mutant collection consists of 2,001 array and/or query strains harboring TS alleles corresponding to 868 unique essential genes, with ~600 of genes represented by two or more TS alleles, including strains for ~140 essential genes that were not represented in previous strain collections (11, 12).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The network identified nearly 1 million genetic interactions in total.
“In total, we identified nearly 1 million genetic interactions, corresponding to ~550,000 negative and ~350,000 positive genetic interactions, including ~120,000 interactions between pairs of essential genes (fig. S3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Negative genetic interactions identified pleiotropic genes.
“Negative interactions connected functionally related genes, mapped core bioprocesses, and identified pleiotropic genes, whereas positive interactions often mapped general regulatory connections among gene pairs, rather than shared functionality.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The comprehensive network maps genetic interactions for essential gene pairs.
“This comprehensive network maps genetic interactions for essential gene pairs, highlighting essential genes as densely connected hubs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The study generated a global genetic interaction network for Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
“We generated a global genetic interaction network for Saccharomyces cerevisiae, constructing over 23 million double mutants, identifying ~550,000 negative and ~350,000 positive genetic interactions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Negative genetic interactions connected functionally related genes.
“Negative interactions connected functionally related genes, mapped core bioprocesses, and identified pleiotropic genes, whereas positive interactions often mapped general regulatory connections among gene pairs, rather than shared functionality.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Most DAmP alleles exhibited fewer interactions compared to TS alleles of essential genes.
“however, only a fraction of DAmP alleles (25%) compromised gene function enough to impact cellular fitness (> 5% fitness defect) and, consequently, most DAmP alleles exhibited fewer interactions compared to TS alleles of essential genes (fig. S1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The global network was constructed from over 23 million double mutants.
“We generated a global genetic interaction network for Saccharomyces cerevisiae, constructing over 23 million double mutants, identifying ~550,000 negative and ~350,000 positive genetic interactions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Only a fraction of DAmP alleles (25%) compromised gene function enough to impact cellular fitness (>5% fitness defect).
“however, only a fraction of DAmP alleles (25%) compromised gene function enough to impact cellular fitness (> 5% fitness defect) and, consequently, most DAmP alleles exhibited fewer interactions compared to TS alleles of essential genes (fig. S1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Negative genetic interactions mapped core bioprocesses.
“Negative interactions connected functionally related genes, mapped core bioprocesses, and identified pleiotropic genes, whereas positive interactions often mapped general regulatory connections among gene pairs, rather than shared functionality.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Genes that encode members of the same essential protein complex exhibited significantly higher interaction profile similarity than gene pairs belonging to the same nonessential complex.
“Moreover, genes on the essential gene similarity network often showed a stronger functional relationship, because genes that encode members of the same essential protein complex exhibited significantly higher interaction profile similarity than gene pairs belonging to the same nonessential complex (fig. S5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
These clusters were enriched for genes whose products function in the same cell compartment.
“Instead, these clusters were enriched for genes whose products function in the same cell compartment (Figs. 2A, S7; Data File S6).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Other highly pleiotropic genes (top 30% pleiotropy scores) included those with proteostasis or signaling roles, as well as select genes with roles in fundamental cellular functions, such as translation, RNA processing, vesicle trafficking, lipid metabolism, and coenzyme-A biosynthesis.
“Other highly pleiotropic genes (top 30% pleiotropy scores) included those with proteostasis or signaling roles, as well as select genes with roles in fundamental cellular functions, such as translation, RNA processing, vesicle trafficking, lipid metabolism, and coenzyme-A biosynthesis (Fig. 4A).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
Essential gene interaction profiles provided higher accuracy gene function predictions across a diverse set of biological processes.
“By evaluating the predictive power of both essential and nonessential genetic interaction profiles (8), we found that essential gene interaction profiles provided higher accuracy gene function predictions across a diverse set of biological processes (14), and this increased accuracy was correlated with the fraction of essential genes annotated to specific bioprocesses (fig. S6; Data File S4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [8] Materials and Methods are available as supporting online material.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [14] Ashburner M Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium Nat Genet 25 25 2000 10802651 PMC3037419 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
Ipa1 physically interacted with CPF complex members, Mpe1 and Ysh1.
“We also found that Ipa1 physically interacted with CPF complex members, Mpe1 and Ysh1 (Data File S8)(8) further supporting a role for IPA1 in this process.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [8] Materials and Methods are available as supporting online material.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingown data
SAFE identified 28 gene clusters corresponding to 123 specific protein complexes.
“At a higher level of functional resolution, SAFE identified 28 gene clusters corresponding to 123 specific protein complexes (Fig 2B, Complexes; Data File S5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Gene clusters enriched for GO terms related to cell polarity, protein degradation, and rRNA processing were specifically detected in the essential gene similarity network.
“Gene clusters enriched for GO terms related to cell polarity, protein degradation, and rRNA processing, were specifically detected in the essential gene similarity network (Fig. 1D), whereas the nonessential gene similarity network identified clusters enriched for mitochondrial and peroxisomal functions (Fig. 1E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Interactions involving either essential or nonessential genes can predict function.
“Nevertheless, interactions involving either essential or nonessential genes can predict function.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
SAFE identified 487 significantly enriched GO bioprocess terms that mapped to 17 unique network regions and covered 1343 genes on the global network.
“SAFE identified 487 significantly enriched GO bioprocess terms that mapped to 17 unique network regions and covered 1343 genes on the global network (Fig. 1F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Functional relationships between protein complexes were resolved in greater detail by extracting biological process-enriched clusters from the global network and visualizing them in isolation.
“Functional relationships between protein complexes were also resolved in greater detail by extracting biological process-enriched clusters from the global network and visualizing them in isolation (Fig. 3; Data File S5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
IPA1 shares many genetic interactions in common with genes encoding members of the CPF and CF IA protein complexes.
“IPA1 shares many genetic interactions in common with genes encoding members of the Cleavage/Polyadenylation factor (CPF) and Cleavage Factor IA (CF IA) protein complexes (Fig. 4B, C), which along with HRP1, are essential for mRNA 3′ end processing (19).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [19] Chan S Choi EA Shi Y Pre-mRNA 3′-end processing complex assembly and function Wiley interdisciplinary reviews RNA 2 321 2011 21957020 PMC3980678 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
Sibling clusters detected at an intermediate range of profile similarity (0.2 < PCC < 0.4), which combined into a relatively smaller set of larger parent clusters at a lower range of profile similarity (0.05 < PCC < 0.2), did not share enrichment for the same GO biological process, pathways or protein complex annotations.
“However, sibling clusters detected at an intermediate range of profile similarity (0.2 < PCC < 0.4), which combined into a relatively smaller set of larger parent clusters at a lower range of profile similarity (0.05 < PCC < 0.2), did not share enrichment for the same GO biological process, pathways or protein complex annotations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Optimal functional prediction performance was achieved with a global similarity network that combined the majority of all nonessential and essential protein coding genes in the S. cerevisiae genome.
“Nevertheless, optimal functional prediction performance was achieved with a global similarity network that combined the majority of all nonessential and essential protein coding genes in the S. cerevisiae genome.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The relative positioning of biological process clusters appeared to reflect shared functionality because distinct, but related processes such as DNA Replication & Repair and Mitosis & Chromosome Segregation, were positioned next to each other in the global similarity network.
“The relative positioning of biological process clusters appeared to reflect shared functionality because distinct, but related processes such as DNA Replication & Repair and Mitosis & Chromosome Segregation, were positioned next to each other in the global similarity network (Fig. 1F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Genes encoding Hsp90, IRA2, and RSP5 ranked among the most highly pleiotropic genes observed.
“Genes encoding Hsp90 (hsc82Δhsp82-5001 TS double mutant query strain; Data File S1), IRA2, a negative regulator of RAS signaling, and RSP5, an E3 ubiquitin ligase, ranked among the most highly pleiotropic genes observed (Data File S7).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
High pleiotropy genes tended not to belong to densely connected network clusters, but rather were more often positioned outside the functionally enriched clusters, scattered in the sparser regions of the global network.
“Because they share genetic interactions with many functionally diverse genes, high pleiotropy genes tended not to belong to densely connected network clusters, but rather were more often positioned outside the functionally enriched clusters, scattered in the sparser regions of the global network (Fig. 4A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Applying SAFE with a protein localization standard detected 14 network regions enriched for genes whose products localize to 11 different subcellular compartments.
“Applying SAFE with a protein localization standard (17), we detected 14 network regions enriched for genes whose products localize to 11 different subcellular compartments (Fig. 2B, Localization).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [17] Koh JL CYCLoPs: A Comprehensive Database Constructed from Automated Analysis of Protein Abundance and Subcellular Localization Patterns in Saccharomyces cerevisiae G3 (Bethesda) 5 1223 2015 26048563 PMC4478550 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
Implementing SAFE with 4373 biological process terms from GO detected gene clusters in each similarity network that were enriched for unique sets of related GO terms.
“Implementing SAFE with 4373 biological process terms from Gene Ontology (GO)(14), we detected gene clusters in each similarity network that were enriched for unique sets of related GO terms (Fig. 1D–F; Data File S5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [14] Ashburner M Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium Nat Genet 25 25 2000 10802651 PMC3037419 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
Unbiased metabolomics analysis revealed that the MTC pathway mutants exhibited elevated levels of kyurenine biosynthetic pathway metabolites, including NAD+.
“Furthermore, unbiased metabolomics analysis revealed that the MTC pathway mutants exhibited elevated levels of kyurenine biosynthetic pathway metabolites, including NAD+ (Fig. 4J)(8).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [8] Materials and Methods are available as supporting online material.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingown data
The essential gene similarity network was more than 25-fold more densely connected compared to the corresponding nonessential network at the same PCC threshold.
“When evaluated at the same Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) threshold, the essential gene similarity network (Fig. 1A) was more than 25-fold more densely connected compared to the corresponding nonessential network (Fig. 1B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The nonessential gene similarity network identified clusters enriched for mitochondrial and peroxisomal functions.
“Gene clusters enriched for GO terms related to cell polarity, protein degradation, and rRNA processing, were specifically detected in the essential gene similarity network (Fig. 1D), whereas the nonessential gene similarity network identified clusters enriched for mitochondrial and peroxisomal functions (Fig. 1E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The ARO1 genetic interaction profile revealed strong negative interactions with genes involved in amino acid metabolism, the entire MTC pathway and the aromatic amino acid transporters, BAP2 and TAT1.
“For example, the ARO1 genetic interaction profile revealed strong negative interactions with genes involved in amino acid metabolism, the entire MTC pathway and the aromatic amino acid transporters, BAP2 and TAT1 (Figs. 4G, S9), suggesting that the MTC pathway may control amino acid metabolism or affect trafficking of Bap2 and Tat1 permeases.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
All ten sibling clusters were enriched for gene products that exhibit nuclear localization patterns.
“Instead, all ten sibling clusters were enriched for gene products that exhibit nuclear localization patterns (Data File S6).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Bioprocess clusters such as DNA synthesis, Mitosis, Nuclear Transport and Transcription combined into a single module encompassing genes localized to the cell nucleus.
“For example, bioprocess clusters such as DNA synthesis, Mitosis, Nuclear Transport and Transcription (Fig. 2B, GO BP; Data File S5) combined into a single module encompassing genes localized to the cell nucleus (Fig. 2B, Localization).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The increased accuracy of essential gene interaction profiles was correlated with the fraction of essential genes annotated to specific bioprocesses.
“By evaluating the predictive power of both essential and nonessential genetic interaction profiles (8), we found that essential gene interaction profiles provided higher accuracy gene function predictions across a diverse set of biological processes (14), and this increased accuracy was correlated with the fraction of essential genes annotated to specific bioprocesses (fig. S6; Data File S4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [8] Materials and Methods are available as supporting online material.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [14] Ashburner M Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium Nat Genet 25 25 2000 10802651 PMC3037419 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
The network uncovered a role for a previously uncharacterized essential gene, YJR141W, which we named IPA1, in the highly conserved process of mRNA 3′-end processing and polyadenylation.
“Notably, while most essential genes are relatively well studied, our network uncovered a role for a previously uncharacterized essential gene, YJR141W, which we named IPA1 (Important for cleavage and PolyAdenylation), in the highly conserved process of mRNA 3′-end processing and polyadenylation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The 10% most connected genes in the genetic interaction network participated in 3.5-fold more genetic interactions than the average gene.
“For example, the 10% most connected genes (i.e. high interaction degree genes or hub genes) in the genetic interaction network participated in 3.5-fold more genetic interactions than the average gene.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The most distantly related essential gene pairs were more frequently connected by positive interactions than gene pairs mapping to the same biological process-level clusters.
“In fact, the most distantly related essential gene pairs were more frequently connected by positive interactions than gene pairs mapping to the same biological process-level clusters (Fig. 6B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
Essential genes participated in ~5-fold more negative and positive interactions than nonessential genes.
“In general, essential genes participated in ~5-fold more negative and positive interactions than nonessential genes, confirming previous estimates (Fig. 5A)(24).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [24] Mnaimneh S Exploration of essential gene functions via titratable promoter alleles Cell 118 31 2004 15242642 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
In the nonessential genetic interaction network (NxN), negative and positive interaction hubs were enriched for biological processes including chromatin organization, transcription and vesicle trafficking.
“In the nonessential genetic interaction network (NxN), negative and positive interaction hubs were enriched for biological processes including chromatin organization, transcription and vesicle trafficking (Data File S11).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Positive interactions tended to connect essential genes with roles in highly distinct biological processes.
“Instead, positive interactions tended to connect essential genes with roles in highly distinct biological processes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
We did not detect any overlap between essential gene positive interactions and other molecular or functional relationships, including physical interactions.
“In contrast, we did not detect any overlap between essential gene positive interactions and other molecular or functional relationships, including physical interactions (Figs. 5B, C, S15).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
ABC transporters, which belong to functionally redundant gene families and thus are extensively buffered, exhibited fewer genetic interactions.
“For example, ABC transporters, which belong to functionally redundant gene families and thus are extensively buffered, exhibited fewer genetic interactions (figs. S11–S14; Table S2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
For both nonessential and essential genetic interactions, stronger interactions tended to connect genes with closer functional relationships.
“For both nonessential and essential genetic interactions, stronger interactions tended to connect genes with closer functional relationships (Fig. 6D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Genes encoding proteins involved in specific biochemical functions, or those that contain specific functional domains, such as an SH3 domain, were also associated with a higher number of genetic interactions.
“Genes encoding proteins involved in specific biochemical functions, or those that contain specific functional domains, such as an SH3 (SRC Homology 3) protein-protein interaction domain, were also associated with a higher number of genetic interactions (figs. S13, S14).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
We observed significant enrichment for positive interactions that connected essential genes with nuclear-related functions to essential genes required for vesicle traffic-dependent functions.
“In particular, we observed significant enrichment for positive interactions that connected essential genes with nuclear-related functions to essential genes required for vesicle traffic-dependent functions (Figs. 5D, S17).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Genes that exhibited relatively few genetic interactions were also associated with specific features.
“Genes that exhibited relatively few genetic interactions were also associated with specific features (figs. S11–S14; Table S2; Data File S10).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Negative interactions were also enriched between deletion alleles of nonessential genes in different biological processes.
“Negative interactions were also enriched between deletion alleles of nonessential genes in different biological processes (Fig. 5D, off-diagonal).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Protein complexes exhibited highly organized patterns of genetic interactions.
“Consistent with previous findings (1, 5, 28, 29), we found that protein complexes exhibited highly organized patterns of genetic interactions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [1] Costanzo M The genetic landscape of a cell Science 327 425 2010 20093466 PMC5600254 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [5] Baryshnikova A Quantitative analysis of fitness and genetic interactions in yeast on a genome scale Nat Methods 7 1017 2010 21076421 PMC3117325 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [28] Segre D Deluna A Church GM Kishony R Modular epistasis in yeast metabolism Nat Genet 37 77 2005 15592468 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [29] Bandyopadhyay S Kelley R Krogan NJ Ideker T Functional maps of protein complexes from quantitative genetic interaction data PLoS Comput Biol 4 e1000065 2008 18421374 PMC2289880 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
Negative genetic interactions were significantly enriched among genes belonging to the same biological process in both the nonessential (NxN) and essential (ExE) genetic interaction networks.
“Negative genetic interactions were significantly enriched (P < 0.05, hypergeometric) among genes belonging to the same biological process in both the nonessential (NxN) and essential (ExE) genetic interaction networks (Fig. 5D, on-diagonal).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The density of negative interactions, among genes in both the nonessential (NxN) and essential (ExE) genetic interaction networks, increased with the functional specificity of a given cluster.
“The density (i.e. number of observed interactions relative to the total number of gene pairs screened) of negative interactions, among genes in both the nonessential (NxN) and essential (ExE) genetic interaction networks, increased with the functional specificity of a given cluster.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
We did not observe a relationship between functional similarity and the magnitude of positive interactions between essential gene pairs.
“Moreover, we did not observe a relationship between functional similarity and the magnitude of positive interactions between essential gene pairs (Fig. 6D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
Positive genetic interactions between nonessential genes also overlapped with protein-protein interactions, albeit to a lesser extent (0.5%, 3.7-fold enrichment).
“Consistent with previous observations (1), positive genetic interactions between nonessential genes also overlapped with protein-protein interactions, albeit to a lesser extent (0.5%, 3.7-fold enrichment; Figs. 5C, S15).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] Costanzo M The genetic landscape of a cell Science 327 425 2010 20093466 PMC5600254 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
Negative interactions among essential genes showed a striking overlap with protein-protein interactions.
“In particular, negative interactions among essential genes showed a striking overlap with protein-protein interactions (Figs. 5C, S15).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The majority of positive interacting gene pairs in both the essential (ExE, 78%) and nonessential (NxN, 75%) genetic interaction networks occurred between distantly connected genes whose products appeared to function in different cell compartments.
“The majority of positive interacting gene pairs in both the essential (ExE, 78%) and nonessential (NxN, 75%) genetic interaction networks occurred between distantly connected genes whose products appeared to function in different cell compartments (Fig. 6C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
Fitness defects associated with both deletion alleles of nonessential genes and TS alleles of essential genes were highly correlated with the degree of genetic interaction.
“As observed previously (1), fitness defects associated with both deletion alleles of nonessential genes and TS alleles of essential genes were highly correlated with the degree of genetic interaction (figs. S11–S12; Table S1; Data File S10).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] Costanzo M The genetic landscape of a cell Science 327 425 2010 20093466 PMC5600254 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
The density of positive interactions detected in the essential network was not related to functional specificity.
“In contrast, the density of positive interactions detected in the essential network was not related to functional specificity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A wide range of connectivity exists in the genetic interaction network.
“Although the average gene participated in ~100 negative interactions (2% of genes tested) and ~65 positive interactions (1% of genes tested), when assessed at an intermediate confidence threshold (8), a wide range of connectivity exists in the genetic interaction network (fig. S10; Data File S9).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [8] Materials and Methods are available as supporting online material.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingown data
The magnitude of a given negative interaction was also associated with the extent of functional similarity shared between genes.
“The magnitude of a given negative interaction was also associated with the extent of functional similarity shared between genes (Fig. 6D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
~1000 of the 5,400 yeast genes examined showed relatively few genetic interactions and remain sparsely connected.
“~1000 of the 5,400 yeast genes we examined showed relatively few genetic interactions and remain sparsely connected”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
A large number of complex-complex pairs were both enriched for genetic interactions (P < 0.001, hypergeometric) and strongly biased towards either negative or positive interactions.
“found a large number of complex-complex pairs that were both enriched for genetic interactions (P < 0.001, hypergeometric) and strongly biased towards either negative or positive interactions”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [8] Materials and Methods are available as supporting online material.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
We discovered a genetic background in which an additional ~3,300 genes are essential for viability.
“we discovered a genetic background in which an additional ~3,300 genes are essential for viability (8)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [8] Materials and Methods are available as supporting online material.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingown data
Negative interactions associated with the 19S proteasome highlighted diverse functions that are particularly important when proteasome activity is compromised, including interactions with genes encoding the APC.
“negative interactions associated with the 19S proteasome highlighted diverse functions that are particularly important when proteasome activity is compromised (Fig. 8B), including interactions with genes encoding the APC”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [34] Peters JM The anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome: a machine designed to destroy Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7 644 2006 16896351 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
The type of interaction observed within protein complexes depended on essentiality.
“The type of interaction observed within protein complexes depended on essentiality.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Essential genes that showed negative interactions with the proteasome were enriched for multidomain proteins.
“essential genes that showed negative interactions with the proteasome were enriched for multidomain proteins”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Extreme negative or synthetic lethal interactions among essential genes often occur between genes within the same protein complex, or between genes in different protein complexes but within the same biological process or subcellular compartment.
“Second, the extreme negative or synthetic lethal interactions among essential genes often occur between genes within the same protein complex, or between genes in different protein complexes but within the same biological process or subcellular compartment”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
None of the essential complexes in the dataset were enriched for positive interactions.
“none of the essential complexes in our dataset were enriched for positive interactions”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The set of protein complexes tested is representative of all protein complexes in yeast.
- Findingown data
Protein complexes biased for positive interactions with essential genes exhibited many negative interactions with checkpoint genes.
“Protein complexes biased for positive interactions with essential genes also exhibited many negative interactions with checkpoint genes (P < 4×10−56, Fisher’s exact test; fig. S22)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Relatively severe deletion alleles of nonessential genes or TS alleles of essential genes often show extensive digenic interaction profiles.
“Our analysis revealed that relatively severe deletion alleles of nonessential genes or TS alleles of essential genes often show extensive digenic interaction profiles.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Genes encoding components of the same proteasome subunit (e.g., within 19S or within 20S) interact more frequently with one another than genes belonging to different subunits (between 19S and 20S).
“genes encoding components of the same subunit (e.g. within 19S or within 20S) interact more frequently with one another than genes belonging to different subunits (between 19S and 20S; fig. S19)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
More complex-complex pairs were connected by coherent sets of negative than positive interactions.
“More complex-complex pairs were connected by coherent sets of negative than positive interactions”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The positive interactions of these biased complexes were more functionally diverse compared to their negative interactions.
“The positive interactions of these biased complexes, were also more functionally diverse compared to their negative interactions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Extracting all genetic interactions for specific protein complexes generated functional wiring diagrams that revealed the set of genes, pathways, and bioprocesses modulated by mutation of a particular complex.
“Extracting all genetic interactions for specific protein complexes generated functional wiring diagrams that revealed the set of genes, pathways, and bioprocesses, modulated by mutation of a particular complex”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Most essential protein complexes (>75% essential genes) were enriched for negative interactions among their members (82%; 35/44 complexes).
“most essential protein complexes (> 75% essential genes; Data File S12) were enriched for negative interactions among their members (82%; 35/44 complexes)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The set of protein complexes tested is representative of all protein complexes in yeast.
- Findingown data
Positive genetic interactions connected the proteasome and other proteostasis-related complexes to genes involved in various functions, including vesicle trafficking and transcription.
“Positive genetic interactions connected the proteasome and other proteostasis-related complexes to genes involved in various functions, including vesicle trafficking and transcription”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The ORC-Translocon connection reflects enrichment for cross-compartment positive interactions observed between genes encoding essential, nuclear and vesicle traffic-dependent functions.
“The ORC-Translocon connection reflects enrichment for cross-compartment positive interactions observed between genes encoding essential, nuclear and vesicle traffic-dependent functions”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Protein complexes involved in proteostasis, including several chaperones and the proteasome, exhibited among the strongest enrichment for positive genetic interactions, especially in the essential gene network.
“Protein complexes involved in proteostasis, including several chaperones and the proteasome, exhibited among the strongest enrichment for positive genetic interactions, especially in the essential gene network”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
Positive interactions were enriched between genes involved in mRNA decay and essential gene DAmP alleles.
“positive interactions were also enriched between genes involved in mRNA decay and essential gene DAmP alleles (13)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] Schuldiner M Exploration of the function and organization of the yeast early secretory pathway through an epistatic miniarray profile Cell 123 507 2005 16269340 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
Coherent sets of negative interactions involving the ORC linked functionally related complexes, including the MCM and GINS complexes.
“coherent sets of negative interactions involving the ORC, which specifies sites of initiation of DNA replication throughout the genome (31), linked functionally related complexes, including the MCM (Mini-Chromosome Maintenance) and the GINS (Go, Ichi, Ni, San) complexes”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [31] Bell SP The origin recognition complex: from simple origins to complex functions Genes Dev 16 659 2002 11914271 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
Hundreds of instances of both coherent negative (470) and positive (192) interactions connecting pairs of essential and nonessential complexes were observed.
“we observed hundreds of instances of both coherent negative (470) and positive (192) interactions connecting pairs of essential and nonessential complexes”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
ORC subunits were connected by coherent sets of positive interactions to genes with roles in several different functions including members of the ER-associated Translocon complex.
“ORC subunits were connected by coherent sets of positive interactions to genes with roles in several different functions including members of the ER-associated Translocon complex”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Complexes composed primarily of nonessential genes (>75% nonessential) were more often enriched for positive (21%, 20/97) compared to negative (5%, 5/97) interactions among their members.
“complexes composed primarily of nonessential genes (> 75% nonessential genes; Data File S12) were more often enriched for positive (21%, 20/97 complexes) compared to negative (5%, 5/97 complexes) interactions among their members”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The set of protein complexes tested is representative of all protein complexes in yeast.
- Findingown data
16% of positive interactions with essential genes appear to be associated with proteostasis.
“In total, 16% of positive interactions with essential genes appear to be associated with proteostasis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
~30% of proteasome positive interactions represent genetic suppression, where a fitness defect associated with a hypomorphic TS allele of an essential gene is suppressed by a second mutation in a proteasome encoding gene.
“we further tested a subset of these positive interactions (8) and, based on this analysis, we estimated that ~30% of proteasome positive interactions represent genetic suppression, where a fitness defect associated with a hypomorphic TS allele of an essential gene is suppressed by a second mutation in a proteasome encoding gene”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [8] Materials and Methods are available as supporting online material.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Rests on an assumption: The subset of positive interactions tested is representative of all proteasome positive interactions.
- Rests on an assumption: The proteasome plays a direct role in controlling protein turnover.
- Findingown data
A subset of protein complexes exhibited more positive interactions compared to negative interactions with essential genes.
“a subset of protein complexes, in addition to being enriched for positive interactions (Fig. 8C), also exhibited more positive interactions compared to negative interactions with essential genes”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
A global network based on genetic interaction profile similarity resolves a hierarchy of modules, enriched for sets of genes within specific pathways and protein complexes, biological processes, or subcellular compartments.
“A global network based on genetic interaction profile similarity resolves a hierarchy of modules, enriched for sets of genes within specific pathways and protein complexes, biological processes, or subcellular compartments.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Mutations that compromise the cellular proteostasis network often suppressed TS alleles of essential genes.
“mutations that compromise the cellular proteostasis network often suppressed TS alleles of essential genes”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Genes belonging to similar biological processes tend to share common genetic interactions.
“Genes belonging to similar biological processes tend to share common genetic interactions, and genes encoding proteins that function together within the same pathway or complex display similar genetic interaction profiles (fig. S4)(1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] Costanzo M The genetic landscape of a cell Science 327 425 2010 20093466 PMC5600254 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
The global network illustrates how coherent sets of genetic interactions connect protein complex and pathway modules to map a functional wiring diagram of the cell.
“The global network illustrates how coherent sets of genetic interactions connect protein complex and pathway modules to map a functional wiring diagram of the cell.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Genetic interaction profiles enabled assembly of a hierarchical model of cell function, including modules corresponding to protein complexes and pathways, biological processes, and cellular compartments.
“Genetic interaction profiles enabled assembly of a hierarchical model of cell function, including modules corresponding to protein complexes and pathways, biological processes, and cellular compartments.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Genetic interaction profiles provide a quantitative measurement of functional similarity.
“Thus, genetic interaction profiles provide a quantitative measurement of functional similarity, and similarity networks generated from the large-scale mapping correlated genetic interaction profiles organizes genes into clusters that highlight biological processes (1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] Costanzo M The genetic landscape of a cell Science 327 425 2010 20093466 PMC5600254 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
The location of numerous previously uncharacterized genes either within or in close proximity to functionally enriched regions of the genetic profile similarity network allows us to predict functions for these genes.
“The location of numerous previously uncharacterized genes either within or in close proximity to functionally enriched regions of the genetic profile similarity network allows us to predict functions for these genes (Fig. 4B)(8).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [8] Materials and Methods are available as supporting online material.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
Similarity networks generated from correlated genetic interaction profiles organize genes into clusters that highlight biological processes.
“Thus, genetic interaction profiles provide a quantitative measurement of functional similarity, and similarity networks generated from the large-scale mapping correlated genetic interaction profiles organizes genes into clusters that highlight biological processes (1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] Costanzo M The genetic landscape of a cell Science 327 425 2010 20093466 PMC5600254 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
Novel functional organization is embedded within large-scale, unbiased datasets, which may not be captured completely by functional standards, including GO as it is currently organized.
“As observed previously (16), this indicates that novel functional organization is embedded within large-scale, unbiased datasets, which may not be captured completely by functional standards, including GO as it is currently organized (14).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [16] Dutkowski J A gene ontology inferred from molecular networks Nat Biotechnol 31 38 2013 23242164 PMC3654867 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [14] Ashburner M Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium Nat Genet 25 25 2000 10802651 PMC3037419 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
All of these genes were identified as important for growth in high-pressure and cold environments.
“Interestingly, all of these genes were identified as important for growth in high-pressure and cold environments (21).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [21] Abe F Minegishi H Global screening of genes essential for growth in high-pressure and cold environments: searching for basic adaptive strategies using a yeast deletion library Genetics 178 851 2008 18245339 PMC2248370 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Genes encoding proteins that function together within the same pathway or complex display similar genetic interaction profiles.
“Genes belonging to similar biological processes tend to share common genetic interactions, and genes encoding proteins that function together within the same pathway or complex display similar genetic interaction profiles (fig. S4)(1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] Costanzo M The genetic landscape of a cell Science 327 425 2010 20093466 PMC5600254 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
MTC2, MTC4, and MTC6 mutants were previously shown to enhance the mutant phenotype associated with perturbation of CDC13, which controls the maintenance of telomere capping.
“MTC2, MTC4, and MTC6 mutants were previously shown to enhance the mutant phenotype associated with perturbation of CDC13, which controls the maintenance of telomere capping (22).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] Addinall SG A genomewide suppressor and enhancer analysis of cdc13-1 reveals varied cellular processes influencing telomere capping in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Genetics 180 2251 2008 18845848 PMC2600956 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
The connectivity for some genes will only be revealed under different environmental or genetic conditions.
“Approximately 1000 genes (~20%), the majority of which are nonessential genes, displayed few genetic interactions and had profiles that generally displayed a relatively low level of functional information, suggesting that the connectivity for some genes will only be revealed under different environmental or genetic conditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Positive interactions between essential genes generally appear to reflect more functionally distant relationships.
“Thus, positive interactions between essential genes generally appear to reflect more functionally distant relationships.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Simultaneous perturbation of two genes encoding members of the same nonessential protein complex often show a fitness defect resembling the corresponding single mutants.
“This reflects that simultaneous perturbation of two genes encoding members of the same nonessential protein complex often show a fitness defect resembling the corresponding single mutants.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
The lack of a functional signal could not be explained by differences in data quality because replicate analysis confirmed that SGA-derived positive and negative interactions showed similar levels of reproducibility.
“The lack of a functional signal could not be explained by differences in data quality because replicate analysis confirmed that SGA-derived positive and negative interactions showed similar levels of reproducibility (fig. S2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
On the basis of the strength of negative genetic interaction, we can predict if two genes share an intimate relationship and possibly function in the same pathway or complex.
“Thus, on the basis of the strength of negative genetic interaction, we can predict if two genes share an intimate relationship and possibly function in the same pathway or complex.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
This observation highlights the reduced ability of a cell to tolerate multiple partial loss-of-function mutations in the same essential pathway or complex.
“This observation highlights the reduced ability of a cell to tolerate multiple partial loss-of-function mutations in the same essential pathway or complex (Figs. 5C, S15).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Coherent sets of negative and positive genetic interactions connect both within and between the highly resolved complex and pathway modules to map a functional wiring diagram of the cell.
“In the context of this functional organization, coherent sets of negative and positive genetic interactions connect both within and between the highly resolved complex and pathway modules to map a functional wiring diagram of the cell.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
A cell cycle delay may result when a mutation activates a checkpoint pathway which slows cell cycle progression, allowing the cell to correct an otherwise rate-limiting defect to mask the phenotypic effect normally associated with a second mutation.
“A cell cycle delay may result when a mutation activates a checkpoint pathway which slows cell cycle progression, allowing the cell to correct an otherwise rate-limiting defect to mask the phenotypic effect normally associated with a second mutation (36).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [36] Li R Murray AW Feedback control of mitosis in budding yeast Cell 66 519 1991 1651172 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
The global network has the potential for digenic interactions to compound the phenotypes associated with single gene mutations.
“An important property associated with the global network is the potential for digenic interactions to compound the phenotypes associated with single gene mutations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Only ~1000 genes in the yeast genome are individually essential in standard growth conditions and cause lethality when mutated.
“While only ~1000 genes in the yeast genome are individually essential in standard growth conditions and cause lethality when mutated (9, 10)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [9] Winzeler EA Functional characterization of the S. cerevisiae genome by gene deletion and parallel analysis Science 285 901 1999 10436161 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [10] Giaever G Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome Nature 418 387 2002 12140549 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
An ORC-dependent S-phase cell cycle delay may mask growth defects associated with perturbation of genes required for polarized secretion during budding, thereby resulting in positive interactions.
“Thus, an ORC-dependent S-phase cell cycle delay may mask growth defects associated with perturbation of genes required for polarized secretion during budding, thereby resulting in positive interactions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Genetic interactions occurring within protein complexes can resolve the structural organization of large, multi-subunit complexes.
“The genetic interactions occurring within protein complexes can even resolve the structural organization of large, multi-subunit complexes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
The global genetic network was mapped under a particular condition in a specific genetic background.
“Our global genetic network was mapped under a particular condition in a specific genetic background”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Cell viability depends on an active checkpoint response in the absence of these complexes.
“suggesting that cell viability depends on an active checkpoint response in the absence of these complexes”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The topology of genetic networks connecting genes within protein complexes by uniform sets of genetic interactions is conserved in higher eukaryotes.
“suggesting that the topology of genetic networks connecting genes within protein complexes by uniform sets of genetic interactions is conserved in higher eukaryotes”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [30] Hoepfner D High-resolution chemical dissection of a model eukaryote reveals targets, pathways and gene functions Microbiol Res 169 107 2014 24360837 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [8] Materials and Methods are available as supporting online material.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Mutations in many different pairs of genes may lead to the same phenotype, such as a disease state, in humans.
“mutations in many different pairs of genes may lead to the same phenotype, such as a disease state, in humans”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Many different pairs of mutations may lead to the same terminal synthetic lethal/sick phenotype.
“many different pairs of mutations may lead to same terminal synthetic lethal/sick phenotype”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Digenic interactions mapped in yeast can be conserved in different yeast species over hundreds of millions of years of evolution.
“It is clear that the digenic interactions we have mapped in yeast can be conserved in different yeast species over hundreds of millions of years of evolution (49, 50).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [49] Dixon SJ Significant conservation of synthetic lethal genetic interaction networks between distantly related eukaryotes Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105 16653 2008 18931302 PMC2575475 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [50] Roguev A Conservation and rewiring of functional modules revealed by an epistasis map in fission yeast Science 322 405 2008 18818364 PMC2753251 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
The regulatory mechanisms associated with positive genetic interactions among essential genes, which include genetic suppression interactions, are potentially relevant to human genetics.
“The regulatory mechanisms associated with positive genetic interactions among essential genes, which include genetic suppression interactions, are also potentially relevant to human genetics”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [46] Buchovecky CM A suppressor screen in Mecp2 mutant mice implicates cholesterol metabolism in Rett syndrome Nature genetics 45 1013 2013 23892605 PMC3837522 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [47] Keeling KM Xue X Gunn G Bedwell DM Therapeutics based on stop codon readthrough Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 15 371 2014 24773318 PMC5304456 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
The general topology of genetic networks will also be conserved.
“it is reasonable to expect that the general topology of genetic networks will also be conserved (25)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] Koch EN Conserved rules govern genetic interaction degree across species Genome biology 13 R57 2012 22747640 PMC3491379 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Scanning disease cohorts for genetic variation that corresponds to coherent sets of mutations that connect genes within or between protein complexes and pathways may reveal genetic networks underlying diseases.
“scanning disease cohorts for genetic variation that corresponds to coherent sets of mutations that connect genes within or between protein complexes and pathways (e.g. see functional wiring diagrams for the ORC the 19S proteasome, Fig. 8) may reveal genetic networks underlying diseases”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Conservation of genetic interactions from yeast to human cells has been observed, particularly within fundamental bioprocesses like DNA synthesis and repair and chromosome segregation.
“conservation of genetic interactions from yeast to human cells has been observed (51, 52), particularly within fundamental bioprocesses like DNA synthesis and repair and chromosome segregation”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [51] Deshpande R A comparative genomic approach for identifying synthetic lethal interactions in human cancer Cancer research 73 6128 2013 23980094 PMC3809957 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [52] McManus KJ Barrett IJ Nouhi Y Hieter P Specific synthetic lethal killing of RAD54B-deficient human colorectal cancer cells by FEN1 silencing Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106 3276 2009 19218431 PMC2651317 source
Not checked in the free run.
- May combine two claims. 50
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 15
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationAn ipa1 TS mutant was impaired for in vitro mRNA cleavage and polyadenylation and showed widespread defects in mRNA processing accuracy and efficiency with a significant bias towards the use of downstream polyadenylation sites.
“Indeed, as shown previously for TS mutants in components of CF IA and CPF complexes (20), such as pcf11 and cft2 TS mutants, an ipa1 TS mutant was impaired for in vitro mRNA cleavage and polyadenylation (fig. S8) and showed widespread defects in mRNA processing accuracy and efficiency with a significant bias towards the use of downstream polyadenylation sites (P < 2 × 10−16, Wilcoxon rank sum; Fig”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] Gordon JM Reconstitution of CF IA from overexpressed subunits reveals stoichiometry and provides insights into molecular topology Biochemistry 50 10203 2011 22026644 PMC3234886 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAt PCC ≥ 0.2, 3.12% of all tested gene pairs were connected in the ExE similarity network, whereas 0.12% of all tested gene pairs were connected in the NxN similarity network.
“For example, at PCC ≥ 0.2, 3.12% of all tested gene pairs were connected in the ExE similarity network, whereas 0.12% of all tested gene pairs were connected in the NxN similarity network.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSibling clusters identified at a relatively high level of profile similarity (e.g. PCC > 0.4), which often corresponded to distinct protein complexes, shared enrichment for the same GO biological process annotations.
“Indeed, sibling clusters identified at a relatively high level of profile similarity (e.g. PCC > 0.4), which often corresponded to distinct protein complexes, shared enrichment for the same GO biological process annotations (Data File S6).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe subsets of enriched GO bioprocess terms associated with each densely connected network region revealed genes involved in core cellular functions and defined an informative subset of GO bioprocess terms associated with these functions.
“The subsets of enriched GO bioprocess terms associated with each densely connected network region in turn revealed genes involved in core cellular functions and defined an informative subset of GO bioprocess terms associated with these functions (Data File S5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe base of the resultant hierarchy was composed of numerous, small clusters of genes with highly similar genetic interaction profiles, whereas the top of the hierarchy was composed of a small set of larger clusters of genes with lower profile similarity.
“The base of the resultant hierarchy was composed of numerous, small clusters of genes with highly similar genetic interaction profiles, whereas the top of the hierarchy was composed of a small set of larger clusters of genes with lower profile similarity (Figs. 2A, S7; Data File S6).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenFunctional predictions for essential genes could also be derived from interactions with nonessential genes and vice versa.
“Interestingly, functional predictions for essential genes could also be derived from interactions with nonessential genes and vice versa.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMTC pathway genes showed strong negative interactions with protein trafficking genes, as well as aromatic amino acid biosynthesis genes, ARO1 and ARO2.
“MTC pathway genes showed strong negative interactions with protein trafficking genes, as well as aromatic amino acid biosynthesis genes, ARO1 and ARO2 (Figs. 4F, S9).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSix poorly characterized genes, MTC2, MTC4, MTC6, CSF1, DLT1, and YPR153W localized in the vicinity of the cell polarity and morphogenesis cluster on the global network and displayed highly similar genetic interaction profiles suggesting that they work together as a novel functional module.
“Six poorly characterized genes, MTC2, MTC4, MTC6, CSF1, DLT1, and YPR153W localized in the vicinity of the cell polarity and morphogenesis cluster on the global network (Fig. 4B) and displayed highly similar genetic interaction profiles suggesting that they work together as a novel functional module (Fig. 4E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationMutations of MTC pathway genes resulted in Bap2 mislocalization and a defect in phenylalanine uptake, resembling that of strains deleted for genes encoding amino acid transporters, including BAP2, TAT1, and GAP1.
“Indeed, mutations of MTC pathway genes resulted in Bap2 mislocalization (Figs. 4H, S9) and a defect in phenylalanine uptake, resembling that of strains deleted for genes encoding amino acid transporters, including BAP2, TAT1, and GAP1 (Fig. 4I)(8).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [8] Materials and Methods are available as supporting online material.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Findingown data63% of gene pairs annotated to the same essential protein complex were connected by a negative genetic interaction, representing a ~15-fold enrichment for negative interactions among co-complexed essential gene pairs.
“Similarly, 63% of gene pairs annotated to the same essential protein complex were connected by a negative genetic interaction, representing a ~15-fold enrichment for negative interactions among co-complexed essential gene pairs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataNegative interactions between TS alleles of essential genes, despite higher abundance, were biased towards gene pairs in the same biological processes and were rarely enriched between genes involved in different biological processes.
“In contrast, negative interactions between TS alleles of essential genes, despite higher abundance (Fig. 5A), were biased towards gene pairs in the same biological processes (Fig. 5D, on-diagonal) and were rarely enriched between genes involved in different biological processes (Fig. 5D, off-diagonal).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataGenes within a cluster enriched for specific pathways or complexes were connected by negative interactions more often than genes in the same biological process-enriched cluster, which in turn, were more frequently connected by negative interactions than genes belonging to a cluster enriched for a specific cell compartment.
“Accordingly, genes within a cluster enriched for specific pathways or complexes were connected by negative interactions more often than genes in the same biological process-enriched cluster, which in turn, were more frequently connected by negative interactions than genes belonging to a cluster enriched for a specific cell compartment (Fig. 6B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataGenetic interaction hubs participated in numerous chemical-genetic interactions and tended to encode conserved, multifunctional, highly expressed and abundant proteins that exhibit many physical interactions.
“In the global network, genetic interaction hubs participated in numerous chemical-genetic interactions and tended to encode conserved, multifunctional, highly expressed and abundant proteins that exhibit many physical interactions (Data File S9; Table S1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataNegative interaction hubs had an average degree of 340 negative interactions and the average positive interaction hub displayed 200 positive interactions.
“More specifically, negative interaction hubs had an average degree of 340 negative interactions and the average positive interaction hub displayed 200 positive interactions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data50% of essential gene pairs whose products physically interact also share a negative interaction, representing a ~10-fold enrichment for negative interactions among essential genes displaying protein-protein interactions.
“For example, 50% of essential gene pairs whose products physically interact also share a negative interaction, representing a ~10-fold enrichment for negative interactions among essential genes displaying protein-protein interactions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationYNL181w encodes a putative oxidoreductase that localizes to the ER and ynl181w hypomorphic mutants showed altered sensitivities to numerous bioactive compounds.
“Indeed, YNL181w encodes a putative oxidoreductase that localizes to the ER (27) and, consistent with defective membrane function, ynl181w hypomorphic mutants showed altered sensitivities to numerous bioactive compounds (fig. S18)(8).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [27] Sanchez R Sali A Large-scale protein structure modeling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95 13597 1998 9811845 PMC24864 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [8] Materials and Methods are available as supporting online material.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe average gene participated in ~100 negative interactions (2% of genes tested) and ~65 positive interactions (1% of genes tested) at an intermediate confidence threshold.
“Although the average gene participated in ~100 negative interactions (2% of genes tested) and ~65 positive interactions (1% of genes tested), when assessed at an intermediate confidence threshold (8), a wide range of connectivity exists in the genetic interaction network (fig. S10; Data File S9).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [8] Materials and Methods are available as supporting online material.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataPositive interactions among nonessential genes exhibited similar albeit weaker trends, where the density of interactions increased gradually with the functional specificity of hierarchy-derived clusters and the magnitude of nonessential positive interactions was predictive of nonessential pathway or complex membership.
“Positive interactions among nonessential genes exhibited similar albeit weaker trends, where the density of interactions increased gradually with the functional specificity of hierarchy-derived clusters (Fig. 6B) and the magnitude of nonessential positive interactions was predictive of nonessential pathway or complex membership (Fig. 6D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataEssential genes that fall into a cluster within the set that was enriched for complexes/pathways (PCC 0.4-0.8) were connected by a negative interaction with a relatively high density (60-90%), but they were rarely connected by a positive interaction.
“For example, essential genes that fall into a cluster within the set that was enriched for complexes/pathways (PCC 0.4–0.8) were connected by a negative interaction with a relatively high density (60–90%), but they were rarely connected by a positive interaction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn total, 43% of nonessential and 56% of essential genes pairs connected by negative interactions shared some degree of functional relatedness.
“In total, 43% of nonessential and 56% of essential genes pairs connected by negative interactions shared some degree of functional relatedness (Fig. 6C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWhile nonessential genes involved in the same biological process were modestly enriched for positive interactions, we failed to observe a similar enrichment for positive interactions among functionally related essential genes.
“While nonessential genes involved in the same biological process were modestly enriched for positive interactions, we failed to observe a similar enrichment for positive interactions among functionally related essential genes (Fig. 5D, on diagonal).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMembers of the same essential protein complex or different alleles of the same essential gene often showed similar positive interaction profiles.
“Furthermore, members of the same essential protein complex or different alleles of the same essential gene often showed similar positive interaction profiles (fig. S17).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataBoth nonessential and essential genetic interactions were predictive of functionally related gene pairs.
“Both nonessential and essential genetic interactions were predictive of functionally related gene pairs (Figs. 5B, C, S15).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataApproximately 1000 genes (~20%), the majority of which are nonessential genes, displayed few genetic interactions and had profiles that generally displayed a relatively low level of functional information.
“Approximately 1000 genes (~20%), the majority of which are nonessential genes, displayed few genetic interactions and had profiles that generally displayed a relatively low level of functional information, suggesting that the connectivity for some genes will only be revealed under different environmental or genetic conditions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIndividual negative interactions were as informative as genetic interaction profile similarity for predicting membership to the same essential pathway or complex, a property that does not hold for nonessential genes.
“In fact, individual negative interactions were as informative as genetic interaction profile similarity for predicting membership to the same essential pathway or complex, a property that does not hold for nonessential genes (fig. S16).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the essential genetic network (ExE), negative interaction hubs were relatively uniformly distributed across all bioprocesses, whereas positive interaction hubs were specifically enriched for proteostasis-related bioprocesses.
“In the essential genetic network (ExE), negative interaction hubs were relatively uniformly distributed across all bioprocesses, whereas positive interaction hubs were specifically enriched for proteostasis-related bioprocesses (Data File S11).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataGenes with lowest interaction degree (lowest 20%) were often associated with more deleterious SNPs, exhibited a higher dN/dS ratio, and displayed high expression variance across different genetic backgrounds and environments.
“Interestingly, genes with lowest interaction degree (lowest 20%; Data File S9) were often associated with more deleterious single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), exhibited a higher dN/dS ratio, and displayed high expression variance across different genetic backgrounds and environments.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMembers of the conserved ER Membrane protein Complex, including EMC1, EMC2, and EMC6, showed strong negative genetic interactions with a previously uncharacterized essential gene, YNL181w, suggesting a role for this gene in lipid metabolism.
“For example, members of the conserved ER Membrane protein Complex, including EMC1, EMC2, and EMC6, which play a role in phospholipid transfer from the ER to mitochondria to facilitate phosphatidylethanolamine biosynthesis (26), showed strong negative genetic interactions (genetic interaction score < −0.65) with a previously uncharacterized essential gene, YNL181w, suggesting a role for this gene”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] Lahiri S A conserved endoplasmic reticulum membrane protein complex (EMC) facilitates phospholipid transfer from the ER to mitochondria PLoS Biol 12 e1001969 2014 25313861 PMC4196738
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationHundreds of thousands of mutant gene pair combinations result in a negative interaction in the global genetic interaction network, including an extreme set of ~10,000 synthetic lethal interactions between nonessential gene pairs.
“we showed that hundreds of thousands of mutant gene pair combinations result in a negative interaction in the global genetic interaction network, including an extreme set of ~10,000 synthetic lethal interactions between nonessential gene pairs (8)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [8] Materials and Methods are available as supporting online material.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataGenes with cell cycle progression-related roles accounted for 30% of essential gene positive interactions, which combined with genes involved in proteostasis, explain 46% of the positive interactions among essential genes.
“Genes with cell cycle progression-related roles accounted for 30% of essential gene positive interactions, which combined with genes involved in proteostasis, explain 46% of the positive interactions among essential genes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data60/141 (43%) of protein complexes tested were enriched for genetic interactions within the set of protein complex encoding genes and were biased for a single type of interaction, either negative or positive.
“many protein complexes tested (60/141, 43%) were enriched (P < 0.01, hypergeometric) for genetic interactions within the set of protein complex encoding genes and were biased for a single type of interaction, either negative or positive”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The set of protein complexes tested is representative of all protein complexes in yeast.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationEssential genes are major hubs and form the basic scaffold of the global genetic interaction network.
“First, consistent with the results of our previous smaller scale surveys (1, 24), essential genes are major hubs and form the basic scaffold of the global genetic interaction network.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataProtein complexes with a positive interaction bias tend to be involved in cell cycle progression and their disruption often leads to a cell cycle delay or arrest phenotype.
“Protein complexes with a positive interaction bias tend to be involved in cell cycle progression and their disruption often leads to a cell cycle delay or arrest phenotype”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data4% (293/6899) of all nonessential pairs of protein complexes tested were connected by negative interactions, whereas positive interactions connected less than 2% (130/6899) of nonessential complexes.
“4% of all nonessential pairs of protein complexes tested (293/6899) were connected by negative interactions, whereas positive interactions connected less than 2% of nonessential complexes (130/6899)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data5% (74/1597) of all essential complex pairs in the dataset were connected by negative interactions, whereas less than 2% (29/1597) of essential protein complex pairs shared positive interactions.
“5% (74/1597) of all essential complex pairs in our dataset were connected by negative interactions, whereas less than 2% (29/1597) of essential protein complex pairs shared positive interactions”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSynthetic lethal interactions can be harnessed to identify new antibiotic or cancer therapeutic targets.
“Synthetic lethal interactions are of particular interest as they can be harnessed to identify new antibiotic or cancer therapeutic targets (6, 7).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [6] Roemer T Boone C Systems-level antimicrobial drug and drug synergy discovery Nat Chem Biol 9 222 2013 23508188 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [7] Bryant HE Specific killing of BRCA2-deficient tumours with inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase Nature 434 913 2005 15829966 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationTS mutants were screened at a semi-permissive temperature where cells were viable but partially compromised for gene function and associated with a reduced growth rate.
“TS mutants were screened at a semi-permissive temperature where cells were viable but partially compromised for gene function and associated with a reduced growth rate (8).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [8] Materials and Methods are available as supporting online material.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationGenetic interaction networks highlight mechanistic connections between genes and their corresponding pathways.
“Genetic interaction networks highlight mechanistic connections between genes and their corresponding pathways (1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] Costanzo M The genetic landscape of a cell Science 327 425 2010 20093466 PMC5600254 source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationGenetic interactions can determine the relationship between genotype and phenotype.
“Genetic interactions can also determine the relationship between genotype and phenotype (2) and may contribute to the “missing heritability”, or the lack of identified genetic determinants underlying a phenotypic trait, in current genome-wide association studies (3, 4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [2] Hartman JLt Garvik B Hartwell L Principles for the buffering of genetic variation Science 291 1001 2001 11232561 source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenThe analyses described exclude DAmP alleles unless otherwise noted.
“Thus, TS alleles mediated the majority of the essential gene genetic interactions in our network and the analyses described exclude DAmP alleles, unless otherwise noted.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSynthetic genetic array (SGA) analysis automates the combinatorial construction of defined mutants and enables quantitative analysis of genetic interactions.
“Synthetic genetic array (SGA) analysis automates the combinatorial construction of defined mutants and enables the quantitative analysis of genetic interactions (1, 5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [1] Costanzo M The genetic landscape of a cell Science 327 425 2010 20093466 PMC5600254 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [5] Baryshnikova A Quantitative analysis of fitness and genetic interactions in yeast on a genome scale Nat Methods 7 1017 2010 21076421 PMC3117325
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe experiments and analyses described here were from a representative subset (>80%) of the complete dataset.
“We note that experiments and analyses described here were from a representative subset (> 80%) of the complete dataset (Data Files S1–S3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The representative subset (>80%) of the complete dataset is representative of the complete dataset.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataNegative and positive genetic interactions were quantified and false negative/positive rates and data reproducibility were determined at defined confidence thresholds from analysis of biological replicates and comparison of interactions for a subset of gene pairs represented on both mutant arrays.
“Negative and positive genetic interactions were quantified and false negative/positive rates and data reproducibility were determined at defined confidence thresholds (1) from analysis of biological replicates and comparison of interactions for a subset of gene pairs represented on both mutant arrays (fig. S2)(8).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [1] Costanzo M The genetic landscape of a cell Science 327 425 2010 20093466 PMC5600254 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [8] Materials and Methods are available as supporting online material.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationGenetic interactions may contribute to the missing heritability in genome-wide association studies.
“Genetic interactions can also determine the relationship between genotype and phenotype (2) and may contribute to the “missing heritability”, or the lack of identified genetic determinants underlying a phenotypic trait, in current genome-wide association studies (3, 4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [3] Zuk O Hechter E Sunyaev SR Lander ES The mystery of missing heritability: Genetic interactions create phantom heritability Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109 1193 2012 22223662 PMC3268279
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [4] Bloom JS Genetic interactions contribute less than additive effects to quantitative trait variation in yeast Nat Commun 6 8712 2015 26537231 PMC4635962
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe ability of an organism to tolerate environmental and genetic variation may be dependent on phenotypic capacitors, a class of genes whose inactivation may increase phenotypic variation among genetically diverse individuals in a population.
“The ability of an organism to tolerate environmental and genetic variation may be dependent on phenotypic capacitors, a class of genes whose inactivation may increase phenotypic variation among genetically diverse individuals in a population (18).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [18] Sangster TA Lindquist S Queitsch C Under cover: causes, effects and implications of Hsp90-mediated genetic capacitance BioEssays: news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology 26 348 2004 15057933 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe MTC pathway may control amino acid metabolism or affect trafficking of Bap2 and Tat1 permeases.
“For example, the ARO1 genetic interaction profile revealed strong negative interactions with genes involved in amino acid metabolism, the entire MTC pathway and the aromatic amino acid transporters, BAP2 and TAT1 (Figs. 4G, S9), suggesting that the MTC pathway may control amino acid metabolism or affect trafficking of Bap2 and Tat1 permeases.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Pathway components often share phenotypes with their target genes, so a genetic interaction profile that contains members of a particular pathway may also identify potential targets of the same pathway.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationHsp90, the canonical capacitor, is a molecular chaperone controlling numerous signaling pathways and thus is considered a multi-functional or pleiotropic gene.
“Hsp90, the canonical capacitor, is a molecular chaperone controlling numerous signaling pathways and thus is considered a multi-functional or pleiotropic gene (18).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [18] Sangster TA Lindquist S Queitsch C Under cover: causes, effects and implications of Hsp90-mediated genetic capacitance BioEssays: news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology 26 348 2004 15057933 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe global similarity network provided a more organized and functionally comprehensive view of cellular function, emphasizing the importance of mapping genetic interactions that involve both nonessential and essential genes.
“The global similarity network provided a more organized and functionally comprehensive view of cellular function, emphasizing the importance of mapping genetic interactions that involve both nonessential and essential genes (Fig. 1F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThese genes are under reduced evolutionary constraints and subject to condition-specific regulation.
“This suggests that these genes are under reduced evolutionary constraints and subject to condition-specific regulation (Table S2; figs. S11–S12).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPrevious studies showed that defects in kyurenine biosynthesis suppressed cdc13-1 TS mutants, suggesting that elevated NAD+ levels inhibit telomere capping.
“Previous studies showed that defects in kyurenine biosynthesis suppressed cdc13-1 TS mutants, suggesting that elevated NAD+ levels inhibit telomere capping (23).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [23] Greenall A A genome wide analysis of the response to uncapped telomeres in budding yeast reveals a novel role for the NAD+ biosynthetic gene BNA2 in chromosome end protection Genome Biol 9 R146 2008 18828915 PMC2760873 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataNegative interactions among essential genes highlight a core set of cellular bioprocesses and nonessential genes appear to mediate connections between these bioprocesses.
“Although these trends could reflect the different genetic perturbations used to interrogate nonessential and essential genes, negative interactions among essential genes highlight a core set of cellular bioprocesses and nonessential genes appear to mediate connections between these bioprocesses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataWhile negative interactions identified clear functional relationships between genes, positive interactions amongst partial loss-of function alleles of essential genes represent a different type of relationship that is not captured by other large-scale datasets or functional standards.
“Thus, while negative interactions identified clear functional relationships between genes, positive interactions amongst partial loss-of function alleles of essential genes represent a different type of relationship that is not captured by other large-scale datasets or functional standards.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe functional, physiological and evolutionary properties associated with genetic interaction frequency should predict genetic network connectivity and candidate genes that may serve as important genetic modifiers in other organisms, including humans.
“The functional, physiological and evolutionary properties associated with genetic interaction frequency should predict genetic network connectivity and candidate genes that may serve as important genetic modifiers in other organisms, including humans (25).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] Koch EN Conserved rules govern genetic interaction degree across species Genome biology 13 R57 2012 22747640 PMC3491379 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe global genetic interaction network traced novel functional connections whereby defects in MTC pathway-dependent protein trafficking alter aromatic amino acid homeostasis, which appears to modulate steady state levels of kyurenine biosynthetic pathway metabolites, linking cell polarity to telomere capping through altered NAD+ levels.
“Thus, the global genetic interaction network traced novel functional connections whereby defects in MTC pathway-dependent protein trafficking alter aromatic amino acid homeostasis, which appears to modulate steady state levels of kyurenine biosynthetic pathway metabolites, linking cell polarity to telomere capping through altered NAD+ levels.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationDuplicated genes with overlapping function often are buffered more extensively, such that more complex triple mutant analysis will be required to reveal their genetic interaction profiles.
“One interesting case involves duplicated genes with overlapping function, which often are buffered more extensively, such that more complex triple mutant analysis will be required to reveal their genetic interaction profiles (1, 40).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [1] Costanzo M The genetic landscape of a cell Science 327 425 2010 20093466 PMC5600254 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [40] VanderSluis B Genetic interactions reveal the evolutionary trajectories of duplicate genes Molecular Systems Biology 6 429 2010 21081923 PMC3010121 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningTS alleles may perturb folding of more complex proteins, resulting in a greater dependence on proteasome activity in mutants.
“suggesting that TS alleles may perturb folding of more complex proteins resulting in a greater dependence on proteasome activity in mutants”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataPositive genetic interactions between two essential genes typically do not reflect shared function, but rather often occur between genes in distant cellular compartments and reflect more general regulatory connections associated with a cell cycle delay or proteostasis.
“Third, positive genetic interactions between two essential genes typically do not reflect shared function, but rather often occur between genes in distant cellular compartments and reflect more general regulatory connections associated with a cell cycle delay or proteostasis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationown dataThese properties may prove useful for predicting genetic interactions in other systems.
“properties that may prove useful for predicting genetic interactions in other systems”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe genes encoding the proteasome are essential in human cells, and severe mutations in these genes may cause disease.
“While the genes encoding the proteasome are essential in human cells, and severe mutations in these genes may cause disease (48)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [48] Tsvetkov P Compromising the 19S proteasome complex protects cells from reduced flux through the proteasome Elife 4 2015 PMC4551903 26327695
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationGenome-scale application of CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing approaches offer the potential to map global genetic interaction networks in human cells.
“genome-scale application of CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing approaches offer the potential to map global genetic interaction networks in human cells (55–57)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [55] Hart T High-Resolution CRISPR Screens Reveal Fitness Genes and Genotype-Specific Cancer Liabilities Cell 163 1515 2015 26627737 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [56] Wang T Identification and characterization of essential genes in the human genome Science 350 1096 2015 26472758 PMC4662922 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [57] Blomen VA Gene essentiality and synthetic lethality in haploid human cells Science 350 1092 2015 26472760 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe general principles of the global yeast genetic network described here will be highly relevant for both the efficient mapping and interpretation of analogous networks in a variety of different cells and organisms.
“We suspect that the general principles of the global yeast genetic network described here will be highly relevant for both the efficient mapping and interpretation of analogous networks in a variety of different cells and organisms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The authors state this as an assumption.
A pleiotropic gene involved in diverse functions should show a genetic interaction profile that partially overlaps with genes representative of its functional spectrum.
“We expect that a pleiotropic gene involved in diverse functions should show a genetic interaction profile that partially overlaps with genes representative of its functional spectrum.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Pathway components often share phenotypes with their target genes, so a genetic interaction profile that contains members of a particular pathway may also identify potential targets of the same pathway.
“Because pathway components often share phenotypes with their target genes, a genetic interaction profile that contains members of a particular pathway may also identify potential targets of the same pathway.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The representative subset (>80%) of the complete dataset is representative of the complete dataset.
“We note that experiments and analyses described here were from a representative subset (> 80%) of the complete dataset (Data Files S1–S3).”
The paper relies on this without support.
The set of protein complexes tested is representative of all protein complexes in yeast.
“many protein complexes tested (60/141, 43%) were enriched (P < 0.01, hypergeometric) for genetic interactions within the set of protein complex encoding genes”
The paper relies on this without support.
The subset of positive interactions tested is representative of all proteasome positive interactions.
“we further tested a subset of these positive interactions (8) and, based on this analysis, we estimated that ~30% of proteasome positive interactions represent genetic suppression”
The paper relies on this without support.
The proteasome plays a direct role in controlling protein turnover.
“Because the proteasome plays a direct role in controlling protein turnover, we hypothesized that a subset of its positive interactions may reflect genetic suppression through the stabilization of a mutant protein (35).”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Our results are consistent with genetic interaction studies in S. cerevisiae that highlight genetic interactors with FKS1 span diverse biological processes.
“Our results are also consistent with genetic interaction studies in S. cerevisiae that highlight genetic interactors with FKS1 span diverse biological processes (Costanzo et al., 2016”
From Functional Genomic Screening Reveals Core Modulators of Echinocandin Stress Responses in Candida albicans (2018) · cites this paper as Costanzo et al., 2016
Costanzo et al. assembled a hierarchy of biological processes using data from a large-scale screen of genetic interactions that examined cell growth for most double mutants of yeast genes, identifying about one million genetic interactions.
“As another example, Costanzo et al. assembled a hierarchy of biological processes using data from a large scale screen of genetic interactions, which examined cell growth for most double mutants of yeast genes, identifying ~1 million genetic interactions (Costanzo et al., 2016, 2019).”
From Mapping the multiscale structure of biological systems (2021) · cites this paper as Costanzo et al., 2016
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Sibling-cluster count changes from six to ten
MinorThe example describes one parent cluster formed from six sibling clusters, then says all ten sibling clusters were enriched for nuclear localization.
“one of the ten parent clusters formed near the top of the hierarchy was comprised of six sibling clusters”
“Instead, all ten sibling clusters were enriched for gene products that exhibit nuclear localization patterns”
Percentage of essential complexes with negative interactions is incorrect
MinorThe reported 35 of 44 complexes is 79.5%, which rounds to 80%, not 82%.
Reported 82 · recomputed 79.545455
“most essential protein complexes (> 75% essential genes; Data File S12) were enriched for negative interactions among their members (82%; 35/44 complexes).”
Cites
Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2
Love, M. I., Huber, W., & Anders, S. (2014) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 · Cited by 95,106 · see citing works
Subramanian, A., Tamayo, P., Mootha, V. K., Mukherjee, S., Ebert, B. L., Gillette, M. A., Paulovich, A., Pomeroy, S. L., Golub, T. R., Lander, E. S., et al. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0506580102 · Cited by 53,625 · see citing works
Cytoscape: A software Environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks
Shannon, P., Markiel, A., Ozier, O., Baliga, N. S., Wang, J. T., Ramage, D., Amin, N., Schwikowski, B., & Ideker, T. (2003) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.1239303 · Cited by 51,888 · see citing works
Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology
Ashburner, M., Ball, C. A., Blake, J. A., Botstein, D., Butler, H., Cherry, J. M., Davis, A. P., Dolinski, K., Dwight, S. S., Eppig, J. T., et al. (2000) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/75556 · Cited by 43,206 · see citing works
PAML 4: Phylogenetic Analysis by Maximum Likelihood
Yang, Z. (2007) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msm088 · Cited by 13,879 · see citing works
EMBOSS: the European molecular biology open software suite.
Rice, P., Longden, I., & Bleasby, A. (2000) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/s0168-9525(00)02024-2 · Cited by 9,466 · see citing works
MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity
Edgar, R. (2004) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-5-113 · Cited by 8,948 · see citing works
Specific killing of BRCA2-deficient tumours with inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase
Bryant, H. E., Schultz, N., Thomas, H. D., Parker, K. M., Flower, D., Lopez, E., Kyle, S., Meuth, M., Curtin, N. J., & Helleday, T. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03443 · Cited by 5,198 · see citing works
Genomic Expression Programs in the Response of Yeast Cells to Environmental Changes
Gasch, A. P., Spellman, P. T., Kao, C. M., Carmel-Harel, O., Eisen, M. B., Storz, G., Botstein, D., & Brown, P. O. (2000) · Molecular Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1091/mbc.11.12.4241 · Cited by 4,815 · see citing works
Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome
Giaever, G., Chu, A. M., Ni, L., Connelly, C., Riles, L., Véronneau, S., Dow, S., Lucau-Danila, A., Anderson, K., André, B., et al. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature00935 · Cited by 4,316 · see citing works
Global analysis of protein localization in budding yeast
Huh, W.-K., Falvo, J. V., Gerke, L. C., Carroll, A. S., Howson, R. W., Weissman, J. S., & O'Shea, E. K. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02026 · Cited by 4,248 · see citing works
Winzeler, E. A., Shoemaker, D. D., Astromoff, A., Liang, H., Anderson, K., Andre, B., Bangham, R., Benito, R., Boeke, J. D., Bussey, H., et al. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.285.5429.901 · Cited by 3,953 · see citing works
Data, information, knowledge and principle: back to metabolism in KEGG
Kanehisa, M. I., Goto, S., Sato, Y., Kawashima, M., Furumichi, M., & Tanabe, M. (2013) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkt1076 · Cited by 3,103 · see citing works
Global landscape of protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Krogan, N. J., Cagney, G., Yu, H., Zhong, G., Guo, X., Ignatchenko, A., Li, J., Pu, S., Datta, N., Tikuisis, A., et al. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04670 · Cited by 2,915 · see citing works
TANDEM: matching proteins with tandem mass spectra
Craig, R., & Beavis, R. C. (2004) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bth092 · Cited by 2,553 · see citing works
Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery
Gavin, A., Aloy, P., Grandi, P., Krause, R., Böesche, M., Marzioch, M., Rau, C., Jensen, L. J., Bastuck, S., Dümpelfeld, B., et al. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04532 · Cited by 2,544 · see citing works
The Genetic Landscape of a Cell
Costanzo, M., Baryshnikova, A., Bellay, J., Kim, Y., Spear, E. D., Sevier, C. S., Ding, H., Koh, J. L. Y., Toufighi, K., Mostafavi, S., et al. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1180823 · Cited by 2,162 · see citing works
Self-citationProteoWizard: open source software for rapid proteomics tools development
Kessner, D., Chambers, M., Burke, R., Agus, D., & Mallick, P. (2008) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btn323 · Cited by 2,024 · see citing works
Fast and SNP-tolerant detection of complex variants and splicing in short reads
Wu, T. D., & Nacu, S. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq057 · Cited by 1,894 · see citing works
Twilight zone of protein sequence alignments
Rost, B. (1999) · Protein Engineering, Design and Selection · doi:10.1093/protein/12.2.85 · Cited by 1,833 · see citing works
The CRAPome: a contaminant repository for affinity purification–mass spectrometry data
Mellacheruvu, D., Wright, Z., Couzens, A. L., Lambert, J.-P., St-Denis, N. A., Li, T., Miteva, Y. V., Hauri, S., Sardiu, M. E., Low, T. Y., et al. (2013) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2557 · Cited by 1,686 · see citing works
Self-citationDissecting the regulatory circuitry of a eukaryotic genome
Holstege, F. C. P., Jennings, E. G., Wyrick, J. J., Lee, T. I., Hengartner, C. J., Green, M. R., Golub, T. R., Lander, E. S., & Young, R. A. (1998) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81641-4 · Cited by 1,670 · see citing works
Identification and characterization of essential genes in the human genome
Wang, T., Birsoy, K., Hughes, N. W., Krupczak, K. M., Post, Y., Wei, J. J., Lander, E. S., & Sabatini, D. M. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aac7041 · Cited by 1,617 · see citing works
High-Resolution CRISPR Screens Reveal Fitness Genes and Genotype-Specific Cancer Liabilities.
Hart, T., Chandrashekhar, M., Aregger, M., Steinhart, Z., Brown, K. R., MacLeod, G., Mis, M., Zimmermann, M., Fradet-Turcotte, A., Sun, S., et al. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.11.015 · Cited by 1,571 · see citing works
The mystery of missing heritability: Genetic interactions create phantom heritability
Zuk, O., Hechter, E., Sunyaev, S. R., & Lander, E. S. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1119675109 · Cited by 1,542 · see citing works
Design and synthesis of a minimal bacterial genome
Hutchison, C. A., Chuang, R.-Y., Noskov, V. N., Assad-Garcia, N., Deerinck, T. J., Ellisman, M. H., Gill, J., Kannan, K., Karas, B. J., Ma, L., et al. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aad6253 · Cited by 1,500 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Ultimately, broad mapping of both core and condition-specific genetic interactions promises to accelerate the field of synthetic biology, providing a rational understanding of the requirements for the design of minimal genomes (38).”
BackgroundSingle-cell proteomic analysis of S. cerevisiae reveals the architecture of biological noise
Newman, J. R. S., Ghaemmaghami, S., Ihmels, J., Breslow, D. K., Noble, M., DeRisi, J. L., & Weissman, J. S. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04785 · Cited by 1,483 · see citing works
Comet: An open‐source <scp>MS</scp> / <scp>MS</scp> sequence database search tool
Eng, J. K., Jahan, T. A., & Hoopmann, M. R. (2013) · PROTEOMICS · doi:10.1002/pmic.201200439 · Cited by 1,474 · see citing works
Genetic Mapping in Human Disease
Altshuler, D., Daly, M. J., & Lander, E. S. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1156409 · Cited by 1,452 · see citing works
High-Quality Binary Protein Interaction Map of the Yeast Interactome Network
Yu, H., Braun, P., Yıldırım, M. A., Lemmens, I., Venkatesan, K., Sahalie, J., Hirozane-Kishikawa, T., Gebreab, F., Li, N., Simonis, N., et al. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1158684 · Cited by 1,392 · see citing works
Self-citationPopulation genomics of domestic and wild yeasts
Liti, G., Carter, D. M., Moses, A. M., Warringer, J., Parts, L., James, S. A., Davey, R., Roberts, I. N., Burt, A., Koufopanou, V., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07743 · Cited by 1,391 · see citing works
A new vital stain for visualizing vacuolar membrane dynamics and endocytosis in yeast.
Vida, T. A., & Emr, S. D. (1995) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.128.5.779 · Cited by 1,364 · see citing works
The anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome: a machine designed to destroy
Peters, J.-M. (2006) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm1988 · Cited by 1,315 · see citing works
Feedback control of mitosis in budding yeast
Li, R., & Murray, A. W. (1991) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(81)90015-5 · Cited by 1,174 · see citing works
The Chemical Genomic Portrait of Yeast: Uncovering a Phenotype for All Genes
Hillenmeyer, M. E., Fung, E., Wildenhain, J., Pierce, S. E., Hoon, S. S., Lee, W., Proctor, M. J., St.Onge, R. P., Tyers, M., Koller, D., et al. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1150021 · Cited by 978 · see citing works
Bidirectional promoters generate pervasive transcription in yeast
Xu, Z., Wei, W., Gagneur, J., Perocchi, F., Clauder‐Münster, S., Camblong, J., Guffanti, E., Stutz, F., Huber, W. K., & Steinmetz, L. M. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07728 · Cited by 926 · see citing works
Self-citationSchuldiner, M., Collins, S. R., Thompson, N. J., Denic, V., Bhamidipati, A., Punna, T., Ihmels, J., Andrews, B., Boone, C., Greenblatt, J. F., et al. (2005) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2005.08.031 · Cited by 870 · cited 2× · see citing works
“In a similar regulatory relationship, positive interactions were also enriched between genes involved in mRNA decay and essential gene DAmP alleles (13), which often affect mRNA stability via disruption of their 3′ untranslated region (fig.”
BackgroundSelf-citationGene essentiality and synthetic lethality in haploid human cells
Blomen, V. A., Májek, P., Jae, L. T., Bigenzahn, J. W., Nieuwenhuis, J., Staring, J., Sacco, R., van Diemen, F. R., Olk, N., Stukalov, A., et al. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aac7557 · Cited by 857 · see citing works
The BioGRID Interaction Database: 2011 update
Stark, C., Breitkreutz, B., Chatr‐aryamontri, A., Boucher, L., Oughtred, R., Livstone, M. S., Nixon, J., Auken, K. M. V., Wang, X., Shi, X., et al. (2010) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkq1116 · Cited by 853 · see citing works
Zhao, R., Davey, M., Hsu, Y.-C., Kaplanek, P., Tong, A., Parsons, A. B., Krogan, N., Cagney, G., Mai, D., Greenblatt, J., et al. (2005) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2004.12.024 · Cited by 819 · see citing works
Self-citationPrinciples for the buffering of genetic variation
Hartman, J. L., Garvik, B., & Hartwell, L. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1056072 · Cited by 808 · see citing works
Principles for the Buffering of Genetic Variation
Hartman IV, J. L. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.291.5506.1001 · Cited by 808 · see citing works
Integrating Genetic Approaches into the Discovery of Anticancer Drugs
Hartwell, L. H., Szankasi, P., Roberts, C. J., Murray, A. W., & Friend, S. H. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.278.5340.1064 · Cited by 777 · see citing works
An in Vivo Map of the Yeast Protein Interactome
Tarassov, K., Messier, V., Landry, C. R., Radinovic, S., Molina, M. M. S., Shames, I., Malitskaya, Y., Vogel, J., Bussey, H., & Michnick, S. W. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1153878 · Cited by 773 · see citing works
Host genetic variation impacts microbiome composition across human body sites
Blekhman, R., Goodrich, J. K., Huang, K., Sun, Q., Bukowski, R., Bell, J. T., Spector, T. D., Keinan, A., Ley, R. E., Gevers, D., et al. (2015) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-015-0759-1 · Cited by 745 · see citing works
Byrne, K. P., & Wolfe, K. H. (2005) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.3672305 · Cited by 720 · see citing works
SAINTexpress: Improvements and additional features in Significance Analysis of INTeractome software
Teo, G., Liu, G., Zhang, J., Nesvizhskii, A. I., Gingras, A., & Choi, H. (2013) · Journal of Proteomics · doi:10.1016/j.jprot.2013.10.023 · Cited by 685 · see citing works
Self-citationThe DISOPRED server for the prediction of protein disorder
Ward, J. J., McGuffin, L. J., Bryson, K., Buxton, B. F., & Jones, D. T. (2004) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bth195 · Cited by 684 · see citing works
InParanoid 7: new algorithms and tools for eukaryotic orthology analysis
Ostlund, G., Schmitt, T., Forslund, K., Kostler, T., Messina, D. N., Roopra, S., Frings, O., & Sonnhammer, E. L. L. (2010) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkp931 · Cited by 623 · see citing works
Natural history and evolutionary principles of gene duplication in fungi
Wapinski, I., Pfeffer, A., Friedman, N., & Regev, A. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06107 · Cited by 614 · see citing works
Tumor-selective action of HDAC inhibitors involves TRAIL induction in acute myeloid leukemia cells
Nebbioso, A., Clarke, N., Voltz, E., Germain, E., Ambrosino, C., Bontempo, P., Álvarez, R., Schiavone, E. M., Ferrara, F., Bresciani, F., et al. (2004) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm1161 · Cited by 613 · see citing works
Exploration of Essential Gene Functions via Titratable Promoter Alleles
Mnaimneh, S., Davierwala, A. P., Haynes, J., Moffat, J., Peng, W.-T., Zhang, W., Yang, X., Pootoolal, J., Chua, G., Lopez, A., et al. (2004) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2004.06.013 · Cited by 604 · see citing works
Self-citationModular epistasis in yeast metabolism
Segrè, D., DeLuna, A., Church, G. M., & Kishony, R. (2005) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1489 · Cited by 575 · see citing works
Shteynberg, D. D., Deutsch, E. W., Lam, H., Eng, J. K., Sun, Z., Tasman, N., Mendoza, L., Moritz, R. L., Aebersold, R. H., & Nesvizhskii, A. I. (2011) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m111.007690 · Cited by 548 · see citing works
Lehner, B., Crombie, C., Tischler, J., Fortunato, A., & Fraser, A. G. (2006) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1844 · Cited by 502 · see citing works
Extent of Gene Duplication in the Genomes of Drosophila, Nematode, and Yeast
Gu, Z., Cavalcanti, A. R. O., Chen, F., Bouman, P., & Li, W. (2002) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004079 · Cited by 496 · see citing works
Biochemical and genetic analysis of the yeast proteome with a movable ORF collectionPreprint
Gelperin, D. M., White, M. A., Wilkinson, M. L., Kon, Y., Kung, L. A., Wise, K. J., Lopez-Hoyo, N., Jiang, L., Piccirillo, S., Yu, H., et al. (2005) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.1362105 · Cited by 479 · see citing works
Rewiring of Genetic Networks in Response to DNA Damage
Bandyopadhyay, S., Mehta, M., Kuo, D., Sung, M.-K., Chuang, R., Jaehnig, E. J., Bodenmiller, B., Licon, K., Copeland, W., Shales, M., et al. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1195618 · Cited by 447 · see citing works
The Ubiquitin–Proteasome System of Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Finley, D. J., Ulrich, H. D., Sommer, T., & Kaiser, P. (2012) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.112.140467 · Cited by 427 · see citing works
Genotype to Phenotype: A Complex Problem
Dowell, R. D., Ryan, O. W., Jansen, A., Cheung, D., Agarwala, S. D., Danford, T., Bernstein, D. A., Rolfe, A., Heisler, L. E., Chin, B., et al. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1189015 · Cited by 408 · see citing works
Self-citationSystematic exploration of essential yeast gene function with temperature-sensitive mutants
Li, Z., Vizeacoumar, F. J., Bahr, S., Li, J., Warringer, J., Vizeacoumar, F. S., Min, R., VanderSluis, B., Bellay, J., DeVit, M. J., et al. (2011) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.1832 · Cited by 404 · see citing works
Self-citationTaipale, M., Tucker, G., Peng, J., Krykbaeva, I., Lin, Z., Larsen, B. G., Choi, H., Berger, B., Gingras, A., & Lindquist, S. L. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.05.039 · Cited by 388 · see citing works
Self-citationInitiating DNA synthesis: from recruiting to activating the MCM complex
Lei, M., & Tye, B. K. (2001) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.114.8.1447 · Cited by 365 · see citing works
Quantitative analysis of fitness and genetic interactions in yeast on a genome scale
Baryshnikova, A., Costanzo, M., Kim, Y., Ding, H., Koh, J., Toufighi, K., Youn, J.-Y., Ou, J., San Luis, B.-J., Bandyopadhyay, S., et al. (2010) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1534 · Cited by 364 · see citing works
Self-citationLarge-scale protein structure modeling of the <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i> genome
Sánchez, R., & Sali, A. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.23.13597 · Cited by 362 · see citing works
Conservation and Rewiring of Functional Modules Revealed by an Epistasis Map in Fission Yeast
Roguev, A., Bandyopadhyay, S., Zofall, M., Zhang, K., Fischer, T., Collins, S. R., Qu, H., Shales, M., Park, H.-O., Hayles, J., et al. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1162609 · Cited by 352 · see citing works
Lahiri, S., Chao, J. T., Tavassoli, S., Wong, A. K. O., Choudhary, V., Young, B. P., Loewen, C. J. R., & Prinz, W. A. (2014) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001969 · Cited by 306 · see citing works
Therapeutics Based on Stop Codon Readthrough
Keeling, K. M., Xue, X., Gunn, G., & Bedwell, D. M. (2014) · Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genom-091212-153527 · Cited by 306 · see citing works
Genetic interactions between polymorphisms that affect gene expression in yeast
Brem, R. B., Storey, J. D., Whittle, J., & Kruglyak, L. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03865 · Cited by 298 · see citing works
The origin recognition complex: from simple origins to complex functions
Bell, S. P. (2002) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.969602 · Cited by 288 · see citing works
Network Hubs Buffer Environmental Variation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Levy, S. F., & Siegal, M. L. (2008) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0060264 · Cited by 279 · see citing works
Yeast Proteome Dynamics from Single Cell Imaging and Automated Analysis
Chong, Y. T., Koh, J. L. Y., Friesen, H., Kaluarachchi Duffy, S., Cox, M. J., Moses, A., Moffat, J., Boone, C., & Andrews, B. J. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.04.051 · Cited by 274 · see citing works
Self-citationUnder cover: causes, effects and implications of Hsp90‐mediated genetic capacitance
Sangster, T. A., Lindquist, S., & Queitsch, C. (2004) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.20020 · Cited by 251 · see citing works
Interaction landscape of membrane-protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Babu, M., Vlasblom, J., Pu, S., Guo, X., Graham, C., Bean, B. D. M., Burston, H. E., Vizeacoumar, F. J., Snider, J. D., Phanse, S., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11354 · Cited by 251 · see citing works
Self-citationA suppressor screen in Mecp2 mutant mice implicates cholesterol metabolism in Rett syndrome
Buchovecky, C. M., Turley, S. D., Brown, H. M., Kyle, S. M., McDonald, J. G., Liu, B., Pieper, A. A., Huang, W., Katz, D. M., Russell, D. W., et al. (2013) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.2714 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
Ben‐Aroya, S., Coombes, C. E., Kwok, T., O’Donnell, K. A., Boeke, J. D., & Hieter, P. (2008) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2008.02.021 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
Finding function: evaluation methods for functional genomic data
Myers, C. L., Barrett, D. R., Hibbs, M., Huttenhower, C., & Troyanskaya, O. G. (2006) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/1471-2164-7-187 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Self-citationDixon, S. J., Fedyshyn, Y., Koh, J. L. Y., Prasad, T. S. K., Chahwan, C., Chua, G., Toufighi, K., Baryshnikova, A., Hayles, J., Hoe, K.-L., et al. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0806261105 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Self-citationA gene ontology inferred from molecular networks
Dutkowski, J., Kramer, M., Surma, M. A., Balakrishnan, R., Cherry, J. M., Krogan, N. J., & Ideker, T. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2463 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
A global analysis of genetic interactions in Caenorhabditis elegans
Byrne, A. B., Weirauch, M. T., Wong, V., Koeva, M., Dixon, S. J., Stuart, J. M., & Roy, P. J. (2007) · Journal of Biology · doi:10.1186/jbiol58 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Hoepfner, D., Helliwell, S. B., Sadlish, H., Schuierer, S., Filipuzzi, I., Brachat, S., Bhullar, B., Plikat, U., Abraham, Y., Altorfer, M., et al. (2014) · Microbiological Research · doi:10.1016/j.micres.2013.11.004 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Systems-level antimicrobial drug and drug synergy discovery
Roemer, T., & Boone, C. (2013) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio.1205 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Self-citationGenetic interactions contribute less than additive effects to quantitative trait variation in yeast
Bloom, J. S., Kotenko, I., Sadhu, M. J., Treusch, S., Albert, F. W., & Kruglyak, L. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms9712 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Systematic Functional Annotation and Visualization of Biological Networks
Baryshnikova, A. (2016) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2016.04.014 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Self-citationPre‐mRNA 3′‐end processing complex assembly and function
Chan, S., Choi, E., & Shi, Y. (2011) · WIREs RNA · doi:10.1002/wrna.54 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
A scalable method for integration and functional analysis of multiple microarray datasets
Huttenhower, C., Hibbs, M., Myers, C. L., & Troyanskaya, O. G. (2006) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl492 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Self-citationFunctional Maps of Protein Complexes from Quantitative Genetic Interaction Data
Bandyopadhyay, S., Kelley, R., Krogan, N. J., & Ideker, T. (2008) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000065 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Integrative phenomics reveals insight into the structure of phenotypic diversity in budding yeastPreprint
Skelly, D. A., Merrihew, G. E., Riffle, M. E., Connelly, C. F., Kerr, E. O., Johansson, M., Jaschob, D., Graczyk, B., Shulman, N., Wakefield, J., et al. (2013) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.155762.113 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
McManus, K. J., Barrett, I. J., Nouhi, Y., & Hieter, P. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0813414106 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Gibney, P. A., Lu, C., Caudy, A. A., Hess, D. C., & Botstein, D. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1318100110 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Self-citationStructure and function of the GINS complex, a key component of the eukaryotic replisome
MacNeill, S. A. (2010) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj20091531 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Plant-derived antifungal agent poacic acid targets β-1,3-glucan
Piotrowski, J. S., Okada, H., Lu, F., Li, S. C., Hinchman, L., Ranjan, A., Smith, D. L., Higbee, A. J., Ulbrich, A., Coon, J. J., et al. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1410400112 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Self-citationGenetic interactions reveal the evolutionary trajectories of duplicate genes
VanderSluis, B., Bellay, J., Musso, G., Costanzo, M., Papp, B., Vizeacoumar, F. J., Baryshnikova, A., Andrews, B., Boone, C., & Myers, C. L. (2010) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.1038/msb.2010.82 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Self-citationA map of directional genetic interactions in a metazoan cell
Fischer, B., Sandmann, T., Horn, T. L., Billmann, M., Chaudhary, V., Huber, W. K., & Boutros, M. (2015) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.05464 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Self-citationAn efficient method for genome-wide polyadenylation site mapping and RNA quantification
Wilkening, S., Pelechano, V., Järvelin, A. I., Tekkedil, M. M., Anders, S., Beneš, V., & Steinmetz, L. M. (2013) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gks1249 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Self-citationA Consensus of Core Protein Complex Compositions for Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Benschop, J. J., Brabers, N. A. C. H., van Leenen, D., Bakker, L. V., van Deutekom, H. W. M., van Berkum, N. L., Apweiler, E., Lijnzaad, P., Holstege, F. C. P., & Kemmeren, P. (2010) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2010.06.002 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
van Pel, D. M., Barrett, I. J., Shimizu, Y., Sajesh, B. V., Guppy, B. J., Pfeifer, T., McManus, K. J., & Hieter, P. (2013) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003254 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Zhao, J., Kessler, M. M., Helmling, S., O’Connor, J. P., & Moore, C. L. (1999) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.19.11.7733 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Self-citationAbe, F., & Minegishi, H. (2008) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.107.083063 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Compromising the 19S proteasome complex protects cells from reduced flux through the proteasome
Tsvetkov, P., Mendillo, M. L., Zhao, J., Carette, J. E., Merrill, P. H., Cikes, D., Varadarajan, M., van Diemen, F. R., Penninger, J. M., Goldberg, A. L., et al. (2015) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.08467 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Addinall, S. G., Downey, M., Yu, M., Zubko, M. K., Dewar, J., Leake, A., Hallinan, J., Shaw, O., James, K., Wilkinson, D. J., et al. (2008) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.108.092577 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Construction of a microbial natural product library for chemical biology studies
Kato, N., Takahashi, S., Nogawa, T., Saito, T., & Osada, H. (2012) · Current Opinion in Chemical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cbpa.2012.02.016 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Wan, L. C. K., Mao, D. Y. L., Neculai, D., Strecker, J. G., Chiovitti, D., Kurinov, I. V., Poda, G. I., Thevakumaran, N., Yuan, F., Szilard, R. K., et al. (2013) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkt322 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Self-citationKoh, J. L. Y., Chong, Y. T., Friesen, H., Moses, A., Boone, C., Andrews, B. J., & Moffat, J. (2015) · G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics · doi:10.1534/g3.115.017830 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Self-citationPredicting phenotypic variation in yeast from individual genome sequences
Jelier, R., Semple, J. I., García-Verdugo, R., & Lehner, B. (2011) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.1007 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Scheler, C., Li, X., Salnikow, J., Dunn, M. J., & Jungblut, P. R. (1999) · Electrophoresis · doi:10.1002/(sici)1522-2683(19991201)20:18 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Putting genetic interactions in context through a global modular decompositionPreprint
Bellay, J., Atluri, G., Sing, T. L., Toufighi, K., Costanzo, M., Ribeiro, P. S. M., Pandey, G. S., Baller, J. A., VanderSluis, B., Michaut, M., et al. (2011) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.117176.110 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Self-citationConserved rules govern genetic interaction degree across species
Koch, E. N., Costanzo, M., Bellay, J., Deshpande, R., Chatfield-Reed, K., Chua, G., D'Urso, G., Andrews, B. J., Boone, C., & Myers, C. L. (2012) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2012-13-7-r57 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Self-citationA Comparative Genomic Approach for Identifying Synthetic Lethal Interactions in Human Cancer
Deshpande, R., Asiedu, M. K., Klebig, M., Sutor, S., Kuzmin, E., Nelson, J., Piotrowski, J., Ho Shin, S., Yoshida, M., Costanzo, M., et al. (2013) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-12-3956 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Self-citationAn Updated Collection of Sequence Barcoded Temperature-Sensitive Alleles of Yeast Essential Genes
Kofoed, M., Milbury, K. L., Chiang, J. H., Sinha, S., Ben-Aroya, S., Giaever, G., Nislow, C., Hieter, P., & Stirling, P. C. (2015) · G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics · doi:10.1534/g3.115.019174 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Modeling Microbial Growth Curves with GCAT
Bukhman, Y. V., DiPiazza, N. W., Piotrowski, J. S., Shao, J., Halstead, A. G. W., Bui, M. D., Xie, E., & Sato, T. K. (2015) · BioEnergy Research · doi:10.1007/s12155-015-9584-3 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Self-citationA global S. cerevisiae small ubiquitin‐related modifier (SUMO) system interactome
Srikumar, T., Lewicki, M. C., & Raught, B. (2013) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.1038/msb.2013.23 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Self-citationKhosrow-Khavar, F., Fang, N. N., Ng, A. H. M., Winget, J. M., Comyn, S. A., & Mayor, T. (2012) · G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics · doi:10.1534/g3.111.001933 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Synthetic Genetic Array Analysis for Global Mapping of Genetic Networks in Yeast
Kuzmin, E., Sharifpoor, S., Baryshnikova, A., Costanzo, M., Myers, C. L., Andrews, B., & Boone, C. M. (2014) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-1363-3_10 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Self-citationComparison of Profile Similarity Measures for Genetic Interaction Networks
Deshpande, R., VanderSluis, B., & Myers, C. L. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0068664 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Self-citationChemical Genomic Profiling via Barcode Sequencing to Predict Compound Mode of Action
Piotrowski, J. S., Simpkins, S. W., Li, S. C., Deshpande, R., McIlwain, S. J., Ong, I. M., Myers, C. L., Boone, C., & Andersen, R. J. (2014) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-2269-7_23 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Self-citationGordon, J. M. B., Shikov, S., Kuehner, J. N., Liriano, M., Lee, E., Stafford, W., Poulsen, M. B., Harrison, C., Moore, C., & Bohm, A. (2011) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi200964p · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Self-citationFung, S., Sofiyev, V., Schneiderman, J., Hirschfeld, A. F., Victor, R. E., Woods, K., Piotrowski, J. S., Deshpande, R., Li, S. C., de Voogd, N. J., et al. (2013) · ACS Chemical Biology · doi:10.1021/cb400740c · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Self-citationGreenall, A., Lei, G., Swan, D. C., James, K., Wang, L., Peters, H., Wipat, A., Wilkinson, D. J., & Lydall, D. (2008) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2008-9-10-r146 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
L-Phenylalanine Transport in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Participation of GAP1, BAP2, and AGP1
Sáenz, D. A., Chianelli, M. S., & Stella, C. A. (2014) · Journal of Amino Acids · doi:10.1155/2014/283962 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- A. P. Rosebrock A. A. Caudy “Metabolomic Analysis of Budding Yeast”. In Budding Yeast: A Laboratory Manual . B. Andrews C. Boone T. Davis S. Fields Eds. (Cold Spring Harbor Press 2016) pp. 599–620.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dixit, A., Parnas, O., Li, B., Chen, J., Fulco, C. P., Jerby-Arnon, L., Marjanovic, N. D., Dionne, D., Burks, T., Raychowdhury, R., et al. (2016) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.11.038 · Cited by 1,863 · see citing works
Oughtred, R., Rust, J., Chang, C., Breitkreutz, B., Stark, C., Willems, A., Boucher, L., Leung, G., Kolas, N., Zhang, F., et al. (2021) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.3978 · Cited by 1,858 · see citing works
Antifungal Drug Resistance: Molecular Mechanisms in <i>Candida albicans</i> and Beyond
Lee, Y., Puumala, E., Robbins, N., & Cowen, L. E. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00199 · Cited by 801 · see citing works
Zitnik, M., Nguyen, F., Wang, B., Leskovec, J., Goldenberg, A., & Hoffman, M. M. (2019) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2018.09.012 · Cited by 675 · see citing works
OpenCell: Endogenous tagging for the cartography of human cellular organization
Cho, N. H., Cheveralls, K. C., Brunner, A.-D., Kim, K., Michaelis, A. C., Raghavan, P., Kobayashi, H., Savy, L., Li, J. Y., Canaj, H., et al. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abi6983 · Cited by 567 · see citing works
Kulmanov, M., Khan, M. A., & Hoehndorf, R. (2018) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btx624 · Cited by 558 · see citing works
Functional genomic landscape of cancer-intrinsic evasion of killing by T cells
Lawson, K. A., Sousa, C. M., Zhang, X., Kim, E., Akthar, R., Caumanns, J. J., Yao, Y., Mikolajewicz, N., Ross, C., Brown, K. R., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2746-2 · Cited by 443 · see citing works
Using deep learning to model the hierarchical structure and function of a cell
Ma, J., Yu, M. K., Fong, S., Ono, K., Sage, E., Demchak, B., Sharan, R., & Ideker, T. (2018) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.4627 · Cited by 435 · see citing works
Combinatorial CRISPR–Cas9 screens for de novo mapping of genetic interactions
Shen, J. P., Zhao, D., Sasik, R., Luebeck, J., Birmingham, A., Bojorquez-Gomez, A., Licon, K., Klepper, K., Pekin, D., Beckett, A. N., et al. (2017) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.4225 · Cited by 359 · see citing works
<i>APOE4</i> disrupts intracellular lipid homeostasis in human iPSC-derived glia
Sienski, G., Narayan, P., Bonner, J. M., Kory, N., Boland, S., Arczewska, A. A., Ralvenius, W. T., Akay, L., Lockshin, E., He, L., et al. (2021) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aaz4564 · Cited by 336 · see citing works
Mapping the Genetic Landscape of Human Cells
Horlbeck, M. A., Xu, A., Wang, M., Bennett, N. K., Park, C. Y., Bogdanoff, D., Adamson, B., Chow, E. D., Kampmann, M., Peterson, T. R., et al. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.06.010 · Cited by 319 · see citing works
Orthologous CRISPR–Cas9 enzymes for combinatorial genetic screens
Najm, F. J., Strand, C., Donovan, K. F., Hegde, M., Sanson, K. R., Vaimberg, E. W., Sullender, M. E., Hartenian, E., Kalani, Z., Fusi, N., et al. (2018) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.4048 · Cited by 279 · see citing works
A new era in functional genomics screens
Przybyla, L., & Gilbert, L. A. (2022) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-021-00409-w · Cited by 281 · see citing works
The Causes and Consequences of Genetic Interactions (Epistasis)
Domingo, J., Baeza-Centurion, P., & Lehner, B. (2019) · Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genom-083118-014857 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
Global Genetic Networks and the Genotype-to-Phenotype Relationship
Costanzo, M., Kuzmin, E., van Leeuwen, J., Mair, B., Moffat, J., Boone, C., & Andrews, B. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.01.033 · Cited by 241 · see citing works
Self-citationA genome-wide atlas of co-essential modules assigns function to uncharacterized genes
Wainberg, M., Kamber, R. A., Balsubramani, A., Meyers, R. M., Sinnott-Armstrong, N., Hornburg, D., Jiang, L., Chan, J., Jian, R., Gu, M., et al. (2021) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-021-00840-z · Cited by 204 · see citing works
A marine microbiome antifungal targets urgent-threat drug-resistant fungi
Zhang, F., Zhao, M., Braun, D. R., Ericksen, S. S., Piotrowski, J. S., Nelson, J., Peng, J., Ananiev, G. E., Chanana, S., Barns, K., et al. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abd6919 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Self-citationSegal, E. S., Gritsenko, V., Levitan, A., Yadav, B., Dror, N., Steenwyk, J. L., Silberberg, Y., Mielich, K., Rokas, A., Gow, N. A. R., et al. (2018) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.02048-18 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Gonatopoulos-Pournatzis, T., Aregger, M., Brown, K. R., Farhangmehr, S., Braunschweig, U., Ward, H. N., Ha, K. C. H., Weiss, A., Billmann, M., Durbic, T., et al. (2020) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-020-0437-z · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Self-citationSkipGNN: predicting molecular interactions with skip-graph networks
Huang, K., Xiao, C., Glass, L. M., Zitnik, M., & Sun, J. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-77766-9 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
The Hsp90 chaperone network modulates Candida virulence traits
O’Meara, T. R., Robbins, N., & Cowen, L. E. (2017) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2017.05.003 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Network modeling of single-cell omics data: challenges, opportunities, and progresses
Blencowe, M., Arneson, D., Ding, J., Chen, Y.-W., Saleem, Z., & Yang, X. (2019) · Emerging Topics in Life Sciences · doi:10.1042/etls20180176 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Self-citationMapping the multiscale structure of biological systems
Schaffer, L. V., & Ideker, T. (2021) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2021.05.012 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Shivarathri, R., Jenull, S., Stoiber, A., Chauhan, M., Mazumdar, R., Singh, A., Nogueira, F., Kuchler, K., Chowdhary, A., & Chauhan, N. (2020) · mSphere · doi:10.1128/msphere.00973-20 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Caplan, T., Polvi, E. J., Xie, J. L., Buckhalter, S., Leach, M. D., Robbins, N., & Cowen, L. E. (2018) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2018.04.084 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Mount, H. O., Revie, N. M., Todd, R. T., Anstett, K., Collins, C., Costanzo, M., Boone, C., Robbins, N., Selmecki, A., & Cowen, L. E. (2018) · PLOS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1007319 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Self-citationSparse dictionary learning recovers pleiotropy from human cell fitness screens
Pan, J., Kwon, J. J., Talamas, J. A., Borah, A. A., Vazquez, F., Boehm, J. S., Tsherniak, A., Zitnik, M., McFarland, J. M., & Hahn, W. C. (2022) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2021.12.005 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Calcineurin-dependent contributions to fitness in the opportunistic pathogen <i>Candida glabrata</i>
Pavesic, M. W., Gale, A. N., Nickels, T. J., Harrington, A. A., Bussey, M., & Cunningham, K. W. (2024) · mSphere · doi:10.1128/msphere.00554-23 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Lee, Y., Liston, S. D., Lee, D., Robbins, N., & Cowen, L. E. (2022) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2022.104432 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Evolutionary rescue of phosphomannomutase deficiency in yeast models of human disease
Vignogna, R. C., Allocca, M., Monticelli, M., Norris, J. W., Steet, R., Perlstein, E. O., Andreotti, G., & Lang, G. I. (2022) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.79346 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
- Authors
- Costanzo, M., VanderSluis, B., Koch, E. N., Baryshnikova, A., Pons, C., Tan, G., Wang, W., Usaj, M., Hanchard, J., Lee, S. D., Pelechano, V., Styles, E. B., Billmann, M., van Leeuwen, J., van Dyk, N., Lin, Z.-Y., Kuzmin, E., Nelson, J., Piotrowski, J. S., Srikumar, T., Bahr, S., Chen, Y., Deshpande, R., Kurat, C. F., Li, S. C., Li, Z., Usaj, M. M., Okada, H., Pascoe, N., San Luis, B.-J., Sharifpoor, S., Shuteriqi, E., Simpkins, S. W., Snider, J., Suresh, H. G., Tan, Y., Zhu, H., Malod-Dognin, N., Janjic, V., Przulj, N., Troyanskaya, O. G., Stagljar, I., Xia, T., Ohya, Y., Gingras, A.-C., Raught, B., Boutros, M., Steinmetz, L. M., Moore, C. L., Rosebrock, A. P., Caudy, A. A., Myers, C. L., Andrews, B., & Boone, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto (CA)
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Princeton University (US)
- The Donnelly Centre, University of Toronto, 160 College Street, Toronto ON, Canada M5S 3E1.
- Tufts University (US)
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (DE)
- German Cancer Research Center (DE)
- Mount Sinai Hospital (CA)
- University Health Network (CA)
- The University of Tokyo (JP)
- Computer Science Deptartment, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
- Department of Computing, Imperial College London, UK.
- Corresponding author
- Costanzo, Michael
- VanderSluis, Benjamin
- Koch, Elizabeth N.
- Baryshnikova, Anastasia
- Pons, Carles
- Tan, Guihong
- Srikumar, Tharan
- Myers, Chad L.
- Andrews, Brenda
- Boone, Charles
- ORCID
- Costanzo, Michael
- VanderSluis, Benjamin
- Koch, Elizabeth N.
- Baryshnikova, Anastasia
- Pons, Carles
- Tan, Guihong
- Wang, Wen
- Hanchard, Julia
- Pelechano, Vicent
- Billmann, Maximilian
- Kuzmin, Elena
- Nelson, Justin
- Piotrowski, Jeff S.
- Srikumar, Tharan
- Chen, Yiqun
- Kurat, Christoph F.
- Li, Sheena C.
- Li, Zhijian
- Okada, Hiroki
- Sharifpoor, Sara
- Simpkins, Scott W.
- Snider, Jamie
- Suresh, Harsha Garadi
- Zhu, Hongwei
- Troyanskaya, Olga G.
- Xia, Tian
- Ohya, Yoshikazu
- Gingras, Anne-Claude
- Raught, Brian
- Boutros, Michael
- Steinmetz, Lars M.
- Moore, Claire L.
- Rosebrock, Adam P.
- Caudy, Amy A.
- Myers, Chad L.
- Andrews, Brenda
- Boone, Charles
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2016-09-23
- Volume
- 353
- Issue
- 6306
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- PMC
- PMC5661885
- OpenAlex
- W2522417827
- Semantic Scholar
- d3c174266b0545f2b2ad44168881f31696690835
- Cited by
- 1,240
- References
- 120
- Citations by year
- 2026: 73 · 2025: 108 · 2024: 111 · 2023: 110 · 2022: 128 · 2021: 138 · 2020: 165 · 2019: 150 · 2018: 137 · 2017: 112 · 2016: 6 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 70.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- RIKEN Strategic Programs for R&D
- JSPS Kakenhi (15H04483)
- National Institutes of Health (R01HG005853, R01HG005084, R01GM104975)
- European Research Council (ERC) Advanced Investigator (AdG-294542)
- Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Sciences and Technology, MEXT (15H04402)
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (FDN-143264, FDN-143265, FDN143301)
- Genome Canada Genome Innovation
- Ontario Genomics Institute
- Canadian Cystic Fibrosis Foundation
- Canadian Cancer Society
- Pancreatic Cancer Canada
- University Health Network
- National Science Foundation (DBI0953881, MCB1244043)
- Cyber-Enabled Discover and Innovation (CDI) (OIA-1028394)
- ERC Starting Independent Researcher (278212)
- ARRS (J1-5424)
- Serbian Ministry of Education and Science (11144006)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China
- National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship (NSF 00039202)
- Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CIFAR)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
- Keywords
- genetic interaction networks, synthetic lethality, negative genetic interactions, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, gene essentiality, network hubs, functional modules, pleiotropy, proteostasis, cell cycle, protein complexes, genetic buffering, gene function prediction, network topology, drug target identification
- MeSH terms
- Epistasis, Genetic, Genes, Fungal, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Genes, Essential, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Gene Regulatory Networks, Genetic Pleiotropy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review