Cited by 81Pluripotent Stem Cells ResearchDevelopmental Biology and Gene RegulationEpigenetics and DNA Methylation

Resetting transcription factor control circuitry toward ground-state pluripotency in human

Open access
Takashima, Yasuhiro, Guo, Ge, Loos, Remco, Nichols, Jennifer, Ficz, Gabriella, Krueger, Felix, Oxley, David, Santos, Fatima +5 more·2015·Cell

Abstract

(Cell 158, 1254–1269; September 11, 2014) Our paper reported that short-term expression of NANOG and KLF2 is sufficient to reset the state of pluripotency in human embryonic stem cells. Figure 7A, depicting colony formation after induced transgene expression, contains two identical images in which the same well is shown to represent both H9 and H1 cells (top row, images 4 and 5). This duplication arose during consolidation of images into the composite figure where the H9 well image was inadvertently inserted for both panels. The revised Figure 7 containing the correct H1 well image is shown below, and the figure has been corrected online. Resetting Transcription Factor Control Circuitry toward Ground-State Pluripotency in HumanTakashima et al.CellSeptember 11, 2014In BriefInvoking the transcription factor circuitry that defines mouse embryonic stem cell identity converts human pluripotent cells to a more naive state, characterized by altered transcriptional and metabolic activity, absence of lineage priming, and global DNA hypomethylation. Full-Text PDF Open Access

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2015.06.052

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • TCA cycle activity varies with PSC identity in human ESCs, which display glutamine independence and increased mitochondrial respiration upon conversion to a more naïve state.

    “TCA cycle activity also varies with PSC identity in human ESCs, which display glutamine independence and increased mitochondrial respiration upon conversion to a more naïve state (215, 216).”

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Takashima, Y., Guo, G., Loos, R., Nichols, J., Ficz, G., Krueger, F., Oxley, D., Santos, F., Clarke, J., Mansfield, W., Reik, W., Bertone, P., & Smith, A.
Corresponding author
  • Bertone, Paul
  • Smith, Austin
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-07
Volume
162
Issue
2
Pages
452-453
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4254473479
Cited by
78
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 7 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Cell (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
Keywords
naive pluripotency, human embryonic stem cells, Nanog, KLF2, colony formation, H1 cell line, H9 cell line, DNA hypomethylation, lineage priming, metabolic activity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review