Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 731

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Personalized Immunomonitoring Uncovers Molecular Networks that Stratify Lupus Patients

Open access
Banchereau, Romain, Hong, Seunghee, Cantarel, Brandi, Baldwin, Nicole, Baisch, Jeanine, Edens, Michelle, Cepika, Alma-Martina, Acs, Peter, Turner, Jacob, Anguiano, Esperanza, Vinod, Parvathi, Khan, Shaheen, Obermoser, Gerlinde, Blankenship, Derek, Wakeland, Edward, Nassi, Lorien, Gotte, Alisa, Punaro, Marilynn, Liu, Yong-Jun, Banchereau, Jacques, Rossello-Urgell, Jose, Wright, Tracey, Pascual, Virginia·2016·Cell

Abstract

Summary Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease characterized by breakdown of tolerance to nucleic acids and highly diverse clinical manifestations. To assess its molecular heterogeneity, we longitudinally profiled the blood transcriptome of 158 pediatric patients. Using mixed models accounting for repeated measurements, demographics, treatment, disease activity (DA) and nephritis class, we confirmed a prevalent IFN signature and identified a plasmablast signature as the most robust biomarker of DA. We detected gradual enrichment of neutrophil transcripts during progression to active nephritis, and distinct signatures in response to treatment in different nephritis subclasses. Importantly, personalized immunomonitoring uncovered individual correlates of disease activity that enabled patient stratification into seven groups, which were supported by patient genotypes. Our study uncovers the molecular heterogeneity of SLE and provides an explanation for the failure of clinical trials. This approach may improve trial design and implementation of tailored therapies in genetically and clinically complex autoimmune diseases.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2016.03.008

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 731

Metadata

Authors
Banchereau, R., Hong, S., Cantarel, B., Baldwin, N., Baisch, J., Edens, M., Cepika, A.-M., Acs, P., Turner, J., Anguiano, E., Vinod, P., Khan, S., Obermoser, G., Blankenship, D., Wakeland, E., Nassi, L., Gotte, A., Punaro, M., Liu, Y.-J., Banchereau, J., Rossello-Urgell, J., Wright, T., & Pascual, V.
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-04
Volume
165
Issue
3
Pages
551-565
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2321809676
Cited by
731
References
7
FWCI
67.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Personalized Immunomonitoring Uncovers Molecular Networks that Stratify Lupus Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cell.2016.03.008
The paper
Banchereau, R., Hong, S., Cantarel, B., Baldwin, N., Baisch, J., Edens, M., Cepika, A.-M., Acs, P., Turner, J., Anguiano, E., Vinod, P., Khan, S., Obermoser, G., Blankenship, D., Wakeland, E., Nassi, L., Gotte, A., Punaro, M., Liu, Y.-J., . . . Pascual, V. (2016). Personalized Immunomonitoring Uncovers Molecular Networks that Stratify Lupus Patients. Cell. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.03.008

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.