Cited by 381Pleistocene-Era Hominins and ArchaeologyForensic and Genetic ResearchGenetic diversity and population structure

Analysis of Human Sequence Data Reveals Two Pulses of Archaic Denisovan Admixture

Open access
Browning, Sharon R., Browning, Brian L., Zhou, Ying, Tucci, Serena, Akey, Joshua M.·2018·Cell

Abstract

Anatomically modern humans interbred with Neanderthals and with a related archaic population known as Denisovans. Genomes of several Neanderthals and one Denisovan have been sequenced, and these reference genomes have been used to detect introgressed genetic material in present-day human genomes. Segments of introgression also can be detected without use of reference genomes, and doing so can be advantageous for finding introgressed segments that are less closely related to the sequenced archaic genomes. We apply a new reference-free method for detecting archaic introgression to 5,639 whole-genome sequences from Eurasia and Oceania. We find Denisovan ancestry in populations from East and South Asia and Papuans. Denisovan ancestry comprises two components with differing similarity to the sequenced Altai Denisovan individual. This indicates that at least two distinct instances of Denisovan admixture into modern humans occurred, involving Denisovan populations that had different levels of relatedness to the sequenced Altai Denisovan. VIDEO ABSTRACT.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.031

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • To isolate regions with Neanderthal ancestry, we considered segments identified in five European populations that have at least 30 putatively introgressed variants that could be compared to the Altai Neanderthal genome and had a match rate of at least 30% to the Altai Neanderthal allele.

    “To isolate regions with Neanderthal ancestry, as recommended by Browning et al.36, we (1) considered segments identified in these five populations that have at least 30 putatively introgressed variants that could be compared to the Altai Neanderthal genome and (2) had a match rate of at least 30% to the Altai Neanderthal allele36.”

    From Quantifying the contribution of Neanderthal introgression to the heritability of complex traits (2021) · cites this paper as [36]

    The STAR Methods section (page unavailable) supports using at least 30 putatively introgressed alleles comparable to the Altai Neanderthal genome. But to classify segments as clearly Neanderthal in origin, it requires a match rate above 60% to that genome, below 40% to the Altai Denisovan genome, and at least 30 comparable alleles for each genome. It does not recommend the cited 30% Neanderthal-match threshold. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Denisovan components in Papuans exhibit deep divergence from the reference Altai Denisovan genome, providing evidence for multiple Denisovan introgression events across time and space.

    “these components exhibit a deep divergence from the reference Altai Denisovan genome, providing strong evidence for the occurrence of multiple Denisovan introgression events across time and space [6, 7].”

    From Denisovan introgression has shaped the immune system of present-day Papuans (2022) · cites this paper as [7]

    The Discussion reports two waves of Denisovan admixture involving populations with different relatedness to the Altai Denisovan; the more distantly related component makes up most Denisovan ancestry in Papuans. But it says the two waves are most evident in East Asians, not Papuans, and the Results present the proposed geographic and temporal route for the Papuan-associated component as one possible scenario rather than an established sequence of events. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The HAR202 region shows signatures of introgression in populations from East Asia.

    “We analyzed chromosome 14 in every population from this database and found that the HAR202 region shows signatures of introgression in populations from East Asian (Fig. 2b; supplementary table S1, Supplementary Material online and supplementary fig. S2, Supplementary Material online).”

    From The Human Accelerated Region HAR202 Controls <i>NPAS3</i> Expression in the Developing Forebrain Displaying Differential Enhancer Activity Between Modern and Archaic Human Sequences (2024) · cites this paper as Browning et al. 2018

    The Results section, “Detection of putative archaic introgression in human populations” (page unavailable), reports introgression in East Asian populations. But neither that passage nor the passages retrieved for “HAR202” identify introgression at HAR202 specifically; the chromosome 14 region discussed in “Signals of positive selection” is the IGH locus. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In Europeans, archaic ancestry is consistent with contributions by a single population of Neanderthals through one or more pulses.

    “In Europeans, archaic ancestry is consistent with contributions by a single population of Neanderthals 3 through one or more pulses [4][5][6][7] .”
  • Denisovan-like ancestry is the result of multiple introgression events from different source populations.

    “We find support for the hypothesis that Denisovan-like ancestry is the result of multiple introgression events from different source populations (9, 10).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 49 · Cited by 381

Authors
Browning, S. R., Browning, B. L., Zhou, Y., Tucci, S., & Akey, J. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Princeton University (US)
Corresponding author
Browning, Sharon R.
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-03
Volume
173
Issue
1
Pages
53-61.e9
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2794087945
Cited by
381
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 22
FWCI
196.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (R01GM110068)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
Keywords
Denisovan admixture, archaic introgression, Neanderthal introgression, modern human genomes, East Asian populations, Papuan populations
MeSH terms
Exome Sequencing, Animals, Humans, Selection, Genetic, Genome, Human, Asian People, Neanderthals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review