Evidence of escape of SARS-CoV-2 variant B.1.351 from natural and vaccine-induced sera
Open accessAbstract
The race to produce vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) began when the first sequence was published, and this forms the basis for vaccines currently deployed globally. Independent lineages of SARS-CoV-2 have recently been reported: UK, B.1.1.7; South Africa, B.1.351; and Brazil, P.1. These variants have multiple changes in the immunodominant spike protein that facilitates viral cell entry via the angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE2) receptor. Mutations in the receptor recognition site on the spike are of great concern for their potential for immune escape. Here, we describe a structure-function analysis of B.1.351 using a large cohort of convalescent and vaccinee serum samples. The receptor-binding domain mutations provide tighter ACE2 binding and widespread escape from monoclonal antibody neutralization largely driven by E484K, although K417N and N501Y act together against some important antibody classes. In a number of cases, it would appear that convalescent and some vaccine serum offers limited protection against this variant.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This structure-function study shows that SARS-CoV-2 variant B.1.351 escapes neutralization by many monoclonal antibodies and by convalescent and vaccinee sera, largely due to RBD mutations K417N, E484K, and N501Y. B.1.351 RBD binds ACE2 with 19-fold higher affinity than Victoria RBD, and neutralization titers are reduced 13.3-fold in convalescent plasma, 7.6-fold after Pfizer-BioNTech vaccination, and 9-fold after Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccination.
Key findings
- Among 20 potent human mAbs, 14 had >10-fold loss of neutralization against B.1.351, with most showing complete knockout; the single anti-NTD mAb tested, 159, was also knocked out, consistent with the B.1.351 NTD deletion 242–244.
- Convalescent plasma from early first-wave infection (n = 34) showed a 13.3-fold geometric mean reduction in FRNT50 against B.1.351 versus Victoria (p < 0.0001); the Results state 18 of 34 failed to reach 50% neutralization at 1:20, while the Discussion states 14 of 34.
- Vaccinee sera showed reduced B.1.351 neutralization: Pfizer-BioNTech (n = 25) had 7.6-fold lower geometric mean titers (p < 0.0001), and Oxford-AstraZeneca (n = 25) had 9-fold lower titers (p < 0.0001); 9/25 AstraZeneca samples versus 2/25 Pfizer samples failed to reach 50% FRNT against B.1.351.
- B.1.351 RBD bound ACE2 with KD 4.0 nM, 19-fold higher affinity than Victoria RBD and 2.7-fold higher than B.1.1.7 RBD; REGN10933 neutralization was 773-fold impaired, while REGN10987 and the AstraZeneca mAb pair were little affected.
Methods
- Structure-function analysis comparing B.1.351 to the early Victoria isolate using focus reduction neutralization tests (FRNT) with convalescent plasma, B.1.1.7 patient plasma, Pfizer-BioNTech and Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccinee sera, a panel of 377 human mAbs from which the 20 most potent were selected, and clinical-stage mAb pairs.
- Samples included early convalescent plasma (n = 34), B.1.1.7-infected patient plasma (n = 13), Pfizer-BioNTech vaccinee serum (n = 25), and Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccinee serum (n = 25).
- Biolayer interferometry measured ACE2 and mAb binding to Victoria and B.1.351 RBDs; structural modeling and Fab/RBD complex analysis rationalized escape; statistics used Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank tests with two-tailed p values and geometric means, with FRNT IC50 determined by probit in SPSS.
Limitations
- Stated: vaccine and convalescent samples were taken early and titers may rise further, but titers may also wane; it remains unknown how B.1.351-infected sera neutralize early Wuhan-related strains or variants B.1.1.7 and P.1; future studies should define mAbs from E484K-infected individuals; and it is important to determine whether vaccination or natural infection with early strains still protects against severe disease and hospitalization.
- Evident from the text: the study reports in vitro neutralization and binding data, not clinical efficacy or protection outcomes; sample sizes are modest; and the paper itself contains a discrepancy between the Results and Discussion on how many convalescent samples failed to reach 50% neutralization at 1:20.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 23 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
In the evolution of B.1.1.7 and B.1.351, NTD-deletion-only mutants and N501Y-only mutants were observed preceding the rising dominance of strains harboring both deletions and 501Y.
“In the evolution of both the B.1.1.7 variant in the UK and the B.1.351 variant in South Africa, a substantial population of N-terminal domain (NTD)-deletion-only mutants (Δ69–70 in B.1.1.7 and Δ242–244 in B.1.153), and N501Y-only mutants were observed in both countries preceding the rising dominance of strains harboring both deletions and 501Y (Figures 1A and 1B).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine serum induced 3.6-fold higher neutralization titers against Victoria than Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine (p<0.0001).
“The Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine serum induced 3.6-fold higher neutralization titers against the Victoria strain than the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine (p < 0.0001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
A number of potent mAbs were able to potently neutralize B.1.351, including 222, 318, 253/55, 353/165, the AstraZeneca pair AZD1061 and AZD889, and Regeneron REGN10987.
“Although the majority of potent mAbs suffered substantial reduction or knockout of activity, a number were able to potently neutralize B.1.351, including 222, 318, 253/55, and 353/165, the AstraZeneca pair AZD1061 and AZD889, and Regeneron REGN10987, which does not contact any of the mutation sites, whereas REGN10933 contacts both 417 and 484 and binding is abrogated.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
18 of 34 early convalescent plasma samples failed to reach 50% neutralization of B.1.351 at a plasma dilution of 1:20.
“Significantly, 18 of 34 samples failed to reach 50% neutralization at a plasma dilution of 1:20, with a number showing a near total reduction of neutralization activity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine serum (n=25), geometric mean B.1.351 neutralization titers were 9-fold lower than for Victoria (p<0.0001).
“For the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine serum, geometric mean B.1.351 titers were 9-fold lower than for Victoria (p < 0.0001) (Figure 3D; Table S2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
Neutralization by the AstraZeneca pair of antibodies (AZD106 and AZD8895) was little affected on B.1.351 compared with Victoria.
“Neutralization by the AZ pair of antibodies was little affected on B.1.351 compared with Victoria.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
More Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine serum samples failed to reach 50% FRNT against B.1.351 (9/25) than Pfizer-BioNTech samples (2/25).
“because the AstraZeneca titers started from a lower base more of the samples failed to reach 50% FRNT titers against B.1.351 (9/25) than for the Pfizer vaccine (2/25), although one of these (Pfizer 2) also showed low neutralizing titers to the Victoria virus.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The single potent NTD-binding antibody mAb 159 showed complete knockout of activity against B.1.351.
“Interestingly, the single potent NTD-binding antibody included in these analyses, mAb 159, also showed a complete knockout of activity against B.1.351, which includes deletion of amino acids 242–244 in the NTD, part of the epitope for mAb 159.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Five of the 19 potent RBD-binding mAbs have lower or equal affinity for B.1.351 RBD than ACE2 does.
“Thus, while all of our set of potent RBD binders have an affinity higher than that between ACE2 and Victoria or B.1.1.7 RBD (KDs of 75.1 and 10.7 nM, respectively), five of the 19 have lower or equal affinity than for ACE2 and B.1.351 RBD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In early convalescent plasma (n=34), neutralization titers against B.1.351 were 13.3-fold reduced compared with Victoria (p<0.0001).
“For the early convalescent samples (n = 34), neutralization titers against B.1.351 were, on average, 13.3-fold reduced compared with Victoria (p < 0.0001) (Figure 2A; Table S1A).”
- Also stated in: § Neutralization of B.1.351 by convalescent plasma · plain
“Overall, in the 34 convalescent plasma samples there was a 13.3-fold (geometric mean) reduction in neutralization titer between Victoria and B.1.351 (p < 0.0001) (Figure 2C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Neutralization of B.1.351 by convalescent plasma · plain
- Findingown data
For Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine serum (n=25), geometric mean neutralization titers for B.1.351 were 7.6-fold lower than for Victoria (p<0.0001).
“For the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine serum, geometric mean titers for B.1.351 were 7.6-fold lower than for Victoria (p < 0.0001) (Figure 3C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In sera from B.1.1.7-infected patients (n=13), there was a 3.1-fold reduction in neutralization titers between Victoria and B.1.351.
“Overall, there was a 3.1-fold (geometric mean) reduction in titers between Victoria and B.1.351 in sera from patients infected with B.1.1.7 (Figure 2D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Neutralization titers for the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine were reduced with B.1.351 by 9-fold.
“Neutralization titers for the Oxford-AstraZeneca and Pfizer vaccines were similarly reduced with B.1.351 by 9-fold and 7.6-fold, respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
14 of 20 of a panel of mAbs are seriously compromised or neutralization is completely knocked out against B.1.351.
“14 of 20 of a panel of mAbs are seriously compromised or neutralization is completely knocked out.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The B.1.351 mutations increase the affinity of the RBD for ACE2 approximately 19-20-fold compared with Wuhan RBD.
“These mutations increase the affinity of the RBD for ACE2 2.7-fold for B.1.1.7 (Supasa et al., 2021) and 19-fold for B.1.351”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“we show here an ∼20-fold increase in affinity for ACE2 compared with Wuhan RBD”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
- Findingown data
On convalescent serum, neutralization titers are reduced 13.3-fold for B.1.351 compared with the Victoria strain.
“On convalescent serum, the neutralization titers are reduced 13.3-fold for B.1.351 compared with the Victoria strain”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The B.1.351 CoV-2 strain is much more difficult to neutralize than parental strains.
“Here, we demonstrate that the B.1.351 CoV-2 strain is much more difficult to neutralize than parental strains”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
14 of 34 convalescent sera failed to reach an NT50 at a 1:20 dilution against B.1.351.
“with 14 of 34 failing to reach an NT50 at a 1:20 dilution”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
For the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine compared with the Pfizer vaccine, more sera failed to reach FRNT50 at 1:20 dilution against B.1.351.
“For the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine compared with the Pfizer vaccine, more sera failed to reach FRNT50 at 1:20 dilution”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Neutralization titers for the Pfizer vaccine were reduced with B.1.351 by 7.6-fold.
“Neutralization titers for the Oxford-AstraZeneca and Pfizer vaccines were similarly reduced with B.1.351 by 9-fold and 7.6-fold, respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine had 3.6-fold lower starting FRNT50 titers than the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine.
“this effect was due to the 3.6-fold lower starting titers for the Oxford-AstraZenca vaccine versus the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
K417N and N501Y act together against some important antibody classes.
“although K417N and N501Y act together against some important antibody classes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
By analysis of known structures of Fab/RBD complexes, the effects on all potent binders to Victoria can be rationalized in terms of interactions with the three mutated residues in the RBD.
“By analysis of known structures of Fab/RBD complexes, we are able to rationalize the effects on all potent binders to the Victoria virus in terms of interactions with the three mutated residues in the RBD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
The B.1.351 variant has multiple changes in the immunodominant spike protein that facilitates viral cell entry via ACE2 receptor.
“These variants have multiple changes in the immunodominant spike protein that facilitates viral cell entry via the angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE2) receptor.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The receptor-binding domain mutations provide tighter ACE2 binding.
“The receptor-binding domain mutations provide tighter ACE2 binding and widespread escape from monoclonal antibody neutralization largely driven by E484K, although K417N and N501Y act together against some important antibody classes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
In vitro evolution to optimize affinity for ACE2 has suggested that K417N, E484K, N501Y confer higher affinity for the receptor.
“in vitro evolution to optimize the affinity for ACE2 has suggested that they confer higher affinity for the receptor (Starr et al., 2020; Zahradník et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Starr et al., 2020 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Zahradník et al., 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Serial passage of virus in sub-neutralizing concentrations of immune plasma led to emergence of deletion of F140 and creation of a new N-linked glycosylation sequon in NTD together with E484K RBD mutation.
“Furthermore, serial passage of virus in sub-neutralizing concentrations of immune plasma led to the emergence of the deletion of F140 and the creation of a new N-linked glycosylation sequon in the NTD together with the E484K RBD mutation (Andreano et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Andreano et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
The observed pattern of effects on neutralization is largely due to the amino acid substitutions in the RBD, K417N, E484K, and N501Y.
“These results broadly follow the neutralization results (compare panels C and D of Figure 6; see Table S3), suggesting that the observed pattern of effects on neutralization is largely due to the amino acid substitutions in the RBD, that is, K417N, E484K, and N501Y.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
mAb 384 buries 82% of the solvent-accessible area of E484, explaining the catastrophic impact of the E484K mutation on binding.
“This mAb approaches the binding site from the front of the left shoulder, burying 82% of the solvent-accessible area of E484 by hydrogen bonding with Y50, T57, and Y59 as well as making a salt bridge with R52 of the LC CDR2 (Figure 5D), thereby explaining the catastrophic impact of the E484K mutation on binding (Table S3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
In vitro evolution experiments have shown that repeated use of plasma therapy in an immunocompromised individual led to transient emergence of N501Y and 69-70 deletion in NTD.
“Interestingly, repeated use of plasma therapy in an immunocompromised individual led to the transient emergence of the N501Y mutation as well as the 69–70 deletion in the NTD, which is characteristic of B.1.1.7 (Kemp et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kemp et al., 2021 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The ACE2 interaction surface is the site for binding of many potent neutralizing antibodies.
“because of its crucial role in viral attachment, it is also the site for binding of many potent neutralizing antibodies (Cerutti et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cerutti et al., 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning
The B.1.1.7, B.1.351, and P.1 lineages have all converged with either deletions or systematic changes in the NTD.
“The B.1.1.7, B.1.351, and P.1 lineages have all converged with either deletions or systematic changes in the NTD.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The combined effects of K417N and N501Y mutations would severely compromise the binding of most IGHV3-53 and IGHV3-66 class mAbs.
“We would therefore expect that the combined effects of the K417N and N501Y mutations would severely compromise the binding of most IGHV3-53 and IGHV3-66 class mAbs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The widespread escape from monoclonal antibody neutralization by B.1.351 is largely driven by E484K.
“The receptor-binding domain mutations provide tighter ACE2 binding and widespread escape from monoclonal antibody neutralization largely driven by E484K, although K417N and N501Y act together against some important antibody classes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The majority of the effects observed on mAb binding are directly explicable by reference to prior structural knowledge.
“Despite these caveats, the majority of the effects observed are directly explicable by reference to prior structural knowledge.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
B.1.351 has key mutations K417N, E484K, and N501Y in the RBD.
“A number of isolates of B.1.351 have been described, all of which have the key mutations K417N, E484K, and N501Y in the RBD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tegally et al. (2021) source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
The changes L18F, T20N, and P26S in P.1 would be expected to impact markedly on binding at the NTD epitope.
“Although P.1 does not harbor NTD deletions, the changes L18F, T20N, and P26S (Faria et al., 2021) would be expected to impact markedly on binding at the NTD epitope.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Faria et al., 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
Convalescent and some vaccine serum offers limited protection against B.1.351 in a number of cases.
“In a number of cases, it would appear that convalescent and some vaccine serum offers limited protection against this variant.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Neutralization titer is a proxy for protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection or disease.
- Premisecitation
A recent report from South Africa on a small sample suggests substantial loss of efficacy for the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine against B.1.351 infection (10.6% efficacy against mild-to-moderate disease).
“a recent report from South Africa on a small sample size suggests substantial loss of efficacy for the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine against B.1.351 infection (10.6% efficacy against mild-to-moderate disease [Madhi et al., 2021])”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Madhi et al., 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Previous infection or vaccination with ancestral strains of SARS-CoV-2 may not provide adequate protection against B.1.351.
“Overall, these results suggest that previous infection or vaccination with ancestral strains of SARS-CoV-2 may not provide adequate protection against B.1.351.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Janssen single-dose COVID-19 vaccine showed 72% efficacy at preventing moderate and severe disease, reduced to 57% in South Africa.
- Premisecitation
In the placebo arm of the Novavax trial, there was no difference in the rate of infection in seronegative versus seropositive volunteers (3.9 versus 3.9%).
“in the placebo arm of the study, there was no difference in the rate of infection in seronegative versus seropositive volunteers (3.9 versus 3.9%)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites https://www.novavax.com/sites/default/files/2021-02/20210202-NYAS-Novavax-Final.pdf
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The higher proportion of Oxford-AstraZeneca sera failing to reach FRNT50 at 1:20 was due to the 3.6-fold lower starting titers for the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine versus the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine.
“since the reduction in FRNT50 titers between the two vaccines was quite similar, this effect was due to the 3.6-fold lower starting titers for the Oxford-AstraZenca vaccine versus the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Neutralizing antibody titers required for protection against parental strains are modest.
“implying neutralizing antibody titers required for this level of protection are modest.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Approximately one-third of the Novavax trial participants in South Africa were seropositive at enrollment.
“approximately one-third of the study participants were seropositive at enrollment”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites https://www.novavax.com/sites/default/files/2021-02/20210202-NYAS-Novavax-Final.pdf
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Previous SARS-CoV-2 exposure does not protect against infection with B.1.351.
“implying a lack of protection of previous SARS-CoV-2 exposure to infection with B.1.351.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Substantial antibody immune escape by B.1.351 is likely playing a role in countries such as South Africa, where rates of previous infection are relatively high (estimate >30%).
“the substantial antibody immune escape by B.1.351 is likely playing a role in countries such as South Africa, where the rates of previous infection are relatively high (estimate >30%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: In South Africa, rates of previous infection are relatively high (estimate >30%).
- Interpretationown data
The ~20-fold increase in affinity for ACE2 may influence transmissibility of B.1.351.
“we show here an ∼20-fold increase in affinity for ACE2 compared with Wuhan RBD, which may influence transmissibility.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
The Novavax vaccine had reduced efficacy of 60% in South Africa, where 92.6% of infections are estimated to have been B.1.351.
“had reduced efficacy of 60% in South Africa, where 92.6% of infections are estimated to have been B.1.351”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites https://www.novavax.com/sites/default/files/2021-02/20210202-NYAS-Novavax-Final.pdf
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
The Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine will retain a degree of efficacy against B.1.351.
“the neutralization titers reported here suggest that a degree of efficacy will be retained.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The B.1.1.7 mutations increase the affinity of the RBD for ACE2 2.7-fold.
“These mutations increase the affinity of the RBD for ACE2 2.7-fold for B.1.1.7 (Supasa et al., 2021) and 19-fold for B.1.351”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Supasa et al., 2021 source
Not checked in the free run.
- May combine two claims. 28
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 14
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataNeutralization of REGN10987 was unaffected by B.1.351, while REGN10933 was severely impaired (773-fold).
“The neutralization of REGN10987 was unaffected by B.1.351, while REGN10933 was severely impaired (773-fold) (Figure 4B; Table S2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe KD for binding of soluble ACE2 to B.1.351 RBD is 4.0 nM, with Kon 4.78E4/Ms and Koff 1.93E−4/s.
“The KD is 4.0 nM, Kon is 4.78E4/Ms, and Koff is 1.93E−4/s; thus, the off-rate is approximately 1.5 h.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataChimeras 253H/55L and 253H/165L can both neutralize B.1.351, with FRNT50 titers of 9 and 13 ng/mL, respectively.
“The chimeras 253H/55L and 253H/165L can both neutralize B.1.351, with FRNT50 titers of 9 and 13 ng/mL, respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataB.1.1.7 and B.1.351 quickly became overwhelmingly dominant in the UK and South Africa, respectively.
“It appears that B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 quickly became overwhelmingly dominant in the UK and South Africa, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenDespite changes in B.1.351, residual neutralizing capacity is present in many convalescent and vaccine sera, with some individuals showing minimal reduction of titers relative to Victoria.
“Despite the changes in B.1.351, residual neutralizing capacity is present in many convalescent and vaccine sera, with some individuals showing minimal reduction of titers relative to the Victoria strain.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataNeutralization of B.1.351 by sera from naturally infected or vaccinated individuals is significantly reduced, leading in some cases to a complete inability to neutralize B.1.351 virus.
“Neutralization of B.1.351 by sera from naturally infected or vaccinated individuals is significantly reduced, leading in some cases to a complete inability to neutralize B.1.351 virus.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFRNT50 titers for mAbs 55, 165, 253, and 318 were relatively equal between Victoria and B.1.351, indicating their epitopes are not perturbed by K417N, E484K, and N501Y mutations.
“The FRNT50 titers for mAbs 55, 165, 253, and 318 were also relatively equal between Victoria and B.1.351, indicating that their epitopes are not perturbed by the K417N, E484K, and N501Y mutations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor Fabs tested against B.1.351, only 4 (or 2 if engineered LC versions of 253 are removed) had KDs below 4 nM, compared with 17 against Victoria, and 7 Fabs failed to achieve near-micromolar affinity.
“whereas for the antigen binding fragments (Fabs) tested against Victoria, 17 had KDs below 4 nM (the affinity of ACE2 for B.1.351) against B.1.351, this reduced to 4 (or 2 if the engineered light-chain [LC] versions of 253 are removed [(Dejnirattisai et al., 2021)]), with 7 Fabs failing to achieve near-micromolar affinity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dejnirattisai et al., 2021 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAs of February 2, 2021, in COG-UK, 21 B.1.1.7 sequences had independently acquired 484K (but not 417N), and 90 sequences displayed these mutations in the background of B.1.351.
“as of February 2, 2021, in the COG-UK database, 21 of the B.1.1.7 sequences were observed to have independently acquired the 484K (but not the 417N) mutation found in the B.1.351 variant, and 90 sequences display these mutations in the background of B.1.351 (as defined by bearing the characteristic Δ242–244 NTD deletion).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataREGN10933 contacts both 417 and 484 and its binding is abrogated by B.1.351.
“Although the majority of potent mAbs suffered substantial reduction or knockout of activity, a number were able to potently neutralize B.1.351, including 222, 318, 253/55, and 353/165, the AstraZeneca pair AZD1061 and AZD889, and Regeneron REGN10987, which does not contact any of the mutation sites, whereas REGN10933 contacts both 417 and 484 and binding is abrogated.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong 20 potent mAbs tested, 14 had >10-fold fall in neutralization titers against B.1.351, with most showing complete knockout.
“The effects on mAb neutralization were severe, 14 of 20 antibodies had >10-fold fall in neutralization titers, with most of these showing a complete knockout of activity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataStructures of 253 and chimera Fabs with RBD or spike show they bind almost identically to the same epitope and do not contact any of the three mutation site residues.
“Structures of 253 and these chimera Fabs with either RBD or spike show that they bind almost identically to the same epitope and do not contact any of the three mutation site residues, correlating well with the neutralization and BLI binding data (Figure 5C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe affinity of B.1.351 RBD for soluble ACE2 is 19-fold higher than for Victoria RBD and 2.7-fold higher than for B.1.1.7 RBD.
“As expected, the affinity for B.1.351 RBD is high; in fact, it is 19-fold higher than for the Victoria RBD and 2.7-fold higher than for B.1.1.7 ((Dejnirattisai et al., 2021); Supasa et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFour of the five IGHV3-53 antibodies tested (150, 158, 175, 269) had neutralization and binding severely compromised or abolished against B.1.351, while mAb 222 was unaffected.
“Four of these, 150, 158, 175, and 269, have their neutralization and binding abilities severely compromised or abolished, while 222 is an exception, since its binding is unaffected by the B.1.351 variant (Figures 6F and 6G).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe B.1.351 strain used in this report has 8 changes relative to the Wuhan sequence and lacks L18F and R246I compared with the Tegally et al. (2021) isolate.
“Sequencing of the strain used in this report, from a case in the UK, shows only 8 changes and lacks L18F and R246I compared with the Tegally et al. (2021) isolate.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tegally et al. (2021) source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenAll three recently identified variant SARS-CoV-2 strains have acquired mutations in the ACE2 interaction surface of the RBD: N501Y in B.1.1.7; K417N, E484K, and N501Y in B.1.351; and K417T, E484K, and N501Y in P.1.
“All three recently identified variant SARS-CoV-2 strains have acquired mutations in the ACE2 interaction surface of the RBD: N501Y in B.1.1.7; K417N, E484K, and N501Y in B.1.351; and K417T, E484K, and N501Y in P.1.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationYeast display of libraries of RBD mutants has been used to select variants for escape from binding to immune serum or for increased affinity of binding to ACE2.
“Alternatively, yeast display of libraries of RBD mutants has been used to select variants for escape from binding to immune serum or alternatively for increased affinity of binding to the ACE2 receptor (Zahradník et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zahradník et al., 2021
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Premisenone givenThe ACE2-binding site extends across the neck and both shoulders of the RBD; N501Y is on the right shoulder, K417N at the back of the neck, and E484K on the left shoulder.
“In this context, the ACE2-binding site extends across the neck and both shoulders. N501Y is on the right shoulder, K417N at the back of the neck, and E484R on the left shoulder.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe change of charge at E484 from negative to positive and shortening of residue 417 side chain from K to N would abolish interactions in Fab 88, explaining the several hundred-fold loss in KD.
“The change of charge at E484 from negative to positive and shortening of the residue 417 side chain from K to N would be expected to abolish all these interactions, explaining the several hundred-fold loss in KD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe RBD is contained in the S1 subunit of spike and is responsible for interacting with ACE2.
“The RBD is contained in the S1 subunit of spike and is responsible for interacting with the SARS-CoV-2 cellular receptor angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE2) (Hoffmann et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hoffmann et al., 2020 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenAll three variants may lead to increased transmissibility, with good evidence for this with B.1.1.7 in the UK.
“All three variants may lead to increased transmissibility, with good evidence for this with B.1.1.7 in the UK.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: In vitro ACE2 binding affinity reflects viral transmissibility or fitness.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe 242-244 deletion in B.1.351 NTD will alter presentation of RBD loop 246-253, compromising binding to mAbs 159 and 4A8.
“The 242–244 deletion will undoubtedly alter the presentation of this loop, compromising binding to these mAbs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe 242-244 deletion in B.1.351 will disrupt the binding sites of neutralizing anti-NTD antibodies, as shown by failure of neutralization of anti-NTD mAb 159.
“The second theme is deletions in the NTD: 69–70 and 144 in B.1.1.7 and 242–244 in B.1.351, both of which will disrupt the binding sites of neutralizing anti-NTD antibodies, as shown here by the failure of neutralization of anti-NTD mAb 159.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe use of mAb therapy or prophylaxis, particularly for extended periods in chronically infected immunocompromised individuals, is likely to drive the emergence of resistance mutations.
“However, it must be recognized that the use of mAb therapy or prophylaxis, particularly for extended periods in chronically infected immunocompromised individuals, is likely to drive the emergence of resistance mutations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningmAb 222 possesses the IGHV3-53 V-region and maintains potency against B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 due to a slight change in HC CDR3 length and suitable LC choice.
“While all other IGHV3-53 antibodies are severely compromised in binding B.1.351, a slight change in the length of the HC CDR3 and a suitable choice of LC enable mAb 222 to maintain potency against B.1.1.7 and B.1.351.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe Novavax vaccine achieved 95.6% efficacy against previous SARS-CoV-2 strains and 85.6% against B.1.1.7 in the UK.
“Very recent data suggest that the Novavax vaccine, which achieved 95.6% efficacy against previous SARS-CoV-2 strains and 85.6% against B.1.1.7 in the UK”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites https://www.novavax.com/sites/default/files/2021-02/20210202-NYAS-Novavax-Final.pdf
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe vaccine and convalescent samples used in the neutralization studies were taken early.
“The vaccine and convalescent samples used in the neutralization studies in this report were taken early”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenBoth Victoria passage 5 and B.1.351 passage 4 stocks were sequenced to verify that they contained the expected spike protein sequence and no changes to the furin cleavage sites.
“Both Victoria passage 5 and B.1.351 passage 4 stocks were sequenced to verify that they contained the expected spike protein sequence and no changes to the furin cleavage sites.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataThe construct used encodes exactly the same protein as native RBD except the K417N, E484K and N501Y mutations, as confirmed by sequencing.
“This construct encodes exactly the same protein as native RBD except the K417N, E484K and N501Y mutations, as confirmed by sequencing.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBoth the Oxford-AstraZeneca and Pfizer vaccines give substantial initial efficacy after a single dose against parental strains (~76 and 89%, respectively).
“However, both the Oxford-AstraZeneca and Pfizer vaccines give substantial initial efficacy after a single dose of vaccine against parental strains (∼76 and 89%, respectively)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningViruses carrying the E484K and N501Y mutations likely have increased transmissibility.
“which is compatible with the observation that viruses carrying the E484K and N501Y mutations likely have increased transmissibility.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: N501Y is found in all B.1.1.7, B.1.351, and P.1 lineages and E484K is found in B.1.351 and P.1.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningAs population immunity increases due to vaccination and natural infection, the evolutionary pressure for viral variants to be selected ratchets up.
“as population immunity increases due to vaccination and natural infection, the evolutionary pressure for viral variants to be selected ratchets up.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn vitro evolution can generate ultra-high-affinity RBD variants for ACE2 in the sub-picomolar range, a higher affinity than almost all mAbs described to date.
“The ability to generate ultra-high-affinity RBD variants for ACE2 in the sub-picomolar range by in vitro evolution (Zahradník et al., 2021), a higher affinity than almost all mAbs described to date”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zahradník et al., 2021
Not checked in the free run.
The paper relies on this without support.
Neutralization titer is a proxy for protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection or disease.
“In a number of cases, it would appear that convalescent and some vaccine serum offers limited protection against this variant.”
“Neutralization of B.1.351 by sera from naturally infected or vaccinated individuals is significantly reduced, leading in some cases to a complete inability to neutralize B.1.351 virus.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Blocking RBD-ACE2 interaction plays a major role in natural and vaccine-induced protection from SARS-CoV-2 infection.
“Blocking RBD-ACE2 interaction is thought to play a major role in natural and vaccine-induced protection from SARS-CoV-2 infection.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The B.1.351 strain used in this report is representative of circulating B.1.351 variants.
“Sequencing of the strain used in this report, from a case in the UK, shows only 8 changes and lacks L18F and R246I compared with the Tegally et al. (2021) isolate.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In vitro ACE2 binding affinity reflects viral transmissibility or fitness.
“like the increased receptor binding and potential increased transmissibility imparted by the RBD mutations”
The paper relies on this without support.
N501Y is found in all B.1.1.7, B.1.351, and P.1 lineages and E484K is found in B.1.351 and P.1.
“Principal among these are N501Y found in all B.1.1.7, B.1.351, and P.1 lineages and E484K found in B.1.351 and P.1.”
The paper relies on this without support.
All approaches to select RBD mutants have led to identification of a common set of mutations found in circulating variant viruses.
“Of great interest is that all of these approaches have led to the identification of a common set of mutations found in the variant viruses that are now circulating.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The Janssen single-dose COVID-19 vaccine showed 72% efficacy at preventing moderate and severe disease, reduced to 57% in South Africa.
“The Janssen single-dose COVID-19 vaccine showed 72% efficacy at preventing moderate and severe disease, which was reduced to 57% in South Africa.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In South Africa, rates of previous infection are relatively high (estimate >30%).
“where the rates of previous infection are relatively high (estimate >30%)”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants including Alpha, Beta, and Delta raised concerns about increased transmission and potential evasion from vaccine-induced immunity.
“The emergence of several SARS-CoV-2 variants, including B.1.1.7 (Alpha), B.1.351 (Beta), and B.1.617.2 (Delta), has also raised concerns about increased transmission and potential evasion from vaccine-induced immunity (30–33).”
From mRNA vaccines induce durable immune memory to SARS-CoV-2 and variants of concern (2021) · cites this paper as [31]
Recent studies have consistently reported lower neutralizing antibody titers against B.1.351 after vaccination but not against B.1.1.7.
“Concerning neutralization of VOCs, recent studies have consistently reported lower neutralizing antibody titers against B.1.351 after vaccination but not against B.1.1.7 (39, 42, 48–59).”
From SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern partially escape humoral but not T cell responses in COVID-19 convalescent donors and vaccine recipients (2021) · cites this paper as [51]
Several studies have shown reduced vaccine efficacy against mild to moderate COVID-19 in countries where B.1.351 was dominant, although protection against severe disease appears preserved.
“Several studies have now shown that there is reduced vaccine efficacy against mild to moderate disease in countries where B1.351 was dominant (Zhou et al., 2021; Shinde et al., 2021; Madhi et al., 2021, Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee, 2021), although protection against severe disease appears to be preserved.”
From Reduced neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 B.1.617 by vaccine and convalescent serum (2021) · cites this paper as Zhou et al., 2021
The neutralizing titers of convalescent and vaccine sera are reduced to B.1.351, leading to a 13-fold reduction in neutralizing titers of convalescent serum, with a number of neutralizing mAbs losing activity completely.
“The neutralizing titers of convalescent and vaccine sera are reduced to the variants with B.1.351 of most concern, leading to a 13-fold reduction in neutralizing titers of convalescent serum, with a number of neutralizing monoclonal antibodies losing activity completely (Zhou et al., 2021; Supasa et al., 2021; Dejnirattisai et al., 2021b; Shinde et al., 2021; Madhi et al., 2021; Food and Drug Adm”
From Reduced neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 B.1.617 by vaccine and convalescent serum (2021) · cites this paper as Zhou et al., 2021
The Beta variant is associated with reduced susceptibility to many mAbs because E484K interferes with binding of several RBM class 1 and 2 mAbs and K417N interferes with the binding of several RBM class 1 mAbs.
“The Beta variant is associated with reduced susceptibility to many mAbs because E484K interferes with binding of several RBM class 1 and 2 mAbs and K417N interferes with the binding of several RBM class 1 mAbs 104,117,121,163,217 .”
From The biological and clinical significance of emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants (2021) · cites this paper as [104]
Of the five FDA EUA-approved mAbs, bamlanivimab, etesevimab and casirivimab are largely inactive against B.1.351 whereas imdevimab and sotrovimab, which bind to the RBD core, retain neutralizing activity.
“Of the five FDA EUA-approved mAbs, bamlanivimab, etesevimab and casirivimab are largely inactive against B.1.351whereas imdevimab and sotrovimab, which bind to the RBD core, retain neutralizing activity 104,109,117,175,204 (TABLe 1).”
From The biological and clinical significance of emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants (2021) · cites this paper as [104]
Of 34 convalescent plasma samples from persons infected with the Alpha variant, 59% had 3-fold to 10-fold reduced neutralizing activity and 18% had >10-fold reduced neutralizing activity to the Beta variant.
“Of 34 convalescent plasma samples from persons infected with the Alpha variant, 59% had 3-fold to 10-fold reduced neutralizing activity and 18% had >10-fold reduced neutralizing activity to the Beta variant 99,104,221 .”
From The biological and clinical significance of emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants (2021) · cites this paper as [104]
Of plasma samples obtained from persons receiving one of the mRNA vaccines, 45% had 3-fold to 10-fold and 30% had >10-fold reduced Beta variant neutralizing activity.
“Of plasma samples obtained from persons receiving one of the mRNA vaccines, 45% had 3-fold to 10-fold and 30% had >10-fold reduced Beta variant neutralizing activity 97,104,117,121,151,204,208,209,222,223 (fIg.5).”
From The biological and clinical significance of emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants (2021) · cites this paper as [104]
Of plasma samples from persons receiving the AZD1222 vaccine, 42% had 3-fold to 10-fold and 54% had >10-fold reduced Beta variant neutralizing activity.
“Of plasma samples from persons receiving the AZD1222 vaccine, 42% had 3-fold to 10-fold and 54% had >10-fold reduced Beta variant neutralizing activity 104,214,224 (fIg.5).”
From The biological and clinical significance of emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants (2021) · cites this paper as [104]
The Beta variant has displayed 3-fold to 10-fold reduced susceptibility to 46% and >10-fold reduced susceptibility to 22% of convalescent plasma samples compared with early pandemic variants.
“The Beta variant has displayed 3-fold to 10-fold reduced susceptibility to 46% and >10-fold reduced susceptibility to 22% of convalescent plasma samples compared with early pandemic variants 97,101,104,121,124,203,204,[218][219][220] (fIg.5).”
From The biological and clinical significance of emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants (2021) · cites this paper as [104]
Mutations within the RBD mediate escape from vaccine-induced neutralizing antibodies.
“Studies of previous SARS-CoV-2 variants have demonstrated that mutations within the receptor binding domain (RBD) mediate escape from vaccine-induced neutralizing antibodies (Cele et al., 2021a; Garcia-Beltran et al., 2021a; Zhou et al., 2021)”
From mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine boosters induce neutralizing immunity against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant (2022) · cites this paper as Zhou et al., 2021
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
B.1.351 E484 mutation is identified as both R and K
MinorThe binding analysis calls the characteristic mutation E484R, whereas the sequenced study virus and the rest of the paper identify it as E484K.
“The triple mutation K417N, E484R, and N501Y is characteristic of the B.1.351 RBD.”
“The B1.351 virus used in these studies contained the following mutations: D80A, D215G, L242-244 deleted, K417N, E484K, N501Y, D614G, A701V.”
AstraZeneca antibody identifier differs from the resources table
MinorThe clinical-antibody Results name AZD106, but the resources table identifies the antibody as AZD1061.
“the AstraZeneca pair AZD106 and AZD8895”
“| AstraZeneca mAbs | AstraZeneca | Cat#AZD1061, AZD8895 |”
Pfizer serum collection window differs between Results and Methods
MinorThe Results give a window of 4-17 days after the second dose; the figure caption and Methods give 7-17 days.
“For Pfizer-BioNTech, vaccinated serum was obtained from healthcare workers (n = 25) 4–17 days following the second dose of vaccine”
“Pfizer vaccine serum was obtained 7-17 days following the second dose of vaccine”
A loop described as RBD is shown as part of the NTD
MinorThe text calls residues 246-253 an RBD loop, but the accompanying figure caption locates the antibody-binding region and nearby deletion in the spike NTD.
“the RBD loop 246–253 interacts with the heavy chain (HC) of mAb 159 and also that of 4A8”
“(H and I) Positions of mutations and the deletion in the spike NTD of the B.1.351 variant relative to the bound antibodies”
Conflicting counts of convalescent samples that failed neutralization
MinorThe Results say 18 of 34 samples failed to reach 50% neutralization at 1:20, while the Discussion says 14 of 34 failed at the same dilution.
“Significantly, 18 of 34 samples failed to reach 50% neutralization at a plasma dilution of 1:20”
“with 14 of 34 failing to reach an NT50 at a 1:20 dilution”
Figure 1 gives a different position for the B.1.351 NTD deletion
MinorThe Figure 1 caption twice identifies the South African deletion as 241-243, while the sequenced study virus is reported to have deletion 242-244.
“and (B) South Africa, NTD deletion 241–243. (C) Structure plot showing distribution of mutations of South African variant sequences as defined by N501Y and deletion 241–243;”
“The B1.351 virus used in these studies contained the following mutations: D80A, D215G, L242-244 deleted, K417N, E484K, N501Y, D614G, A701V.”
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 38 · Cited by 992
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Faria, 2021, Genomic characterisation of an emergent SARS-CoV-2 lineage in Manaus: preliminary findings - SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus / nCoV-2019 Genomic Epidemiology - Virological, virological.org
- Authors
- Zhou, D., Dejnirattisai, W., Supasa, P., Liu, C., Mentzer, A. J., Ginn, H. M., Zhao, Y., Duyvesteyn, H. M. E., Tuekprakhon, A., Nutalai, R., Wang, B., Paesen, G. C., Lopez-Camacho, C., Slon-Campos, J., Hallis, B., Coombes, N., Bewley, K., Charlton, S., Walter, T. S., Skelly, D., Lumley, S. F., Dold, C., Levin, R., Dong, T., Pollard, A. J., Knight, J. C., Crook, D., Lambe, T., Clutterbuck, E., Bibi, S., Flaxman, A., Bittaye, M., Belij-Rammerstorfer, S., Gilbert, S., James, W., Carroll, M. W., Klenerman, P., Barnes, E., Dunachie, S. J., Fry, E. E., Mongkolsapaya, J., Ren, J., Stuart, D. I., & Screaton, G. R.
- Affiliations
- Centre for Human Genetics (GB)
- Instruct-ERIC (GB)
- Public Health England (GB)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Worthing Hospital (GB)
- Siriraj Hospital (TH)
- Corresponding author
- Mongkolsapaya, Juthathip
- Ren, Jingshan
- Stuart, David I.
- Screaton, Gavin R.
- ORCID
- Zhou, Daming
- Dejnirattisai, Wanwisa
- Supasa, Piyada
- Liu, Chang
- Mentzer, Alexander J.
- Ginn, Helen M.
- Zhao, Yuguang
- Duyvesteyn, Helen M.E.
- Tuekprakhon, Aekkachai
- Nutalai, Rungtiwa
- Wang, Beibei
- Paesen, Guido C.
- Lopez-Camacho, Cesar
- Slon-Campos, Jose
- Hallis, Bassam
- Coombes, Naomi
- Bewley, Kevin
- Charlton, Sue
- Walter, Thomas S.
- Skelly, Donal
- Lumley, Sheila F.
- Dold, Christina
- Dong, Tao
- Pollard, Andrew J.
- Knight, Julian C.
- Crook, Derrick
- Lambe, Teresa
- Clutterbuck, Elizabeth
- Bibi, Sagida
- Flaxman, Amy
- Bittaye, Mustapha
- Gilbert, Sarah
- James, William
- Carroll, Miles W.
- Klenerman, Paul
- Barnes, Eleanor
- Dunachie, Susanna J.
- Fry, Elizabeth E.
- Mongkolsapaya, Juthathip
- Ren, Jingshan
- Stuart, David I.
- Screaton, Gavin R.
- Venue
- Cell
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-04
- Volume
- 184
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2348-2361.e6
- ISSN
- 0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7901269
- OpenAlex
- W3131995220
- Cited by
- 992
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 129 · 2022: 366 · 2021: 393 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 74.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Cell (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Greater South Information System
- Funders
- UK Research and Innovation
- Medical Research Council (ACE2, MR/N00065X/1, 203141/Z/16/Z, 095541/A/11/Z, 090532/Z/09/Z)
- Public Health England
- National Institute for Health Research
- Department of Health and Social Care
- NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre
- National Institutes of Health (U19 I082360, WT204969/Z/16/Z)
- Wellcome Trust (101122/Z/13/Z)
- Cancer Research UK (C375/A17721)
- Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations
- Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
- China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences (2018-I2M-2-002)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Virus Infections Studies
- Keywords
- SARS-CoV-2, B.1.351 variant, immune evasion, spike protein mutations, receptor binding domain, E484K, K417N, N501Y, ACE2 binding, monoclonal antibody neutralization, vaccine-induced immunity, convalescent serum, COVID-19 vaccines, structure-function analysis
- MeSH terms
- COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Vaccines, COVID-19 Serotherapy, Animals, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Chlorocebus aethiops, Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Immunization, Passive, Models, Molecular, Mutation, Neutralization Tests, Protein Binding, Vero Cells, HEK293 Cells
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-06.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-06.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review