BacPROTACs mediate targeted protein degradation in bacteria
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Hijacking the cellular protein degradation system offers unique opportunities for drug discovery, as exemplified by proteolysis-targeting chimeras. Despite their great promise for medical chemistry, so far, it has not been possible to reprogram the bacterial degradation machinery to interfere with microbial infections. Here, we develop small-molecule degraders, so-called BacPROTACs, that bind to the substrate receptor of the ClpC:ClpP protease, priming neo-substrates for degradation. In addition to their targeting function, BacPROTACs activate ClpC, transforming the resting unfoldase into its functional state. The induced higher-order oligomer was visualized by cryo-EM analysis, providing a structural snapshot of activated ClpC unfolding a protein substrate. Finally, drug susceptibility and degradation assays performed in mycobacteria demonstrate in vivo activity of BacPROTACs, allowing selective targeting of endogenous proteins via fusion to an established degron. In addition to guiding antibiotic discovery, the BacPROTAC technology presents a versatile research tool enabling the inducible degradation of bacterial proteins.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Varadi, M., Anyango, S., Deshpande, M., Nair, S., Natassia, C., Yordanova, G., Yuan, D., Stroe, O., Wood, G., Laydon, A., et al. (2022) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkab1061 · Cited by 7,850 · see citing works
Semi-supervised learning for peptide identification from shotgun proteomics datasets
Käll, L., Canterbury, J. D., Weston, J., Noble, W. S., & MacCoss, M. J. (2007) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth1113 · Cited by 2,424 · see citing works
Phthalimide conjugation as a strategy for in vivo target protein degradation
Winter, G. E., Buckley, D. L., Paulk, J., Roberts, J. M., Souza, A., Dhe-Paganon, S., & Bradner, J. E. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aab1433 · Cited by 1,760 · see citing works
Protac-Induced Protein Degradation in Drug Discovery: Breaking the Rules or Just Making New Ones?
Churcher, I. (2018) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b01272 · Cited by 491 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chasing molecular glue degraders: screening approaches
Domostegui, A., Nieto-Barrado, L., Perez-Lopez, C., & Mayor-Ruiz, C. (2022) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d2cs00197g · Cited by 200 · see citing works
Ligandability of E3 Ligases for Targeted Protein Degradation Applications
Belcher, B. P., Ward, C. C., & Nomura, D. K. (2023) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.biochem.1c00464 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Molecular glue degraders: exciting opportunities for novel drug discovery
Lemaitre, T., Cornu, M., Schwalen, F., Since, M., Kieffer, C., & Voisin-Chiret, A. S. (2024) · Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery · doi:10.1080/17460441.2024.2306845 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
- Authors
- Morreale, F. E., Kleine, S., Leodolter, J., Junker, S., Hoi, D. M., Ovchinnikov, S., Okun, A., Kley, J., Kurzbauer, R., Junk, L., Guha, S., Podlesainski, D., Kazmaier, U., Boehmelt, G., Weinstabl, H., Rumpel, K., Schmiedel, V. M., Hartl, M., Haselbach, D., Meinhart, A., Kaiser, M., & Clausen, T.
- Affiliations
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (AT)
- University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
- Saarland University (DE)
- Boehringer Ingelheim (Austria) (AT)
- Max Perutz Labs (AT)
- Corresponding author
- Kaiser, Markus
- Clausen, Tim
- ORCID
- Venue
- Cell
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-06
- Volume
- 185
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 2338-2353.e18
- ISSN
- 0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9240326
- OpenAlex
- W4281780442
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 38 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 4 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 12.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Cell (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- European Research Council
- Vienna Science and Technology Fund (LS17-029)
- Boehringer Ingelheim
- Österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft (852936)
- Universität des Saarlandes
- Instituto Mexicano del Petróleo
- Horizon 2020 (AdG 694978)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Heat shock proteins research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
- Keywords
- PROTACs, targeted protein degradation, substrate receptor, mycobacteria, antibiotic discovery, cryo-EM structure
- MeSH terms
- Bacteria, Bacterial Proteins, Molecular Chaperones, Proteolysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review