Cited by 108Bacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyMicrobial Community Ecology and PhysiologyGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

Genetic manipulation of Patescibacteria provides mechanistic insights into microbial dark matter and the epibiotic lifestyle

Open access
Wang, Yaxi, Gallagher, Larry A., Andrade, Pia A., Liu, Andi, Humphreys, Ian R., Turkarslan, Serdar, Cutler, Kevin J., Arrieta-Ortiz, Mario L. +8 more·2023·Cell

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Patescibacteria, also known as the candidate phyla radiation (CPR), are a diverse group of bacteria that constitute a disproportionately large fraction of microbial dark matter. Its few cultivated members, belonging mostly to Saccharibacteria, grow as epibionts on host Actinobacteria. Due to a lack of suitable tools, the genetic basis of this lifestyle and other unique features of Patescibacteira remain unexplored. Here, we show that Saccharibacteria exhibit natural competence, and we exploit this property for their genetic manipulation. Imaging of fluorescent protein-labeled Saccharibacteria provides high spatiotemporal resolution of phenomena accompanying epibiotic growth, and a transposon-insertion sequencing (Tn-seq) genome-wide screen reveals the contribution of enigmatic Saccharibacterial genes to growth on their hosts. Finally, we leverage metagenomic data to provide cutting-edge protein structure-based bioinformatic resources that support the strain Southlakia epibionticum and its corresponding host, Actinomyces israelii, as a model system for unlocking the molecular underpinnings of the epibiotic lifestyle.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2023.08.017

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Wang, Y., Gallagher, L. A., Andrade, P. A., Liu, A., Humphreys, I. R., Turkarslan, S., Cutler, K. J., Arrieta-Ortiz, M. L., Li, Y., Radey, M. C., McLean, J. S., Cong, Q., Baker, D., Baliga, N. S., Peterson, S. B., & Mougous, J. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Institute for Systems Biology (US)
  • Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Mougous, Joseph D.
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-10
Volume
186
Issue
22
Pages
4803-4817.e13
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4386498269
Cited by
108
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 1
FWCI
18.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (R01AI128215, R01AI141953, R01DE023810)
  • NSF
  • University of Washington
  • U.S. Department of Defense
  • Southwestern Medical Foundation
  • HHMI
  • Defense Threat Reduction Agency
  • Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP1156262)
  • National Science Foundation (IIBR-2042948, IOS-2050550, MCB-2105570)
  • Welch Foundation (I-2095-20220331)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
Patescibacteria, Candidate Phyla Radiation, microbial dark matter, Saccharibacteria, natural competence, genetic engineering, epibiosis, Actinomyces israelii, transposon sequencing, fluorescent protein tagging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review