Cited by 56Bacteriophages and microbial interactionsCRISPR and Genetic EngineeringBacterial Genetics and Biotechnology

DNA end sensing and cleavage by the Shedu anti-phage defense system

Open access
Loeff, Luuk, Walter, Alexander, Rosalen, Gian Tizio, Jinek, Martin·2025·Cell

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The detection of molecular patterns associated with invading pathogens is a hallmark of innate immune systems. Prokaryotes deploy sophisticated host defense mechanisms in innate anti-phage immunity. Shedu is a single-component defense system comprising a putative nuclease SduA. Here, we report cryoelectron microscopy (cryo-EM) structures of apo- and double-stranded DNA (dsDNA)-bound tetrameric SduA assemblies, revealing that the N-terminal domains of SduA form a clamp that recognizes free DNA ends. End binding positions the DNA over the PD-(D/E)XK nuclease domain, resulting in dsDNA nicking at a fixed distance from the 5' end. The end-directed DNA nicking activity of Shedu prevents propagation of linear DNA in vivo. Finally, we show that phages escape Shedu immunity by suppressing their recombination-dependent DNA replication pathway. Taken together, these results define the antiviral mechanism of Shedu systems, underlining the paradigm that recognition of pathogen-specific nucleic acid structures is a conserved feature of innate immunity across all domains of life.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2024.11.030

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Loeff, L., Walter, A., Rosalen, G. T., & Jinek, M.
Affiliations
University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Loeff, Luuk
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-02
Volume
188
Issue
3
Pages
721-733.e17
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4405925000
Cited by
56
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 8
FWCI
15.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DORA PSI (Paul Scherrer Institute) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
  • EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (845268)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • European Research Council (CRISPR2.0, 820152)
  • Functional Genomics Center Zurich
  • Vallee Foundation
  • National Center of Competence in Research Chemical Biology
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Keywords
DNA nicking, innate immunity, double-stranded DNA binding, cryo-EM structure
MeSH terms
Bacterial Proteins, Bacteriophages, DNA, DNA Replication, Escherichia coli, Immunity, Innate, Models, Molecular, Cryoelectron Microscopy, Escherichia coli Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review