Cited by 42Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalitiesCancer Genomics and DiagnosticsSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics

Single-cell, genome-wide sequencing identifies clonal somatic copy-number variation in the human brain

Open access
Cai, Xuyu, Evrony, Gilad D., Lehmann, Hillel S., Elhosary, Princess C., Mehta, Bhaven K., Poduri, Annapurna, Walsh, Christopher A.·2015·Cell Reports

Abstract

(Cell Reports 8, 1280–1289; September 11, 2014) In the original published version, an Accession Numbers section was missing. This section has since been added to the article. The authors regret the error. Single-Cell, Genome-wide Sequencing Identifies Clonal Somatic Copy-Number Variation in the Human BrainCai et al.Cell ReportsAugust 21, 2014In BriefCai et al. performed copy-number analysis on over 200 single cells, including glia and >160 neurons and glia isolated from primary human brain tissue. Although most neurons in normal brains are euploid, large subchromosomal CNVs were commonly identified, suggesting genetic heterogeneity within normal human brains. Clonal somatic CNVs were identified from both normal and diseased human brains, suggesting that CNVs occurring during neurogenesis can have a wide range of functional impacts on human cognitive function. Full-Text PDF Open Access

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.01.028

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent advances in next generation sequencing and single cell genomics have enabled detection of somatic genomic variations in specific cells and healthy and diseased human brains.

    “Recent advances in next generation sequencing and single cell genomics have enabled the detection of somatic genomic variations in specific cells and healthy and diseased human brains (Cai et al., 2015; Hu et al., 2014; Marin-Valencia et al., 2014).”
  • Certain neurodevelopmental diseases are caused by de novo somatic mutations in neural progenitors that expand clonally to produce aberrations in specific neural cell types and brain regions.

    “For example, these studies have demonstrated that certain neurodevelopmental diseases are caused by de novo somatic mutations in neural progenitors that then expand clonally to produce aberrations in specific neural cell types and brain regions (Cai et al., 2015; Hu et al., 2014; Marin-Valencia et al., 2014).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cai, X., Evrony, G. D., Lehmann, H. S., Elhosary, P. C., Mehta, B. K., Poduri, A., & Walsh, C. A.
Corresponding author
Walsh, Christopher A.
Venue
Cell Reports
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-02
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
645
ISSN
2211-1247 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4244739225
Cited by
42
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
3.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Keywords
somatic copy number variation, human brain, single-cell sequencing, neuronal heterogeneity, glial cells, neurogenesis, genetic heterogeneity, cognitive function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review