Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 453

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cancer-Associated SF3B1 Hotspot Mutations Induce Cryptic 3′ Splice Site Selection through Use of a Different Branch Point

Open access
Darman, Rachel B., Seiler, Michael, Agrawal, Anant A., Lim, Kian H., Peng, Shouyong, Aird, Daniel, Bailey, Suzanna L., Bhavsar, Erica B., Chan, Betty, Colla, Simona, Corson, Laura, Feala, Jacob, Fekkes, Peter, Ichikawa, Kana, Keaney, Gregg F., Lee, Linda, Kumar, Pavan, Kunii, Kaiko, MacKenzie, Crystal, Matijevic, Mark, Mizui, Yoshiharu, Myint, Khin, Park, Eun Sun, Puyang, Xiaoling, Selvaraj, Anand, Thomas, Michael P., Tsai, Jennifer, Wang, John Y., Warmuth, Markus, Yang, Hui, Zhu, Ping, Garcia-Manero, Guillermo, Furman, Richard R., Yu, Lihua, Smith, Peter G., Buonamici, Silvia·2015·Cell Reports

Abstract

Recurrent mutations in the spliceosome are observed in several human cancers, but their functional and therapeutic significance remains elusive. SF3B1, the most frequently mutated component of the spliceosome in cancer, is involved in the recognition of the branch point sequence (BPS) during selection of the 3' splice site (ss) in RNA splicing. Here, we report that common and tumor-specific splicing aberrations are induced by SF3B1 mutations and establish aberrant 3' ss selection as the most frequent splicing defect. Strikingly, mutant SF3B1 utilizes a BPS that differs from that used by wild-type SF3B1 and requires the canonical 3' ss to enable aberrant splicing during the second step. Approximately 50% of the aberrantly spliced mRNAs are subjected to nonsense-mediated decay resulting in downregulation of gene and protein expression. These findings ascribe functional significance to the consequences of SF3B1 mutations in cancer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.09.053

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Cited by

See all 453

Metadata

Authors
Darman, R. B., Seiler, M., Agrawal, A. A., Lim, K. H., Peng, S., Aird, D., Bailey, S. L., Bhavsar, E. B., Chan, B., Colla, S., Corson, L., Feala, J., Fekkes, P., Ichikawa, K., Keaney, G. F., Lee, L., Kumar, P., Kunii, K., MacKenzie, C., Matijevic, M., Mizui, Y., Myint, K., Park, E. S., Puyang, X., Selvaraj, A., Thomas, M. P., Tsai, J., Wang, J. Y., Warmuth, M., Yang, H., Zhu, P., Garcia-Manero, G., Furman, R. R., Yu, L., Smith, P. G., & Buonamici, S.
Venue
Cell Reports
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-11
Volume
13
Issue
5
Pages
1033-1045
ISSN
2211-1247 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2193225046
Cited by
453
References
13
FWCI
14.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cancer-Associated SF3B1 Hotspot Mutations Induce Cryptic 3′ Splice Site Selection through Use of a Different Branch Point. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.celrep.2015.09.053
The paper
Darman, R. B., Seiler, M., Agrawal, A. A., Lim, K. H., Peng, S., Aird, D., Bailey, S. L., Bhavsar, E. B., Chan, B., Colla, S., Corson, L., Feala, J., Fekkes, P., Ichikawa, K., Keaney, G. F., Lee, L., Kumar, P., Kunii, K., MacKenzie, C., . . . Buonamici, S. (2015). Cancer-Associated SF3B1 Hotspot Mutations Induce Cryptic 3′ Splice Site Selection through Use of a Different Branch Point. Cell Reports. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2015.09.053

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.